Compare myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock vs Desloc D110 Plus Smart Lock

The app can associate access with individual PINs or users, giving at least basic visibility into who opened the door.

Event history and logs are repeatedly mentioned for locks, unlocks, activity, users, and alarm events.

Reviewers consistently describe the myQ app as central to setup, settings, unlocking, device management, and camera/lock control.

The app is generally considered straightforward for status, access, settings, and control, with one reviewer only calling the overall feature set adequate.

Auto-lock evidence is strong, including unknown-person locking, face-based lock/unlock automation, and a configurable 90-second autolock delay.

Auto-lock is widely supported and usually convenient, but missing door sensing makes it risky when the door is open.

Failed-attempt protection is supported through wrong-try/security lockout evidence, and later firmware reportedly added repeated-unlock protection.

The hands-on install shows adjustable backset handling, including the common 2-3/8 and 2-3/4 inch style positions.

GearBrain specifically listed support for 2-3/8-inch or 2-3/4-inch backsets.

Battery feedback is mostly positive around six-month claims and rechargeable design, with one caveat that the initial charge took several hours.

Battery life is commonly described around four AA batteries and six months, with some concern about Wi-Fi drain before updates.

Bluetooth appears during setup or internal hardware discussion, but the review evidence is limited and not performance-focused.

Bluetooth appears as setup or local connectivity support rather than a headline feature.

Hands-on reviewers describe the exterior as dense, secure, and well built, with general quality impressions that are strongly positive.

Most reviews describe solid build, BHMA/IP-rated durability, or good build for the price; PCWorld was the main outlier on questionable construction.

Camera and doorbell evidence is broad: reviewers cite 2K HDR video, wide-angle viewing, color night vision, two-way audio, and doorbell/camera consolidation.

Door-sense is supported by the included magnetic open/closed sensor and app feedback that distinguishes a door being ajar from closed.

Reviewers agree it lacks a door sensor, so time-based auto-lock can throw the bolt even if the door is open.

Door fit is workable for deadbolt-style installs, though one reviewer needed to drill and prep a door that did not already have a deadbolt.

Evidence supports standard U.S. deadbolt sizing and auto left/right door detection, while one reviewer cautioned against very thick doors.

Existing hardware reuse is limited because the lock replaces the deadbolt and may require new drilling if the door is not already prepared.

Existing-hardware reuse is mixed: one reviewer reused an existing deadlock, while another said the lock replaces the entire deadbolt.

Firmware updates improved Wi-Fi stability, power usage, passcode masking, auto-lock behavior, and feature availability.

Fingerprint support is repeatedly mentioned and tested, with reviewers treating it as one of the main everyday unlock methods.

Most reviewers found fingerprint access fast or accurate; PCWorld was the main negative outlier with hit-and-miss scans.

Guest and temporary access are supported through PIN codes, user-specific pins, and quick passes for short-term access.

Temporary, one-pass, scheduled, and Airbnb-style access are well-supported across reviews.

Review evidence points to direct Wi-Fi setup and optional accessories rather than a clearly required hub, though no review gives a formal no-hub statement.

Reviewers repeatedly emphasize direct Wi-Fi operation without a separate hub or gateway.

Setup is usually described as clear or easy, but the most detailed install shows extra work for drilling, strike prep, calibration, and alignment.

Most reviewers found setup simple, with app-guided onboarding and auto door-hand detection, but PCWorld and GearBrain reported hardware, cord, or overtightening problems.

A physical key remains available as a backup, with reviewers noting included keys and a concealed keyhole under the doorbell cover.

Multiple reviewers confirm a mechanical key or keyway backup, and several frame it as a reliable fallback if power or electronics fail.

The keypad supports PIN entry and is described as visible during setup, with one reviewer noting the touch-sensitive design instead of physical buttons.

Keypad evidence is mixed: one review praised responsiveness and lighting, another said it was slow to wake, and others noted backlit or passcode features.

Speed evidence is strong, including two-second unlock claims and hands-on praise for fast facial recognition.

Fingerprint and voice/app responses are often described as quick, snappy, or instant, though one reviewer found it slower than other locks.

Motor operation is described positively overall, with smooth inside locking and working app lock/unlock, though one install needed strike cleanup.

Motor evidence is mixed: PCWorld found operation smooth and quiet, while GearBrain warned overtightening could make the bolt struggle.

Hands-on testing found the unlock methods working after setup, with reliability depending partly on correct strike alignment.

Most hands-on reviewers reported reliable operation, including no jamming, stable 90-day use, and successful remote or app use.

Notifications include context-aware alerts, motion alerts, access alerts, and paid detection labels that identify what triggered an alert.

Reviewers saw lock status, user, and alarm notifications, though one noted emergency emails went to spam.

Physical resistance evidence is limited: one review says no BHMA/ANSI grade is disclosed, while another notes a stronger strike component.

BHMA Grade 3, cycle, salt-spray, impact, and residential-security claims support basic physical durability, not premium security.

Pick or drill resistance is not independently tested; the only related evidence is the lack of a disclosed BHMA/ANSI grade.

Remote access is well supported, with app-based lock/unlock control described for letting someone in when the owner is away.

Remote locking, unlocking, monitoring, and code management are consistently supported when Wi-Fi is enabled.

Security evidence is strongest for biometric privacy because one reviewer says face scans stay on the device rather than the cloud.

Evidence supports anti-peep PINs, failed-attempt lockout, anti-hijack alerts, and encrypted biometric storage.

Integration is mixed: myQ ecosystem integration is presented as a strength, but popular third-party platforms are described as unsupported or previously restricted.

Alexa and Google support is consistent, but reviewers repeatedly flag missing HomeKit, Matter, IFTTT, or deeper security-platform integration.

Only one review clearly mentions a tamper-triggered anti-hijack alarm, so evidence is limited.

The front keypad is touch-sensitive, though one reviewer notes physical buttons may be a personal preference for some users.

The touch/display experience is generally useful for keypad entry, status, battery, and visual feedback, but it remains basic.

User management is strong, with evidence for managing users, assigning PINs, adding fingerprints, adding another user, and short-term access.

User management is one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly citing user profiles, fingerprints, PINs, schedules, and permissions.

Value is mixed: reviewers like the all-in-one design, but price, overkill for simple needs, and subscription-gated features create clear caveats.

Most reviewers saw strong value or sub-$100 appeal; PCWorld was the clearest dissent, saying compromises undercut the value.

Voice-control evidence is negative because reviewers cite removed Google Assistant support and lack of Amazon Alexa or Google Home integration.

Voice control through Alexa and Google is directly supported, with several reviewers describing successful or seamless use.

Support evidence is a concern because one review highlights disabled third-party support and broader consumer skepticism about Chamberlain’s practices.

Formal warranty was not reviewed, but support evidence is positive through repeated firmware updates and customer-responsive enhancements.

Weather evidence is positive, including the stated -4°F to 140°F range and hands-on praise for a moisture-sealing rubber gasket.

Reviewers repeatedly cite IP-rated dust and water resistance or durability testing, though one review called the IP54 rating tame.

Wi-Fi support is directly shown in review evidence, including connection to a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi network during setup.

Built-in Wi-Fi is a central strength, supporting remote status/control and later firmware improvements.