Compare Garmin Forerunner 965 vs Apple Watch SE 3

P1 Garmin Forerunner 965
P2 Apple Watch SE 3

Comparison Takeaways

Garmin Forerunner 965

Where It Has the Edge

  • blood oxygen tracking is 4.3 vs 1.0. The Forerunner 965 supports Pulse Ox or blood oxygen readings, and reviewers treat it as part of a...
  • cross-platform compatibility is 4.1 vs 2.0. The watch works across iPhone, Android, and Apple Health workflows, although some functions are more capable on Android.
  • style and design is 4.6 vs 3.3. Style and design receive strong praise for the slim, modern AMOLED look, titanium accents, and a more premium...
  • brightness is 4.5 vs 3.5. Reviewers consistently praise the AMOLED screen as bright enough for quick glances, direct sunlight, and varied lighting conditions.

Apple Watch SE 3

Where It Has the Edge

  • LTE connectivity is 4.3 vs 1.0. LTE and cellular connectivity are improved by 5G, with reviewers noting better coverage, calls, texts, messages, and downloads...
  • voice assistant quality is 4.4 vs 1.4. Voice assistant quality improves with on-device Siri and the S10 chip, making requests faster and more useful than...
  • activity auto-detection is 4.2 vs 1.8. Reviewers found automatic workout or walk detection useful and generally dependable, though one noted occasional slower workout-end recognition.
  • size options is 4.0 vs 2.4. Size options are adequate and familiar at 40mm and 44mm, with the smaller size appealing to smaller wrists,...
Average score
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0
Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.8

Exercise auto-detection is a weakness because one review says it does not work well enough for training, so users need to start workouts manually.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.2

Reviewers found automatic workout or walk detection useful and generally dependable, though one noted occasional slower workout-end recognition.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Garmin offers Connect IQ apps and widgets, but reviewers describe the app store as useful yet less polished and less broad than major smartwatch ecosystems.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

The app ecosystem is a major strength, with reviewers praising the Apple Watch App Store and broad app availability compared with rival budget watches.

band quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Reviewers generally like the silicone straps and removable bands, with praise for comfort and style, though one notes the silicone band needs drying after workouts.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.5

Band support is a strength because the SE 3 uses Apple’s familiar strap system and has many Apple and third-party options.

battery life
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Battery life is widely praised for an AMOLED sports watch, usually landing around a week with always-on use and much longer in gesture or smartwatch modes, but ultra and multi-day users see limits.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Battery life is the clearest mixed area: some reviewers saw all-day or better results, while others still treated it as a daily-charge watch.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

The Forerunner 965 supports Pulse Ox or blood oxygen readings, and reviewers treat it as part of a broad health-sensor suite rather than a headline differentiator.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
1.0

Blood oxygen tracking is consistently described as missing from the SE 3, making it a clear limitation versus Series and Ultra models.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Bluetooth and ANT+ support are useful for headphones, sensors, accessories, and heart-rate broadcasting, with reviewers repeatedly noting broad connectivity.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Bluetooth support is present and useful for headphones and audio, though reviewers mostly mention it as part of the connectivity package rather than a standout feature.

brightness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Reviewers consistently praise the AMOLED screen as bright enough for quick glances, direct sunlight, and varied lighting conditions.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Brightness is adequate for many reviewers, but the 1,000-nit display is repeatedly framed as weaker than the Series 11 in direct sunlight.

build quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Build quality is framed as performance-focused rather than rugged, with the watch feeling purpose-built for running and training.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Build quality is generally praised as light, well made, and attractive, with tougher glass helping the SE 3 feel less like a budget device.

button controls
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

The five-button Garmin layout is a major strength, especially during workouts, because nearly every function can be handled without relying on touch.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Button and gesture controls are strongly received, especially the Digital Crown, side button, Double Tap, and Wrist Flick gestures.

call handling
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.7

Call handling is mixed: some reviews mention answering or taking calls, while others criticize the lack of speaker and microphone features found on more smartwatch-focused models.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Call handling is solid for a wrist device, with useful speaker, microphone, cellular, and voice isolation notes, though it is not ideal as a primary phone substitute.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.9

Calorie-related usefulness is limited: one reviewer uses calorie alerts for fueling, while another says Garmin is weak for diet and calorie tracking.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Calorie tracking is treated as part of the reliable core fitness feature set, with one reviewer noting workout calorie metrics matched comparison data.

charging convenience
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.2

Charging is mixed because USB-C on the cable helps, but reviewers still criticize Garmin’s proprietary four-pin connection, weak cord attachment, and lack of wireless charging.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.9

Charging convenience improves with USB-C magnetic charging and fast top-ups, but sleep tracking still requires a daily charging routine for many users.

charging speed
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Charging speed is generally good, with several reviews describing roughly one hour to major recharge levels or fast percentage gains.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Charging speed is a repeated upgrade, with reviewers citing useful fast-charge top-ups and roughly 80 percent in around 45 minutes to an hour.

coaching features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Coaching tools are a major strength, including suggested workouts, training plans, interval tools, Garmin Coach, race guidance, and structured workout support.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Coaching features are useful but not deeply advanced; Workout Buddy is described as beginner-friendly, motivational, or basic depending on the reviewer.

comfort
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Comfort is generally strong thanks to the light, slim design, though bulk can still be noticeable for smaller wrists or sleep tracking.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Comfort is a strength, with reviewers calling the watch lightweight, unobtrusive, and well suited to sleep or smaller wrists.

companion app quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Garmin Connect receives mixed but mostly positive feedback: reviewers praise data depth and access, while some find route creation or organization clunky.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Companion app quality is functional but split across Watch, Health, and Fitness apps, which can be useful yet occasionally tedious.

contactless payments
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Garmin Pay is present and useful where supported, but reviewers note banking support can be weak depending on region.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Contactless payments are a strong Apple Watch staple, with Apple Pay repeatedly included among the SE 3’s core smartwatch strengths.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

The watch works across iPhone, Android, and Apple Health workflows, although some functions are more capable on Android.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
2.0

Cross-platform compatibility is weak because reviewers frame the SE 3 as an iPhone smartwatch and note it only works with iPhone.

customization options
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Customization is a clear strength, with extensive control over watch faces, data screens, sport profiles, widgets, and settings from the watch or app.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Customization is strong across watch faces, metrics, widgets, bands, and gesture-driven controls.

display quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

The AMOLED display is one of the most praised upgrades, with reviewers highlighting crisp resolution, color, legibility, map detail, and a more modern feel.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Display quality is much improved by the always-on OLED screen, though thicker bezels and lower brightness keep it below Series and Ultra displays.

durability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.2

Durability is the most repeated physical caveat: multiple reviewers report scratches or worry about Gorilla Glass compared with more rugged sapphire models.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.9

Durability is improved through tougher Ion-X glass and water resistance, but some reviewers still point to weaker scratch or dust protection than pricier models.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.0

The Forerunner 965 lacks ECG hardware, a repeated limitation compared with Garmin’s Venu line and newer or more smartwatch-oriented alternatives.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
1.0

ECG functionality is absent, and reviewers repeatedly call this one of the main health-feature tradeoffs.

fit
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Fit is positive for clothing and activity use, with one review noting the slim profile avoids issues with gloves or jackets.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Fit is favorable for smaller wrists and sleep tracking, though one reviewer found the older chassis less flush than newer models.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Fitness tracking is very strong, with reviewers praising distance, pace, activity data, and sensor consistency across workouts.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Fitness tracking accuracy is a strong point, with reviewers reporting accurate workouts and close agreement with comparison devices.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

GPS accuracy is one of the strongest points, with repeated praise for multi-band/SatIQ reliability, precise tracks, quick lock-on, and low distance error.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

GPS accuracy is generally strong for a single-band Apple Watch, with caveats in tall-building or canyon-like conditions.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Health tracking is data-rich and generally reliable, combining heart rate, HRV, blood oxygen, stress, sleep, Body Battery, and related metrics.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.2

Health tracking accuracy is solid for the essentials, especially heart rate, sleep, and workouts, while advanced sensors are omitted.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Heart rate accuracy is broadly strong and often close to straps or medical devices, though several reviewers note lag or limitations during high-intensity intervals.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Heart-rate accuracy is repeatedly praised, with reviewers finding close agreement against straps or other watches.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.0

LTE is absent, and reviewers call this out as a smart-feature limitation compared with a few Garmin or smartwatch alternatives.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

LTE and cellular connectivity are improved by 5G, with reviewers noting better coverage, calls, texts, messages, and downloads away from the phone.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Mapping and navigation are standout strengths, with full maps, turn-by-turn directions, route following, Next Fork, and AMOLED-enhanced map detail.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Mapping and navigation are useful thanks to Apple Maps, offline maps, Find My basics, and Compass Backtrack, though precision finding is limited.

materials quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Materials quality is mixed-positive: reviewers like the titanium bezel, silicone strap, and Gorilla Glass, but some still prefer sapphire for durability.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Materials quality is good for the price, with aluminum and Ion-X glass, but premium titanium, sapphire, and some rugged ratings remain reserved for higher models.

menu navigation
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Menu navigation is generally approachable for Garmin users, with button and touchscreen options, though some newcomers may find the system dense.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.5

Menu navigation is easy and fast, helped by watchOS, the Digital Crown, touch controls, and one-handed gestures.

music controls
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

Music support is useful for controls and offline playback, but reviewers note the experience can be basic or occasionally glitchy.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Music controls are a strength, including Apple Music pairing, media controls, and playback improvements.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Onboard music storage is a solid smart feature, with Spotify, Deezer, Amazon Music, MP3 or podcast support and enough storage for music plus maps.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Onboard storage and offline playback are improved, with 64GB storage and support for music or media without the phone nearby.

operating system experience
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.8

The Garmin operating system is sports-first: smooth and functional on the watch, but still basic compared with Apple or Wear OS smartwatches.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

The operating system experience is a major strength; reviewers praise watchOS 26 as polished, cohesive, and rich in Apple Watch features.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Outdoor visibility is strong for an AMOLED watch, with reviewers reporting good readability in sunlight and bright outdoor conditions.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.6

Outdoor visibility is usable but not class-leading, with the 1,000-nit screen and direct sunlight repeatedly cited as limits.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Pairing and syncing are reliable, with quick phone pairing, seamless Strava syncing, and dependable activity uploads.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Pairing and iPhone integration are strong, with reviewers praising how well the watch syncs, routes notifications, and pairs with Apple services.

recovery insights
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Recovery insights are a core strength, especially Training Readiness, HRV Status, Body Battery, Acute Load, Chronic Load, and load-ratio guidance.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Recovery insights are present through training load, Vitals, sleep score, and workout feedback, but they are not as deep or prescriptive as some rivals.

reliability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Reliability is strong across testing, with reviewers describing stable SatIQ/GPS behavior and dependable performance over heavy use.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Reliability appears strong in everyday use, with reviewers emphasizing smooth performance and lack of issues in ordinary tasks.

safety features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Safety features include Find My Phone/Watch, wrong-direction or course alerts, fall or security features, and location sharing through LiveTrack.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Safety features are a major strength, including fall detection, crash detection, emergency SOS, heart-rate alerts, and Compass Backtrack.

size options
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.4

Size options are limited because the Forerunner 965 comes in one large-ish size, which can be a drawback for smaller wrists.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Size options are adequate and familiar at 40mm and 44mm, with the smaller size appealing to smaller wrists, though color choices are limited.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.8

Sleep tracking is mixed: some reviewers find it excellent or improved, while others say phases or scores can feel off.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Sleep tracking is useful and generally accurate for time and stages, but sleep score is sometimes described as simple or limited.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Notifications are readable and customizable, but interaction is limited, especially on iOS and compared with fuller smartwatches.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Notifications are a core strength, especially with always-on viewing, wrist vibration routing, and gestures for dismissal or management.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

Smartwatch features are useful but secondary, with notifications, music, Garmin Pay, weather, and calls in some contexts but fewer smart extras than Apple or Wear OS.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Smartwatch features are excellent for the price, with reviewers emphasizing that it feels like a full Apple Watch rather than a stripped-down tracker.

software smoothness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Software smoothness is generally good, with smoother UI and updates praised, though Garmin’s broader smart-app polish remains imperfect.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Software smoothness is one of the clearest strengths because the S10 chip keeps watchOS, apps, and gestures fast and responsive.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Step counting is supported and measured well in one lab-style review, while other reviewers appreciate live step visibility and basic activity tracking.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Step counting appears as part of the core activity toolkit, though reviewers discuss the feature more than rigorous step-count accuracy.

stress tracking
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Stress tracking is part of Garmin’s broader readiness and wellness stack, useful for recovery context but not always used heavily by reviewers.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
No score yet
style and design
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Style and design receive strong praise for the slim, modern AMOLED look, titanium accents, and a more premium everyday appearance.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.3

Style and design are mixed: reviewers like the familiar Apple Watch look but often criticize the older body, thicker bezels, and limited colors.

third-party app support
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Third-party support is useful through Connect IQ, Strava, Komoot, and integrations, but the app ecosystem lacks the polish and breadth of larger smartwatch platforms.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Third-party app support is strong because the SE 3 retains Apple’s large app store and broad developer support.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Touchscreen support is useful for maps and daily navigation, though many reviewers prefer disabling it during workouts and using buttons instead.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Touchscreen responsiveness is strong, with reviewers saying touch, buttons, gestures, and everyday controls work promptly and fluidly.

user interface
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

The AMOLED-era interface is clearer, smoother, and more colorful, while still retaining Garmin’s dense data-first structure.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

The user interface is easy, clean, and cohesive, especially with watchOS 26 and the familiar watch face/home structure.

value for money
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Value depends on the buyer: serious athletes get premium mapping and training tools, but casual users or 955 owners may not justify the price.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Value for money is the strongest consensus attribute, with reviewers repeatedly saying the SE 3 offers near-Series functionality at a much lower price.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.4

Voice assistant quality is poor because the watch lacks the speaker, microphone, and voice-assistant features found on some alternatives.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Voice assistant quality improves with on-device Siri and the S10 chip, making requests faster and more useful than earlier SE models.

watch face quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Watch faces benefit from AMOLED color and customization, with reviewers praising the stock faces and Connect IQ options.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Watch face quality is praised through attractive, high-quality options and watchOS 26 face support.

water resistance
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Water resistance is strong for workouts, swimming, showering, and wet use, with reviews noting 5ATM or 50-meter protection.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Water resistance is solid for typical use, with reviewers noting 50-meter or 164-foot resistance and swim tracking, but not advanced dive sensors.

wellness insights
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Wellness insights are broad and useful, especially Body Battery, readiness, sleep, stress, HRV, and daily health context.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Wellness insights are useful for mainstream users through sleep score, sleep apnea alerts, wrist temperature, Vitals, and heart-rate notifications.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

Wi-Fi is useful for map downloads, updates, and faster transfers, although it is not a major review focus.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Wi-Fi is adequate but not premium, with reviewers noting 2.4GHz-only or Wi-Fi 4 support rather than dual-band.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Workout variety is extensive, with running, cycling, swimming, triathlon, gym, yoga, hiking, golf, and many sport profiles or metrics.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Workout tracking variety is strong, covering many sports, workouts, running metrics, swimming, and common gym activities.