Average score
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.0
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2
app ecosystem
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.1

Garmin’s app ecosystem is decent rather than expansive, with app downloads and Connect IQ support present, but not framed as a major reason to buy the watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.7

The app ecosystem is useful but not expansive. Reviewers mention ConnectIQ apps and data fields, while also noting that Garmin’s ecosystem feels more limited than watchOS or Wear OS.

band quality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.2

The included nylon band is widely liked for comfort and security, but not universally loved because some reviewers prefer silicone or dislike how the fabric stays damp.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Band quality is good, with soft silicone straps and positive comments about long-term wear and durability.

battery life
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.8

Battery life is the headline feature and consistently lives up to the hype, with standout real-world endurance and major upside from improved solar charging.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.2

Battery life is the biggest tradeoff. Some reviewers still found it good in normal use, but many say the brighter screen makes it noticeably weaker than the 265, especially with always-on display.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.1

Blood-oxygen tracking is included as part of the health stack, but reviews mostly mention availability rather than deeply testing its precision.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

The watch includes blood-oxygen-related health sensing, with reviewers mentioning a pulse oximeter and overnight blood-oxygen or saturation tracking as part of the health stack.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.2

Bluetooth connectivity gets limited direct discussion, but support for ANT+ and Bluetooth Smart sensors suggests strong accessory compatibility for training use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Bluetooth support is functional for phone-linked features and external sensor pairing, including Bluetooth and ANT+ accessory support.

brightness
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.2

Brightness is improved and backlight quality is better than before, yet the screen still trails bright AMOLED competitors in darker settings.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.9

Brightness is a standout strength, with multiple reviews describing the screen as one of Garmin’s brightest and easiest to read outdoors.

build quality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.3

Build quality is reassuring overall, blending a light case with a premium feel that reviewers still trust for hard outdoor use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Build quality feels premium for the line, with one review explicitly describing it as a high-quality watch.

button controls
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.6

Button controls are a strong point, with reviewers praising the hybrid control scheme and even preferring the Enduro 3’s click feel to some rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

Button controls are one of the watch’s practical strengths. Reviewers like the five-button layout and say it works reliably when touch is less convenient.

call handling
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
1.8

Call handling is limited: reviewers repeatedly note missing mic and speaker hardware, and some mention that call support is mostly limited to rejects or phone-dependent behavior.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Call support is a useful upgrade rather than a must-have killer feature. Reviewers generally found wrist calls workable and clear enough when paired to a phone.

charging convenience
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
2.9

Charging convenience is mixed: infrequent charging helps a lot, but the proprietary four-pin cable remains an annoyance.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.8

Charging convenience is less impressive. Reviewers specifically wanted wireless charging and also called out the proprietary cable setup.

charging speed
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
2.8

Charging speed is not a strength; one long-term review notes that topping the watch back to full takes a while.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Charging speed is fine in practice, with one long-term reviewer saying it can top up from empty to full during a shower.

coaching features
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.4

Coaching tools are robust, with structured strength plans, performance condition, recovery guidance, and training-plan support making the watch feel more actionable than passive.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Coaching features are well developed, especially for runners and triathletes. Garmin Coach plans, daily suggestions, and structured guidance were consistently praised.

comfort
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.4

Comfort is a major plus for such a large watch, with many reviewers surprised by how wearable and forget-on-wrist the Enduro 3 feels.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Comfort is a major plus. Across sizes and use cases, reviewers repeatedly say the watch is easy to wear for workouts, daily use, and even overnight.

companion app quality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.2

The companion app is viewed positively for surfacing trends, plans, and training data, though the reviews focus more on utility than delight.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Garmin Connect is usually viewed positively for depth and data richness, though the new subscription layer is a recurring annoyance in the reviews.

contactless payments
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.4

Contactless payments are a consistent plus, with NFC and Garmin Pay repeatedly noted as convenient everyday features that remain intact despite Enduro’s stripped-back smart focus.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

NFC payments are available, giving the watch a useful everyday smartwatch feature beyond training tools.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.2

Cross-platform support is good but uneven: the watch works with Android and iPhone, yet message replies are more capable on Android than on iOS.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Cross-platform support looks good overall, with smooth iPhone use noted in one review and phone-assistant access highlighted in another.

customization options
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.4

Customization is a strength, with hotkeys, pinned activities, editable layouts, and data-field flexibility giving power users lots of control.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Customization is a strength. Reviews mention editable glance folders, assignable shortcuts, and flexible watch-face or data layout changes.

display quality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.2

Display quality is improved versus prior solar MIP Garmins, with better clarity and readability, but reviewers still stop short of calling it an AMOLED rival.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.8

Display quality is excellent. Reviewers repeatedly call the AMOLED screen brighter, sharper, clearer, and more vivid than the previous generation.

durability
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.6

Durability scores well thanks to rugged construction, scratch resistance, and repeated confidence that the watch is built for years of hard use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Durability impressions are positive. Reviewers mention scratch resistance, pristine condition after use, and very little visible wear over time.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.9

ECG support is a meaningful add, but several reviews note it is region-limited, making the feature useful yet not equally available to every buyer.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
1.5

ECG is a clear miss. Reviewers repeatedly call out that the Forerunner 570 lacks ECG despite using Garmin’s newer sensor hardware.

fit
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.4

Fit is secure and confidence-inspiring, helped by low weight and a strap design that keeps the watch planted during activity.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.8

Fit is excellent when sized correctly, with reviewers describing the watch as secure, flush on the wrist, and almost second-skin-like.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.5

When judged as a training watch, the Enduro 3 delivers an excellent sports-tracking experience and can even substitute for a bike computer in some use cases.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

Fitness tracking is broadly praised, with one review calling the core tracking accuracy second to none for the watch’s main sports focus.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.7

GPS performance is one of the watch’s standout strengths, with repeated praise for accurate distance, strong multiband performance, and dependable routing in harder environments.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.8

GPS accuracy is one of the strongest areas. Across city runs, trails, and side-by-side tests, reviews consistently describe tracking as excellent, flawless, or near flawless.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.2

Reviews describe the Enduro 3 as a strong general wellness watch, with improved sensors and dependable everyday health tracking rather than breakthrough new health precision.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Health stats are generally described as good, with one data-driven review calling overall stat accuracy solid and another saying heart-rate and sleep-stage tracking are pretty good.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.3

Heart-rate tracking is widely rated good to very good, often close to chest straps in steady efforts, but several reviewers note misses or lag during high-intensity or gym work.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Heart-rate tracking is a major strength. Multiple reviewers say it stays close to chest straps, performs well in intervals, and is one of Garmin’s better recent sensors.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
1.0

LTE is absent, and at least one reviewer explicitly frames that as a missing convenience for buyers who want stronger untethered communication.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
No score yet
materials quality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.2

Materials balance premium and practical choices: sapphire and titanium are praised, while the plastic back is mostly accepted as a comfort and weight-saving tradeoff.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Material choices are a step up from older mid-range Forerunners, especially the aluminum bezel and sturdier-feeling case construction.

menu navigation
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.2

Menu navigation is improved, with settings and activity functions reorganized to be easier to find and use in the field.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Menu navigation is easy to learn and generally straightforward, helped by the refreshed layout and button-plus-touch design.

music controls
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.9

Music controls are present but not a highlight; reviewers note accessible music widgets and phone control, though one review calls control on the phone clunky.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Music controls are present and usable, including the ability to check what is playing from services like Spotify.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.4

Onboard music storage is a real advantage, with offline music support and generous local storage repeatedly cited alongside maps and payments.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Onboard music storage is useful but not generous. Reviews note 8GB of storage and MP3 support, with some calling the capacity a bit stingy.

operating system experience
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.0

The overall OS experience is strong but not frictionless, with reviewers liking the new organization while also noting some learning curve or lifestyle rough edges.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

The overall software experience is modern and capable. Reviewers describe it as faster, more polished, and close in feel to Garmin’s higher-end models.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.4

Outdoor visibility is excellent in bright conditions, one of the MIP display’s biggest advantages, though a few reviewers still needed the backlight in dim terrain.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.9

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with reviewers saying the display remains easy to read in bright sunlight and other tough conditions.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.4

Pairing reliability is mixed. One reviewer found syncing smooth and seamless, while another reported repeated disconnect-and-reconnect behavior.

recovery insights
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.5

Recovery tools are a clear strength, with readiness, recovery time, and training-state guidance repeatedly highlighted as helpful for pacing hard and easy days.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Recovery guidance is strong. Reviews highlight training readiness, recovery time, and daily summaries that help frame when to push and when to back off.

reliability
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.4

Reliability is a strong suit, with reviewers trusting the Enduro 3 for long adventures, low-maintenance use, and day-to-day dependability.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

General reliability is strong, with reviewers saying the watch can be relied on for training and that key controls remain responsive even after submersion.

safety features
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.5

Safety-minded touches like the flashlight, off-course alerts, sunset info, and satellite-communication pairing support add practical reassurance outdoors.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Safety coverage includes Garmin’s Incident Detection and LiveTrack features for activity sharing and emergency notifications.

size options
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
1.8

Size choice is a clear weakness because the Enduro 3 comes only in a large 51mm case that several reviews call a dealbreaker for some wrists.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Two case sizes broaden the fit range, and multiple reviewers specifically call out the benefit of having both 42mm and 47mm options.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.2

Sleep tracking is positively described, with reviewers calling it solid and useful when paired with Garmin’s overnight recovery and readiness features.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.7

Sleep tracking is useful but not flawless. Reviews say it is reasonably accurate and helpful for readiness, though some found it less robust than the best sleep-focused competitors.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.2

Notifications are handled well overall, with a revamped notification center and support for calls, texts, and app alerts, though functionality still depends on phone platform.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.5

Notifications work, but the experience is mixed. Some reviewers had smooth delivery, while others found text truncated or alerts too persistent on screen.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.0

Smartwatch features cover the essentials well enough—music, payments, notifications, flashlight, and watch customization—but the experience is clearly secondary to sport and battery priorities.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Smartwatch features are improved meaningfully with the added speaker, microphone, voice tools, and day-to-day conveniences, even if the watch still prioritizes sport over general smartwatch depth.

software smoothness
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.6

Software smoothness is acceptable rather than flawless, with praise for the redesign but repeated mentions of lag, loading delays, or a need for more polish.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.9

Software smoothness is generally strong, but not perfect. Some reviews call the experience polished, while others report crashes or temporary unresponsiveness in edge cases.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Step counting looked solid in direct testing, with one reviewer finding the watch was off by only around 40 steps in repeated checks.

stress tracking
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.0

Stress tracking is treated as part of Garmin’s broader wellness suite and is mainly valued for feeding readiness and daily body-status insights.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

Stress is part of the recovery picture rather than a headline feature, with one reviewer specifically noting that stress levels feed into the watch’s overall readiness guidance.

style and design
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.0

Style is somewhat divisive: many like the cleaner solar ring and understated rugged look, but several reviews still note the big case or polarized aesthetics.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

The design is widely liked. Reviewers highlight the brighter colors, more expressive styling, and a look that feels more refined than past Forerunners.

third-party app support
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.4

Third-party app support exists but gets mixed enthusiasm, with some reviewers appreciating downloads while others say the wider smartwatch app experience is still limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Third-party service support is solid for a sports watch, with repeated mentions of Spotify, Deezer, Amazon Music, and YouTube Music support.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.4

Touch response is a plus, especially for maps and quick interactions, and Garmin’s touch-unlock approach earns specific praise.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Touch response is consistently described as responsive and easy to use, especially alongside the physical-button setup.

user interface
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.3

The updated interface is generally well received for feeling more modern and organized, though not everyone thinks Garmin has fully finished the polish yet.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

The interface is widely praised for feeling slicker, cleaner, more intuitive, and more modern than older Garmin implementations.

value for money
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.5

Value is judged unusually well for a high-end Garmin because Enduro 3 undercuts pricier siblings while keeping most of the training and navigation substance.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.7

Value for money is the main weakness. Most reviews say the watch is too expensive for what it adds over the 265, though a small number of owners still felt very happy with the purchase.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
1.3

Voice assistant support is a weakness because the Enduro 3 lacks the Fenix 8’s speaker and microphone setup that powers voice-driven features.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Voice features are mostly good for simple commands, timers, and phone-assistant access, though one reviewer reported crashes and awkward behavior with the phone assistant.

watch face quality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.6

Watch-face support is mixed: there are new watch-face tools and customization options, but some reviewers still find Garmin’s faces less appealing than rivals’.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Watch-face customization is strong, with reviewers calling the default face clean and noting that layouts and displayed data can be tailored easily.

water resistance
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.0

Water resistance is solid for swimming and surface sports, but reviewers consistently remind buyers that this is not the dive-ready Garmin option.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Water resistance is solid for swimming use. Reviews mention pool use, open-water suitability, and repeated use in lakes or the ocean without issue.

wellness insights
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.5

Wellness insights are deep and useful, with Body Battery, HRV, sleep coaching, illness-readiness signals, and training status frequently called out as valuable daily context.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Wellness insights are a standout. Body Battery, Sleep Score, energy level, and broader readiness-style insights were repeatedly cited as genuinely useful.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.8

Workout coverage is extensive, spanning major endurance sports, gym profiles, and multisport use, with reviewers repeatedly emphasizing just how broad the activity list is.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.8

Workout coverage is excellent. Reviewers repeatedly mention broad activity support, triathlon and multisport tools, and dozens of sport modes.