Average score
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
3.4
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
3.9

Automatic detection is a real strength for basic activities like walking, running, cycling, and swimming, though one reviewer said auto-tracked sessions sometimes needed manual cleanup.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.0

Auto-detection is explicitly criticized in testing, with reviewers saying workouts usually need to be started manually to access the watch’s richer tracking features.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.3

Reviewers like the broader Withings ecosystem, especially the ability to collect watch data alongside other Withings health devices in one app.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

The app ecosystem is solid rather than class-leading: reviewers cite Connect IQ support and a healthy app catalog, but not the broader polish or reach of Apple or Wear OS ecosystems.

band quality
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.3

Band comfort is strong, with positive notes on all-day wear, soft material, secure fit, and low skin irritation.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Band quality is generally good, with flexible silicone straps and solid sweat performance, though silicone can stay damp and irritate skin if not dried after workouts.

battery life
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
3.8

Battery life is usually a standout, with many reviewers seeing multi-week endurance, but results vary sharply depending on settings like Quicklook, notifications, and workout use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Battery life is a major strength. Reviewers report multi-day to multi-week endurance depending on usage, with always-on display and GPS workouts reducing runtime but still leaving it ahead of many rivals.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
1.0

Reviewers repeatedly note that the ScanWatch Light lacks SpO2 monitoring, leaving blood-oxygen tracking to higher-end alternatives.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

The watch supports blood oxygen tracking and related wellness sensors, but reviewers discuss it more as part of the feature set than as a standout accuracy differentiator.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Bluetooth connectivity is dependable for phone pairing and headphone playback, with no major complaints in the selected reviews.

brightness
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
2.5

Screen brightness is mixed: one reviewer found it too dim in use, while another found wake behavior too bright at night.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Brightness is repeatedly praised. Reviewers call the AMOLED screen bright, vivid, and easy to read in varied lighting.

build quality
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.5

Build impressions are strong, with repeated praise for the solid-feeling case and overall hardware execution.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Build quality feels premium overall, helped by the metal or titanium bezel and polished finish, even if outright ruggedness is not the headline strength.

button controls
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
3.8

Physical controls are the norm here, and reviewers say the crown or dial works well once you adapt to it.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Button controls are a clear positive. Multiple reviews praise the tactile hardware buttons and say they remain easy to use during workouts and with gloves.

call handling
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.7

Call handling is inconsistent across reviews. One source says calls can be answered via a paired phone, while others explicitly note missing call functionality compared with Garmin’s more smartwatch-focused models.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
3.0

Calorie data is present but basic, and reviewers describe it as more of a simple estimate than a standout training metric.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.1

Calorie tracking is only modestly useful. Calories are visible in daily metrics, but one review says users wanting stronger calorie and intake support should look elsewhere.

charging convenience
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
2.8

The proprietary charger is a recurring complaint for feel and convenience, even though some reviewers liked its secure grip or compact shape.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.5

Charging convenience is a weak point because Garmin still uses a proprietary connector, and reviewers call the port connection delicate while also noting the lack of wireless charging.

charging speed
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.1

Charging speed is consistently reported around two hours for a full top-up, with some reviewers noting meaningful recovery in 30 minutes.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Charging speed is good, with reviewers citing roughly an hour to reach high percentages and quick top-ups that provide meaningful battery in minutes.

coaching features
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
3.5

Coaching is light but present through guided breathing and premium-app guidance rather than deep on-watch training features.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Coaching features are strong, with suggested workouts, race prediction, and readiness-style guidance giving the watch a helpful training-assistant feel.

comfort
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.8

Comfort is a major positive, with reviewers repeatedly calling the watch light, slim, unobtrusive, and easy to wear to bed or during exercise.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Comfort is a strength for most users thanks to the light, slim build and wearable design, though the large case can still be noticeable for some sleepers or smaller wrists.

companion app quality
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.2

The Health Mate app is generally seen as detailed and easy to navigate, though not every reviewer liked its layout.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Companion app quality is mixed. Garmin Connect is praised for depth and data access, but several reviewers also call it confusing or poorly organized in places.

contactless payments
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
1.0

Payments are absent, and reviewers explicitly say to look elsewhere if contactless pay is important.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Contactless payments are available through Garmin Pay, but real-world usefulness depends heavily on bank support, which several reviewers say is still uneven.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.3

The watch is consistently described as working with both Android and iPhone, and reviewers also note app availability across mobile platforms.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Cross-platform compatibility is strong, with consistent support for both Android and iPhone across reviews.

customization options
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
3.3

Customization is modest but useful, covering screen order, watch behavior, and shortcut setup rather than deep personalization.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Customization options are extensive, including watch faces, widgets, data pages, and other configurable on-watch and in-app elements.

display quality
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
2.8

The small monochrome/OLED display is functional for basics, but reviewers repeatedly describe it as tiny and limited for dense information.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.8

Display quality is one of the headline wins. The AMOLED panel is widely described as sharp, vibrant, and transformative compared with older MIP models.

durability
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.3

Durability looks good in early testing, with scratch resistance and resistance to sweat or rain called out positively.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.5

Durability is mixed. Some reviewers appreciate the materials and scratch resistance expectations, but several also report real scratches and visible wear sooner than expected.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
1.0

ECG is not included on the ScanWatch Light, and reviewers point to that omission as a clear gap versus pricier models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

ECG functionality is absent. Multiple reviews explicitly state that the Forerunner 965 does not include ECG hardware or support.

fit
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
3.4

Fit is best for smaller wrists, and multiple reviewers caution that the 37mm case may feel too small or less ideal for some users.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.5

Fit is acceptable for many wrists but not ideal for everyone. Several reviews warn that the 47mm case can feel large on smaller wrists.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
3.7

General fitness tracking is serviceable and often close enough for casual use, but auto-detected sessions can need editing and this is not framed as a serious sports watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.9

Fitness tracking accuracy is a standout strength, with reviewers praising the consistency of workout metrics and the overall trustworthiness of exercise data.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.0

There is no built-in GPS, but connected GPS through the phone was repeatedly described as accurate enough for distance and pace comparisons against Garmin devices.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.9

GPS accuracy is one of the watch’s clearest strengths, repeatedly described as spot-on, industry-leading, or nearly dead accurate in testing.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
3.5

Broader health readings come across as useful and directionally solid, but at least one reviewer found Oura more precise for sleep timing and staging.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Health tracking accuracy is good overall but not flawless. Reviewers praise the depth and usefulness of health data, while some flag sleep-related inconsistency that affects broader health confidence.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.0

Heart-rate performance is generally strong, with close comparisons to Garmin and Polar in several tests, though one reviewer found average daily readings ran too high.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Heart rate accuracy is strong for a wrist-based sensor, with several reviewers calling it excellent or near chest-strap performance, though interval lag can still appear.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

LTE connectivity is absent. Reviews explicitly note that the watch lacks LTE or mobile internet support.

materials quality
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.5

Materials are consistently framed as premium for the price, especially the stainless steel and Gorilla Glass construction.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Materials quality is solid, with repeated mentions of titanium, Gorilla Glass, and generally premium-feeling hardware choices.

menu navigation
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.0

Crown-based navigation takes adjustment but is generally easy once learned, and several reviewers say scrolling through screens becomes natural.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Menu navigation is generally good once learned, with reviewers highlighting customizable widgets and easy menu flow, though Garmin’s depth can still feel dense at first.

music controls
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
1.0

Music control is a clear omission, with reviewers calling out the inability to manage playback from the wrist.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Music controls are well covered for a sports watch, with reviewers noting onboard player controls and convenient workout use.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Onboard music storage is a strength thanks to offline music support and ample storage for playlists, maps, and media.

operating system experience
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
2.5

One reviewer found the overall system experience less seamless than a Pixel Watch because watch and phone settings are not deeply synchronized.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

The operating system experience is capable but not always elegant. Reviewers appreciate the depth and button-first control options, yet some still describe Garmin’s interface conventions as archaic or complex.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
2.0

Outdoor readability is a weakness, with direct-sun visibility called out as poor.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Outdoor visibility is a clear positive. Reviewers say the AMOLED screen remains readable outdoors and in direct sun, even if some still prefer MIP’s look.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.5

Phone pairing and syncing were described as smooth and stress-free in the reviews that directly discussed setup reliability.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Pairing reliability is strong, with quick phone pairing and dependable syncing or headphone use in the selected reviews.

recovery insights
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.8

Recovery insights are a major strength, especially through Training Readiness, recovery time, and related load metrics that help guide training decisions.

reliability
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.0

Core functionality is generally reliable, with one reviewer explicitly calling it solid and another praising battery endurance as dependable.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Reliability is broadly strong. Reviewers describe stable tracking, dependable uploads, and few serious failures in day-to-day use.

safety features
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
2.2

Safety-oriented features are mixed: high and low heart-rate alerts are included, but reviewers criticize the lack of AFib detection.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Safety features are meaningful, with reviewers highlighting LiveTrack and fall detection as useful extras for training and outdoor use.

size options
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
2.0

Size flexibility is limited because the ScanWatch Light comes only in a single 37mm case.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.8

Size options are limited because the Forerunner 965 is effectively a one-size model, which can be restrictive for smaller-wrist users.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
3.8

Sleep duration, stages, and scores were often similar to Garmin, Oura, or other reference devices, but some reviewers saw less precise wake or sleep-time detection.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Sleep tracking accuracy is one of the most mixed areas. Some reviewers call it excellent or improved versus older Garmins, while others say the results can feel off or inconsistent.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
3.3

Phone notifications work, but the tiny screen makes longer messages slower to read and the experience varies from acceptable to genuinely good depending on expectations.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Smartphone notifications work well enough for viewing alerts, but several reviews point out limitations around interaction and reply behavior, especially on iPhone.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
2.6

As a smartwatch, the ScanWatch Light is intentionally basic: notifications, timers, and alarms are present, but richer smart features are limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Smartwatch features are good for a training watch, including notifications, music, and payments, but they still trail more full-fledged smartwatches in polish and breadth.

software smoothness
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Software smoothness is a strong point, with reviewers describing the interface as fluid and largely free of lag or stutter.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
2.5

Step counts were directionally useful, but several reviewers saw daily totals run about 1,000 steps away from comparison devices.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Step counting accuracy is strong in the selected evidence, including one low-error test result and praise for the visible real-time counter.

stress tracking
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Stress tracking is well integrated into Garmin’s broader readiness and wellness stack, with reviewers frequently citing it as one of the useful day-to-day metrics.

style and design
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.7

Style is one of the clearest strengths: reviewers repeatedly praise the analog look, elegant feel, and ability to pass as a real watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Style and design are widely praised, with the AMOLED display, slimmer body, and premium bezel helping the 965 look more modern and upscale than earlier Forerunners.

third-party app support
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.2

Third-party syncing is a plus, with repeated mentions of Apple Health, Google Fit, Strava, and Samsung Health integration.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Third-party app support is good, with Connect IQ apps plus integrations like Strava and TrainingPeaks adding flexibility for training and data workflows.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
1.0

There is no touchscreen at all, so touch responsiveness is effectively absent by design.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Touchscreen responsiveness is generally praised, with reviewers saying touch makes navigation easy and smooth when they choose to use it.

user interface
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
3.3

Interface impressions are mixed: some reviewers praise a clean, simple UI, while others found the app busy or cluttered.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

The user interface is improved and easier on the eyes than earlier Forerunners, with smoother visuals and a more modern presentation.

value for money
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
3.7

Value depends on priorities: reviewers think the price makes sense for the design and battery life, but some still see it as expensive for a basic smartwatch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.8

Value for money is mixed. Several reviewers think the feature set can justify the price, but others say many buyers would be better served by cheaper Garmin alternatives.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

Voice assistant functionality is absent. Reviews explicitly note there is no voice assistant, microphone-based response system, or similar wrist voice feature.

watch face quality
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
3.5

The analog face looks elegant and the hands smartly move aside for the display, but readability can suffer in some lighting.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Watch face quality is good overall, especially visually on the AMOLED display, but some reviewers also note fewer face options than previous Garmin experiences.

water resistance
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.5

Multiple reviewers treated the 5ATM rating as genuinely useful, reporting normal operation after pools, sea use, showers, and swims.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Water resistance is strong, with repeated confirmation of 5ATM or 50-meter suitability for swimming and everyday water exposure.

wellness insights
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.0

The watch and app add trend views, HRV, respiratory context, cycle tools, and broader wellness insight, though deeper guidance can sit behind a subscription.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Wellness insights are a major selling point, with Body Battery, sleep scores, readiness-style guidance, and rest cues making daily health data more actionable.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

Wi-Fi connectivity is useful for tasks like map or music downloads, though it is not framed as especially fast or notable compared with other core features.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Withings ScanWatch Light
4.2

Reviewers consistently highlight broad workout coverage, with roughly 30 to 40-plus activity modes and both manual and some automatic workout support.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Workout tracking variety is excellent, with broad multisport coverage, triathlon support, and many workout modes ranging from yoga to golf and hiking.