Average score
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.9
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
5.0

One review says the watch can identify logged strength movements on its own and surface the specific exercise afterward.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.0

Auto-detection is explicitly criticized in testing, with reviewers saying workouts usually need to be started manually to access the watch’s richer tracking features.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.2

Reviewers say the app store exists and offers some utilities, but the overall ecosystem is smaller and less polished than Apple or Google storefronts.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

The app ecosystem is solid rather than class-leading: reviewers cite Connect IQ support and a healthy app catalog, but not the broader polish or reach of Apple or Wear OS ecosystems.

band quality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Included silicone straps are described as comfortable, easy to clean, and soft with good adjustability.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Band quality is generally good, with flexible silicone straps and solid sweat performance, though silicone can stay damp and irritate skin if not dried after workouts.

battery life
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.6

Battery life is a standout, with many reviewers getting about a week to 10 days under heavier use and up to the advertised multi-week runtime under lighter use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Battery life is a major strength. Reviewers report multi-day to multi-week endurance depending on usage, with always-on display and GPS workouts reducing runtime but still leaving it ahead of many rivals.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

Reviewers confirm SpO2 tracking is part of the health suite, though detailed accuracy validation is limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

The watch supports blood oxygen tracking and related wellness sensors, but reviewers discuss it more as part of the feature set than as a standout accuracy differentiator.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Bluetooth support worked for calls and external sensor pairing in the review that directly tested it.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Bluetooth connectivity is dependable for phone pairing and headphone playback, with no major complaints in the selected reviews.

brightness
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

The display’s 2,000-nit peak brightness is highlighted as a clear strength.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Brightness is repeatedly praised. Reviewers call the AMOLED screen bright, vivid, and easy to read in varied lighting.

build quality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.3

Reviewers describe the watch as solid and premium-feeling for the price.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Build quality feels premium overall, helped by the metal or titanium bezel and polished finish, even if outright ruggedness is not the headline strength.

button controls
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.3

The crown and buttons generally work well, but some reviewers wanted better default logic or more customization.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Button controls are a clear positive. Multiple reviews praise the tactile hardware buttons and say they remain easy to use during workouts and with gloves.

call handling
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.9

Bluetooth calling is available and generally clear, though it remains phone-tethered.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.7

Call handling is inconsistent across reviews. One source says calls can be answered via a paired phone, while others explicitly note missing call functionality compared with Garmin’s more smartwatch-focused models.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.8

Calories are surfaced in workout summaries and daily reports, making them useful as part of broader activity tracking.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.1

Calorie tracking is only modestly useful. Calories are visible in daily metrics, but one review says users wanting stronger calorie and intake support should look elsewhere.

charging convenience
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.2

Charging uses a small proprietary USB-C-compatible cradle or puck; functional, but not especially elegant.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.5

Charging convenience is a weak point because Garmin still uses a proprietary connector, and reviewers call the port connection delicate while also noting the lack of wireless charging.

charging speed
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.9

Charging is reasonably quick, usually landing around 1 to 2 hours for a full refill.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Charging speed is good, with reviewers citing roughly an hour to reach high percentages and quick top-ups that provide meaningful battery in minutes.

coaching features
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.0

Zepp Coach and AI plans are present, but usefulness is mixed, with some reviewers finding them generic or not especially insightful.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Coaching features are strong, with suggested workouts, race prediction, and readiness-style guidance giving the watch a helpful training-assistant feel.

comfort
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Multiple reviewers say the Balance 2 wears comfortably for daily use and training despite its size.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Comfort is a strength for most users thanks to the light, slim build and wearable design, though the large case can still be noticeable for some sleepers or smaller wrists.

companion app quality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.8

The Zepp app is feature-rich and improving, though some reviewers still find parts of it busy or less polished than top rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Companion app quality is mixed. Garmin Connect is praised for depth and data access, but several reviewers also call it confusing or poorly organized in places.

contactless payments
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
2.3

Zepp Pay exists, but support is region- and bank-dependent and not as seamless as Apple Pay.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Contactless payments are available through Garmin Pay, but real-world usefulness depends heavily on bank support, which several reviewers say is still uneven.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Reviewers explicitly note support for both Android and iOS.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Cross-platform compatibility is strong, with consistent support for both Android and iPhone across reviews.

customization options
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Watch faces, widgets and button behavior offer meaningful customization.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Customization options are extensive, including watch faces, widgets, data pages, and other configurable on-watch and in-app elements.

display quality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

The AMOLED panel is widely praised for sharpness and clarity.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.8

Display quality is one of the headline wins. The AMOLED panel is widely described as sharp, vibrant, and transformative compared with older MIP models.

durability
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Sapphire protection and rugged construction give reviewers confidence for workouts and rougher use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.5

Durability is mixed. Some reviewers appreciate the materials and scratch resistance expectations, but several also report real scratches and visible wear sooner than expected.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
1.0

Reviewers explicitly note that ECG is missing.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

ECG functionality is absent. Multiple reviews explicitly state that the Forerunner 965 does not include ECG hardware or support.

fit
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.3

The watch fits comfortably for tested reviewers, but its larger case may suit some wrists better than others.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.5

Fit is acceptable for many wrists but not ideal for everyone. Several reviews warn that the 47mm case can feel large on smaller wrists.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.3

Reviewers generally describe fitness tracking as accurate, especially for running and everyday workout stats.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.9

Fitness tracking accuracy is a standout strength, with reviewers praising the consistency of workout metrics and the overall trustworthiness of exercise data.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.2

GPS is widely praised, though a few reviews note occasional underreporting or less consistency than the best Garmins.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.9

GPS accuracy is one of the watch’s clearest strengths, repeatedly described as spot-on, industry-leading, or nearly dead accurate in testing.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.1

Across heart rate, sleep and general wellness metrics, reviewers usually found the data credible, with some algorithm generosity noted.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Health tracking accuracy is good overall but not flawless. Reviewers praise the depth and usefulness of health data, while some flag sleep-related inconsistency that affects broader health confidence.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.4

Heart rate tracking is one of the stronger areas, performing well in multiple comparisons, though not perfect in every scenario.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Heart rate accuracy is strong for a wrist-based sensor, with several reviewers calling it excellent or near chest-strap performance, though interval lag can still appear.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
1.0

Reviewers explicitly state there is no LTE or cellular option.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

LTE connectivity is absent. Reviews explicitly note that the watch lacks LTE or mobile internet support.

materials quality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.3

Aluminum, polymer and sapphire materials feel premium for the price.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Materials quality is solid, with repeated mentions of titanium, Gorilla Glass, and generally premium-feeling hardware choices.

menu navigation
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.7

Core controls are accessible, but some reviewers found deeper menus busy or slightly overwhelming at first.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Menu navigation is generally good once learned, with reviewers highlighting customizable widgets and easy menu flow, though Garmin’s depth can still feel dense at first.

music controls
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.8

Basic music playback controls are available and work as expected.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Music controls are well covered for a sports watch, with reviewers noting onboard player controls and convenient workout use.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.8

Local music storage is available with 32GB onboard, but it relies on manual file syncing rather than streaming.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Onboard music storage is a strength thanks to offline music support and ample storage for playlists, maps, and media.

operating system experience
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Zepp OS is described as fluid and responsive in day-to-day use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

The operating system experience is capable but not always elegant. Reviewers appreciate the depth and button-first control options, yet some still describe Garmin’s interface conventions as archaic or complex.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

Most reviewers had no issue reading the screen outdoors, though one scientific review reported glare or visibility concerns in bright sun.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Outdoor visibility is a clear positive. Reviewers say the AMOLED screen remains readable outdoors and in direct sun, even if some still prefer MIP’s look.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Setup and syncing are described as quick and easy in the review that covered pairing.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Pairing reliability is strong, with quick phone pairing and dependable syncing or headphone use in the selected reviews.

recovery insights
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.1

Readiness, recovery time and BioCharge-style insights are useful to several reviewers, though not all training metrics feel fully mature.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.8

Recovery insights are a major strength, especially through Training Readiness, recovery time, and related load metrics that help guide training decisions.

reliability
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

Reviewers generally describe tracking performance as dependable across regular use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Reliability is broadly strong. Reviewers describe stable tracking, dependable uploads, and few serious failures in day-to-day use.

safety features
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Safety features are meaningful, with reviewers highlighting LiveTrack and fall detection as useful extras for training and outdoor use.

size options
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.8

Size options are limited because the Forerunner 965 is effectively a one-size model, which can be restrictive for smaller-wrist users.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.8

Sleep duration and broad sleep data are often viewed as reasonable, but some reviewers say sleep scoring or stage detail can be generous or weaker than the best trackers.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Sleep tracking accuracy is one of the most mixed areas. Some reviewers call it excellent or improved versus older Garmins, while others say the results can feel off or inconsistent.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

Notifications come through reliably and can sometimes be interacted with, but the experience still trails top smartwatch platforms.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Smartphone notifications work well enough for viewing alerts, but several reviews point out limitations around interaction and reply behavior, especially on iPhone.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

The Balance 2 covers a solid mid-tier smartwatch feature set, but it is not as full-featured as Apple Watch or Wear OS devices.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Smartwatch features are good for a training watch, including notifications, music, and payments, but they still trail more full-fledged smartwatches in polish and breadth.

software smoothness
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.4

General scrolling and animation smoothness are frequently praised, though occasional stutters are noted.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Software smoothness is a strong point, with reviewers describing the interface as fluid and largely free of lag or stutter.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Step counting accuracy is strong in the selected evidence, including one low-error test result and praise for the visible real-time counter.

stress tracking
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

Stress tracking is present and described as responsive or useful in daily monitoring.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Stress tracking is well integrated into Garmin’s broader readiness and wellness stack, with reviewers frequently citing it as one of the useful day-to-day metrics.

style and design
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Reviewers like the sporty yet polished circular design.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Style and design are widely praised, with the AMOLED display, slimmer body, and premium bezel helping the 965 look more modern and upscale than earlier Forerunners.

third-party app support
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
2.0

Third-party support remains limited, with repeated complaints about missing major services like Spotify and a smaller store.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Third-party app support is good, with Connect IQ apps plus integrations like Strava and TrainingPeaks adding flexibility for training and data workflows.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

The touchscreen is usually responsive, though one reviewer found it a little too sensitive.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Touchscreen responsiveness is generally praised, with reviewers saying touch makes navigation easy and smooth when they choose to use it.

user interface
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

The on-watch UI is intuitive once learned, but feature density can make it feel busy.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

The user interface is improved and easier on the eyes than earlier Forerunners, with smoother visuals and a more modern presentation.

value for money
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.6

Value is one of the watch’s biggest strengths, with many reviewers saying it packs a lot in for the price.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.8

Value for money is mixed. Several reviewers think the feature set can justify the price, but others say many buyers would be better served by cheaper Garmin alternatives.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

Zepp Flow is seen as capable and convenient for basic queries and watch control.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

Voice assistant functionality is absent. Reviews explicitly note there is no voice assistant, microphone-based response system, or similar wrist voice feature.

watch face quality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
2.5

Watch face selection exists, but preloaded faces and the overall catalog draw lukewarm reactions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Watch face quality is good overall, especially visually on the AMOLED display, but some reviewers also note fewer face options than previous Garmin experiences.

water resistance
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.7

Water resistance is a major strength, with 10 ATM support and repeated praise for swim and dive readiness.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Water resistance is strong, with repeated confirmation of 5ATM or 50-meter suitability for swimming and everyday water exposure.

wellness insights
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.3

Reviewers like the app’s wellness insights, especially when they tie sleep, training, food logging or daily readiness together.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Wellness insights are a major selling point, with Body Battery, sleep scores, readiness-style guidance, and rest cues making daily health data more actionable.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

Wi-Fi connectivity is useful for tasks like map or music downloads, though it is not framed as especially fast or notable compared with other core features.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
5.0

Workout variety is excellent, with more than 170 modes and support for niche activities like golf and Hyrox.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Workout tracking variety is excellent, with broad multisport coverage, triathlon support, and many workout modes ranging from yoga to golf and hiking.