Compare Garmin Enduro 3 vs Garmin Forerunner 570

P1 Garmin Enduro 3
P2 Garmin Forerunner 570

Comparison Takeaways

Garmin Enduro 3

Where It Has the Edge

  • ECG functionality is 3.8 vs 1.0. ECG support is repeatedly noted through the Gen 5 sensor, but availability is region-dependent and not treated as...
  • reliability is 5.0 vs 2.3. Reliability is strong in long-term use, with one reviewer describing the watch as dependable for demanding races and...
  • mapping and navigation is 4.4 vs 2.2. Mapping and navigation are major strengths, with TopoActive maps, turn-by-turn guidance, ClimbPro, off-course alerts, rerouting, and route-following praised...
  • value for money is 4.6 vs 2.6. Value for money is strong despite the high price because reviewers repeatedly emphasize the reduced launch price and...

Garmin Forerunner 570

Where It Has the Edge

  • voice assistant quality is 4.1 vs 1.5. Voice assistant and command quality is good for watch tasks and commands, while phone-assistant workflows can be clunky...
  • call handling is 4.2 vs 1.7. Call handling is a solid new smartwatch feature via microphone, speaker, and Bluetooth, though reviewers usually treat it...
  • size options is 4.5 vs 2.0. Size options are a strength because the 570 comes in 42mm and 47mm, making it more accessible than...
  • charging speed is 4.4 vs 2.5. Charging speed receives positive user evidence, with one long-term reviewer saying it can recharge during a morning shower.
Average score
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.8
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Reviewers noted helpful race/activity automation, especially AutoLap timing gates and finish-line cleanup, but evidence is narrow rather than a broad auto-detection theme.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.5

The app ecosystem is adequate but not Apple-like, with Connect IQ apps and watch faces available but not treated as a major strength.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

Garmin's app ecosystem is useful through Connect IQ and watchface downloads, though reviewers repeatedly describe it as more limited than Apple or Wear OS.

band quality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.9

Band quality is mostly positive for comfort and adjustability, but sweat retention and the lack of an included silicone option are recurring caveats.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

The silicone/translucent bands are generally praised for softness, fit, sweat comfort, and durability, with one reviewer noting a strap tail/bump annoyance.

battery life
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.8

Battery life is the clearest consensus strength, with reviewers repeatedly reporting weeks of use, ultra-long GPS tracking, and meaningful solar gains.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.3

Battery life is divisive: still far better than mainstream smartwatches for some users, but several reviewers saw a drop from the 265 and short always-on endurance.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.0

Blood oxygen tracking is present as part of the broader Garmin sensor and wellness package rather than a standout reason to buy.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Blood oxygen tracking is present and used in overnight health tracking, but reviewers mention it as part of the health suite rather than a standout accuracy feature.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.0

Bluetooth connectivity is supported for sensors, with the watch pairing to ANT+ and Bluetooth Smart accessories.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.6

Bluetooth supports calls and pairing with phones/sensors, but one reviewer reported frequent phone disconnect notices, making connectivity evidence mixed.

brightness
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.0

Brightness is improved versus prior solar designs and usable in dim conditions with backlight, though it is not AMOLED-level vivid.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

Brightness is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers calling the AMOLED screen brighter, vivid, and among Garmin's brightest.

build quality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.2

Build quality is generally strong for the price, but reviewers split on the move to more plastic and the loss of some metal construction.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Build quality is viewed positively thanks to a robust-feeling case and upgraded aluminum bezel, with no major build concerns outside price-tier omissions.

button controls
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.3

Button controls are a major strength, combining Garmin's five-button system with touch input and customizable hotkeys.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

The five-button setup is repeatedly praised for sweaty, rainy, gloved, and swimming use, while also complementing the touchscreen well.

call handling
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
1.7

Call handling is limited because the Enduro 3 lacks speaker and microphone hardware; reviewers note rejection or phone handoff rather than true wrist calling.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

Call handling is a solid new smartwatch feature via microphone, speaker, and Bluetooth, though reviewers usually treat it as handy rather than essential.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.0

Calorie tracking appears as a standard activity metric, but reviewers do not give it much deeper evaluation beyond its presence in activity profiles.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Calorie tracking is available and tied into activity details, including pack-weight calculations, but reviewers do not deeply validate calorie accuracy.

charging convenience
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.2

Charging convenience is mixed: huge battery life reduces charging frequency, but Garmin's physical proprietary cable remains a nuisance for some.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.7

Charging convenience is acceptable but not premium: Garmin's connector is functional and fast enough, yet the lack of wireless charging is a recurring caveat.

charging speed
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
2.5

Charging speed is a minor weakness in the long-term evidence, where one reviewer says it takes a while to reach full charge.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Charging speed receives positive user evidence, with one long-term reviewer saying it can recharge during a morning shower.

coaching features
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.3

Coaching features are strong, especially daily suggestions, training plans, strength workouts, animated exercises, and readiness-based workout guidance.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Coaching features are a major strength, including Garmin Coach, triathlon plans, daily workout suggestions, and adaptive training guidance.

comfort
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.1

Comfort is surprisingly good for a large endurance watch thanks to low weight and nylon straps, though sleeping with it or wearing it on small wrists can be less comfortable.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Comfort is broadly strong, with reviewers calling it light and wearable all day; only larger-size sleep comfort and strap buckle issues temper the praise.

companion app quality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.0

The companion app helps surface trends and training context, though reviewers focus more on Garmin's watch-side metrics than on the app itself.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

Garmin Connect is powerful and data-rich, though one reviewer notes its learning curve and depth can feel overwhelming.

contactless payments
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.3

Contactless payments are a clear positive, with Garmin Pay and NFC repeatedly mentioned as available and useful.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Contactless payment support is confirmed through NFC payments, but reviewers mention it briefly rather than as a major buying reason.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.5

Cross-platform compatibility is good for basic Android and iPhone use, though reviewer evidence implies fuller reply features are stronger on Android.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Cross-platform use is solid for notifications on Android and iPhone, but iPhone reply limitations keep it short of Apple Watch-level integration.

customization options
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.5

Customization is a strength, with hotkeys, data fields, widgets, sport screens, and Garmin-style controls offering deep personalization.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Customization is strong across watchfaces, widgets, data fields, layouts, colors, and report options, with several reviewers highlighting personalization.

display quality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.0

Display quality is strong for an MIP watch, with improved clarity and readability, but reviewers consistently frame AMOLED as brighter and more colorful.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

Display quality is a standout: the AMOLED panel is sharp, vivid, responsive, and frequently cited as a major upgrade.

durability
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.5

Durability is strong in long-term and lab-style reviews, with sapphire, titanium, rugged construction, and minimal visible wear after months of use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Durability evidence is mostly positive, with bezels, bands, water use, and glass holding up well, though one review noted small scratches or heat-related unresponsiveness.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.8

ECG support is repeatedly noted through the Gen 5 sensor, but availability is region-dependent and not treated as the watch's main draw.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
1.0

ECG functionality is the clearest omission: many reviewers criticize the lack of ECG despite the newer heart-rate sensor and the price.

fit
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.5

Fit is secure and comfortable despite the 51mm case, helped by low weight and strap stability.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Fit is praised for secure, no-bounce wear and useful size options, particularly for smaller wrists.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.3

Fitness tracking accuracy is strong across real workouts, with reviewers praising activity logs and controlled heart-rate tests while noting some optical limits.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Fitness tracking accuracy is strong overall, anchored by consistently praised GPS and heart-rate performance across running, cycling, and multisport use.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.5

GPS accuracy is one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for satellite lock, multiband performance, technical-terrain reliability, and real-world route precision.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

GPS accuracy is one of the strongest attributes, with reviewers repeatedly calling tracks excellent, flawless, near-perfect, or among the best tested.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.3

Reviewers found Garmin's health signals useful and sometimes impressively sensitive, especially when wellness scores reflected underlying fatigue or illness signs.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Health tracking is broad and useful, covering heart rate, sleep, stress, skin temperature, respiration, and wellness metrics, but some illness/sleep limitations appear.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.9

Heart rate accuracy was generally strong with the Gen 5 sensor, though several reviewers still saw optical-sensor wobble during sharp intervals, climbs, or strength work.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Heart-rate accuracy is highly rated across most reviews, especially for running and intervals, though lab-style testing found some delays and dips.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
1.0

LTE connectivity is effectively absent; reviewers note no cellular connectivity and one argues the Enduro line is the kind of model that deserves LTE.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
1.1

LTE connectivity is not offered; reviewers explicitly note the lack of cellular connection or cellular smartwatch capability.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.4

Mapping and navigation are major strengths, with TopoActive maps, turn-by-turn guidance, ClimbPro, off-course alerts, rerouting, and route-following praised across reviews.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.2

Navigation is the biggest tradeoff: breadcrumb routing works, but the absence of offline/topographic maps is repeatedly criticized at this price.

materials quality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.5

Materials quality is strong where it matters, with sapphire glass and titanium repeatedly cited, though some plastic parts are a tradeoff for lower weight.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Materials quality improves over the 265 with an aluminum bezel and Gorilla Glass, giving the watch a more premium feel.

menu navigation
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.8

Menu navigation is improved and more coherent for some reviewers, but added screens and button presses can still make parts of the interface feel busy.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Menu navigation is mostly intuitive and easy, supported by buttons, touchscreen, Glances, and refreshed menus, though phantom clicks hurt one review.

music controls
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.0

Music controls are available but mixed: reviewers note a dedicated music lane and phone controls, while also calling some implementation clunky or not dismissible.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Music controls are available alongside notifications and calendar previews, but reviewer evidence is brief.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.3

Onboard music storage is well supported, with offline music, 32GB for maps/music, and streaming services such as Spotify, Amazon Music, Deezer, and YouTube Music mentioned.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Onboard music storage is supported through 8GB storage, MP3s, and streaming-service syncing, giving it better music capability than many sports watches.

operating system experience
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.0

The operating system experience improves over older Garmins with the Fenix 8-style interface, though not all reviewers think the redesign is fully polished.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

The updated operating-system experience is cleaner and more modern, with Garmin aligning the 570 with newer Fenix/Forerunner UI styling.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.5

Outdoor visibility is mostly strong in bright light, but mixed in forests or dim map situations where the backlight may be necessary.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.9

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with reviewers praising sunlight readability and the bright AMOLED display in harsh outdoor conditions.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.6

Pairing and syncing are mixed: some reviewers found smooth iPhone/Strava syncing, while another saw repeated phone disconnects.

recovery insights
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.5

Recovery insights are a major strength, with training readiness, recovery time, Body Battery, and readiness guidance helping users decide when to push or rest.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Recovery insights are a major reason reviewers liked the watch, especially Training Readiness, Body Battery, HRV, and sleep-informed rest guidance.

reliability
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
5.0

Reliability is strong in long-term use, with one reviewer describing the watch as dependable for demanding races and adventures.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.3

Reliability is mixed: core tracking is reliable, but reviewers cite occasional crashes, overheating unresponsiveness, software bugs, and phantom clicks.

safety features
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.3

Safety features are valuable for outdoor use, especially the flashlight, red LED, and off-course alerts that can prevent navigation mistakes.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Safety features are solid, with LiveTrack, Incident Detection, and safety/tracking features mentioned as part of the package.

size options
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
2.0

Size options are a clear weakness because the Enduro 3 comes only in a large 51mm case.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Size options are a strength because the 570 comes in 42mm and 47mm, making it more accessible than single-size Garmin alternatives.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.0

Sleep tracking was described as solid, with sleep stages, HRV, Sleep Coach, and morning wellness context supporting recovery decisions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.3

Sleep tracking is useful but not class-leading; some found it reasonably accurate while others called it less robust or less complete than competitors.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.3

Smartphone notifications are useful and improved, with grouping, clearer notification access, and basic notification display across paired phones.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.1

Smartphone notifications work, but evidence is mixed because one reviewer found notification handling intrusive during workouts.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
2.8

Smartwatch features cover essentials such as notifications, music, Garmin Pay, and Messenger, but reviewers agree it falls short of Apple, Samsung, or Fenix 8 lifestyle extras.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Smartwatch features improved meaningfully with mic, speaker, calls, voice commands, music, NFC, reports, and notifications, though it is not a full smartwatch.

software smoothness
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.1

Software smoothness is mixed: some reviewers found the watch fast and reactive, while others saw sluggish UI behavior or slow loading of post-run stats.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Software smoothness is generally positive, with reviewers describing the interface as polished, faster, and modern, but not bug-free.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Step counting appears accurate in direct step tests and is part of the daily tracking suite.

stress tracking
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.0

Stress tracking appears within Garmin's broader daily health suite, alongside sleep, blood oxygen, Body Battery, and recovery metrics.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Stress tracking feeds into readiness and wellness guidance, giving it practical value for recovery decisions.

style and design
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.5

Style and design are polarizing: reviewers like the rugged, slimmer-bezel direction, but some call the look subjective or too large.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Style and design are a standout upgrade, with reviewers praising the colorful, expressive, more premium look.

third-party app support
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
2.5

Third-party app support is a weakness versus mainstream smartwatches, with reviewers noting few compelling third-party apps.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.5

Third-party app support exists through Connect IQ, but reviewers view Garmin's store as useful yet limited versus full smartwatch platforms.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.3

Touchscreen responsiveness is good, especially for maps and the new touch-unlock behavior, while physical buttons remain available for reliability.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Touchscreen responsiveness is widely praised as responsive, fast, and useful, especially alongside the physical buttons.

user interface
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.8

The user interface is generally more modern and phone-like, with quicker access to key settings, though some reviewers remain on the fence.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

The user interface is cleaner and easier to navigate than before, though Garmin's learning curve and rare menu quirks remain.

value for money
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.6

Value for money is strong despite the high price because reviewers repeatedly emphasize the reduced launch price and cheaper position versus comparable Fenix models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.6

Value for money is the most common concern: reviewers like the watch but repeatedly say the price is high versus the 265, 965, 970, and rivals.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
1.5

Voice-assistant quality is weak because reviewers repeatedly note the absence of microphone, speaker, and digital-assistant interaction.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Voice assistant and command quality is good for watch tasks and commands, while phone-assistant workflows can be clunky or dependent on the phone.

watch face quality
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.0

Watch face quality is mixed: Connect IQ and third-party options exist, but one reviewer criticized the built-in faces while another liked the large library.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Watch face quality is strong thanks to customization and readable data layouts, with reviewers highlighting clean default faces and useful widgets.

water resistance
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.0

Water resistance is solid for swimming and surface water use at 10ATM or 100 m, but reviewers stress that it is not a dive watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Water resistance is well supported for swimming and real-world water exposure, including pools, lakes, ocean use, and a 5ATM rating.

wellness insights
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.2

Wellness insights are extensive, combining sleep, HRV, stress, Body Battery, blood oxygen, recovery levels, and daily health trends into useful training context.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Wellness insights are deep and actionable, especially Body Battery, readiness, stress, sleep, and recovery metrics that shape daily decisions.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
3.0

Wi-Fi connectivity is only lightly evidenced through watch settings access, with no detailed performance praise or complaint.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
No score yet
workout tracking variety
Product 1: Garmin Enduro 3
4.8

Workout variety is excellent, with reviewers describing broad sports profiles and deep sport-specific modes for runners, cyclists, swimmers, hikers, triathletes, gym users, and more.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Workout tracking variety is excellent, with triathlon/multisport support, many sport modes, open-water swimming, gym profiles, and new activity types.