Compare Apple Watch SE 3 vs Garmin Forerunner 570

P1 Apple Watch SE 3
P2 Garmin Forerunner 570

Comparison Takeaways

Apple Watch SE 3

Where It Has the Edge

  • LTE connectivity is 4.3 vs 1.1. LTE and cellular connectivity are improved by 5G, with reviewers noting better coverage, calls, texts, messages, and downloads...
  • value for money is 4.8 vs 2.6. Value for money is the strongest consensus attribute, with reviewers repeatedly saying the SE 3 offers near-Series functionality...
  • mapping and navigation is 4.3 vs 2.2. Mapping and navigation are useful thanks to Apple Maps, offline maps, Find My basics, and Compass Backtrack, though...
  • reliability is 4.4 vs 2.3. Reliability appears strong in everyday use, with reviewers emphasizing smooth performance and lack of issues in ordinary tasks.

Garmin Forerunner 570

Where It Has the Edge

  • blood oxygen tracking is 4.0 vs 1.0. Blood oxygen tracking is present and used in overnight health tracking, but reviewers mention it as part of...
  • cross-platform compatibility is 4.1 vs 2.0. Cross-platform use is solid for notifications on Android and iPhone, but iPhone reply limitations keep it short of...
  • outdoor visibility is 4.9 vs 3.6. Outdoor visibility is excellent, with reviewers praising sunlight readability and the bright AMOLED display in harsh outdoor conditions.
  • brightness is 4.7 vs 3.5. Brightness is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers calling the AMOLED screen brighter, vivid, and among Garmin's...
Average score
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.2

Reviewers found automatic workout or walk detection useful and generally dependable, though one noted occasional slower workout-end recognition.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Reviewers noted helpful race/activity automation, especially AutoLap timing gates and finish-line cleanup, but evidence is narrow rather than a broad auto-detection theme.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

The app ecosystem is a major strength, with reviewers praising the Apple Watch App Store and broad app availability compared with rival budget watches.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

Garmin's app ecosystem is useful through Connect IQ and watchface downloads, though reviewers repeatedly describe it as more limited than Apple or Wear OS.

band quality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.5

Band support is a strength because the SE 3 uses Apple’s familiar strap system and has many Apple and third-party options.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

The silicone/translucent bands are generally praised for softness, fit, sweat comfort, and durability, with one reviewer noting a strap tail/bump annoyance.

battery life
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Battery life is the clearest mixed area: some reviewers saw all-day or better results, while others still treated it as a daily-charge watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.3

Battery life is divisive: still far better than mainstream smartwatches for some users, but several reviewers saw a drop from the 265 and short always-on endurance.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
1.0

Blood oxygen tracking is consistently described as missing from the SE 3, making it a clear limitation versus Series and Ultra models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Blood oxygen tracking is present and used in overnight health tracking, but reviewers mention it as part of the health suite rather than a standout accuracy feature.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Bluetooth support is present and useful for headphones and audio, though reviewers mostly mention it as part of the connectivity package rather than a standout feature.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.6

Bluetooth supports calls and pairing with phones/sensors, but one reviewer reported frequent phone disconnect notices, making connectivity evidence mixed.

brightness
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Brightness is adequate for many reviewers, but the 1,000-nit display is repeatedly framed as weaker than the Series 11 in direct sunlight.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

Brightness is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers calling the AMOLED screen brighter, vivid, and among Garmin's brightest.

build quality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Build quality is generally praised as light, well made, and attractive, with tougher glass helping the SE 3 feel less like a budget device.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Build quality is viewed positively thanks to a robust-feeling case and upgraded aluminum bezel, with no major build concerns outside price-tier omissions.

button controls
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Button and gesture controls are strongly received, especially the Digital Crown, side button, Double Tap, and Wrist Flick gestures.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

The five-button setup is repeatedly praised for sweaty, rainy, gloved, and swimming use, while also complementing the touchscreen well.

call handling
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Call handling is solid for a wrist device, with useful speaker, microphone, cellular, and voice isolation notes, though it is not ideal as a primary phone substitute.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

Call handling is a solid new smartwatch feature via microphone, speaker, and Bluetooth, though reviewers usually treat it as handy rather than essential.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Calorie tracking is treated as part of the reliable core fitness feature set, with one reviewer noting workout calorie metrics matched comparison data.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Calorie tracking is available and tied into activity details, including pack-weight calculations, but reviewers do not deeply validate calorie accuracy.

charging convenience
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.9

Charging convenience improves with USB-C magnetic charging and fast top-ups, but sleep tracking still requires a daily charging routine for many users.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.7

Charging convenience is acceptable but not premium: Garmin's connector is functional and fast enough, yet the lack of wireless charging is a recurring caveat.

charging speed
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Charging speed is a repeated upgrade, with reviewers citing useful fast-charge top-ups and roughly 80 percent in around 45 minutes to an hour.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Charging speed receives positive user evidence, with one long-term reviewer saying it can recharge during a morning shower.

coaching features
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Coaching features are useful but not deeply advanced; Workout Buddy is described as beginner-friendly, motivational, or basic depending on the reviewer.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Coaching features are a major strength, including Garmin Coach, triathlon plans, daily workout suggestions, and adaptive training guidance.

comfort
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Comfort is a strength, with reviewers calling the watch lightweight, unobtrusive, and well suited to sleep or smaller wrists.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Comfort is broadly strong, with reviewers calling it light and wearable all day; only larger-size sleep comfort and strap buckle issues temper the praise.

companion app quality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Companion app quality is functional but split across Watch, Health, and Fitness apps, which can be useful yet occasionally tedious.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

Garmin Connect is powerful and data-rich, though one reviewer notes its learning curve and depth can feel overwhelming.

contactless payments
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Contactless payments are a strong Apple Watch staple, with Apple Pay repeatedly included among the SE 3’s core smartwatch strengths.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Contactless payment support is confirmed through NFC payments, but reviewers mention it briefly rather than as a major buying reason.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
2.0

Cross-platform compatibility is weak because reviewers frame the SE 3 as an iPhone smartwatch and note it only works with iPhone.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Cross-platform use is solid for notifications on Android and iPhone, but iPhone reply limitations keep it short of Apple Watch-level integration.

customization options
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Customization is strong across watch faces, metrics, widgets, bands, and gesture-driven controls.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Customization is strong across watchfaces, widgets, data fields, layouts, colors, and report options, with several reviewers highlighting personalization.

display quality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Display quality is much improved by the always-on OLED screen, though thicker bezels and lower brightness keep it below Series and Ultra displays.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

Display quality is a standout: the AMOLED panel is sharp, vivid, responsive, and frequently cited as a major upgrade.

durability
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.9

Durability is improved through tougher Ion-X glass and water resistance, but some reviewers still point to weaker scratch or dust protection than pricier models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Durability evidence is mostly positive, with bezels, bands, water use, and glass holding up well, though one review noted small scratches or heat-related unresponsiveness.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
1.0

ECG functionality is absent, and reviewers repeatedly call this one of the main health-feature tradeoffs.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
1.0

ECG functionality is the clearest omission: many reviewers criticize the lack of ECG despite the newer heart-rate sensor and the price.

fit
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Fit is favorable for smaller wrists and sleep tracking, though one reviewer found the older chassis less flush than newer models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Fit is praised for secure, no-bounce wear and useful size options, particularly for smaller wrists.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Fitness tracking accuracy is a strong point, with reviewers reporting accurate workouts and close agreement with comparison devices.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Fitness tracking accuracy is strong overall, anchored by consistently praised GPS and heart-rate performance across running, cycling, and multisport use.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

GPS accuracy is generally strong for a single-band Apple Watch, with caveats in tall-building or canyon-like conditions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

GPS accuracy is one of the strongest attributes, with reviewers repeatedly calling tracks excellent, flawless, near-perfect, or among the best tested.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.2

Health tracking accuracy is solid for the essentials, especially heart rate, sleep, and workouts, while advanced sensors are omitted.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Health tracking is broad and useful, covering heart rate, sleep, stress, skin temperature, respiration, and wellness metrics, but some illness/sleep limitations appear.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Heart-rate accuracy is repeatedly praised, with reviewers finding close agreement against straps or other watches.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Heart-rate accuracy is highly rated across most reviews, especially for running and intervals, though lab-style testing found some delays and dips.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

LTE and cellular connectivity are improved by 5G, with reviewers noting better coverage, calls, texts, messages, and downloads away from the phone.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
1.1

LTE connectivity is not offered; reviewers explicitly note the lack of cellular connection or cellular smartwatch capability.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Mapping and navigation are useful thanks to Apple Maps, offline maps, Find My basics, and Compass Backtrack, though precision finding is limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.2

Navigation is the biggest tradeoff: breadcrumb routing works, but the absence of offline/topographic maps is repeatedly criticized at this price.

materials quality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Materials quality is good for the price, with aluminum and Ion-X glass, but premium titanium, sapphire, and some rugged ratings remain reserved for higher models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Materials quality improves over the 265 with an aluminum bezel and Gorilla Glass, giving the watch a more premium feel.

menu navigation
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.5

Menu navigation is easy and fast, helped by watchOS, the Digital Crown, touch controls, and one-handed gestures.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Menu navigation is mostly intuitive and easy, supported by buttons, touchscreen, Glances, and refreshed menus, though phantom clicks hurt one review.

music controls
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Music controls are a strength, including Apple Music pairing, media controls, and playback improvements.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Music controls are available alongside notifications and calendar previews, but reviewer evidence is brief.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Onboard storage and offline playback are improved, with 64GB storage and support for music or media without the phone nearby.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Onboard music storage is supported through 8GB storage, MP3s, and streaming-service syncing, giving it better music capability than many sports watches.

operating system experience
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

The operating system experience is a major strength; reviewers praise watchOS 26 as polished, cohesive, and rich in Apple Watch features.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

The updated operating-system experience is cleaner and more modern, with Garmin aligning the 570 with newer Fenix/Forerunner UI styling.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.6

Outdoor visibility is usable but not class-leading, with the 1,000-nit screen and direct sunlight repeatedly cited as limits.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.9

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with reviewers praising sunlight readability and the bright AMOLED display in harsh outdoor conditions.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Pairing and iPhone integration are strong, with reviewers praising how well the watch syncs, routes notifications, and pairs with Apple services.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.6

Pairing and syncing are mixed: some reviewers found smooth iPhone/Strava syncing, while another saw repeated phone disconnects.

recovery insights
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Recovery insights are present through training load, Vitals, sleep score, and workout feedback, but they are not as deep or prescriptive as some rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Recovery insights are a major reason reviewers liked the watch, especially Training Readiness, Body Battery, HRV, and sleep-informed rest guidance.

reliability
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Reliability appears strong in everyday use, with reviewers emphasizing smooth performance and lack of issues in ordinary tasks.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.3

Reliability is mixed: core tracking is reliable, but reviewers cite occasional crashes, overheating unresponsiveness, software bugs, and phantom clicks.

safety features
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Safety features are a major strength, including fall detection, crash detection, emergency SOS, heart-rate alerts, and Compass Backtrack.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Safety features are solid, with LiveTrack, Incident Detection, and safety/tracking features mentioned as part of the package.

size options
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Size options are adequate and familiar at 40mm and 44mm, with the smaller size appealing to smaller wrists, though color choices are limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Size options are a strength because the 570 comes in 42mm and 47mm, making it more accessible than single-size Garmin alternatives.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Sleep tracking is useful and generally accurate for time and stages, but sleep score is sometimes described as simple or limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.3

Sleep tracking is useful but not class-leading; some found it reasonably accurate while others called it less robust or less complete than competitors.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Notifications are a core strength, especially with always-on viewing, wrist vibration routing, and gestures for dismissal or management.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.1

Smartphone notifications work, but evidence is mixed because one reviewer found notification handling intrusive during workouts.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Smartwatch features are excellent for the price, with reviewers emphasizing that it feels like a full Apple Watch rather than a stripped-down tracker.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Smartwatch features improved meaningfully with mic, speaker, calls, voice commands, music, NFC, reports, and notifications, though it is not a full smartwatch.

software smoothness
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Software smoothness is one of the clearest strengths because the S10 chip keeps watchOS, apps, and gestures fast and responsive.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Software smoothness is generally positive, with reviewers describing the interface as polished, faster, and modern, but not bug-free.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Step counting appears as part of the core activity toolkit, though reviewers discuss the feature more than rigorous step-count accuracy.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Step counting appears accurate in direct step tests and is part of the daily tracking suite.

stress tracking
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Stress tracking feeds into readiness and wellness guidance, giving it practical value for recovery decisions.

style and design
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.3

Style and design are mixed: reviewers like the familiar Apple Watch look but often criticize the older body, thicker bezels, and limited colors.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Style and design are a standout upgrade, with reviewers praising the colorful, expressive, more premium look.

third-party app support
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Third-party app support is strong because the SE 3 retains Apple’s large app store and broad developer support.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.5

Third-party app support exists through Connect IQ, but reviewers view Garmin's store as useful yet limited versus full smartwatch platforms.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Touchscreen responsiveness is strong, with reviewers saying touch, buttons, gestures, and everyday controls work promptly and fluidly.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Touchscreen responsiveness is widely praised as responsive, fast, and useful, especially alongside the physical buttons.

user interface
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

The user interface is easy, clean, and cohesive, especially with watchOS 26 and the familiar watch face/home structure.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

The user interface is cleaner and easier to navigate than before, though Garmin's learning curve and rare menu quirks remain.

value for money
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Value for money is the strongest consensus attribute, with reviewers repeatedly saying the SE 3 offers near-Series functionality at a much lower price.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.6

Value for money is the most common concern: reviewers like the watch but repeatedly say the price is high versus the 265, 965, 970, and rivals.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Voice assistant quality improves with on-device Siri and the S10 chip, making requests faster and more useful than earlier SE models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Voice assistant and command quality is good for watch tasks and commands, while phone-assistant workflows can be clunky or dependent on the phone.

watch face quality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Watch face quality is praised through attractive, high-quality options and watchOS 26 face support.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Watch face quality is strong thanks to customization and readable data layouts, with reviewers highlighting clean default faces and useful widgets.

water resistance
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Water resistance is solid for typical use, with reviewers noting 50-meter or 164-foot resistance and swim tracking, but not advanced dive sensors.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Water resistance is well supported for swimming and real-world water exposure, including pools, lakes, ocean use, and a 5ATM rating.

wellness insights
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Wellness insights are useful for mainstream users through sleep score, sleep apnea alerts, wrist temperature, Vitals, and heart-rate notifications.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Wellness insights are deep and actionable, especially Body Battery, readiness, stress, sleep, and recovery metrics that shape daily decisions.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Wi-Fi is adequate but not premium, with reviewers noting 2.4GHz-only or Wi-Fi 4 support rather than dual-band.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
No score yet
workout tracking variety
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Workout tracking variety is strong, covering many sports, workouts, running metrics, swimming, and common gym activities.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Workout tracking variety is excellent, with triathlon/multisport support, many sport modes, open-water swimming, gym profiles, and new activity types.