Average score
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.5
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.0

Auto-detection is explicitly criticized in testing, with reviewers saying workouts usually need to be started manually to access the watch’s richer tracking features.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.0

The watch ecosystem feels limited compared with rivals, with reviewers specifically pointing to restricted customization and a thinner app offering.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

The app ecosystem is solid rather than class-leading: reviewers cite Connect IQ support and a healthy app catalog, but not the broader polish or reach of Apple or Wear OS ecosystems.

band quality
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.2

Band quality is good overall, with the included strap described as soft, flexible, and secure.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Band quality is generally good, with flexible silicone straps and solid sweat performance, though silicone can stay damp and irritate skin if not dried after workouts.

battery life
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.0

Battery life is solid and often close to claims, but it is not class-leading and can drop faster with heavier features enabled.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Battery life is a major strength. Reviewers report multi-day to multi-week endurance depending on usage, with always-on display and GPS workouts reducing runtime but still leaving it ahead of many rivals.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.9

SpO2 is onboard and presented with baseline and altitude context, but reviews focused more on feature availability than deep validation.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

The watch supports blood oxygen tracking and related wellness sensors, but reviewers discuss it more as part of the feature set than as a standout accuracy differentiator.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.3

Bluetooth support is broad enough for sensors and broadcasting, but some workflows feel more finicky than they should.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Bluetooth connectivity is dependable for phone pairing and headphone playback, with no major complaints in the selected reviews.

brightness
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.7

Screen brightness is excellent, with reviewers repeatedly saying the display stayed easy to read across lighting conditions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Brightness is repeatedly praised. Reviewers call the AMOLED screen bright, vivid, and easy to read in varied lighting.

build quality
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.7

Build quality feels impressively rugged and substantial, with one reviewer flatly describing it as built like a tank.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Build quality feels premium overall, helped by the metal or titanium bezel and polished finish, even if outright ruggedness is not the headline strength.

button controls
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.5

The physical buttons are a plus, offering good grip and easy operation even with gloves.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Button controls are a clear positive. Multiple reviews praise the tactile hardware buttons and say they remain easy to use during workouts and with gloves.

call handling
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.7

Call handling is inconsistent across reviews. One source says calls can be answered via a paired phone, while others explicitly note missing call functionality compared with Garmin’s more smartwatch-focused models.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.4

Calorie and fuel-use feedback is present and the energy usage breakdown was considered handy, though it is still an estimate rather than a precision tool.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.1

Calorie tracking is only modestly useful. Calories are visible in daily metrics, but one review says users wanting stronger calorie and intake support should look elsewhere.

charging convenience
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.2

Charging is reasonably convenient thanks to the USB-C cable setup, even if it still relies on a proprietary watch connection.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.5

Charging convenience is a weak point because Garmin still uses a proprietary connector, and reviewers call the port connection delicate while also noting the lack of wireless charging.

charging speed
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.1

Charging speed was seen as a plus, with quick top-ups restoring a meaningful chunk of battery in a short session.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Charging speed is good, with reviewers citing roughly an hour to reach high percentages and quick top-ups that provide meaningful battery in minutes.

coaching features
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.5

Coaching tools are strong, with FitSpark-style workout suggestions, fueling prompts, and broader training guidance standing out.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Coaching features are strong, with suggested workouts, race prediction, and readiness-style guidance giving the watch a helpful training-assistant feel.

comfort
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.5

Comfort is mixed: some reviewers found it wearable and comfortable, while others said the size and strap hurt all-day comfort.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Comfort is a strength for most users thanks to the light, slim build and wearable design, though the large case can still be noticeable for some sleepers or smaller wrists.

companion app quality
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.3

Polar Flow offers lots of data, but the companion app experience was repeatedly described as dated, buggy, and cumbersome.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Companion app quality is mixed. Garmin Connect is praised for depth and data access, but several reviewers also call it confusing or poorly organized in places.

contactless payments
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
1.0

The watch lacks built-in NFC payments, which reviewers repeatedly flagged as a missing premium feature.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Contactless payments are available through Garmin Pay, but real-world usefulness depends heavily on bank support, which several reviewers say is still uneven.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Cross-platform compatibility is strong, with consistent support for both Android and iPhone across reviews.

customization options
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.9

There is useful customization for sport profiles, data pages, and watch faces, even if the platform is not endlessly flexible.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Customization options are extensive, including watch faces, widgets, data pages, and other configurable on-watch and in-app elements.

display quality
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.5

Display quality is a strong point, with reviewers praising the AMOLED panel for clarity, punch, and overall visual appeal.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.8

Display quality is one of the headline wins. The AMOLED panel is widely described as sharp, vibrant, and transformative compared with older MIP models.

durability
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.7

Durability is a major strength, backed by MIL-STD-style construction and repeated praise for the watch's ruggedness.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.5

Durability is mixed. Some reviewers appreciate the materials and scratch resistance expectations, but several also report real scratches and visible wear sooner than expected.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.0

The watch offers non-medical ECG checks that reviewers found useful for intentional HRV-style spot checks rather than medical screening.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

ECG functionality is absent. Multiple reviews explicitly state that the Forerunner 965 does not include ECG hardware or support.

fit
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.1

Fit is more polarizing on smaller wrists because the 48 mm case size makes the watch wear noticeably large.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.5

Fit is acceptable for many wrists but not ideal for everyone. Several reviews warn that the 47mm case can feel large on smaller wrists.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.1

Broad fitness tracking was viewed positively thanks to consistent GPS and heart-rate performance in many sessions, though it was not flawless across all scenarios.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.9

Fitness tracking accuracy is a standout strength, with reviewers praising the consistency of workout metrics and the overall trustworthiness of exercise data.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.2

GPS accuracy was one of the stronger areas, with several reviewers reporting solid routes, small variance, and accurate maps, though not every test was perfect.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.9

GPS accuracy is one of the watch’s clearest strengths, repeatedly described as spot-on, industry-leading, or nearly dead accurate in testing.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.1

Health tracking impressions were generally positive, with one review calling the sleep features quite good and useful for nightly energy feedback.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Health tracking accuracy is good overall but not flawless. Reviewers praise the depth and usefulness of health data, while some flag sleep-related inconsistency that affects broader health confidence.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.1

Heart rate performance was good overall and often close to chest straps, but multiple reviewers still saw occasional spikes, misses, or mixed interval results.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Heart rate accuracy is strong for a wrist-based sensor, with several reviewers calling it excellent or near chest-strap performance, though interval lag can still appear.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

LTE connectivity is absent. Reviews explicitly note that the watch lacks LTE or mobile internet support.

materials quality
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.6

Materials feel premium, with sapphire protection and rugged hardware choices reinforcing the flagship positioning.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Materials quality is solid, with repeated mentions of titanium, Gorilla Glass, and generally premium-feeling hardware choices.

menu navigation
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.3

Menus are usable once learned, but the navigation flow still takes some getting used to.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Menu navigation is generally good once learned, with reviewers highlighting customizable widgets and easy menu flow, though Garmin’s depth can still feel dense at first.

music controls
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.6

Phone media controls are available and useful for basic playback control, but the experience does not go beyond that.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Music controls are well covered for a sports watch, with reviewers noting onboard player controls and convenient workout use.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
1.0

There is no onboard music storage or playback, leaving users dependent on phone-based audio.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Onboard music storage is a strength thanks to offline music support and ample storage for playlists, maps, and media.

operating system experience
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.8

The core software experience works, but it was described as dated rather than meaningfully refreshed.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

The operating system experience is capable but not always elegant. Reviewers appreciate the depth and button-first control options, yet some still describe Garmin’s interface conventions as archaic or complex.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.6

Outdoor visibility is very good, with the bright AMOLED screen remaining readable outside and on maps.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Outdoor visibility is a clear positive. Reviewers say the AMOLED screen remains readable outdoors and in direct sun, even if some still prefer MIP’s look.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.6

Pairing and syncing are a recurring frustration, with reviewers mentioning re-pairing hassles and regular phone reconnection issues.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Pairing reliability is strong, with quick phone pairing and dependable syncing or headphone use in the selected reviews.

recovery insights
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.6

Recovery guidance is a strong point, with daily workout suggestions and recovery-linked ideas repeatedly called out as useful.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.8

Recovery insights are a major strength, especially through Training Readiness, recovery time, and related load metrics that help guide training decisions.

reliability
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.8

Operational reliability was generally good, with at least one long-term reviewer saying it recorded every workout without crashing.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Reliability is broadly strong. Reviewers describe stable tracking, dependable uploads, and few serious failures in day-to-day use.

safety features
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Safety features are meaningful, with reviewers highlighting LiveTrack and fall detection as useful extras for training and outdoor use.

size options
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.8

Size options are limited because the Forerunner 965 is effectively a one-size model, which can be restrictive for smaller-wrist users.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.1

Sleep timing was reported as reliable, with one long-term reviewer saying fall-asleep and wake-up detection worked the majority of the time.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Sleep tracking accuracy is one of the most mixed areas. Some reviewers call it excellent or improved versus older Garmins, while others say the results can feel off or inconsistent.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.5

Phone notifications work for viewing and dismissal, but the experience is basic because replies and actions are missing.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Smartphone notifications work well enough for viewing alerts, but several reviews point out limitations around interaction and reply behavior, especially on iPhone.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.2

Smartwatch features trail the competition, offering the basics but lacking the breadth expected at this price.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Smartwatch features are good for a training watch, including notifications, music, and payments, but they still trail more full-fledged smartwatches in polish and breadth.

software smoothness
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.0

Performance is generally smooth and snappy thanks to the faster processor, with only occasional caveats around other software rough edges.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Software smoothness is a strong point, with reviewers describing the interface as fluid and largely free of lag or stutter.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
1.3

Step counting was a clear weak point, with reports of inflated totals and non-step activities being converted into steps too aggressively.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Step counting accuracy is strong in the selected evidence, including one low-error test result and praise for the visible real-time counter.

stress tracking
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.4

Stress-related wellness tools exist, but the dedicated Serene breathing coach was described as simple rather than especially advanced.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Stress tracking is well integrated into Garmin’s broader readiness and wellness stack, with reviewers frequently citing it as one of the useful day-to-day metrics.

style and design
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.6

Design is one of the watch's biggest positives, combining rugged hardware with a premium look that several reviewers really liked.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Style and design are widely praised, with the AMOLED display, slimmer body, and premium bezel helping the 965 look more modern and upscale than earlier Forerunners.

third-party app support
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.7

Third-party support is mixed: routing and exports to services like Strava and Komoot are helpful, but missing TrainingPeaks workout support remains a notable gap.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Third-party app support is good, with Connect IQ apps plus integrations like Strava and TrainingPeaks adding flexibility for training and data workflows.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.3

Touch interaction was described as predictably responsive, with swipes and taps generally behaving well.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Touchscreen responsiveness is generally praised, with reviewers saying touch makes navigation easy and smooth when they choose to use it.

user interface
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.4

The user interface was widely criticized as clunky and less fluid than similarly priced rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

The user interface is improved and easier on the eyes than earlier Forerunners, with smoother visuals and a more modern presentation.

value for money
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
1.8

Value for money is the biggest weakness, as multiple reviewers felt the watch asked premium money without matching rival feature depth.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.8

Value for money is mixed. Several reviewers think the feature set can justify the price, but others say many buyers would be better served by cheaper Garmin alternatives.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

Voice assistant functionality is absent. Reviews explicitly note there is no voice assistant, microphone-based response system, or similar wrist voice feature.

watch face quality
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.6

The stock watch faces are decent and lightly customizable, but the selection does not feel especially deep.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Watch face quality is good overall, especially visually on the AMOLED display, but some reviewers also note fewer face options than previous Garmin experiences.

water resistance
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.6

Water protection is strong, with reviewers calling out the 100-meter rating as a meaningful upgrade for swim and water use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Water resistance is strong, with repeated confirmation of 5ATM or 50-meter suitability for swimming and everyday water exposure.

wellness insights
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.3

Wellness features are rich, especially around sleep and recovery, with SleepWise-style data and other overnight insights highlighted as useful.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Wellness insights are a major selling point, with Body Battery, sleep scores, readiness-style guidance, and rest cues making daily health data more actionable.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
1.0

The watch has no Wi-Fi, which makes map management more cumbersome because downloads require a wired computer transfer.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

Wi-Fi connectivity is useful for tasks like map or music downloads, though it is not framed as especially fast or notable compared with other core features.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.6

Workout coverage is extensive, with more than 150 sport profiles and support for everything from trail sports to niche activities like baseball.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Workout tracking variety is excellent, with broad multisport coverage, triathlon support, and many workout modes ranging from yoga to golf and hiking.