Compare Edifier NeoBuds Planar Earbuds vs Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

ANC is broadly seen as good to impressive for everyday noise, though several reviewers note it is not the strongest at this price or for deep low-frequency rumble.

ANC is broadly strong and often near flagship level, though several reviewers say it still falls short of the very best Bose-style silence.

Android compatibility is positive, with easy Android pairing and Android-only hi-res codec benefits noted.

Android compatibility is praised for LDAC, fast pairing, and strong ANC value with Android phones.

The app is mostly praised as useful, stable, and customizable, although one reviewer found its look ugly and another noted missing device-list convenience.

The app is mostly praised for useful controls, customization, stability, and EQ access, despite some complaints about layout.

aptX support is treated as part of the product’s unusually broad high-resolution codec package, including aptX Adaptive and lossless-related support.

aptX support is a weakness because one reviewer specifically wished Qualcomm aptX codecs were included.

Latency and gaming support are viewed positively, with reviewers noting strong gaming performance and premium audio use beyond music.

Video sync is mostly strong, with two reviewers reporting zero or no visible lag, while one notes a slight delay with some codecs.

Auracast support is a concern in one scored review because the reviewer criticizes its absence.

Bass is the most divisive sound attribute: some reviewers heard deep or strong bass with the right fit or preset, while others found it light, thin, or lacking punch.

Bass is widely praised for depth, control, punch, and low distortion, with only one review criticizing the default balance as too boomy.

Battery life is average to mediocre overall; some reviewers found it acceptable, but many expected more from a premium-priced earbud.

Battery life is consistently a strength, with reviewers praising long ANC runtime and major improvement over the AZ80.

Bluetooth performance has limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer praising range after staying connected across an office.

Bluetooth reliability is consistently praised, with reviewers reporting stable connections and no meaningful dropouts.

Build quality is mostly positive, with reviewers praising finish and construction, though one noted cheap-looking plastic.

Build quality is praised as premium, tactile, mature, and a substantial step forward.

Hi-res playback and audiophile-grade sound receive strong praise in the available evidence.

Hi-res playback is praised in the one scored review, where LDAC/FLAC listening brought more detail, solidity, and space.

The squeeze or pinch controls are usually considered reliable and customizable, though a few reviewers found them delayed or weaker than top competitors.

Control remapping is praised as unusually flexible and useful across the app and earbuds.

Carry case impressions are mixed: reviewers liked its secure magnets or compact/pocketable feel, but others criticized its size, looks, or chunkiness.

Case quality is mixed: it is compact and pocketable, but multiple reviewers criticize weak magnets, rattle, scratches, or bland styling.

Charging is a positive convenience point, especially wireless charging and quick top-ups.

Charging is viewed positively where evaluated, especially wireless charging and case convenience.

Codec support is a major strength, repeatedly praised as exhaustive or unusually complete for high-resolution listening.

Codec support is praised for LDAC/LC3 breadth, but the absence of aptX is called a mild limitation.

Long-use comfort is generally strong, with several reviewers wearing them for hours or all day, though one review found comfort only medium over time.

Comfort trends positive thanks to smaller, lighter ergonomics, but fit fatigue and bulk remain concerns for some ears.

Design is subjective and split, with reviewers admiring its distinctive modern look while others called it unattractive, retro, or an acquired taste.

Design and aesthetics are generally praised as premium, sleek, compact, or classy, though a few reviewers find the look plain.

Fit is highly important and mostly positive; reviewers found better bass and stability once the right tips or seal were achieved.

Eartip fit is generally good with the right size, but some reviewers report looseness, bulk, or falling out.

Ear tip size options are praised for helping users find the right fit and bass seal.

Ear tip options are considered useful and generous, especially for finding the right fit across ear sizes.

EQ customization is polarizing: reviewers like the depth and flexibility, but many criticize limited bands, poor bass impact, or weak responsiveness.

EQ customization is a clear strength, with many reviewers praising the eight-band control and meaningful tuning options.

Find My support is useful for peace of mind, though one reviewer is disappointed by the location behavior.

Reviewers describe the frequency balance as generally accurate and controlled, with strong detail and tonality, though the bass region is less consistently weighted.

Frequency response impressions are mixed: one review calls it strange, while others praise accuracy, balance, and low distortion.

Included accessories get positive limited evidence, especially the multiple tips and protective pouch/case cover.

Included accessories draw criticism where reviewed because foam tips are missing despite multiple silicone tip sizes.

Instrument separation is one of the clearest consensus wins, with reviewers repeatedly praising clean layering, precise reproduction, and strong detail retrieval.

Instrument separation is a standout strength, with reviewers hearing layers, voices, and complex arrangements as distinct and clearly placed.

The integrated microphone setup is adequate in limited evidence, but not a leading strength.

Independent left/right earbud use is praised as convenient and useful when scored.

LDAC support is repeatedly included in reviewers’ praise for the broad high-resolution codec package.

LDAC is received positively for higher-quality playback and better sound from compatible Android or hi-res sources.

Lossless audio support is a strength within the broader codec package, with reviewers treating the support as unusually complete.

Maximum-volume clarity is praised for staying clean and distortion-free even at high levels.

Microphone noise reduction is mixed: some reviewers heard good wind or background reduction, while others found ambient noise pickup and noisy conditions problematic.

Microphone noise reduction is polarized: several reviewers praise wind and background suppression, while one reports failed clarity and cutouts.

Call quality ranges from excellent to merely okay, with most reviewers finding voices intelligible but not always natural, loud, or class-leading.

Call quality is mixed, ranging from serviceable or excellent in some reviews to choppy, robotic, or poor in others.

Midrange and vocals are usually praised as clear, detailed, and natural, with one reviewer noting vocal volume could dip in the mix.

Midrange and vocals are generally described as clear, detailed, warm, and more forward than the previous model.

Multi-platform compatibility is positive in limited evidence, with codec support framed as useful across Qualcomm, MediaTek, and Google Tensor phones.

Multi-platform compatibility is praised because the app and customization work across iOS and Android.

Multipoint is useful and sometimes seamless, but not consistently reliable; one reviewer had to switch manually while others reported smooth pause-and-play behavior.

Multipoint is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising reliable switching and three-device connectivity.

Passive isolation was described as decent with a proper fit, but the review evidence mainly focuses on ANC rather than unpowered isolation.

Passive isolation is viewed positively when the tips seal well, with reviewers noting isolation even before ANC is active.

Portability has limited positive evidence, with one reviewer calling the charging case compact.

Portability is strong because the case is repeatedly described as pocketable, small, and easy to carry.

Preset EQ profiles are generally useful, especially Dynamic, which reviewers said improved balance or impact.

Preset EQ quality is mostly positive, especially Direct, Dynamic, and Treble+ modes, though SuperBass+ is too heavy for one reviewer.

RGB/light customization has limited but positive evidence, with the case light colors treated as fun customization.

Sensors are mixed: one reviewer found wear detection unreliable, while another said it worked well.

Smudge resistance has limited positive evidence, with the matte case finish praised for helping prevent fingerprints.

Setup and software simplicity are mixed: pairing can be simple, but mode switching and Edifier-style configuration can feel sluggish or finicky.

Setup and software simplicity are mostly positive, but the lack of a physical pairing button adds friction for one reviewer.

Sound leakage is a weakness in the one scored review, which says loud music can be heard in a quiet room.

Reviewers strongly agree the NeoBuds Planar are detail-first earbuds with unusually precise, clean sound, though a few found the tuning inconsistent or easier to admire than love.

Reviewers overwhelmingly praise the AZ100's sound as clear, detailed, musical, and high-end, though one review found the stock tuning odd.

Soundstage depth is mixed: one reviewer heard no depth, another praised immersion, and another felt the presentation was pushed forward.

Soundstage depth is usually strong, with reviewers praising depth, immersion, and layering, though one long-term reviewer wanted more depth.

Several reviewers heard an open, airy, expansive soundstage, with soundstage width treated as one of the planar driver strengths.

Soundstage width receives strong praise, with reviewers describing the presentation as spacious, broad, expansive, and room-like.

Spatial audio is a clear missing-feature complaint from the available evidence.

Spatial audio is mixed: reviewers appreciate Dolby/head-tracking support, but several find it merely decent, distracting, or less clear than stereo.

Stability is mostly good for regular use and exercise, though some reviewers experienced shifting during runs or workouts.

Stability is mixed: several reviewers found the fit secure, while others would not trust it for vigorous movement.

Touch/tap responsiveness is mixed: one reviewer found the controls pretty good, while others said the tap system needs adjustment or works only most of the time.

Touch controls are generally responsive and customizable, though sensitivity and personal preference create some mixed reactions.

Transparency mode is functional but not a standout; reviewers praised voice-focused tools in one case but often found it muffled, unnatural, or merely adequate.

Transparency mode is mixed: some find it natural or useful, while others hear hiss, over-processing, or weaker situational awareness.

Treble detail is a major strength, often described as crisp, clean, or precise, but some reviewers found the highs bright, toasty, or potentially fatiguing.

Treble is usually considered clear, airy, detailed, and non-harsh, though one review says the default tuning lacks high-end content.

Value for money is heavily split by region and priorities: sound-focused reviewers can justify it, but many think the price is too high versus competitors.

Value is mixed-to-positive: reviewers like the premium feature set and sound, but several note the high price and strong competition.

Voice assistant use has limited but positive evidence, with voice commands described as swift.

Voice assistant integration is limited in coverage but works reliably where tested or described.

Volume output drew mild criticism: reviewers generally found it usable, but noted it was on the lower side and not ideal for listeners who want maximum loudness.

Volume output is praised as top-tier and very loud in the reviews that discuss it.

The water and dust rating is viewed as practical for rain, sweat, dust, and realistic everyday conditions.

Water and sweat resistance is adequate for workouts or rain, but one reviewer cautions against heavier rain exposure.

Weight comfort is positive in the limited evidence, with reviewers describing the buds as lightweight or far from heavy.

Weight comfort is praised because the earbuds feel better distributed, light, and easier to forget during use.