Compare McHose GX87 Keyboard vs Corsair K65 Plus

Cable quality was a weak point in one review, where the included cable was described as cheap and not very good.

The included cable received light but positive comments, with reviewers appreciating that it is braided, good-sized, and long enough for charging.

Portability was a weakness because one reviewer said the heavy aluminum build makes it undesirable to carry to and from an office.

Portability was mixed: the compact form and dongle storage help travel, but multiple reviewers noted the board is heavier than expected.

Reliability evidence was mixed to negative in one review due to occasional held-input recognition and rare multiple key registrations.

Reliability evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer saying the board stayed dependable in hectic gameplay.

Connectivity was mixed: reviewers liked the wireless and tri-mode feature set, but noted mode-switch delay, visible front controls, and minor connectivity issues.

Connectivity was a major positive: wired, 2.4GHz, and Bluetooth modes were repeatedly described as versatile, smooth, and easy to use.

Extra gaming features received positive evidence from one reviewer who highlighted the ultra-low-latency mode as a surprise at this price.

Gaming extras were mixed: reviewers liked Fn functions and anti-ghosting, but several felt the board lacked standout gaming features such as advanced switches or macro keys.

RGB lighting quality was acceptable but not class-leading, with one reviewer saying the lighting options do not match bigger keyboard brands.

RGB quality was usually praised as vibrant, tasteful, bright, or stylish despite its mostly aesthetic underglow role.

Materials quality was praised for the aluminum case, smooth finish, premium feel, and solid components.

Materials drew mixed reactions: reviewers liked the premium feel from the plate and PBT caps but often wished for more metal or less plastic at the price.

Value for money was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly calling the keyboard exceptional for its price and feature set.

Value sentiment was mostly positive at the launch price, especially versus pricier gaming boards, but some reviewers felt cheaper competitors outclass it.

Onboard memory was positively supported by stored keyboard customizations that persist when moving between devices.

Onboard profile evidence was mixed: some reviewers liked saved profiles, while others criticized the lack of true hardware-profile behavior.

Profile management was supported by the ability to store customizations on the keyboard so settings persist across devices.

Profile management was useful for switching setups, but opinions were mixed because onboard limits and preset behavior constrain software-free use.

Stabilizer impressions were mixed: some reviewers found them tuned and issue-free, while others noted plate-mount tradeoffs or a need for more lube.

Stabilizers were generally strong, especially the spacebar, though a few reviewers found uneven lube or minor rattle/wobble.

Wireless performance received positive evidence from a reviewer who found the wireless functionality impressive and quick to reconnect.

Wireless performance was repeatedly praised as stable, lag-free, and reliable over 2.4GHz or Bluetooth in normal use.

Reviewers treated the 1,000 Hz polling behavior as a strength, linking it to responsive inputs and low-latency use.

The 1,000Hz polling rate was usually considered fine for casual or average gamers, but reviewers noted it trails high-end competitive boards.

Desk space efficiency was positive in one review, which liked that TKL saves space while leaving room for an optional macro pad.

Reviewers consistently said the 75% layout frees up desk and mouse space while preserving useful keys.

Latency impressions were positive overall, helped by 1,000 Hz operation and an ultra-low-latency mode, though this is still framed as strong budget performance rather than elite Hall Effect speed.

Wireless latency feedback was very positive, with reviewers reporting no noticeable lag or dropout issues in gaming.

Key stability evidence was mixed: one reviewer disliked the plate-mounted stabilizer tradeoff, while another found the installed stabilizers secure and free of ticking.

Key stability evidence was limited but positive, with reviewers noting little wobble and consistent key behavior.

Keycap quality was praised for PBT material, thickness, durability, and a profile that helped typing accuracy.

Keycap quality was mixed: reviewers liked PBT durability and feel, but several criticized legend alignment, no shine-through, or keycaps holding back the premium impression.

Customization options were a major strength, especially the magnetic or ball-catch quick-disassembly case, hot-swap design, and easy access for mods.

Customization was strongly praised, especially hot-swap support, onboard shortcuts, iCUE controls, remapping, lighting control, and hardware-level adjustments.

Battery life was strongly praised, with reviewers emphasizing the large 8,000 mAh capacity and long time between charges.

Battery life was widely praised, especially with RGB off; reviewers with RGB on reported shorter but still usable runtimes ranging from days to around a week.

One reviewer found the switch actuation consistent, with only a slight scratchiness detectable during very slow presses.

Evidence was limited but positive: reviewers described stable, consistent key travel and simultaneous presses registering as expected.

Size and form factor earned positive evidence from one reviewer who found TKL a comfortable step down from full-size keyboards.

The 75% form factor was a major strength, balancing compactness with arrows, function keys, and everyday usability.

Gaming performance was viewed as more than adequate for casual or hybrid use, with reviewers reporting competent play across first-person and general gaming sessions.

Gaming performance was mostly praised for smooth, responsive, reliable play, though one reviewer found it merely average and not exceptional.

Ergonomics received limited but positive evidence because the fixed typing angle was expected to be comfortable for most people.

Ergonomic feedback was mixed: adjustable feet helped some reviewers, but sharper edges and the missing wrist rest hurt long-session comfort for others.

Build quality was a major point of agreement, with every review giving positive evidence around the aluminum body, dense feel, assembly, or lack of flex.

Build quality was a consistent strength, with reviewers calling the board sturdy, solid, hefty, and well-built despite its plastic-heavy shell.

Design aesthetics were generally positive for clean, premium, and attractive looks, but some reviewers found the styling mundane or noticed mismatched colors.

Most reviewers liked the understated two-tone look and cleaner non-gamery styling, though one disliked the keycap color mix.

Compatibility evidence was positive where reviewers connected QMK and VIA support to deep, flexible keyboard customization.

Reviewers liked the broad platform support, including Windows, Mac, mobile devices, consoles, and multiple-device use cases.

Macro customization was positively supported by reviewers who noted easy macro setup through VIA or QMK-style customization.

Macro support was positively reviewed through iCUE and hardware workflows, though one reviewer needed time to rebuild old macros on fewer keys.

Durability evidence centered on the solid aluminum build and PBT keycaps, which reviewers linked to lasting use.

Durability evidence was limited, but one reviewer strongly expected the sturdy build to last a long time.

Switch replacement was mostly easy thanks to tool-free access and hot-swap sockets, though one reviewer found reinstalling switches harder because the PCB flexes.

Reviewers generally found switch replacement and disassembly approachable, though one noted some switches required extra force.

Frame rigidity was mostly praised for its solid, flex-free construction, though the quick-release design was seen by one reviewer as less sturdy than screws.

The frame was usually described as rigid and flex-resistant thanks to internal plates and solid construction, with one reviewer noting some chassis flex.

Typing feel was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers calling it joyful, great, smooth, and close to ideal.

Typing feel was one of the strongest themes, with many reviewers calling it smooth, satisfying, premium, or the best Corsair typing experience.

Noise level received limited but positive evidence from a reviewer who described the sound as muted and thocky rather than harsh.

Noise was widely praised as quiet, calm, and non-disruptive, making the board suitable for shared or quieter spaces.

Switch choice was the clearest limitation: one reviewer wanted tactile options at checkout, while another wanted to try tactiles despite liking the included switches.

Switch options were a recurring weakness because the base board ships only with linear MLX Reds, even though hot-swap mitigates that limitation.

Acoustics were a standout strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the thocky, poppy, solid, and very nice sound.

Most reviewers liked the quieter, fuller sound profile, often crediting the K65 Plus with enthusiast-like acoustics; a few noted average sound or a plasticky spacebar.

RGB customization was broadly useful, especially through VIA, QMK, or the MCHOSE software, though one reviewer found the RGB controls clunky.

RGB customization was often praised through iCUE and onboard presets, but reviewers disliked reduced wireless customization and non-shine-through caps.

Software quality was mostly praised for VIA, QMK, and the dedicated MCHOSE software, with caveats around VIA being basic and RGB customization sometimes clunky.

Software feedback was mostly positive for iCUE’s options and ease, but reviewers also cited limited dial control, hardware-profile limits, and occasional dependence on software.

Reviewers generally liked the switch feel, calling the Vintage White or stock linear switches smooth, responsive, crisp, and satisfying, with only mild scratchiness or preference-based caveats.

Switch feel was widely praised for smooth, soft, factory-lubed MLX Reds, though a few reviewers wanted tactile alternatives or found them average.

Key response was consistently praised, with reviewers describing the keys or switches as responsive and accurate enough for both typing and gaming.

Most reviewers found response strong or fast, especially for gaming, but a few described responsiveness as average or noted accidental presses.

Typing comfort was praised across reviews for its bouncy gasket feel, smooth typing, and balanced flex, though one reviewer found it slightly firm.

Typing comfort was mostly praised over long sessions, but some reviewers found the edge angle or lack of wrist rest uncomfortable.

Sound dampening was praised for reducing ping, refining the sound, and isolating vibration through the case design and internal layers.

Sound dampening was strongly praised, with reviewers crediting the foam and silicone layers for quieter, smoother, less hollow sound.

Hot-swappable switches were consistently treated as a benefit because users can replace switches without soldering and personalize the board.

Hot-swappable switches were one of the strongest points, repeatedly praised for making the keyboard easy to tailor after purchase.

Reviewers generally found the lighting bright or visible around the caps, helped by the reflective plate, even though it does not shine through legends.

Key spacing evidence was limited but very positive, with one reviewer saying the keys felt naturally placed and reduced mis-hits.

The 75% layout was praised as a productivity-and-gaming compromise, but reviewers also noted missing or awkwardly relocated keys and limited regional layouts.

Legend visibility was a consistent weakness because the opaque keycaps do not shine through, making dark-room typing harder.

The control dial was generally liked for volume, scroll, zoom, and brightness, but several reviewers wanted deeper remapping or noted slight wobble.

Per-key lighting control was mixed because wired/iCUE use unlocks stronger customization, while wireless mode limits patterns and layers.

Rapid trigger support was viewed as a missing or unnecessary advanced feature depending on the reviewer’s gaming needs.

Volume control through the dial was liked and convenient, although reviewers noted mode limits and minor dial tolerance issues.

Wrist-rest feedback was negative because the keyboard lacks one, which several reviewers felt mattered at the price or for comfort.