Compare Garmin Venu Sq 2 vs Apple Watch SE 3

P1 Garmin Venu Sq 2
P2 Apple Watch SE 3

Comparison Takeaways

Garmin Venu Sq 2

Where It Has the Edge

  • blood oxygen tracking is 3.6 vs 1.0. Blood oxygen support is broadly present through SpO2 and Health Snapshot, though reviewers disagree on accuracy, with some...
  • cross-platform compatibility is 4.5 vs 2.0. Cross-platform compatibility is a clear advantage, with reviewers noting support for both Android and iOS, unlike some platform-locked...
  • battery life is 4.7 vs 3.5. Battery life is the clearest strength, with reviewers repeatedly reporting about nine to eleven days in normal smartwatch...
  • brightness is 4.5 vs 3.5. Brightness is rated highly, with multiple reviewers saying the AMOLED screen is vibrant and readable outdoors or under...

Apple Watch SE 3

Where It Has the Edge

  • LTE connectivity is 4.3 vs 1.0. LTE and cellular connectivity are improved by 5G, with reviewers noting better coverage, calls, texts, messages, and downloads...
  • voice assistant quality is 4.4 vs 1.5. Voice assistant quality improves with on-device Siri and the S10 chip, making requests faster and more useful than...
  • call handling is 4.1 vs 1.6. Call handling is solid for a wrist device, with useful speaker, microphone, cellular, and voice isolation notes, though...
  • mapping and navigation is 4.3 vs 1.9. Mapping and navigation are useful thanks to Apple Maps, offline maps, Find My basics, and Compass Backtrack, though...
Average score
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.6
Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.0

Only one review directly discusses automatic activity capture, saying the watch can credit elevated activity even without a manually started mode.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.2

Reviewers found automatic workout or walk detection useful and generally dependable, though one noted occasional slower workout-end recognition.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.4

Reviewers describe Garmin’s Connect IQ ecosystem as useful for faces, widgets, and extras, but much smaller than Apple or Google-style app stores.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

The app ecosystem is a major strength, with reviewers praising the Apple Watch App Store and broad app availability compared with rival budget watches.

band quality
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.0

Band impressions are split: some reviewers found the silicone strap comfortable, while others called the bundled strap stiff or not especially comfortable.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.5

Band support is a strength because the SE 3 uses Apple’s familiar strap system and has many Apple and third-party options.

battery life
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.7

Battery life is the clearest strength, with reviewers repeatedly reporting about nine to eleven days in normal smartwatch use and much less with always-on display.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Battery life is the clearest mixed area: some reviewers saw all-day or better results, while others still treated it as a daily-charge watch.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.6

Blood oxygen support is broadly present through SpO2 and Health Snapshot, though reviewers disagree on accuracy, with some readings described as low or unreliable.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
1.0

Blood oxygen tracking is consistently described as missing from the SE 3, making it a clear limitation versus Series and Ultra models.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.1

Bluetooth support is solid for sensors, headphones, and external heart-rate gear, with reviewers noting ANT+ and Bluetooth Smart accessory compatibility.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Bluetooth support is present and useful for headphones and audio, though reviewers mostly mention it as part of the connectivity package rather than a standout feature.

brightness
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.5

Brightness is rated highly, with multiple reviewers saying the AMOLED screen is vibrant and readable outdoors or under direct sunlight.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Brightness is adequate for many reviewers, but the 1,000-nit display is repeatedly framed as weaker than the Series 11 in direct sunlight.

build quality
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.4

Build quality is functional but not premium; reviewers note lightweight construction and a useful aluminum bezel while criticizing the plasticky or cheaper feel.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Build quality is generally praised as light, well made, and attractive, with tougher glass helping the SE 3 feel less like a budget device.

button controls
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.8

Button controls are usable but mixed: reviewers like glove-friendly physical buttons, while others find the two-button layout clunky or less intuitive.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Button and gesture controls are strongly received, especially the Digital Crown, side button, Double Tap, and Wrist Flick gestures.

call handling
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
1.6

Call handling is weak because reviews repeatedly state there is no Bluetooth call support, speaker, microphone, or Venu 2 Plus-style calling feature.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Call handling is solid for a wrist device, with useful speaker, microphone, cellular, and voice isolation notes, though it is not ideal as a primary phone substitute.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.8

Calorie tracking appears as part of Garmin’s basic daily fitness metrics and sport alerts, but reviewers focus more on steps, intensity minutes, and workouts.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Calorie tracking is treated as part of the reliable core fitness feature set, with one reviewer noting workout calorie metrics matched comparison data.

charging convenience
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.3

Charging convenience is mixed: the cable can plug in securely, but reviewers dislike the proprietary USB-A charger and Garmin-specific cable.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.9

Charging convenience improves with USB-C magnetic charging and fast top-ups, but sleep tracking still requires a daily charging routine for many users.

charging speed
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.8

Charging speed is praised in one review, which says the watch charged from a low level to full in under 45 minutes.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Charging speed is a repeated upgrade, with reviewers citing useful fast-charge top-ups and roughly 80 percent in around 45 minutes to an hour.

coaching features
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.5

Coaching features are strong for the price, especially Garmin Coach, downloadable workouts, training plans, and goal-based running or cycling support.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Coaching features are useful but not deeply advanced; Workout Buddy is described as beginner-friendly, motivational, or basic depending on the reviewer.

comfort
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.6

Comfort is a consistent positive, with reviewers praising the light weight, slim case, 24/7 wearability, and ability to forget it is on the wrist.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Comfort is a strength, with reviewers calling the watch lightweight, unobtrusive, and well suited to sleep or smaller wrists.

companion app quality
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.5

The companion app is powerful and data-rich, but opinions split between clear presentation and complaints that Garmin Connect can feel buried or overwhelming.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Companion app quality is functional but split across Watch, Health, and Fitness apps, which can be useful yet occasionally tedious.

contactless payments
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.8

Garmin Pay works and reviewers successfully used it, but support depends on banks and regions, so contactless payments are useful yet not universal.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Contactless payments are a strong Apple Watch staple, with Apple Pay repeatedly included among the SE 3’s core smartwatch strengths.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.5

Cross-platform compatibility is a clear advantage, with reviewers noting support for both Android and iOS, unlike some platform-locked rivals.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
2.0

Cross-platform compatibility is weak because reviewers frame the SE 3 as an iPhone smartwatch and note it only works with iPhone.

customization options
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.5

Customization is broad through shortcuts, glances, data screens, and watch faces, though some watch-face configuration and shortcut limits feel awkward.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Customization is strong across watch faces, metrics, widgets, bands, and gesture-driven controls.

display quality
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.5

Display quality is strongly praised after the move to AMOLED, with reviewers calling it bright, colorful, vibrant, sharp, and a major upgrade.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Display quality is much improved by the always-on OLED screen, though thicker bezels and lower brightness keep it below Series and Ultra displays.

durability
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.2

Durability looks good for everyday use, with mentions of Gorilla Glass, aluminum, water resistance, and resistance to scuffs and scratches.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.9

Durability is improved through tougher Ion-X glass and water resistance, but some reviewers still point to weaker scratch or dust protection than pricier models.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
1.3

ECG functionality is absent; reviewers repeatedly state the Venu Sq 2 has no ECG feature and that Garmin ECG support was limited elsewhere.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
1.0

ECG functionality is absent, and reviewers repeatedly call this one of the main health-feature tradeoffs.

fit
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.9

Fit is generally good for smaller or average wrists, though one reviewer needed time for the silicone strap to settle around the wrist.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Fit is favorable for smaller wrists and sleep tracking, though one reviewer found the older chassis less flush than newer models.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.4

Fitness tracking accuracy is strong overall, with GPS, heart-rate, sports, and exercise tracking often described as great, reliable, or close to reference devices.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Fitness tracking accuracy is a strong point, with reviewers reporting accurate workouts and close agreement with comparison devices.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.5

GPS accuracy is a major positive, with several reviewers reporting quick locks, accurate routes, and performance close to more expensive devices, aside from tougher city conditions.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

GPS accuracy is generally strong for a single-band Apple Watch, with caveats in tall-building or canyon-like conditions.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.2

Health tracking accuracy is mixed: heart-rate and sleep timing can be good, but some reviewers question how meaningfully Garmin combines health data.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.2

Health tracking accuracy is solid for the essentials, especially heart rate, sleep, and workouts, while advanced sensors are omitted.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.3

Heart-rate accuracy is mostly good to excellent, especially for steady workouts, though a few reviews note lag or higher max readings during harder intervals.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Heart-rate accuracy is repeatedly praised, with reviewers finding close agreement against straps or other watches.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
1.0

LTE connectivity is not available; one reviewer directly says the watch lacks built-in LTE or cellular connection.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

LTE and cellular connectivity are improved by 5G, with reviewers noting better coverage, calls, texts, messages, and downloads away from the phone.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
1.9

Mapping and navigation are basic; reviewers note only simple back-to-start or compass-style help, with no maps, breadcrumb trails, or course support.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Mapping and navigation are useful thanks to Apple Maps, offline maps, Find My basics, and Compass Backtrack, though precision finding is limited.

materials quality
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.9

Materials are practical rather than luxurious, with fiber-reinforced resin, aluminum trim, silicone straps, and a design carried over from the original.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Materials quality is good for the price, with aluminum and Ion-X glass, but premium titanium, sapphire, and some rugged ratings remain reserved for higher models.

menu navigation
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.5

Menu navigation is divided: some reviewers find it simple and easy after learning it, while a critical review calls it slow and inconvenient.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.5

Menu navigation is easy and fast, helped by watchOS, the Digital Crown, touch controls, and one-handed gestures.

music controls
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.0

Music controls are useful on the base model for phone playback, while the Music Edition adds more independent playback options.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Music controls are a strength, including Apple Music pairing, media controls, and playback improvements.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.1

Onboard music storage is useful on the Music Edition but widely criticized as an upcharge, since the base model lacks storage.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Onboard storage and offline playback are improved, with 64GB storage and support for music or media without the phone nearby.

operating system experience
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.0

The operating system experience is more Garmin-familiar and easier than the original Venu Sq, but still trails fuller smartwatch platforms.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

The operating system experience is a major strength; reviewers praise watchOS 26 as polished, cohesive, and rich in Apple Watch features.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.1

Outdoor visibility is generally good after the AMOLED upgrade, though one review still notes squinting in bright sun.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.6

Outdoor visibility is usable but not class-leading, with the 1,000-nit screen and direct sunlight repeatedly cited as limits.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.8

Pairing support is present for Bluetooth headphones and accessories, but direct evidence is mostly about pairing capability rather than long-term reliability.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Pairing and iPhone integration are strong, with reviewers praising how well the watch syncs, routes notifications, and pairs with Apple services.

recovery insights
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.4

Recovery insights are useful through Body Battery, but the watch lacks more advanced training readiness, load, and structured recovery metrics from higher Garmin models.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Recovery insights are present through training load, Vitals, sleep score, and workout feedback, but they are not as deep or prescriptive as some rivals.

reliability
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.4

Reliability is generally positive, especially for running-watch use and GPS chipset behavior, with reviewers calling it reliable or a solid option.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Reliability appears strong in everyday use, with reviewers emphasizing smooth performance and lack of issues in ordinary tasks.

safety features
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.9

Safety features are a plus, including Assistance, Incident Detection, and LiveTrack, though phone pairing is required for some features.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Safety features are a major strength, including fall detection, crash detection, emergency SOS, heart-rate alerts, and Compass Backtrack.

size options
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
2.2

Size options are limited, as reviewers note a single 40mm case or no size differences between versions.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Size options are adequate and familiar at 40mm and 44mm, with the smaller size appealing to smaller wrists, though color choices are limited.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.7

Sleep tracking is mixed to positive: timing is often accurate, but reviewers question stages, note no nap tracking, and mention occasional over-reporting.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Sleep tracking is useful and generally accurate for time and stages, but sleep score is sometimes described as simple or limited.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.9

Smartphone notifications work well for alerts and basic viewing, but reply features depend on Android and richer notification actions are limited.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Notifications are a core strength, especially with always-on viewing, wrist vibration routing, and gestures for dismissal or management.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.0

Smartwatch features are serviceable but limited, with repeated criticism of missing calls, voice support, richer apps, and fuller phone-like functionality.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Smartwatch features are excellent for the price, with reviewers emphasizing that it feels like a full Apple Watch rather than a stripped-down tracker.

software smoothness
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
2.9

Software smoothness is mixed, with several reviewers noticing lag, slow glances, or slower responsiveness than Apple or Samsung watches.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Software smoothness is one of the clearest strengths because the S10 chip keeps watchOS, apps, and gestures fast and responsive.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.0

Step counting is presented as a standard fitness-tracker feature, and one reviewer found step counts close to an Apple Watch comparison.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Step counting appears as part of the core activity toolkit, though reviewers discuss the feature more than rigorous step-count accuracy.

stress tracking
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.0

Stress tracking is useful through HRV, stress widgets, and Relax Reminders, though one quote frames it as part of broader wellness logging.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
No score yet
style and design
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
2.4

Style and design are polarizing, with praise for wearability but repeated criticism that the square design is ordinary, cheaper-looking, or unattractive.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.3

Style and design are mixed: reviewers like the familiar Apple Watch look but often criticize the older body, thicker bezels, and limited colors.

third-party app support
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
2.7

Third-party app support is limited; reviewers say Connect IQ has useful tools but pales beside Apple, Google, and Samsung app libraries.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Third-party app support is strong because the SE 3 retains Apple’s large app store and broad developer support.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.1

Touchscreen responsiveness is mostly good, with some reviewers calling it responsive and predictable, while others notice lag or less snappy motion.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Touchscreen responsiveness is strong, with reviewers saying touch, buttons, gestures, and everyday controls work promptly and fluidly.

user interface
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.4

The user interface is basic but usable, with Garmin’s revised UI helping, though some reviewers still find the layout underused or plain.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

The user interface is easy, clean, and cohesive, especially with watchOS 26 and the familiar watch face/home structure.

value for money
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.1

Value for money is strong for fitness-focused buyers thanks to battery, accuracy, and Garmin features, but weaker for shoppers wanting full smartwatch features or cheap pricing.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Value for money is the strongest consensus attribute, with reviewers repeatedly saying the SE 3 offers near-Series functionality at a much lower price.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
1.5

Voice assistant quality is poor because there is effectively no voice assistant support on the Venu Sq 2.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Voice assistant quality improves with on-device Siri and the S10 chip, making requests faster and more useful than earlier SE models.

watch face quality
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.4

Watch face quality is mixed: there are customizable and downloadable faces, but some reviewers dislike limited default customization and square-face support.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Watch face quality is praised through attractive, high-quality options and watchOS 26 face support.

water resistance
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.5

Water resistance is well supported, with multiple reviewers noting 5ATM or 50-meter protection suitable for swimming and shower use.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Water resistance is solid for typical use, with reviewers noting 50-meter or 164-foot resistance and swim tracking, but not advanced dive sensors.

wellness insights
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.3

Wellness insights are a core strength, including Body Battery, stress, sleep score, SpO2, Health Snapshot, respiration, and energy-level guidance.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Wellness insights are useful for mainstream users through sleep score, sleep apnea alerts, wrist temperature, Vitals, and heart-rate notifications.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
3.5

Wi-Fi is available on the Music Edition for music syncing, while the base model is described as limited to Bluetooth and ANT+.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Wi-Fi is adequate but not premium, with reviewers noting 2.4GHz-only or Wi-Fi 4 support rather than dual-band.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Garmin Venu Sq 2
4.3

Workout tracking variety is broad for casual fitness, with more than 25 profiles, HIIT, yoga, swimming, running, cycling, and structured workouts.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Workout tracking variety is strong, covering many sports, workouts, running metrics, swimming, and common gym activities.