Compare Varmilo Muse65 HE Magnetic Keyboard vs McHose GX87 Keyboard

Acoustics were generally positive but not perfect, with several reviewers liking the sound while one wanted better spacebar sound.

Acoustics were a standout strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the thocky, poppy, solid, and very nice sound.

Actuation behavior was mostly strong, though one reviewer noted accidental deactivation at a zero bottom dead zone.

One reviewer found the switch actuation consistent, with only a slight scratchiness detectable during very slow presses.

Battery life was strongly praised, with reviewers emphasizing the large 8,000 mAh capacity and long time between charges.

Build quality was a consistent highlight, with reviewers describing the keyboard as premium, solid, metal, and tank-like.

Build quality was a major point of agreement, with every review giving positive evidence around the aluminum body, dense feel, assembly, or lack of flex.

Cable quality was a weak point in one review, where the included cable was described as cheap and not very good.

Compatibility was criticized in limited evidence because software setup required a Windows laptop.

Compatibility evidence was positive where reviewers connected QMK and VIA support to deep, flexible keyboard customization.

Connectivity had a small caveat because one reviewer found the USB-C opening too narrow for a coiled cable.

Connectivity was mixed: reviewers liked the wireless and tri-mode feature set, but noted mode-switch delay, visible front controls, and minor connectivity issues.

Customization options were mixed: the board offers layers and actuation control, but reviewers criticized the software workflow and sliders.

Customization options were a major strength, especially the magnetic or ball-catch quick-disassembly case, hot-swap design, and easy access for mods.

Reviewers repeatedly praised the Muse65 HE's appearance, calling it striking, good looking, beautiful, and nice across all five reviews.

Design aesthetics were generally positive for clean, premium, and attractive looks, but some reviewers found the styling mundane or noticed mismatched colors.

Desk space efficiency was positive in one review, which liked that TKL saves space while leaving room for an optional macro pad.

Durability evidence was positive, with reviewers tying the aluminum build and tank-like construction to a premium, durable feel.

Durability evidence centered on the solid aluminum build and PBT keycaps, which reviewers linked to lasting use.

Switch replacement was mostly easy thanks to tool-free access and hot-swap sockets, though one reviewer found reinstalling switches harder because the PCB flexes.

Ergonomics had limited positive evidence because light switches reduced fatigue during longer use.

Ergonomics received limited but positive evidence because the fixed typing angle was expected to be comfortable for most people.

Extra gaming features were criticized because the Muse65 HE lacks premium features like Snap Tap and quad-actuation.

Extra gaming features received positive evidence from one reviewer who highlighted the ultra-low-latency mode as a surprise at this price.

Frame rigidity and heft were praised because the heavy board felt stable, solid, and hard to knock around.

Frame rigidity was mostly praised for its solid, flex-free construction, though the quick-release design was seen by one reviewer as less sturdy than screws.

Gaming performance was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers reporting snappy movement, indistinguishable Hall-effect performance, and flawless play.

Gaming performance was viewed as more than adequate for casual or hybrid use, with reviewers reporting competent play across first-person and general gaming sessions.

Hot-swappable switch support was scored low from one review because switch choice and hot-swap ability were described as limited.

Hot-swappable switches were consistently treated as a benefit because users can replace switches without soldering and personalize the board.

Keycap quality was praised for soft-touch PBT feel and generally nice surface quality.

Keycap quality was praised for PBT material, thickness, durability, and a profile that helped typing accuracy.

Responsiveness was a major strength, with reviewers describing the switches and in-game input response as highly responsive or flawless.

Key response was consistently praised, with reviewers describing the keys or switches as responsive and accurate enough for both typing and gaming.

Key stability evidence was mixed: one reviewer disliked the plate-mounted stabilizer tradeoff, while another found the installed stabilizers secure and free of ticking.

Latency was praised in testing, with no input lag noticed during gameplay.

Latency impressions were positive overall, helped by 1,000 Hz operation and an ultra-low-latency mode, though this is still framed as strong budget performance rather than elite Hall Effect speed.

Layout options had limited positive evidence from a reviewer who liked the 65% layout because it includes arrow keys.

Macro customization had limited positive evidence, with one reviewer calling macro setup very customizable.

Macro customization was positively supported by reviewers who noted easy macro setup through VIA or QMK-style customization.

Materials quality was praised for the aluminum case and premium-feeling construction.

Materials quality was praised for the aluminum case, smooth finish, premium feel, and solid components.

Noise level had limited positive evidence, with one reviewer describing it as not too loud for a rapid-trigger keyboard.

Noise level received limited but positive evidence from a reviewer who described the sound as muted and thocky rather than harsh.

Onboard memory was positively supported by stored keyboard customizations that persist when moving between devices.

Per-key lighting control was criticized in one review because custom lighting changes did not appear to sync to the keyboard.

High polling support was viewed positively, with reviewers calling it fast or smooth for competitive-style play.

Reviewers treated the 1,000 Hz polling behavior as a strength, linking it to responsive inputs and low-latency use.

Portability was a weakness because one reviewer said the heavy aluminum build makes it undesirable to carry to and from an office.

Profile management was criticized because one reviewer could not find a way to set different profiles.

Profile management was supported by the ability to store customizations on the keyboard so settings persist across devices.

Rapid Trigger was well received, with reviewers saying it felt nice, worked as intended, and helped with fast resets.

Reliability was hurt by software crashes and finicky setup behavior in the negative reviews.

Reliability evidence was mixed to negative in one review due to occasional held-input recognition and rare multiple key registrations.

RGB customization was criticized because reviewers had trouble making lighting changes apply to the board.

RGB customization was broadly useful, especially through VIA, QMK, or the MCHOSE software, though one reviewer found the RGB controls clunky.

RGB lighting quality had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer saying the RGB looked pretty nice.

RGB lighting quality was acceptable but not class-leading, with one reviewer saying the lighting options do not match bigger keyboard brands.

Size and form factor were mixed: one reviewer preferred TKL, while another liked the 65% layout for arrow-key access.

Size and form factor earned positive evidence from one reviewer who found TKL a comfortable step down from full-size keyboards.

Software quality was the clearest weakness, ranging from merely early and improvable to janky, confusing, crashing, and very frustrating.

Software quality was mostly praised for VIA, QMK, and the dedicated MCHOSE software, with caveats around VIA being basic and RGB customization sometimes clunky.

Sound dampening was viewed positively in limited evidence, with one reviewer saying the construction made the keyboard sound more premium.

Sound dampening was praised for reducing ping, refining the sound, and isolating vibration through the case design and internal layers.

Stabilizer quality was mixed to weak because one reviewer specifically criticized the spacebar sound.

Stabilizer impressions were mixed: some reviewers found them tuned and issue-free, while others noted plate-mount tradeoffs or a need for more lube.

Switch feel was consistently positive, with reviewers liking the light force, smoothness, and Gateron dual-rail feel.

Reviewers generally liked the switch feel, calling the Vintage White or stock linear switches smooth, responsive, crisp, and satisfying, with only mild scratchiness or preference-based caveats.

Switch choice was divisive: one review criticized the limited options, while another felt the available Gateron choices were strong.

Switch choice was the clearest limitation: one reviewer wanted tactile options at checkout, while another wanted to try tactiles despite liking the included switches.

Typing comfort was praised in limited evidence, especially for long typing sessions.

Typing comfort was praised across reviews for its bouncy gasket feel, smooth typing, and balanced flex, though one reviewer found it slightly firm.

Typing feel was positive overall, with reviewers calling the typing experience good and the regular keys pleasant.

Typing feel was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers calling it joyful, great, smooth, and close to ideal.

Value for money was split: some reviewers liked the $155 price, while another felt better value was available elsewhere.

Value for money was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly calling the keyboard exceptional for its price and feature set.

Wireless performance received positive evidence from a reviewer who found the wireless functionality impressive and quick to reconnect.