Average score
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.7
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
2.9

Auto workout detection is available, but the reviews that tested it say it can miss sessions or recognize them late.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
No score yet
app ecosystem
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.2

The broader app ecosystem is functional but limited, with reviewers calling out missing big-name apps and integrations.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Garmin's broader software ecosystem is a positive, with Connect and Connect IQ giving the watch more depth than a barebones entry-level tracker.

band quality
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.4

The silicone band is repeatedly described as breathable and well-ventilated, helping comfort during workouts and long wear.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

The included band gets positive remarks for its slim silicone construction and everyday wearability.

battery life
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.8

Battery life is a standout strength, with heavy/AOD use around 10 days and lighter use stretching toward the 25-day claim.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9

Battery life is good for an AMOLED running watch and often lands near Garmin's claims, but it is not class-leading once heavy GPS use or always-on display enters the picture.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.0

SpO₂ tracking is part of the health suite and is treated as a standard always-on wellness feature in multiple reviews.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.7

Pulse-ox support is present and useful for extra health data, but it is treated more as a nice add-on than a core reason to buy the watch.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.1

Bluetooth support is solid and central to calling, audio, and phone-linked features.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Bluetooth support is solid for headphones and sensor sharing, with reviewers reporting stable connections in normal use.

brightness
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.8

Reviewers consistently praise the very bright 3,000-nit panel, especially for outdoor readability.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Screen brightness is strong enough to make the display look lively and readable instead of dim or washed out.

build quality
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.4

Build quality is better than the price suggests, with reviewers describing the watch as well made and dependable in daily use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Build quality is strong for the price, with reviewers calling Garmin's overall construction dependable.

button controls
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.1

The two-button setup is easy to use, with textured hardware and reliable operation even with gloves.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

The five-button layout is a real advantage for sweaty workouts and gloves, giving the watch dependable control beyond touch alone.

call handling
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.0

Bluetooth calling works well enough for routine use, with reviewers highlighting clear hands-free handling from the wrist.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
1.5

Call features are limited because the watch lacks a microphone and speaker for taking calls directly from the wrist.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
2.0

Calorie estimates are a weak point, with testing suggesting they can be noticeably off the mark.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
No score yet
charging convenience
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.9

Charging is generally easy thanks to magnetic puck charging, though one review notes the proprietary dock is less elegant.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
2.5

Charging is less convenient than USB-C-on-watch designs because Garmin still relies on its proprietary cable.

charging speed
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.2

Charging speed is good for the class, with one review noting a 30-minute session restores about 30% battery.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Charging speed is a plus, with reviewers commonly seeing a full charge in about an hour.

coaching features
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.1

Zepp Coach and training guidance are strong value adds, offering workout suggestions, plans, and adaptive recommendations.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Coaching is a major strength, with Garmin Coach, adaptive plans, and suggested workouts giving newer runners useful structure without much friction.

comfort
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.5

Despite the large case, multiple reviewers found the watch comfortable enough for all-day and overnight wear.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Comfort is a standout, with many reviewers saying the watch feels light, unobtrusive, and easy to wear all day and overnight.

companion app quality
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.4

The Zepp app offers lots of data and beginner-friendly explanations, but several reviewers still find it busy or unintuitive.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Garmin Connect is generally useful and improving, though some reviewers still find it a bit dense compared with simpler platforms.

contactless payments
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.9

Zepp Pay/contactless payments are present and useful, though the overall payment experience is not described as class-leading.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Garmin Pay is a convenient inclusion and works well when supported by the user's bank, adding real day-to-day usefulness during runs and errands.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.4

Android and iPhone support is a real advantage, with reviewers noting broadly similar core functionality across both.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

The watch works across phone platforms, though the notification experience can vary somewhat between iPhone and Android.

customization options
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.1

Customization is a plus, with editable widgets, native watch faces, and support for custom faces and strap swaps.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Customization is a strong point, with editable widgets, data screens, watch faces, and settings that let users tune the experience to their preferences.

display quality
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.9

The screen is bright and readable, but some reviews say color tuning and overall refinement trail better displays.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

The AMOLED display is a headline feature, repeatedly praised for its sharpness, color, and premium feel at this price.

durability
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.5

Durability looks good for the price, with positive reports on scratch resistance and everyday toughness.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Durability looks strong for normal training use, with reviewers calling the watch durable and noting it held up well over time.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
1.0

ECG is absent, and at least one review explicitly calls out the lack of a built-in ECG module.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
1.5

ECG is a clear omission; multiple reviewers note that shoppers who need ECG or EKG features should look at pricier Garmin models.

fit
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.5

Fit is comfortable for many wrists thanks to the strap and lug design, but the large case is less friendly to smaller wrists.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Fit is generally good across typical wrists, though the single-case-size approach will not suit everyone equally.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.0

Overall fitness tracking is considered good for the price, especially for casual and recreational athletes.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Core fitness tracking is described as accurate and dependable for day-to-day activity and general training use.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.6

GPS is usable and often respectable, but the single-band setup shows more drift and compromise than pricier dual-band rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

GPS accuracy is one of the watch's standout strengths, with repeated praise for dependable routes and mileage even without dual-band GPS.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.0

Core health metrics like sleep, stress, and recovery trends are generally viewed as reasonably accurate for this segment.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Reviewers describe the watch's sleep and workout insights as highly accurate and useful for everyday training decisions.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.6

Heart-rate tracking is often good enough for steady efforts, but intervals and fast changes can expose lag or errors.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Heart-rate performance is generally strong, with several reviewers finding it reliable and in some cases close to chest-strap or higher-end watch readings.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
1.0

LTE/cellular connectivity is not offered, which limits fully phone-free calling and messaging.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
No score yet
materials quality
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.6

Materials are decent rather than premium, typically combining aluminium with plastic but avoiding an overtly cheap feel.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.7

Materials are more functional than luxurious, leaning on polymer and plastic to keep weight low, though the glass still feels durable.

menu navigation
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.1

Menu navigation is straightforward, with swipe-based movement between widgets, menus, and quick settings feeling intuitive.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Menu navigation is flexible because the watch can be fully operated with buttons, touch, or a mix of both.

music controls
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.0

Music controls work as expected for phone playback and are easy to access from the watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.3

Music handling is functional but mixed: controls are handy once set up, yet several reviewers find Garmin's music experience clunky or not worth the premium.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.2

Built-in storage is a meaningful strength, with room for offline music, podcasts, and maps.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.7

Offline music support is helpful on the Music model and includes major services, but the extra cost and setup friction keep it from being an easy win.

operating system experience
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.4

Zepp OS is easy enough to learn and efficient, though reviewers still want more polish and sophistication.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

The watch OS feels familiar and practical, making common tasks like scrolling through menus and smart features straightforward.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.8

Outdoor visibility is excellent thanks to the very bright AMOLED panel.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with reviewers consistently able to read the screen in sunlight and other bright conditions.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.2

Pairing works, but one review notes it is not as seamless as watches that are more tightly tied to a phone platform.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Pairing reliability is strong for Bluetooth headphones in day-to-day use.

recovery insights
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.0

Recovery tools are surprisingly deep for the price, including training load, recovery time, and BioCharge-style guidance.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Recovery Time, Training Effect, and similar post-workout guidance are useful, but the watch still lacks deeper training-readiness and load tools from higher-end models.

reliability
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.1

General reliability is good, with reviewers saying the watch performs consistently and that many claims hold up in real use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.5

Overall reliability is strong, with reviewers repeatedly calling the watch dependable in daily use and training.

safety features
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
2.9

Basic health alerts are present, but advanced safety tools like fall detection and emergency features are missing.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.8

Safety features like emergency contacts, incident alerts, and phone-finding tools add meaningful utility beyond pure fitness tracking.

size options
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
2.4

Size and color choice are limited, with reviews repeatedly noting the single large-case approach.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
2.5

Only one size is offered, which simplifies the lineup but reduces fit choice for shoppers who prefer smaller or larger cases.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.0

Sleep tracking is generally useful and often close enough on duration and timing, but it is not flawless night to night.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.8

Sleep tracking is usually judged accurate enough for nightly timing and general recovery, though one reviewer found the sleep score too generous on a rough night.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.0

Phone notifications are handled competently, and the watch supports everyday alert viewing and related smart features.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Phone notifications are easy to read and generally reliable, though they are basic smartwatch alerts rather than a full communications experience.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.8

Smartwatch smarts are good for basics, but multiple reviews stop short of calling it a full-featured smartwatch rival.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9

Smartwatch extras like notifications, payments, music on the Music model, and safety tools are useful, but the feature set is still secondary to fitness and training.

software smoothness
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.4

Day-to-day software motion is smooth, with several reviewers explicitly praising UI fluidity.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Software smoothness is good, with swipes and widget navigation feeling responsive rather than sluggish.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
2.8

Step and workout-counting data can be a little imprecise, especially if detailed accuracy is a priority.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Step counts are reported to line up closely with comparison devices, suggesting dependable all-day step tracking.

stress tracking
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.0

Stress tracking is a core part of the health stack and is regularly mentioned alongside heart rate, breathing, and sleep.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Stress and recovery-style wellness metrics are available and helpful for day-to-day awareness, even if they are not the platform's most advanced readiness tools.

style and design
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.3

Design reactions are mixed: some call it plain or chunky, while others appreciate the understated look and finish.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

The design is sporty, slim, and easy to wear daily, though it favors practical training aesthetics over luxury materials.

third-party app support
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
2.5

Third-party app support is one of the clearest compromises, with reviewers calling it limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Connect IQ widgets, watch faces, and sync options add useful third-party flexibility, though the ecosystem is still more fitness-focused than app-heavy smartwatch rivals.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.2

Touch response is generally strong and fast, though sensitivity can occasionally feel a bit over-eager.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Touch response is consistently praised as smooth and reliable, and it works well alongside the physical controls.

user interface
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.0

The interface is usable but uneven, with complaints about visual immaturity, clutter, and inconsistent scrolling behavior.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

The interface is approachable and easy to learn, which helps the Forerunner 165 feel friendlier than more intimidating Garmin options.

value for money
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.5

Value is one of the watch’s biggest selling points, with many reviews saying it offers unusually strong hardware and features for the price.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.3

Value is one of the Forerunner 165's biggest advantages, especially for runners who want Garmin training depth without moving up to much pricier models.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.0

The voice assistant is useful but not fully polished, with language-output limitations noted in testing.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
1.5

Voice-assistant support is absent, so this is not a strong pick for users who want voice help from a smartwatch.

watch face quality
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
3.6

Watch-face support is broad and customizable, though some reviews dislike paywalled options or mixed free selections.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Watch-face options are plentiful thanks to built-in designs and Connect IQ additions.

water resistance
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.0

5ATM protection makes it suitable for showering, swimming, rain, and general workout use around water.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.0

Water resistance is solid for rain, sweat, and swimming, making it suitable for everyday fitness use around water.

wellness insights
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.1

BioCharge, lifestyle tips, and recovery summaries add helpful wellness context beyond raw sensor data.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
4.4

Morning Report, Body Battery, HRV, and related insights are widely seen as genuinely useful for understanding recovery, sleep, and daily readiness.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
1.0

Wi-Fi is missing, which narrows connectivity options versus pricier models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.3

Wi-Fi helps with music downloads and syncing on supported models, but at least one reviewer found the setup and troubleshooting process frustrating.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Amazfit Active Max
4.5

Workout variety is a major strength, with well over 170 sports and numerous niche activity profiles.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 165
3.9

Workout coverage is broad for common sports like running, cycling, swimming, hiking, and gym work, but missing triathlon and some niche activities limits the ceiling.