Compare Desloc D110 Plus Smart Lock vs eufy Video Smart Lock E330

Access logs were useful for seeing lock history, entry timing, and who entered.

Reviewers who evaluated event history found it useful for checking clips and seeing who came or went, especially for family awareness.

The app was generally described as simple, easy, and user-friendly, with good access controls and setup flow.

The app was consistently praised as simple, polished, and useful for setup, live view, lock control, access management, and monitoring.

Auto-lock was praised for peace of mind and convenience, but multiple reviewers flagged limits around timing and open-door behavior.

Auto-lock drew strong praise for reliably relocking after a set time and reducing worry about whether the door was left unlocked.

Failed-attempt lockout drew criticism from one reviewer because the settings and behavior were not clearly adjustable or explained.

The failed-attempt lockout behavior was viewed as a strong security safeguard when someone keeps entering wrong codes or fingerprints.

Battery impressions were good overall but not exceptional, ranging from solid and efficient to fine but not incredible.

Battery feedback was the most divided area: some reviewers liked the removable rechargeable pack, while others reported short runtime or slow charging.

Most reviewers described the lock as solid, sturdy, or durable for the price, while one found the construction quality questionable.

Build quality was rated very highly, with reviewers repeatedly describing the lock as metal, sturdy, well made, durable, and high quality.

Camera and doorbell performance was generally strong, with sharp 2K video, good night vision, fast loading, and useful two-way features, though field of view and door placement limited some setups.

Door-sense was a clear weakness because reviewers noted there is no door sensor and the bolt can extend while the door is open.

Door-sense was weakly supported because a reviewer specifically wanted a sensor to know whether the door was open or closed.

One reviewer cautioned that very thick doors may require modification even though standard doors worked well.

Door compatibility was a major caveat because screen doors, storm doors, deep jambs, and awkward door angles could compromise the camera or overall fit.

Existing hardware reuse scored well in the one clear opinionated case, where the lock worked with an existing strike plate and the reviewer called that nice.

Facial recognition was mixed: HomeBase-linked identification worked in one test, while another reviewer wanted face-based unlocking added.

The 90-day follow-up praised Desloc for frequent firmware updates and meaningful improvements.

Fingerprint access was one of the most praised areas, with many fast and accurate reports, though PCWorld found it hit-and-miss.

Fingerprint access was one of the strongest areas, repeatedly described as fast, accurate, responsive, convenient, and the preferred unlock method.

Guest access was praised for one-pass, scheduled, IC-card, and Airbnb-style temporary access options.

Guest access was praised when reviewers could give temporary or remote user access without handing over physical keys.

Reviewers consistently liked that no separate hub or gateway is required.

Hub requirement was mixed because the lock can work without a HomeBase, but one reviewer disliked needing a separate chime when used alone.

Industrial design was praised as sleek, ergonomic, modern, and premium-looking rather than overly bulky.

Industrial design was well liked, with reviewers calling the lock sleek, compact, sharp, premium-looking, and attractive.

Installation was usually described as quick and simple, but one reviewer had jammed bolts and another noted a short cord and over-tightening sensitivity.

Installation and setup were consistently praised as quick, easy, straightforward, foolproof, or among the easiest smart-lock setups reviewers had tried.

One reviewer specifically reported no jamming during several days of testing.

Backup mechanical keys were valued as a practical fallback, especially for power loss.

Key override reliability scored well because reviewers appreciated the hidden physical key and backup power options for dead-battery situations.

Keypad impressions were mixed: PCMag found it responsive and well-lit, PCWorld found it slow to wake, and another liked the soft glow.

The keypad was viewed positively for reliability, passcode flexibility, and backlighting, although one reviewer treated keypad access as less preferred than fingerprint.

Keyway quality was a recurring weakness because multiple reviewers noted the lock cannot be rekeyed or needs a locksmith for extra keys.

Speed was mostly positive for voice and remote response, though one reviewer found it fast but slower than pricier locks.

Lock and unlock speed scored strongly in the one clear opinionated review that called the lock fast and quiet.

Motor feel was mixed: one reviewer found it smooth and quiet, while another warned that over-tightening could make the bolt struggle.

The locking motor was praised as smooth and responsive in hands-on use.

Reliability was a strength across several reviews, with reports of perfect testing, stable 90-day use, and natural daily fit.

Locking reliability scored highly where reviewers focused on the smart-lock half, calling it responsive and saying it worked as advertised.

Notifications were useful for awareness and security, but one reviewer wanted push notifications instead of emergency emails that went to spam.

Notifications were a clear strength, with reviewers describing alerts as nearly instant, responsive, fast, or consistent.

Reviewers repeatedly liked the small on-lock display, describing it as helpful for setup, status, battery, alerts, and local control, though one saw it as basic rather than groundbreaking.

Palm vein recognition was not included, and one reviewer missed that faster, convenient method from another lock.

Physical resistance evidence was moderate: reviewers cited BHMA certification and durability, but one emphasized it is the lowest acceptable commercial level.

Remote access was a major convenience, especially for managing the lock away from home or unlocking for guests.

Remote access was rated very highly because reviewers liked being able to view, unlock, greet visitors, or control the lock from the app remotely.

Security features such as anti-peeping and anti-hijacking were viewed as useful or reassuring, with PCMag also noting enhanced security options.

Security features such as scramble passcode and failed-attempt protections were praised as sensible, useful, and security-enhancing.

Smart-home integration was the main limitation: Alexa and Google were supported, but reviewers missed HomeKit, Matter, IFTTT, or broader security-system support.

Smart-home integration was mixed-positive: Alexa, Google, Apple Watch, and Eufy ecosystem links were appreciated, but lack of HomeKit hurt one review.

The touch surface/keypad was praised as responsive, well lit, and visually integrated into the front panel.

Touchscreen visibility scored poorly in the one clear opinionated review because the keypad and doorbell button were hard to find in the dark.

User access management was a strong point, with praise for simple schedules, temporary codes, and control over different users.

User access management scored well where reviewers valued adding users, codes, and fingerprints with access rules.

Value was the broadest strength because most reviewers saw a lot of features for the price, although PCWorld rejected the value claim after testing.

Value was mostly positive thanks to all-in-one convenience and savings versus higher-tier models, though one reviewer stressed that the lock is not cheap.

Voice control worked well in the reviews that tested it, especially with Alexa and Google Assistant.

Voice control was positively received, especially Alexa integration, chime support, and hands-free unlocking through assistants.

Weather resistance was generally viewed positively, including rain/outdoor use, though one reviewer called the IP54 rating tame.

Weather resistance scored strongly where reviewers found the lock handled rain, hot conditions, or outdoor exposure well.

Built-in Wi-Fi was praised for direct connectivity and remote use, and one follow-up noted updates that improved Wi-Fi stability and power use.

Wi-Fi was mixed-positive: one reviewer saw fast alerts even on weak 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, while another warned experience depends on network strength.