Compare Suunto Race S vs Garmin Forerunner 965

P1 Suunto Race S
P2 Garmin Forerunner 965

Comparison Takeaways

Suunto Race S

Where It Has the Edge

  • size options is 4.2 vs 2.4. Size options improve wearability versus the larger Race, with reviewers praising the smaller 45mm format.
  • durability is 3.9 vs 3.2. Durability is generally solid, but the switch from sapphire to Gorilla Glass and 50m rating creates some caveats.
  • value for money is 4.7 vs 3.9. Value for money is one of the strongest agreements, with reviewers repeatedly calling the feature set unusually strong...
  • build quality is 4.8 vs 4.3. Build quality is praised as premium for the price, including strong comments on watch and strap construction.

Garmin Forerunner 965

Where It Has the Edge

  • onboard music storage is 4.4 vs 1.1. Onboard music storage is a solid smart feature, with Spotify, Deezer, Amazon Music, MP3 or podcast support and...
  • contactless payments is 3.9 vs 1.0. Garmin Pay is present and useful where supported, but reviewers note banking support can be weak depending on...
  • health tracking accuracy is 4.5 vs 2.7. Health tracking is data-rich and generally reliable, combining heart rate, HRV, blood oxygen, stress, sleep, Body Battery, and...
  • button controls is 4.6 vs 3.0. The five-button Garmin layout is a major strength, especially during workouts, because nearly every function can be handled...
Average score
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.7
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Suunto Race S
1.0

Activity auto-detection is weak in the available evidence, with one review saying not to expect auto exercise detection.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.8

Exercise auto-detection is a weakness because one review says it does not work well enough for training, so users need to start workouts manually.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.3

The app ecosystem is strong for routes, TrainingPeaks-style workflows and SuuntoPlus-style extensions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Garmin offers Connect IQ apps and widgets, but reviewers describe the app store as useful yet less polished and less broad than major smartwatch ecosystems.

band quality
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.0

Band quality is mostly positive for comfort and fastening, with some concerns about stickiness or discoloration.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Reviewers generally like the silicone straps and removable bands, with praise for comfort and style, though one notes the silicone band needs drying after workouts.

battery life
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.2

Battery life is strong for an AMOLED sports watch, though real-world daily use can fall below the largest headline claims.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Battery life is widely praised for an AMOLED sports watch, usually landing around a week with always-on use and much longer in gesture or smartwatch modes, but ultra and multi-day users see limits.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Suunto Race S
2.8

Blood oxygen is present, but evidence is thin and one reviewer called overnight SpO2 readings unreliable.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

The Forerunner 965 supports Pulse Ox or blood oxygen readings, and reviewers treat it as part of a broad health-sensor suite rather than a headline differentiator.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.1

Bluetooth works for sensors and notifications, but reviewers noted sensor-management limits and pairing compromises.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Bluetooth and ANT+ support are useful for headphones, sensors, accessories, and heart-rate broadcasting, with reviewers repeatedly noting broad connectivity.

brightness
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.6

Brightness is consistently praised, especially for the AMOLED screen and route-following visibility.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Reviewers consistently praise the AMOLED screen as bright enough for quick glances, direct sunlight, and varied lighting conditions.

build quality
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.8

Build quality is praised as premium for the price, including strong comments on watch and strap construction.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Build quality is framed as performance-focused rather than rugged, with the watch feeling purpose-built for running and training.

button controls
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.0

Button controls are mixed: the physical layout helps, but the crown is repeatedly described as tricky or awkward.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

The five-button Garmin layout is a major strength, especially during workouts, because nearly every function can be handled without relying on touch.

call handling
Product 1: Suunto Race S
2.8

Call handling is limited to alerts rather than true calling, matching the watch’s training-first focus.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.7

Call handling is mixed: some reviews mention answering or taking calls, while others criticize the lack of speaker and microphone features found on more smartwatch-focused models.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.3

Calorie tracking is mentioned as part of basic workout feedback, but reviewer evidence is limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.9

Calorie-related usefulness is limited: one reviewer uses calorie alerts for fueling, while another says Garmin is weak for diet and calorie tracking.

charging convenience
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.6

Charging convenience is mixed: speed helps, but the proprietary cradle and alignment requirements can be inconvenient.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.2

Charging is mixed because USB-C on the cable helps, but reviewers still criticize Garmin’s proprietary four-pin connection, weak cord attachment, and lack of wireless charging.

charging speed
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.6

Charging speed is a strength, with several reviewers reporting roughly 40 minutes to an hour or rapid top-ups.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Charging speed is generally good, with several reviews describing roughly one hour to major recharge levels or fast percentage gains.

coaching features
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.4

Coaching is mixed: structured workouts and climb guidance help, but reviewers missed richer training plans or daily suggested workouts.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Coaching tools are a major strength, including suggested workouts, training plans, interval tools, Garmin Coach, race guidance, and structured workout support.

comfort
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.3

Comfort is generally positive, especially for daily wear, though some found sleep wear or bulk less ideal.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Comfort is generally strong thanks to the light, slim design, though bulk can still be noticeable for smaller wrists or sleep tracking.

companion app quality
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.3

The companion app is a standout for routes, maps and clean design, though a few reviewers wanted a more intuitive experience.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Garmin Connect receives mixed but mostly positive feedback: reviewers praise data depth and access, while some find route creation or organization clunky.

contactless payments
Product 1: Suunto Race S
1.0

Contactless payments are absent, making this a clear weakness for users who rely on wrist payments.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Garmin Pay is present and useful where supported, but reviewers note banking support can be weak depending on region.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.4

Cross-platform phone support is solid, with explicit evidence for both Android and Apple compatibility.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

The watch works across iPhone, Android, and Apple Health workflows, although some functions are more capable on Android.

customization options
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.3

Customization is strong across watch faces, widgets, map layers and personalized sport modes.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Customization is a clear strength, with extensive control over watch faces, data screens, sport profiles, widgets, and settings from the watch or app.

display quality
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.6

Display quality is a major strength, with AMOLED sharpness, color and resolution praised across reviews.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

The AMOLED display is one of the most praised upgrades, with reviewers highlighting crisp resolution, color, legibility, map detail, and a more modern feel.

durability
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.9

Durability is generally solid, but the switch from sapphire to Gorilla Glass and 50m rating creates some caveats.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.2

Durability is the most repeated physical caveat: multiple reviewers report scratches or worry about Gorilla Glass compared with more rugged sapphire models.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Suunto Race S
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.0

The Forerunner 965 lacks ECG hardware, a repeated limitation compared with Garmin’s Venu line and newer or more smartwatch-oriented alternatives.

fit
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.6

Fit is a strength for smaller wrists and active use, with secure strap fit and reduced case size praised.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Fit is positive for clothing and activity use, with one review noting the slim profile avoids issues with gloves or jackets.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.2

Fitness tracking is generally competent for workouts, but wrist-HR weaknesses affect confidence in some activities.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Fitness tracking is very strong, with reviewers praising distance, pace, activity data, and sensor consistency across workouts.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.8

GPS accuracy is one of the strongest consensus positives, with reviewers praising precise tracks across runs, rides, trails and mapping use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

GPS accuracy is one of the strongest points, with repeated praise for multi-band/SatIQ reliability, precise tracks, quick lock-on, and low distance error.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Race S
2.7

Health tracking is usable for HRV-style context, but reviewers flagged weak sleep-stage reliability and inconsistent body-resource style metrics.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Health tracking is data-rich and generally reliable, combining heart rate, HRV, blood oxygen, stress, sleep, Body Battery, and related metrics.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.3

Heart rate accuracy is the clearest split: some reviewers saw improved or precise running/swim data, while many still recommended a chest strap.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Heart rate accuracy is broadly strong and often close to straps or medical devices, though several reviewers note lag or limitations during high-intensity intervals.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Race S
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.0

LTE is absent, and reviewers call this out as a smart-feature limitation compared with a few Garmin or smartwatch alternatives.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Suunto Race S
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Mapping and navigation are standout strengths, with full maps, turn-by-turn directions, route following, Next Fork, and AMOLED-enhanced map detail.

materials quality
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.2

Materials quality is good for the price, with steel, titanium and Gorilla Glass mentioned, though the plastic body and non-sapphire lens are tradeoffs.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Materials quality is mixed-positive: reviewers like the titanium bezel, silicone strap, and Gorilla Glass, but some still prefer sapphire for durability.

menu navigation
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.2

Menu navigation takes practice; reviewers described the logic as initially confusing despite short navigation paths once learned.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Menu navigation is generally approachable for Garmin users, with button and touchscreen options, though some newcomers may find the system dense.

music controls
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.9

Music control from a phone works across reviews, but it is not the same as phone-free playback.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

Music support is useful for controls and offline playback, but reviewers note the experience can be basic or occasionally glitchy.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Suunto Race S
1.1

Onboard music storage is a repeated limitation, with several reviewers saying there is no real music storage or streaming support.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Onboard music storage is a solid smart feature, with Spotify, Deezer, Amazon Music, MP3 or podcast support and enough storage for music plus maps.

operating system experience
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.2

The operating system feels simpler and more focused than Garmin, with reviewers noting improved organization and responsiveness.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.8

The Garmin operating system is sports-first: smooth and functional on the watch, but still basic compared with Apple or Wear OS smartwatches.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.6

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with reviewers reporting easy readability in sun, shade and outdoor workouts.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Outdoor visibility is strong for an AMOLED watch, with reviewers reporting good readability in sunlight and bright outdoor conditions.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.6

Pairing is easy for the phone and external HR monitors, but multi-sensor management is a notable limitation.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Pairing and syncing are reliable, with quick phone pairing, seamless Strava syncing, and dependable activity uploads.

recovery insights
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.0

Recovery insights are a real part of the platform, using HRV, sleep and training load, though presentation varies by reviewer.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Recovery insights are a core strength, especially Training Readiness, HRV Status, Body Battery, Acute Load, Chronic Load, and load-ratio guidance.

reliability
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.7

Reliability is strong where tested long-term, with no GPS drops, data loss or signal dropouts reported by key reviewers.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Reliability is strong across testing, with reviewers describing stable SatIQ/GPS behavior and dependable performance over heavy use.

safety features
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.1

Safety features center on Find Back, offline maps, route guidance and battery reminders, all useful for outdoor use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Safety features include Find My Phone/Watch, wrong-direction or course alerts, fall or security features, and location sharing through LiveTrack.

size options
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.2

Size options improve wearability versus the larger Race, with reviewers praising the smaller 45mm format.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.4

Size options are limited because the Forerunner 965 comes in one large-ish size, which can be a drawback for smaller wrists.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Race S
2.8

Sleep tracking drew repeated caveats, from underreported sleep and night comfort issues to poor sleep-stage confidence.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.8

Sleep tracking is mixed: some reviewers find it excellent or improved, while others say phases or scores can feel off.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.5

Smartphone notifications work for basic mirroring, though some reviewers found presentation limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Notifications are readable and customizable, but interaction is limited, especially on iOS and compared with fuller smartwatches.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.1

Smartwatch features are intentionally basic: notifications, music control and widgets are present, but advanced smartwatch tools are limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

Smartwatch features are useful but secondary, with notifications, music, Garmin Pay, weather, and calls in some contexts but fewer smart extras than Apple or Wear OS.

software smoothness
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.2

Software smoothness is improved over earlier Suunto experiences, though one review still noted minor lag.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Software smoothness is generally good, with smoother UI and updates praised, though Garmin’s broader smart-app polish remains imperfect.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.0

Step counting is mixed: one reviewer found totals similar to Garmin, while another saw substantial undercounting.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Step counting is supported and measured well in one lab-style review, while other reviewers appreciate live step visibility and basic activity tracking.

stress tracking
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.1

Stress tracking appears mainly through training-stress metrics, with reviewers noting Training Stress Score and Training Stress Balance displays.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Stress tracking is part of Garmin’s broader readiness and wellness stack, useful for recovery context but not always used heavily by reviewers.

style and design
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.6

Style and design are standout positives, with reviewers repeatedly calling the watch sleek, premium or great-looking.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Style and design receive strong praise for the slim, modern AMOLED look, titanium accents, and a more premium everyday appearance.

third-party app support
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.9

Third-party support is useful through SuuntoPlus and connected services, but on-watch app limits hold it back.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Third-party support is useful through Connect IQ, Strava, Komoot, and integrations, but the app ecosystem lacks the polish and breadth of larger smartwatch platforms.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.0

Touchscreen responsiveness is mostly good or improved, with some caveats around ultimate slickness and moisture sensitivity.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Touchscreen support is useful for maps and daily navigation, though many reviewers prefer disabling it during workouts and using buttons instead.

user interface
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.4

The user interface is functional but divisive, with comments ranging from easy to find features to less intuitive than rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

The AMOLED-era interface is clearer, smoother, and more colorful, while still retaining Garmin’s dense data-first structure.

value for money
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.7

Value for money is one of the strongest agreements, with reviewers repeatedly calling the feature set unusually strong for the price.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Value depends on the buyer: serious athletes get premium mapping and training tools, but casual users or 955 owners may not justify the price.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Suunto Race S
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.4

Voice assistant quality is poor because the watch lacks the speaker, microphone, and voice-assistant features found on some alternatives.

watch face quality
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.0

Watch faces are customizable and improved, though at least one reviewer still wanted third-party watch faces.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Watch faces benefit from AMOLED color and customization, with reviewers praising the stock faces and Connect IQ options.

water resistance
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.9

Water resistance is adequate for swimming and normal use, but it is lower than the larger Race.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Water resistance is strong for workouts, swimming, showering, and wet use, with reviews noting 5ATM or 50-meter protection.

wellness insights
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.7

Wellness insights exist and can be helpful, but they stay relatively low-key and are not always as persuasive as Garmin-style metrics.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Wellness insights are broad and useful, especially Body Battery, readiness, sleep, stress, HRV, and daily health context.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.8

Wi-Fi is mainly useful for map downloads and syncing map regions, with the process often tied to the app and charger.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

Wi-Fi is useful for map downloads, updates, and faster transfers, although it is not a major review focus.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.7

Workout variety is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly citing broad sport modes, triathlon support and multisport coverage.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Workout variety is extensive, with running, cycling, swimming, triathlon, gym, yoga, hiking, golf, and many sport profiles or metrics.