Compare Apple Watch SE 3 vs Garmin Forerunner 255

P1 Apple Watch SE 3
P2 Garmin Forerunner 255

Comparison Takeaways

Apple Watch SE 3

Where It Has the Edge

  • touchscreen responsiveness is 4.7 vs 1.7. Touchscreen responsiveness is strong, with reviewers saying touch, buttons, gestures, and everyday controls work promptly and fluidly.
  • call handling is 4.1 vs 1.5. Call handling is solid for a wrist device, with useful speaker, microphone, cellular, and voice isolation notes, though...
  • smartwatch features is 4.8 vs 3.2. Smartwatch features are excellent for the price, with reviewers emphasizing that it feels like a full Apple Watch...
  • music controls is 4.8 vs 3.9. Music controls are a strength, including Apple Music pairing, media controls, and playback improvements.

Garmin Forerunner 255

Where It Has the Edge

  • blood oxygen tracking is 3.4 vs 1.0. Blood oxygen/Pulse Ox support is present and mentioned often, but reviewers treat it as secondary because continuous use...
  • cross-platform compatibility is 4.3 vs 2.0. Cross-platform compatibility is positive, with reviewers noting iOS and Android support through Garmin Connect and Bluetooth.
  • battery life is 4.6 vs 3.5. Battery life is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly reporting week-plus use, two-week smartwatch estimates, and...
  • outdoor visibility is 4.6 vs 3.6. Outdoor visibility is strong, with reviewers repeatedly praising MIP visibility in direct sunlight or bright outdoor conditions.
Average score
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.2

Reviewers found automatic workout or walk detection useful and generally dependable, though one noted occasional slower workout-end recognition.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.3

Auto-detection evidence is positive but limited, with reviewers noting automatic run/walk/rest or effort detection rather than broad automatic workout recognition.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

The app ecosystem is a major strength, with reviewers praising the Apple Watch App Store and broad app availability compared with rival budget watches.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.9

The app ecosystem is supported through Connect IQ and Garmin's watch-face/app store, but the evidence emphasizes fitness tools more than a broad app marketplace.

band quality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.5

Band support is a strength because the SE 3 uses Apple’s familiar strap system and has many Apple and third-party options.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.4

Band quality is strong, with reviewers praising the silicone quick-release band, stretch, comfort, notches, and easy swapping.

battery life
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Battery life is the clearest mixed area: some reviewers saw all-day or better results, while others still treated it as a daily-charge watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.6

Battery life is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly reporting week-plus use, two-week smartwatch estimates, and strong GPS endurance.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
1.0

Blood oxygen tracking is consistently described as missing from the SE 3, making it a clear limitation versus Series and Ultra models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.4

Blood oxygen/Pulse Ox support is present and mentioned often, but reviewers treat it as secondary because continuous use can hurt battery life and accuracy depends on conditions.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Bluetooth support is present and useful for headphones and audio, though reviewers mostly mention it as part of the connectivity package rather than a standout feature.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.3

Bluetooth connectivity is strong for headphones and external sensors, with reviewers noting Bluetooth audio and ANT+/Bluetooth sensor pairing.

brightness
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Brightness is adequate for many reviewers, but the 1,000-nit display is repeatedly framed as weaker than the Series 11 in direct sunlight.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.4

Brightness is mixed: the display is readable, but multiple reviewers prefer brighter AMOLED screens or say brightness could be better.

build quality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Build quality is generally praised as light, well made, and attractive, with tougher glass helping the SE 3 feel less like a budget device.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.9

Build quality is generally good for a lightweight sports watch, but reviewers note the plastic/resin construction feels cheaper than metal premium models.

button controls
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Button and gesture controls are strongly received, especially the Digital Crown, side button, Double Tap, and Wrist Flick gestures.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.1

Button controls are broadly positive, with reviewers liking reliable physical buttons for sports, though a few mention learning curves or squishy buttons.

call handling
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Call handling is solid for a wrist device, with useful speaker, microphone, cellular, and voice isolation notes, though it is not ideal as a primary phone substitute.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
1.5

Call handling is weak because one review directly says the watch cannot make calls and lacks the hardware for calling.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Calorie tracking is treated as part of the reliable core fitness feature set, with one reviewer noting workout calorie metrics matched comparison data.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.8

Calorie tracking is mentioned as part of the workout data set, but reviewers do not deeply evaluate its independent usefulness.

charging convenience
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.9

Charging convenience improves with USB-C magnetic charging and fast top-ups, but sleep tracking still requires a daily charging routine for many users.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.2

Charging convenience is mixed: the cable fits and replacement cables are available, but proprietary charging and battery drain with GPS/music are recurring caveats.

charging speed
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Charging speed is a repeated upgrade, with reviewers citing useful fast-charge top-ups and roughly 80 percent in around 45 minutes to an hour.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.5

Charging speed is positive, with reviewers noting full charging in a couple of hours and 50 percent charge in under half an hour.

coaching features
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Coaching features are useful but not deeply advanced; Workout Buddy is described as beginner-friendly, motivational, or basic depending on the reviewer.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.5

Coaching features are a standout, with race widgets, Garmin Coach, adaptive suggested workouts, race-based plans, and workout guidance appearing across many reviews.

comfort
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Comfort is a strength, with reviewers calling the watch lightweight, unobtrusive, and well suited to sleep or smaller wrists.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.6

Comfort is a consistent strength, with many reviewers describing the watch as light, comfortable for 24/7 wear, and easy to sleep in.

companion app quality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Companion app quality is functional but split across Watch, Health, and Fitness apps, which can be useful yet occasionally tedious.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.5

The companion app is a major strength, with Garmin Connect described as detailed, polished, powerful, and helpful for syncing, workouts, and long-term stats.

contactless payments
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Contactless payments are a strong Apple Watch staple, with Apple Pay repeatedly included among the SE 3’s core smartwatch strengths.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.9

Contactless payments are consistently supported through Garmin Pay/NFC, although bank participation limits usefulness for some reviewers.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
2.0

Cross-platform compatibility is weak because reviewers frame the SE 3 as an iPhone smartwatch and note it only works with iPhone.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.3

Cross-platform compatibility is positive, with reviewers noting iOS and Android support through Garmin Connect and Bluetooth.

customization options
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Customization is strong across watch faces, metrics, widgets, bands, and gesture-driven controls.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.7

Customization is a strong point, with reviewers praising data fields, watch-face changes, activity settings, and phone-based configuration.

display quality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Display quality is much improved by the always-on OLED screen, though thicker bezels and lower brightness keep it below Series and Ultra displays.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.0

Display quality is practical and readable, especially for sport use, but reviewers contrast the MIP screen with brighter AMOLED displays.

durability
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.9

Durability is improved through tougher Ion-X glass and water resistance, but some reviewers still point to weaker scratch or dust protection than pricier models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.4

Durability evidence is positive but limited, with reviewers mentioning Gorilla Glass, solid daily durability, and few scratches or cracks over months.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
1.0

ECG functionality is absent, and reviewers repeatedly call this one of the main health-feature tradeoffs.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
No score yet
fit
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Fit is favorable for smaller wrists and sleep tracking, though one reviewer found the older chassis less flush than newer models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.3

Fit is positive, supported by closely spaced strap holes, multiple sizes, and reviewers reporting secure wrist adjustment.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Fitness tracking accuracy is a strong point, with reviewers reporting accurate workouts and close agreement with comparison devices.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.6

Fitness tracking is described as accurate and detailed across workouts, with reviewers highlighting strong sport data, reliable modes, and post-workout analysis.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

GPS accuracy is generally strong for a single-band Apple Watch, with caveats in tall-building or canyon-like conditions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.7

GPS accuracy is one of the strongest consensus points, with reviewers praising multi-band GNSS and reporting excellent or near spot-on tracking in varied conditions.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.2

Health tracking accuracy is solid for the essentials, especially heart rate, sleep, and workouts, while advanced sensors are omitted.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.5

One review says the watch helps build an accurate picture of day-to-day health, based on heart rate, SpO2, sleep, stress, and related health stats.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Heart-rate accuracy is repeatedly praised, with reviewers finding close agreement against straps or other watches.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.5

Reviewers repeatedly report strong wrist heart-rate accuracy, often comparing it favorably with chest straps, though one notes chest straps remain preferable for maximum precision.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

LTE and cellular connectivity are improved by 5G, with reviewers noting better coverage, calls, texts, messages, and downloads away from the phone.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
No score yet
mapping and navigation
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Mapping and navigation are useful thanks to Apple Maps, offline maps, Find My basics, and Compass Backtrack, though precision finding is limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
No score yet
materials quality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Materials quality is good for the price, with aluminum and Ion-X glass, but premium titanium, sapphire, and some rugged ratings remain reserved for higher models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.5

Materials quality evidence is limited and mixed, with one review identifying the resin case and silicone band rather than premium materials.

menu navigation
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.5

Menu navigation is easy and fast, helped by watchOS, the Digital Crown, touch controls, and one-handed gestures.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.6

Menu navigation is mixed: Garmin's button/menu system works and can be quick, but reviewers note a learning curve and limited mapping/navigation depth.

music controls
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Music controls are a strength, including Apple Music pairing, media controls, and playback improvements.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.9

Music controls are useful, with reviewers noting phone playback control and on-watch controls such as changing, pausing, and playing tracks.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Onboard storage and offline playback are improved, with 64GB storage and support for music or media without the phone nearby.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.1

Onboard music storage is a clear optional strength on Music models, with Spotify/offline playlist support and roughly 500-song storage noted, though storage is limited versus higher models.

operating system experience
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

The operating system experience is a major strength; reviewers praise watchOS 26 as polished, cohesive, and rich in Apple Watch features.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.1

Operating system experience is functional and familiar, with Garmin's watch software described as consistent and usable rather than lifestyle-watch rich.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.6

Outdoor visibility is usable but not class-leading, with the 1,000-nit screen and direct sunlight repeatedly cited as limits.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.6

Outdoor visibility is strong, with reviewers repeatedly praising MIP visibility in direct sunlight or bright outdoor conditions.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Pairing and iPhone integration are strong, with reviewers praising how well the watch syncs, routes notifications, and pairs with Apple services.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.3

Pairing reliability evidence is limited, but one cycling review successfully paired power-meter pedals and used the data without complaint.

recovery insights
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Recovery insights are present through training load, Vitals, sleep score, and workout feedback, but they are not as deep or prescriptive as some rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.2

Recovery insights are a major upgrade, with HRV, Body Battery, recovery time, and training-load tools giving useful context, though Training Readiness is missing.

reliability
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Reliability appears strong in everyday use, with reviewers emphasizing smooth performance and lack of issues in ordinary tasks.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.8

Reliability evidence is limited but positive, with one long-term reviewer calling the watch fantastic after six months.

safety features
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Safety features are a major strength, including fall detection, crash detection, emergency SOS, heart-rate alerts, and Compass Backtrack.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.2

Safety features are present through emergency assistance, live tracking, and personal safety features, but evidence assumes phone-linked or outdoor use cases.

size options
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Size options are adequate and familiar at 40mm and 44mm, with the smaller size appealing to smaller wrists, though color choices are limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.4

Size options are a strength, with reviewers repeatedly highlighting 41/42mm and 46mm options that serve different wrist sizes.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Sleep tracking is useful and generally accurate for time and stages, but sleep score is sometimes described as simple or limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.1

Sleep tracking is widely covered and generally positive, with several reviewers finding it useful or close to external sleep tools, while some still note overestimation or limits.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Notifications are a core strength, especially with always-on viewing, wrist vibration routing, and gestures for dismissal or management.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.7

Smartphone notifications are consistently available and useful for viewing messages, calls, texts, and app alerts, though controls vary by phone platform.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Smartwatch features are excellent for the price, with reviewers emphasizing that it feels like a full Apple Watch rather than a stripped-down tracker.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.2

Smartwatch features are adequate for Garmin Pay, music, notifications, and Connect IQ, but reviewers repeatedly say they fall short of Apple or Samsung-style smartwatches.

software smoothness
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Software smoothness is one of the clearest strengths because the S10 chip keeps watchOS, apps, and gestures fast and responsive.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.3

Software smoothness gets limited but positive evidence, with one review calling menuing smooth and lag-free.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Step counting appears as part of the core activity toolkit, though reviewers discuss the feature more than rigorous step-count accuracy.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.3

Step counting evidence is limited and mixed: one reviewer reports an inaccurate stair count, while another calls the step counter very accurate.

stress tracking
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.6

Stress tracking appears through HRV, Body Battery, and stress metrics, but evidence is mixed because at least one reviewer finds Garmin's stress data not very useful.

style and design
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.3

Style and design are mixed: reviewers like the familiar Apple Watch look but often criticize the older body, thicker bezels, and limited colors.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.6

Style and design are functional rather than stylish, with reviewers calling it clearly sporty, utilitarian, or not a luxury-looking watch.

third-party app support
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Third-party app support is strong because the SE 3 retains Apple’s large app store and broad developer support.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.8

Third-party app support exists through Connect IQ and downloadable faces/apps, but reviewers describe it as useful rather than Apple Watch-level broad.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Touchscreen responsiveness is strong, with reviewers saying touch, buttons, gestures, and everyday controls work promptly and fluidly.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
1.7

Touchscreen responsiveness scores low because the watch does not have a touchscreen; reviewers often frame this as acceptable for workouts.

user interface
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

The user interface is easy, clean, and cohesive, especially with watchOS 26 and the familiar watch face/home structure.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.8

The user interface is practical, especially through glances and widgets, but some recovery/health metrics require interpretation.

value for money
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Value for money is the strongest consensus attribute, with reviewers repeatedly saying the SE 3 offers near-Series functionality at a much lower price.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.4

Value for money is strongly positive for sports-focused buyers, though reviewers also mention price concerns and cheaper rivals.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Voice assistant quality improves with on-device Siri and the S10 chip, making requests faster and more useful than earlier SE models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
No score yet
watch face quality
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Watch face quality is praised through attractive, high-quality options and watchOS 26 face support.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.9

Watch-face quality is solid, with customizable stock faces and Connect IQ options, though one reviewer notes limits around custom Face It storage.

water resistance
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Water resistance is solid for typical use, with reviewers noting 50-meter or 164-foot resistance and swim tracking, but not advanced dive sensors.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.3

Water resistance is positive, with reviewers noting 5ATM/waterproofing and suitability for swimming, pool use, showers, and open water.

wellness insights
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Wellness insights are useful for mainstream users through sleep score, sleep apnea alerts, wrist temperature, Vitals, and heart-rate notifications.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.2

Wellness insights are well represented through Morning Report, Body Battery, Health Snapshot, and sleep/recovery context, and several reviewers call these features useful.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Wi-Fi is adequate but not premium, with reviewers noting 2.4GHz-only or Wi-Fi 4 support rather than dual-band.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.0

Wi-Fi evidence is limited to Music models and syncing/downloading use cases, but reviewers confirm Wi-Fi support for those versions.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Workout tracking variety is strong, covering many sports, workouts, running metrics, swimming, and common gym activities.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.7

Workout variety is a major strength, with reviewers emphasizing triathlon, multisport, running, cycling, swimming, open-water swimming, and many built-in activity profiles.