Compare Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Apple Watch Ultra 2

P1 Garmin Forerunner 165
P2 Apple Watch Ultra 2

Comparison Takeaways

Garmin Forerunner 165

Where It Has the Edge

  • cross-platform compatibility is 3.8 vs 2.0. Cross-platform compatibility is functional, but one reviewer noted the phone experience differs between iPhone and Android, especially for...
  • recovery insights is 3.5 vs 2.2. Recovery insights are useful through Recovery Time, Training Effect, HRV, Body Battery, and related tools, but the missing...
  • blood oxygen tracking is 4.1 vs 2.9. The watch includes blood oxygen or Pulse Ox tracking, but reviewers treated it as a useful health sensor...
  • wellness insights is 4.4 vs 3.3. Wellness insights were strong through Morning Report, Body Battery, HRV, sleep, stress, recovery, and daily health glances.

Apple Watch Ultra 2

Where It Has the Edge

  • ECG functionality is 4.7 vs 1.0. ECG functionality is well supported and repeatedly mentioned as part of the Ultra 2’s robust health suite, including...
  • voice assistant quality is 4.5 vs 1.0. Voice assistant quality improved with on-device Siri, faster commands, better dictation, and less cloud dependence, though a few...
  • music controls is 4.1 vs 2.3. Music controls work well through Double Tap and the Music app, with speaker playback and wrist controls adding...
  • materials quality is 4.8 vs 3.2. Materials quality is high, with recycled titanium, sapphire protection, and premium band hardware recurring across reviews.
Average score
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0
Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.3
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
No score yet
Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.2

Automatic activity support appears around brisk-walk logging, running-track recognition, and contextual auto-marking, though reviewers do not dwell on broad workout auto-detection.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.1

Connect IQ gives the watch a modest app ecosystem for watch faces, widgets, data fields, and extras, though it is not framed as a full smartwatch app platform.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.9

The app ecosystem is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers praising Apple’s native and third-party app depth over competing watch platforms.

band quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Reviewers generally liked the soft, adjustable silicone strap and standard strap options, with no major comfort complaints about the band itself.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.3

Band impressions are mostly positive, especially for comfort and material quality, though one reviewer found the Alpine Loop slow to dry after sweat or water.

battery life
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Battery life was praised as strong for an AMOLED Garmin in normal training use, but several reviewers said always-on display, music, or endurance use reduces its advantage.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.4

Battery life is excellent for an Apple Watch, often lasting two to three days, but dedicated GPS watches still make it look short for endurance use.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.1

The watch includes blood oxygen or Pulse Ox tracking, but reviewers treated it as a useful health sensor rather than a headline reason to buy.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
2.9

Blood oxygen coverage is mixed in the review set because some reviews mention the feature’s patent-related absence, while the updated PCMag review says monitoring was restored.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.2

Bluetooth and ANT+ sensor/headphone support were viewed positively, with reviewers noting external sensor support and solid headphone connectivity.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.6

Bluetooth support is strong for cycling accessories, especially power meters, speed sensors, and cadence sensors, with reviewers treating it as a useful sports upgrade.

brightness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.7

Brightness was a clear strength, especially the bold AMOLED screen and usable bright-display behavior.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.8

Brightness is a major consensus strength, with repeated praise for the 3,000-nit display and flashlight improvement.

build quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9

Build quality was viewed as dependable for the price, with Garmin durability praised even though the plastic construction feels less premium.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.7

Reviewers consistently describe the build as premium, rugged, and performance-oriented, with titanium, sapphire, and protected controls adding confidence.

button controls
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

The five-button layout was one of the most consistently praised usability strengths, especially for workouts, gloves, sweat, and wet conditions.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.4

Button controls are a practical Ultra advantage, especially the Action Button and gloved-use crown, though one long-term reviewer admits the Action Button never became a habit.

call handling
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.2

Call handling was limited to reliable call-related smartphone alerts rather than full on-watch calling.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.7

Call handling gets direct praise for clear and sufficiently loud audio, helped by the Ultra line’s microphone and speaker hardware.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
2.5

Calorie tracking received weak support; one reviewer saw calorie burn data in strength mode but did not find that feature very useful.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.0

Calorie tracking is framed through Apple’s activity rings and standard fitness metrics rather than as a lab-tested calorie measurement system.

charging convenience
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.2

Charging convenience was mostly fine thanks to secure contacts and Garmin’s familiar proprietary cable, though it is not universal wireless charging.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.1

Charging is convenient through familiar magnetic charging and occasional iPhone-powered charging, though reviewers still need to charge more often than with sports watches.

charging speed
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.1

Charging speed was generally acceptable to good, with reviewers reporting around one hour to just under two hours depending on the source.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
3.8

Charging speed is acceptable, commonly around 0-80% in about an hour and full in roughly 90 minutes, but slower than the faster-charging Series 10.

coaching features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Coaching features were well supported through Garmin Coach, adaptive plans, structured workouts, daily suggestions, and race-related guidance.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
3.6

Coaching improved with Training Load and effort context, but several reviewers still find Apple’s coaching and analysis shallower than Garmin, Whoop, or similar platforms.

comfort
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.6

Comfort was a major point of agreement: reviewers repeatedly described the watch as light, compact, unobtrusive, and easy to wear day and night.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
3.9

Comfort is context-dependent: some reviewers find the Ultra 2 comfortable all day, while others note size, tugging, or crown irritation on smaller wrists.

companion app quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.1

Garmin Connect was mostly praised for depth, workout analysis, and improving organization, though one reviewer found the redesign not dramatically easier.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.8

Companion app quality is strong, with reviewers praising Apple Watch, Health, and Fitness app integration and easy configuration from the iPhone.

contactless payments
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.1

Garmin Pay was consistently mentioned as available and useful for contactless payments across models.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.6

Contactless payments are a reliable smartwatch strength, with Apple Pay repeatedly cited as part of the platform’s everyday convenience.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.8

Cross-platform compatibility is functional, but one reviewer noted the phone experience differs between iPhone and Android, especially for replies.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
2.0

Cross-platform compatibility is poor because the Ultra 2 requires an iPhone and does not work with Android phones.

customization options
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Customization was strong, with configurable widgets, data fields, watch faces, and training screens noted across reviews.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.5

Customization is strong across watch faces, complications, utility slots, action button choices, and app-driven personalization.

display quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.6

Display quality was one of the strongest attributes, with reviewers repeatedly praising the vibrant, crisp AMOLED screen.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
5.0

Display quality is one of the best-reviewed attributes, with multiple reviewers calling it among the best smartwatch screens they have tested.

durability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Durability evidence was positive overall, including resistance to daily abuse, though not all reviewers considered it a rugged outdoor watch.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.8

Durability is a major strength, supported by titanium, sapphire, MIL-STD testing, and reviewers’ reports of wear resistance.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
1.0

ECG functionality was consistently absent; reviewers repeatedly stated users need a different or higher-end Garmin for ECG/EKG.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.7

ECG functionality is well supported and repeatedly mentioned as part of the Ultra 2’s robust health suite, including Afib-related features.

fit
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Fit was generally positive, with the small case sitting neatly on wrists and under layers without feeling oversized.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
3.8

Fit is mixed: the rectangular case can feel secure, but the single 49mm size can be challenging for smaller wrists.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.6

Fitness tracking accuracy was praised across multiple reviews, especially for daily activity data, run metrics, and overall sensor reliability.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.8

Fitness tracking accuracy is excellent overall, with reviewers praising GPS, heart-rate, and overall workout tracking accuracy against reference devices.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

GPS accuracy was a major strength; most reviewers found it accurate or solid despite the lack of dual-band GPS, with only occasional challenging-environment issues.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.8

GPS accuracy is consistently strong, with dual-frequency/multiband tracking matching or approaching Garmin-class performance in several tests.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Health tracking accuracy was supported by the reliable sensor package and detailed data collection, but evidence was less extensive than for GPS and heart rate.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.3

Health tracking accuracy is viewed positively for sleep apnea, ECG-adjacent accuracy, and broad health tracking, though some insights still need manual interpretation.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Heart rate accuracy was broadly positive, often matching chest straps or higher-end watches well, with occasional optical-sensor lag or spikes.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.9

Heart-rate accuracy is one of the strongest measured areas, with reviewers reporting close agreement with chest straps and armband monitors.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
No score yet
Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.8

LTE is a core feature because cellular support comes standard, enabling calls, streaming, and messaging away from the iPhone when a plan is active.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Navigation is useful but limited: reviewers liked breadcrumb routing, courses, back-to-start, and GPX support, while noting the absence of full maps.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
3.2

Mapping and navigation are useful but frequently caveated: Compass, waypoints, routes, and maps help, yet native GPX and phone-free offline mapping gaps remain.

materials quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.2

Materials quality was a tradeoff: the polymer/plastic body helps weight and price but feels less premium than metal.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.8

Materials quality is high, with recycled titanium, sapphire protection, and premium band hardware recurring across reviews.

menu navigation
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.2

Menu navigation is flexible because Garmin allows almost everything to be controlled by buttons, reducing reliance on touch.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.4

Menu navigation is helped by the crown, complications, Modular Ultra, and Smart Stack, which reviewers generally find useful for quick glanceable information.

music controls
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
2.3

Music controls were a weak spot, with reviewers finding on-run controls unintuitive or limited without the Music model.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.1

Music controls work well through Double Tap and the Music app, with speaker playback and wrist controls adding everyday convenience.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.7

Onboard music storage is useful on the Music edition, but reviews were split because syncing can be tedious and costs extra.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.5

Onboard storage is improved to 64GB, giving reviewers more confidence for offline music, podcasts, apps, and media downloads.

operating system experience
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.7

The operating system experience felt Garmin-like and sport-focused, with solid hybrid smartwatch behavior but limitations versus true smartwatches.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.5

The operating system experience is polished, especially with watchOS 10 and 11 updates adding new watch faces, cycling features, Smart Stack, and Ultra features.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.6

Outdoor visibility was a standout strength; reviewers repeatedly said the AMOLED screen was readable in sunlight and bright conditions.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.7

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with several reviewers reporting no trouble reading the screen in sunlight or bright reflective conditions.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Pairing reliability was specifically praised for Bluetooth headphones in one review, with no broad pairing complaints across the review set.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.4

Pairing evidence is limited but positive, with one setup transcript saying the familiar Apple pairing flow completed cleanly.

recovery insights
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.5

Recovery insights are useful through Recovery Time, Training Effect, HRV, Body Battery, and related tools, but the missing Training Readiness and Training Load limited depth.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
2.2

Recovery insights are a recurring weakness; reviewers repeatedly say Apple lacks Garmin/Whoop-style recovery, readiness, and performance analysis.

reliability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Reliability was praised in long-term and general-use terms, with reviewers describing the watch as dependable and accessible.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.3

Reliability is broadly positive in long-term and battery-use impressions, with reviewers describing stable every-other-day charging and dependable use.

safety features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Safety features were positively noted through LiveTrack and incident detection, though the evidence came from one detailed review.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.8

Safety features are a standout Ultra trait, including siren, SOS, fall and crash detection, Backtrack, cellular waypoints, and emergency guidance.

size options
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
2.7

Size options were a weakness because reviewers repeatedly noted there is only one case size, despite the size working for many wrists.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
2.6

Size options are a clear limitation because the Ultra 2 comes only in a large 49mm case.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9

Sleep tracking was mostly useful for sleep duration and scores, but opinions were mixed because at least one reviewer found missed restless sleep.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.2

Sleep tracking is generally accurate but simpler than rival platforms; newer sleep apnea detection adds more health value.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.2

Smartphone notifications were considered reliable and readable, with texts, calls, and app alerts working well when paired.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.6

Smartphone notifications are handled well, with reviewers praising rich notifications, texting, and responsive notification handling within the Apple ecosystem.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.2

Smartwatch features were solid for a sport watch, including notifications, wallet/payments, Find My Phone, music, and safety tools, but not full smartwatch depth.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.6

Smartwatch features are outstanding overall, with reviewers treating the Ultra 2 as Apple’s most full-featured wearable and a top true smartwatch.

software smoothness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.8

Software smoothness was acceptable but not premium-watch smooth, with one review noting the refresh rate was not Apple Watch-like.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.8

Software smoothness is strong, with reviewers describing zippy, quick, responsive, and buttery-smooth operation.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.6

Step counting accuracy was positively supported by one review that found it closely matched other tested devices.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
No score yet
stress tracking
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Stress tracking was present as part of the broader Garmin health and sleep feature set.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
No score yet
style and design
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.1

Style and design were viewed positively for a sporty, compact watch with a bright display that could be worn daily.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.7

Style and design are praised for the premium rugged look, especially the black titanium version, though the large look is not for everyone.

third-party app support
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.7

Third-party app support exists through Connect IQ widgets, watch faces, data fields, and apps, but reviewers did not portray it as a rich smartwatch store.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.6

Third-party app support is excellent through the watchOS App Store and helps fill gaps in navigation, fitness, and everyday smartwatch use.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Touchscreen responsiveness was mostly praised as smooth and useful, though one reviewer noted accidental touches.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.9

Touchscreen responsiveness is excellent on land, with reviewers praising taps and swipes, though touch does not work underwater.

user interface
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

The user interface was considered approachable and easy to use, especially with the combined touchscreen and button approach.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.5

The user interface is generally easy and polished, especially for iPhone users, Smart Stack, and redesigned watchOS apps.

value for money
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Value for money was one of the strongest consensus points, with many reviewers calling the 165 a strong budget or sweet-spot Garmin.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.2

Value is mixed: the Ultra 2 can justify its price for users who exploit its rugged, cellular, and battery advantages, but reviewers repeatedly note cheaper or more specialized alternatives.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
1.0

Voice assistant quality is effectively absent because one reviewer explicitly noted there is no voice assistant.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.5

Voice assistant quality improved with on-device Siri, faster commands, better dictation, and less cloud dependence, though a few minor voice quirks remain.

watch face quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Watch face quality was strong thanks to customizable stock faces and Connect IQ options.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.6

Watch face quality is strong, especially Modular Ultra and complication-rich layouts designed for the large screen.

water resistance
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Water resistance was well supported for swimming, rain, sweat, and shallow water, with reviewers noting 5ATM or 50-meter resistance.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.8

Water resistance is a major strength, with 100m/WR100 ratings, diving support, and better water credentials than standard Apple Watches.

wellness insights
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Wellness insights were strong through Morning Report, Body Battery, HRV, sleep, stress, recovery, and daily health glances.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
3.3

Wellness insights are broad but uneven: Vitals, Health data, and trends help, but reviewers often want more interpretation and readiness-style guidance.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.1

Wi-Fi connectivity exists mainly for the Music edition and music syncing, but one review reported Wi-Fi troubleshooting friction.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.2

Wi-Fi is present as part of the core connectivity package, though reviews discuss it mostly as availability rather than as a tested performance differentiator.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.8

Workout tracking variety covers most common running, cycling, swimming, gym, yoga, and fitness modes, but reviewers repeatedly noted missing triathlon, skiing, and other niche profiles.

Product 2: Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.5

Workout tracking variety is strong across running, cycling, hiking, swimming, diving, strength training, structured workouts, and third-party sport apps.