Compare myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock vs eufy Video Smart Lock S330

The app can associate access with individual PINs or users, giving at least basic visibility into who opened the door.

Reviewers who discussed logs found useful entry history, including how the lock opened and which fingerprint was used, with one transcript explicitly describing an activity log.

The included chime can get loud enough for household alerts across rooms or floors, though reviewers discussed chime volume rather than a separate siren.

Reviewers consistently describe the myQ app as central to setup, settings, unlocking, device management, and camera/lock control.

The app was generally praised as smooth, clean, user-friendly, and feature-rich, with live video, settings, and remote controls accessible from the phone.

Auto-lock evidence is strong, including unknown-person locking, face-based lock/unlock automation, and a configurable 90-second autolock delay.

Auto-lock was repeatedly seen as a useful peace-of-mind feature, with timing and schedule controls, although one reviewer warned it may lock when the door is open.

Wrong-try protection and passcode lockout were clearly supported, giving the lock a configurable response after repeated failed attempts.

The hands-on install shows adjustable backset handling, including the common 2-3/8 and 2-3/4 inch style positions.

Backset support is well documented for common 2 3/8-inch and 2 3/4-inch sizes.

Battery feedback is mostly positive around six-month claims and rechargeable design, with one caveat that the initial charge took several hours.

Battery feedback was strongly positive overall, with multiple reviewers citing several months of use, USB-C charging, and only occasional recharges.

Bluetooth appears during setup or internal hardware discussion, but the review evidence is limited and not performance-focused.

Bluetooth is present through the included bridge, which PCMag says contains both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth radios.

Hands-on reviewers describe the exterior as dense, secure, and well built, with general quality impressions that are strongly positive.

Build quality was consistently described as sturdy, metal, heavy-duty, or durable, although the hardware is also physically large.

Camera and doorbell evidence is broad: reviewers cite 2K HDR video, wide-angle viewing, color night vision, two-way audio, and doorbell/camera consolidation.

Camera and doorbell performance were usually praised for 2K clarity and useful detection, but a few reviews reported missed, delayed, or weaker night events.

Door-sense is supported by the included magnetic open/closed sensor and app feedback that distinguishes a door being ajar from closed.

Door-sense style features are mixed: one review praised leaving detection, while another said auto-lock did not know whether the door was open or closed.

Door fit is workable for deadbolt-style installs, though one reviewer needed to drill and prep a door that did not already have a deadbolt.

Deadbolt fit is the biggest installation caveat: it replaces a standard deadbolt but can be sensitive to strike-plate depth, alignment, and size constraints.

Existing hardware reuse is limited because the lock replaces the deadbolt and may require new drilling if the door is not already prepared.

SafeWise explicitly noted that the existing deadbolt can be reused if the Eufy deadbolt does not fit flush.

At least one long-term reviewer observed a useful live-view unlocking feature added after the original review.

Fingerprint support is repeatedly mentioned and tested, with reviewers treating it as one of the main everyday unlock methods.

Fingerprint performance was split: several reviewers called it fast and accurate, while PCWorld had repeated recognition problems.

Geofencing or phone-proximity unlock was not available in the reviewed app experience; one reviewer specifically wished for it.

Guest and temporary access are supported through PIN codes, user-specific pins, and quick passes for short-term access.

Guest access is a strength, with temporary passcodes, schedules, and easy programming mentioned across reviews.

Review evidence points to direct Wi-Fi setup and optional accessories rather than a clearly required hub, though no review gives a formal no-hub statement.

The bridge/chime is central to the system: reviewers described it as included, useful for indoor chimes and storage, and in one case mandatory.

Setup is usually described as clear or easy, but the most detailed install shows extra work for drilling, strike prep, calibration, and alignment.

Installation was mostly manageable and often easy, but several reviewers noted alignment, strike-plate depth, or two-handed handling challenges.

Jam detection can be frustrating when calibration or strike-plate depth is off, with one reviewer saying the app kept showing jammed despite a secure bolt.

A physical key remains available as a backup, with reviewers noting included keys and a concealed keyhole under the doorbell cover.

Key backup is well covered: reviewers repeatedly noted the hidden or included physical key option for emergencies.

The keypad supports PIN entry and is described as visible during setup, with one reviewer noting the touch-sensitive design instead of physical buttons.

The keypad generally worked well and supports PIN entry, though one review found the touchscreen sometimes needed extra wake-up taps.

Speed evidence is strong, including two-second unlock claims and hands-on praise for fast facial recognition.

Lock and unlock speed was strong in favorable tests, especially through fingerprint access, with instant or very quick operation reported.

Motor operation is described positively overall, with smooth inside locking and working app lock/unlock, though one install needed strike cleanup.

The motor can be sensitive to deadbolt alignment; one review warned it may fail to lock if the motor struggles.

Hands-on testing found the unlock methods working after setup, with reliability depending partly on correct strike alignment.

Locking reliability ranged from flawless or year-long solid use to sensitivity when alignment was imperfect or one-touch locking failed.

Notifications include context-aware alerts, motion alerts, access alerts, and paid detection labels that identify what triggered an alert.

Notifications were generally fast and useful for activity, motion, lock/unlock events, and thumbnails, though one review noted delayed motion recording.

Physical resistance evidence is limited: one review says no BHMA/ANSI grade is disclosed, while another notes a stronger strike component.

Physical resistance was not attack-tested, but the lock offers extra screws for added security and reviewers described sturdy hardware.

Pick or drill resistance is not independently tested; the only related evidence is the lack of a disclosed BHMA/ANSI grade.

Remote access is well supported, with app-based lock/unlock control described for letting someone in when the owner is away.

Remote access was a clear strength, with reviewers locking or unlocking from the app, even away from home.

Security evidence is strongest for biometric privacy because one reviewer says face scans stay on the device rather than the cloud.

Security features include scramble passcodes, wrong-try protection, and an encryption message, while one review also mentioned broader Eufy privacy concerns.

Integration is mixed: myQ ecosystem integration is presented as a strength, but popular third-party platforms are described as unsupported or previously restricted.

Alexa and Google support were consistently reported, while reviewers also consistently noted missing HomeKit, IFTTT, and Matter support.

The front keypad is touch-sensitive, though one reviewer notes physical buttons may be a personal preference for some users.

Touchscreen and touchpad feedback was mixed, ranging from PCMag's responsive touchpad to PCWorld's wake-up issues.

User management is strong, with evidence for managing users, assigning PINs, adding fingerprints, adding another user, and short-term access.

User access management is strong, with high user/fingerprint limits, individual codes, and easy additional-user enrollment.

Value is mixed: reviewers like the all-in-one design, but price, overkill for simple needs, and subscription-gated features create clear caveats.

Reviewers generally found the price reasonable for the all-in-one lock, doorbell, camera, local storage, and no-fee value, while still calling it pricey.

Voice-control evidence is negative because reviewers cite removed Google Assistant support and lack of Amazon Alexa or Google Home integration.

Voice control works through Alexa and Google according to multiple reviews, but Apple ecosystem support is absent.

Support evidence is a concern because one review highlights disabled third-party support and broader consumer skepticism about Chamberlain’s practices.

Weather evidence is positive, including the stated -4°F to 140°F range and hands-on praise for a moisture-sealing rubber gasket.

Weather resistance is supported by an IP65 waterproof rating and operating-temperature claims in the reviewed materials.

Wi-Fi support is directly shown in review evidence, including connection to a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi network during setup.

Wi-Fi works through the bridge and supports remote use, but reviewers noted 2.4GHz-only setup and dependence on the bridge/chime connection.