Compare Polar Grit X2 Pro vs Suunto Race S

Polar Grit X2 Pro
Suunto Race S

Quick verdict

What each product is best for

Choose Polar Grit X2 Pro for blood oxygen tracking and health tracking accuracy.

Choose Suunto Race S for app ecosystem and value for money.

Comparison Takeaways

Polar Grit X2 Pro

Where It Has the Edge

  • blood oxygen tracking is 3.5 vs 1.0. Blood oxygen tracking was treated as useful for quick altitude-adaptation checks, with positioning caveats.
  • health tracking accuracy is 4.0 vs 2.0. Health tracking features were described as working well overall in the BGR review.
  • sleep tracking accuracy is 3.9 vs 2.1. Sleep timing was usually praised, while sleep-stage precision and occasional missing/broken sleep metrics limited confidence.
  • button controls is 4.2 vs 2.8. Buttons were widely liked for speed, texture, glove use, and firm clicks.

Suunto Race S

Where It Has the Edge

  • app ecosystem is 4.0 vs 1.5. The app ecosystem was praised for useful SuuntoPlus tools, though one review said Suunto still lags Garmin on...
  • value for money is 4.8 vs 2.4. Value for money is the clearest consensus strength, with nearly every reviewer framing the Race S as aggressively...
  • customization options is 4.3 vs 2.3. Customization is useful for routes, sport modes, complications, and modes, though it is not presented as a deep...
  • companion app quality is 4.5 vs 2.5. The companion app was broadly praised for route planning, maps, layout, reliability, and modern design.
Average score
Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.6
Suunto Race S
3.9
app ecosystem
Polar Grit X2 Pro
1.5

Reviewers found the app/platform ecosystem thin, with no proper ecosystem and limited app integration compared with rivals.

Suunto Race S
4.0

The app ecosystem was praised for useful SuuntoPlus tools, though one review said Suunto still lags Garmin on ecosystem depth.

blood oxygen tracking
Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.5

Blood oxygen tracking was treated as useful for quick altitude-adaptation checks, with positioning caveats.

Suunto Race S
1.0

Blood oxygen tracking was only clearly evaluated in one review, and that reviewer called the nighttime SpO2 results poor.

value for money
Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.4

Value was highly contested: base Grit X2 reviews liked the price, but Pro reviews often called the Grit X2 Pro overpriced versus rivals or the Vantage V3.

Suunto Race S
4.8

Value for money is the clearest consensus strength, with nearly every reviewer framing the Race S as aggressively priced for its mapping, GPS, AMOLED, and training feature set.

customization options
Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.3

Customization was limited by four data fields and dated configuration depth despite some configurable faces and sport profiles.

Suunto Race S
4.3

Customization is useful for routes, sport modes, complications, and modes, though it is not presented as a deep smartwatch-level customization system.

companion app quality
Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.5

Polar Flow was valued for data but repeatedly criticized as dated, sluggish, buggy, or unintuitive.

Suunto Race S
4.5

The companion app was broadly praised for route planning, maps, layout, reliability, and modern design.

health tracking accuracy
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.0

Health tracking features were described as working well overall in the BGR review.

Suunto Race S
2.0

A scientific review treated the broader health measurements as weak, especially because heart-rate and sleep-related results were not strong.

sleep tracking accuracy
Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.9

Sleep timing was usually praised, while sleep-stage precision and occasional missing/broken sleep metrics limited confidence.

Suunto Race S
2.1

Sleep tracking drew mostly negative or cautious evidence, with reviewers reporting underreported sleep, inaccurate stages, or a lack of confidence in the data.

operating system experience
Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.0

The software/OS experience was described as behind the curve despite the hardware improvements.

Suunto Race S
3.9

The operating system experience is mixed-positive: reviewers saw a basic, sports-first platform that improved in responsiveness but is not a rich smartwatch OS.

pairing reliability
Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.7

Pairing and syncing were mixed: setup could be straightforward, but Polar Flow sync failures appeared in multiple reviews.

Suunto Race S
4.5

Pairing reliability had one clearly positive review, with setup and app pairing described as simple and straightforward.

third-party app support
Polar Grit X2 Pro
1.5

Third-party app/program support was weak, especially the lack of TrainingPeaks support on the watch.

Suunto Race S
3.3

Third-party app support is useful but not fully baked in, with praise for the app store offset by criticism that some tools should be native.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Polar Grit X2 Pro
1.3

The lack of Wi-Fi was criticized because map transfers and music-style features depend on cabled or phone workflows.

Suunto Race S
3.0

Wi-Fi connectivity was evaluated mainly through map downloads, which work but were criticized for slow transfer behavior.

button controls
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.2

Buttons were widely liked for speed, texture, glove use, and firm clicks.

Suunto Race S
2.8

Button controls are mixed, with several reviewers finding the digital crown fiddly, delayed, awkward, or unpredictable despite useful physical input.

recovery insights
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.8

Recovery insights were one of Polar’s strongest areas, especially HRV and recovery-linked guidance.

Suunto Race S
3.5

Recovery insights are useful when presented clearly, especially HRV and Progress-style metrics, but some reviewers found the packaging weak or the conclusions discouraging.

smartwatch features
Polar Grit X2 Pro
1.9

Smartwatch capability was repeatedly described as limited, especially compared with Garmin, Apple, or WearOS-style devices.

Suunto Race S
3.2

Smartwatch features are intentionally limited: some reviewers liked the cleaner sports-watch focus, while others wanted a fuller smartwatch experience.

step counting accuracy
Polar Grit X2 Pro
1.5

Step counting was a major weakness because non-step activities and even driving inflated totals.

Suunto Race S
2.8

Step counting was mixed: one review found totals similar to comparison devices, while another found counts far enough off to be noticeable.

charging convenience
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.0

One reviewer valued being able to charge during an activity, especially for long hikes.

Suunto Race S
2.8

Charging convenience is more mixed because reviewers liked quick charging but disliked the proprietary pad, alignment, or travel requirement.

brightness
Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.5

The AMOLED panel was praised for brightness, though one review noted dramatic dimming at very low battery during workouts.

Suunto Race S
4.7

Brightness is consistently praised, with reviewers describing the screen as bright, vibrant, and easy to view in demanding conditions.

smartphone notifications
Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.7

Notifications worked, but reviewers criticized the lack of replies or actionable options.

Suunto Race S
3.7

Smartphone notifications generally worked, though reviewers framed them as basic and often noted limited interaction beyond reading alerts.

user interface
Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.8

The interface was serviceable but repeatedly described as dated, clunky, or old-school.

Suunto Race S
3.8

The user interface ranged from confusing at first to quick and easy once learned, with touch and app-driven navigation often helping.

fit
Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.5

Fit was split between praise for smaller-wrist suitability in Grit X2 reviews and criticism of the Pro feeling oversized on a small wrist.

Suunto Race S
4.5

Fit is praised for smaller wrists and secure sport use, especially where reviewers noted stable wear during activities.

mapping and navigation
Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.6

Mapping and navigation were major strengths, but compass calibration, route workflow, missing rerouting, and map detail limitations created friction.

Suunto Race S
4.5

Mapping and navigation are standout strengths, with repeated praise for offline maps, route planning, responsiveness, and trail usefulness, despite setup and routability limits.

comfort
Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.5

Comfort was mixed: some found it wearable despite size, while others called it bulky or criticized the strap breathability.

Suunto Race S
4.4

Comfort is generally strong, with reviewers praising all-day wear, unobtrusive feel, and smaller case comfort, though some disliked bulk at night.

water resistance
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.4

Water resistance was viewed as a clear strength for adventure and swimming use.

Suunto Race S
3.5

Water resistance received limited opinionated evidence; one reviewer judged 50 meters acceptable for most but a downgrade for deeper use.

music controls
Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.0

Music control was available for phone media, but reviewers saw it as basic.

Suunto Race S
3.9

Music controls worked adequately for phone playback, but reviewers consistently treated them as basic controls rather than a full music solution.

reliability
Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.0

One long-term reviewer noted workouts recorded without crashing, despite other bugs and quirks.

Suunto Race S
3.9

Reliability is mostly positive for workout operation and GPS logging, but one scientific review and one software-focused review noted broader metric concerns.

menu navigation
Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.2

Menu navigation was a common weak spot, with reviewers calling sleep data messy, controls unintuitive, and navigation clunky.

Suunto Race S
3.0

Menu navigation takes practice; reviewers liked short paths after learning the logic but criticized confusing menus and less-smooth swiping.

durability
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.8

Durability drew strong praise, with reviewers reporting scratch resistance, impact resistance, and a like-new appearance after use.

Suunto Race S
4.0

Durability is mostly positive, with strong scratch/impact evidence in one test, although Gorilla Glass and reduced water rating were noted as downgrades from larger models.

Bluetooth connectivity
Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.3

Bluetooth-related features worked once connected, but reviewers complained about repeated pairing steps and finicky heart-rate broadcasting.

Suunto Race S
1.5

Bluetooth connectivity is mostly discussed through sensor support, where reviewers criticized Suunto’s one-sensor limitations and weak pairing model.

GPS accuracy
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.0

GPS accuracy was broadly positive on land, with most reviewers calling it solid or impressive, while some noted drift, slower acquisition, or poor swim tracks.

Suunto Race S
4.6

GPS accuracy received the strongest overall praise, with many reviewers calling tracks precise, strong, pristine, or among the best they had tested.

workout tracking variety
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.3

Workout variety was a strength, with reviewers praising the huge sport profile library and broad activity coverage.

Suunto Race S
4.9

Workout variety is a clear strength, with reviewers praising the broad sport-mode support for running, cycling, swimming, triathlon, MTB, and many other activities.

onboard music storage
Polar Grit X2 Pro
1.0

The lack of onboard music storage or playback was repeatedly flagged as a missing feature.

Suunto Race S
1.6

Onboard music storage is a notable weakness, with multiple reviewers calling out the absence of music downloads or internal playback.

band quality
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.5

The Titan leather band and several included straps earned strong praise, though one reviewer found a silicone strap floppy.

Suunto Race S
4.0

Band quality is mixed-positive, with comfort and secure designs praised but some straps criticized for tacky branding, stickiness, or glow-at-night drawbacks.

heart rate accuracy
Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.6

Heart-rate accuracy was mixed: many found it solid or improved, but interval, cycling, and bursty efforts exposed misses and lag.

Suunto Race S
3.2

Heart-rate accuracy is the most divided attribute: several reviewers found the updated sensor solid or precise, while others reported poor readings and recommended an external strap.

flashlight usefulness
Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.6

The screen flashlight was useful in a basic way but criticized as awkward to access or aim compared with Garmin-style torches.

Suunto Race S
3.0

Flashlight usefulness is limited because it is screen-based, though one reviewer still found it functional for basic low-light tasks.

build quality
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.8

Build quality was consistently praised as premium, rugged, and well assembled.

Suunto Race S
4.5

Build quality is a strength, with reviewers praising the watch and strap construction, premium feel, and high-quality form factor.

coaching features
Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.9

Training, fueling, recovery, and workout suggestions were often praised, while missing TrainingPeaks/on-watch programs hurt athlete workflows.

Suunto Race S
3.6

Coaching features are capable but uneven, with praise for structured workouts and training planning but criticism for missing Garmin-style suggested workouts and weaker presentation.

charging speed
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.3

Charging was described as reasonably fast, including quick top-ups and full charging under an hour in one review.

Suunto Race S
4.5

Charging speed is consistently praised, with several reviewers reporting fast full charges or quick top-ups.

touchscreen responsiveness
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.2

Touchscreen responsiveness was generally praised, including reliable taps/swipes and good wet-weather usability.

Suunto Race S
4.0

Touchscreen responsiveness is mostly positive after improvements, though moisture sensitivity and a less-slick feel kept scores from being perfect.

software smoothness
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.3

On-watch performance was generally snappy and smoother than older Polar models.

Suunto Race S
4.1

Software smoothness improved across reviews, with several reviewers calling the UI faster or fluid, though a few still saw polish issues or minor lag.

fitness tracking accuracy
Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.5

Overall fitness tracking was adequate to good, with one scientific review describing broad agreement but not class-leading precision.

Suunto Race S
3.3

General fitness tracking was praised for workout capture in one review, but another scientific test found the accuracy only middling versus better devices.

materials quality
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.5

Materials were viewed positively where reviewers noted the premium case and rugged hardware.

Suunto Race S
4.7

Materials quality is highly regarded, especially the premium wrist feel, titanium option, and quality materials.

battery life
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.1

Battery life was generally seen as solid for daily use and GPS tracking, but always-on display, maps, and long navigation sessions reduced endurance.

Suunto Race S
4.2

Battery life is strong overall for an AMOLED sports watch, but reviews vary from excellent to shorter-than-claimed depending on always-on display and navigation use.

style and design
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.5

Reviewers strongly liked the rugged-premium styling, calling it one of Polar’s best-looking watches.

Suunto Race S
4.7

Style and design are among the strongest attributes, with reviewers repeatedly calling the Race S sleek, attractive, premium, or one of the best-looking sports watches.

watch face quality
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.0

Watch faces were generally acceptable to good, with some praise for newer designs but requests for more options.

Suunto Race S
3.9

Watch faces are improved and customizable, but one reviewer found accidental customization in the shower slightly annoying.

wellness insights
Polar Grit X2 Pro
3.3

Wellness insights were useful for simple fitness and recovery context, though scientific sleep-detail confidence was limited.

Suunto Race S
3.3

Wellness insights were polarizing; one reviewer liked the quieter data approach, while another thought Suunto’s resource-style metric lagged Garmin-like alternatives.

display quality
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.6

The AMOLED display was one of the strongest points, repeatedly praised for color, clarity, responsiveness, and map readability.

Suunto Race S
4.7

Display quality is a consistent strength, with repeated praise for the sharp AMOLED panel, color, clarity, and readability.

outdoor visibility
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.6

Outdoor visibility was consistently excellent across bright sun, daylight, and varied conditions.

Suunto Race S
4.6

Outdoor visibility is strong; reviewers reported readability in midday sun, normal sunlight, forest shade, and other outdoor conditions.

contactless payments
Polar Grit X2 Pro
1.0

Reviewers criticized the lack of native NFC/contactless payment support.

Suunto Race S
1.0

Contactless payments were clearly treated as missing in one review, making this a low-scoring feature for users who expect payments on-wrist.

call handling
Polar Grit X2 ProNo score yet
Suunto Race S
3.0

Call handling is limited to alerts and message/call visibility, with one reviewer wishing reply functionality were available.

ECG functionality
Polar Grit X2 Pro
4.0

ECG was viewed as useful for intentional HRV readings rather than full medical-grade detection.

Suunto Race SNo score yet
safety features
Polar Grit X2 ProNo score yet
Suunto Race S
4.5

Safety features received limited but positive evidence, especially Find Back/navigation support that added peace of mind.

size options
Polar Grit X2 ProNo score yet
Suunto Race S
3.5

Size options are useful but not universally ideal; some reviewers liked the midsize case, while one found it still suited to thicker wrists.

stress tracking
Polar Grit X2 Pro
2.0

Stress/wellness breathing support was described as basic.

Suunto Race SNo score yet