Compare Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard vs McHose GX87 Keyboard

P1 Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
P2 McHose GX87 Keyboard

Comparison Takeaways

Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard

Where It Has the Edge

  • portability is 3.9 vs 2.0. Portability is decent for a 96-key board because reviewers cite a lightweight portable form and use while commuting,...
  • desk space efficiency is 4.4 vs 3.0. The 96-key layout keeps a numpad while saving desk space, making it more compact than a typical full-size...
  • cable quality is 3.9 vs 2.6. Cable feedback is mixed: one review praises the braided USB-C cable, while another calls the included cable generic...
  • connectivity is 4.5 vs 3.9. Connectivity is a major strength, with reviewers consistently pointing to wired, 2.4GHz, and Bluetooth modes, plus multi-device pairing.

McHose GX87 Keyboard

Where It Has the Edge

  • frame rigidity is 4.9 vs 3.3. Frame rigidity is excellent in the strongest evidence, with no flex or rattles and a ball-catch system that...
  • materials quality is 4.7 vs 3.5. Materials quality is a strength, with aluminum construction, high-quality components, and PBT keycaps repeatedly cited.
  • build quality is 4.6 vs 3.9. Build quality earns broad praise, with reviewers repeatedly describing a solid, dense, exceptional-feeling aluminum keyboard.
  • value for money is 4.9 vs 4.3. Value for money is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly emphasizing the low price for the...
Average score
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.1
Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.2
acoustics
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.3

Reviewers describe the Cypher96 as pleasingly clacky or thocky, with strong overall sound quality, though one review notes pinging can spoil the profile.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.7

Acoustics are a standout, with reviews calling the sound stock, poppy, thocky, and unusually good for the price.

actuation consistency
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Actuation is supported by one review that describes keypresses as consistent and smooth, helped by the gasket-mounted design.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.3

Only one review directly addresses actuation consistency, saying the switches feel smooth with a consistent key press.

backlight brightness
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.1

Lighting brightness is generally viewed positively, with several reviewers calling it vibrant or bright, while one found the side underglow weak.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
battery life
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.6

Battery life is a strength thanks to the dual 4,000mAh packs, with reviewers repeatedly noting the large 8,000mAh total capacity.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.7

Battery life is a major strength, with the 8,000mAh capacity repeatedly highlighted and one reviewer saying it goes forever.

build quality
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.9

Build quality is mostly solid for a plastic budget board, though opinions differ because some reviewers report flex while others found no creaks or wobble.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.6

Build quality earns broad praise, with reviewers repeatedly describing a solid, dense, exceptional-feeling aluminum keyboard.

cable quality
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.9

Cable feedback is mixed: one review praises the braided USB-C cable, while another calls the included cable generic but usable.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
2.6

Cable quality is a weak spot because one reviewer calls the cable cheap, while another simply describes it as a standard rubberized cable.

compatibility
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.1

Compatibility is good for Windows and Mac users, though one review notes the lack of dedicated Mac-specific keycaps or hotkeys.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.3

Compatibility evidence is positive but limited, with persistence across multiple devices and software OS/layout changes mentioned.

connectivity
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Connectivity is a major strength, with reviewers consistently pointing to wired, 2.4GHz, and Bluetooth modes, plus multi-device pairing.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.9

Connectivity is good overall through tri-mode support, but one review flags infrequent minor connectivity issues.

customization options
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Customization options are strong, covering key remapping, RGB adjustments, macros, programmable inputs, and shared configurations.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.8

Customization is one of the strongest themes, with easy disassembly, hot-swap support, software customization, and budget room for user mods.

desk space efficiency
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

The 96-key layout keeps a numpad while saving desk space, making it more compact than a typical full-size keyboard.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.0

Desk-space efficiency is a drawback for users who move the board around because one review says the chunky TKL is tricky on the desk.

durability
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Durability evidence centers on double-shot PBT keycaps, which reviewers say resist shine and should last well over time.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.7

Durability evidence centers on the aluminum case and durable PBT keycaps, with reviewers describing the board and caps as built to last.

ease of switch replacement
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Switch replacement is easy because the board is hot-swappable and supports common 3-pin and 5-pin MX-style switches.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Switch replacement is generally easy due to hot-swap support, although one review says flex cuts can make installation more tedious.

ergonomics
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.1

Ergonomics are helped by adjustable feet and multiple resting positions, though the evidence is limited to setup angle rather than wrist support.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.0

Ergonomics are generally acceptable, with typing comfort praised, but the fixed angle and firmer feel may not suit everyone.

extra gaming features
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Gaming extras are present but basic, with reviews citing anti-ghosting, N-key rollover, and a 1,000Hz polling rate rather than advanced analog features.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.1

Extra gaming features are moderate: 1,000Hz polling and low-latency mode help, but reviews do not show advanced analog or rapid-trigger features.

frame rigidity
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.3

Frame rigidity is mixed: some reviewers report flex and twisting, while another found no flex when pressing down.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.9

Frame rigidity is excellent in the strongest evidence, with no flex or rattles and a ball-catch system that feels like one solid piece.

gaming performance
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Gaming performance is solid for conventional play thanks to responsive switches, anti-ghosting, N-key rollover, and 1,000Hz polling.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.3

Gaming performance is good for a mechanical productivity/gaming hybrid, with reviewers reporting competent play and responsive behavior rather than elite Hall Effect features.

hot-swappable switches
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.6

Hot-swappable switch support is consistently praised, with reviewers noting easy replacement and broad 3-pin or 5-pin compatibility.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
5.0

Hot-swap support is consistently confirmed, with reviewers saying switches can be changed without soldering.

keycap quality
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.2

Keycap quality is mostly strong because of double-shot PBT caps, although one reviewer disliked inconsistent thin legends.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.3

Keycap quality is mostly positive thanks to double-shot PBT and good thickness, but one review noted a color mismatch on the white unit.

key responsiveness
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Key responsiveness is rated highly, with reviewers calling the switches responsive, fast enough, and light to actuate.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.2

Responsiveness is praised across typing and gaming, with reviewers describing responsive switches, immediate key presses, and tactile/responsive keys.

key spacing
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
2.6

Key spacing is a weakness for one reviewer, who found the 96% layout harder to navigate without looking.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
key stability
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.9

Key stability is mostly good on large keys, but stabilizer looseness appears as a caveat for rattle-sensitive users.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.4

Key stability evidence is mixed because the plate-mounted stabilizers are described as less stable and more prone to future rattling.

latency
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Latency is strong in 2.4GHz and wired modes, with low-latency wireless and minimal-latency wired performance cited; Bluetooth is a slight caveat.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.3

Latency is generally strong for a mechanical board, helped by 1,000Hz polling and an ultra-low latency mode, though it is not framed as a Hall Effect esports board.

layout options
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.5

Layout options are somewhat mixed: the board supports Mac/Windows layout modes, but one reviewer preferred a true full-size layout.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.0

Layout-options evidence is limited to software-side OS/layout changes, not broad physical layout choices.

legend visibility
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.3

Legend visibility is mixed, with one review praising sharp visible legends while another criticizes inconsistent thin lettering.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
macro customization
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Macro customization is a clear software strength, with reviews citing macro recording, mouse-click detection, and easy setup.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.6

Macro customization is supported through VIA/QMK-style remapping and the ability to create complex macros.

materials quality
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.5

Materials quality is acceptable rather than premium: reviewers repeatedly identify an ABS plastic build that feels sturdy but not aluminum-like.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.7

Materials quality is a strength, with aluminum construction, high-quality components, and PBT keycaps repeatedly cited.

noise level
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.3

Noise level is generally well controlled by dampening, with reviewers saying it avoids obnoxious noise and keeps rattles down.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.6

Noise character is favorable: reviews describe muted, thocky sound and stabilizers tuned to be nearly silent, not necessarily a silent board.

onboard memory
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
No score yet
Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.7

Onboard memory is directly supported by one review, which says customizations are stored on the keyboard and persist across devices.

per-key lighting control
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.2

Per-key lighting evidence is limited but positive, with references to per-key RGB underglow and zone-based effects.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
polling rate
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.8

Polling rate is strong, with multiple reviewers citing a 1,000Hz rate in wired and wireless modes.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.3

Polling-rate evidence is positive, with multiple reviews calling out 1,000Hz behavior and one video noting very high measured polling/latency behavior.

portability
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.9

Portability is decent for a 96-key board because reviewers cite a lightweight portable form and use while commuting, though it is not tiny.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
2.0

Portability is poor because the keyboard is heavy enough that one reviewer says they would not cart it to and from the office.

profile management
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.1

Profile management has limited but positive evidence through shareable configurations for keymaps, macros, and lighting profiles.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
reliability
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.7

Reliability is mixed: some evidence praises reliable switches and daily dependability, but one review warns PCB bending may be a long-term risk.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.0

Reliability is mixed: one review reports no QC issues, while another notes rare repeated inputs and worries the issue could worsen.

RGB customization
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

RGB customization is consistently strong, with software controls for effects, colors, brightness, zones, and multiple lighting modes.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.1

RGB customization is supported through lighting controls, VIA/QMK-style tools, and software lighting effects, but one review found it clunky.

RGB lighting quality
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.3

RGB lighting quality is generally praised as vibrant, bright, and attractive, though the lack of shine-through legends limits visibility through keycaps.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.9

RGB lighting quality is acceptable to good, with south-facing RGB and lighting effects mentioned, though it is not described as best-in-class.

size and form factor
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.2

The compact 96%/96-key form factor is widely recognized as useful because it retains a numpad in a smaller footprint.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.9

The TKL form factor is familiar and comfortable for many, but one review also calls it chunky and heavy.

software quality
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.2

Software quality is generally good and easy to use, though one review says it is less customizable than deeper enthusiast platforms.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.2

Software quality is broadly useful thanks to QMK/VIA and dedicated software mentions, though reviewers note clunky RGB and some uncertainty or wireless limits.

sound dampening
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Sound dampening is one of the clearest strengths, with reviews repeatedly citing foam, silicone pads, gasket mounting, and reduced vibration.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.7

Sound dampening is strongly supported by multiple foam and PET layers that reduce harsh frequencies and ping.

stabilizer quality
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.0

Stabilizer quality is mixed: several reviews say large keys are rattle-free or solid, while others recommend tuning or relubing.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.7

Stabilizer quality is mixed: some reviewers found them lubed and quiet, while others wanted more lube or noted plate-mounted limitations.

switch feel
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.1

Switch feel is mostly positive, with smooth pre-lubed linear switches praised, though some reviewers found them generic or too light.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.6

Reviewers describe the stock linear switches as smooth, poppy, crisp, snappy, and satisfying, though one notes the included choices lean linear rather than tactile.

switch options
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.1

Switch options are limited because stock choices are basically Wisteria or Flamingo, though hot-swap support lets users change them later.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.2

Switch choice is a limitation: one review says there are no tactile options, while another notes Vintage White and Matcha Latte choices.

typing comfort
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Typing comfort is a highlight, with reviewers describing long sessions as comfortable, cushioned, and easy on the fingers.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Typing comfort is strong, with reviewers citing soft/bouncy feel, a comfort focus, and a generally pleasant typing experience.

typing feel
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.6

Typing feel is one of the strongest attributes, repeatedly described as smooth, cushioned, pleasant, and premium for the price.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.7

Typing feel is a major strength, with reviews praising a soft or satisfying feel, strong flex balance, and a generally enjoyable typing experience.

value for money
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.3

Value for money is strong, with reviewers repeatedly framing the Cypher96 as affordable or well priced for its features.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.9

Value for money is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly emphasizing the low price for the feature set and build.

wireless performance
Product 1: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Wireless performance is strong overall, with low-latency 2.4GHz, multi-device Bluetooth, and usable range, though Bluetooth response rates can dip slightly.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.2

Wireless performance is promising in the dedicated evidence, especially fast reconnection, but this is supported by one review only.