Average score
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.9
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.0

Auto-detection is explicitly criticized in testing, with reviewers saying workouts usually need to be started manually to access the watch’s richer tracking features.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.4

Reviews describe a broad Suunto ecosystem, with an app store that had already caught up and roughly 200 partner apps extending features and data flows.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

The app ecosystem is solid rather than class-leading: reviewers cite Connect IQ support and a healthy app catalog, but not the broader polish or reach of Apple or Wear OS ecosystems.

band quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

The band is described as comfortable on skin, suggesting solid everyday strap quality.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Band quality is generally good, with flexible silicone straps and solid sweat performance, though silicone can stay damp and irritate skin if not dried after workouts.

battery life
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.9

Battery life is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly calling it fantastic, exceptional, or unusually long-lasting.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Battery life is a major strength. Reviewers report multi-day to multi-week endurance depending on usage, with always-on display and GPS workouts reducing runtime but still leaving it ahead of many rivals.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.7

Blood oxygen is present as a watch/app feature, but reviewers give only limited evaluation beyond its inclusion in the broader toolset.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

The watch supports blood oxygen tracking and related wellness sensors, but reviewers discuss it more as part of the feature set than as a standout accuracy differentiator.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.2

Bluetooth support covers common sport sensors and phone-linked functions like music control.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Bluetooth connectivity is dependable for phone pairing and headphone playback, with no major complaints in the selected reviews.

brightness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

The improved backlight gets very bright, helping the display in darker conditions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Brightness is repeatedly praised. Reviewers call the AMOLED screen bright, vivid, and easy to read in varied lighting.

build quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.8

Reviewers describe the watch as luxurious yet rugged and even tank-like, pointing to strong build quality.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Build quality feels premium overall, helped by the metal or titanium bezel and polished finish, even if outright ruggedness is not the headline strength.

button controls
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.4

The physical controls are easy to use, including with gloves, and the buttons are generally well-regarded.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Button controls are a clear positive. Multiple reviews praise the tactile hardware buttons and say they remain easy to use during workouts and with gloves.

call handling
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.7

Call handling is inconsistent across reviews. One source says calls can be answered via a paired phone, while others explicitly note missing call functionality compared with Garmin’s more smartwatch-focused models.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.2

One reviewer found the watch’s calorie-related training data more realistic than competing devices, making the readouts reasonably useful.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.1

Calorie tracking is only modestly useful. Calories are visible in daily metrics, but one review says users wanting stronger calorie and intake support should look elsewhere.

charging convenience
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.1

The magnetic charger is easy to align or attach, though it remains a dedicated charging solution.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.5

Charging convenience is a weak point because Garmin still uses a proprietary connector, and reviewers call the port connection delicate while also noting the lack of wireless charging.

charging speed
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.7

Charging speed feedback is mixed: one review saw a very fast recharge, while another reported fast-charging issues.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Charging speed is good, with reviewers citing roughly an hour to reach high percentages and quick top-ups that provide meaningful battery in minutes.

coaching features
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.1

Coaching tools are present through VO2 max estimation and Suunto Coach guidance, but they are framed as helpful rather than especially advanced.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Coaching features are strong, with suggested workouts, race prediction, and readiness-style guidance giving the watch a helpful training-assistant feel.

comfort
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

Comfort is a plus, with the band feeling good on skin and the watch avoiding an overly clunky feel.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Comfort is a strength for most users thanks to the light, slim build and wearable design, though the large case can still be noticeable for some sleepers or smaller wrists.

companion app quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

The companion app is consistently praised for usability, organization, route planning, and depth of information.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Companion app quality is mixed. Garmin Connect is praised for depth and data access, but several reviewers also call it confusing or poorly organized in places.

contactless payments
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
1.0

One review explicitly notes that NFC payments are not included.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Contactless payments are available through Garmin Pay, but real-world usefulness depends heavily on bank support, which several reviewers say is still uneven.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.1

Reviewers used it with iPhone/Komoot and also noted access to the app on tablet or macOS desktop.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Cross-platform compatibility is strong, with consistent support for both Android and iPhone across reviews.

customization options
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

Users can customize pages, widgets, watch-face elements, and colors, giving the watch strong personalization options.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Customization options are extensive, including watch faces, widgets, data pages, and other configurable on-watch and in-app elements.

display quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.4

Reviewers describe the larger screen as easy to read and notably improved over older Suunto displays, especially for map use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.8

Display quality is one of the headline wins. The AMOLED panel is widely described as sharp, vibrant, and transformative compared with older MIP models.

durability
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.8

Reviews point to strong durability through real-world wear and formal ruggedness claims.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.5

Durability is mixed. Some reviewers appreciate the materials and scratch resistance expectations, but several also report real scratches and visible wear sooner than expected.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
1.0

One review explicitly states that ECG functionality is missing.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

ECG functionality is absent. Multiple reviews explicitly state that the Forerunner 965 does not include ECG hardware or support.

fit
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.9

Fit is mixed-positive: the large case may take getting used to, but it does not feel especially chunky on wrist.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.5

Fit is acceptable for many wrists but not ideal for everyone. Several reviews warn that the 47mm case can feel large on smaller wrists.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.2

One reviewer says the overall training data looked more accurate than on competing watches.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.9

Fitness tracking accuracy is a standout strength, with reviewers praising the consistency of workout metrics and the overall trustworthiness of exercise data.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.8

GPS accuracy is a standout strength, with repeated praise for precise tracks and strong performance against major rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.9

GPS accuracy is one of the watch’s clearest strengths, repeatedly described as spot-on, industry-leading, or nearly dead accurate in testing.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Health tracking accuracy is good overall but not flawless. Reviewers praise the depth and usefulness of health data, while some flag sleep-related inconsistency that affects broader health confidence.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
2.4

Optical heart-rate accuracy is a recurring weakness, especially for sports use, with under-reading and inconsistency noted.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Heart rate accuracy is strong for a wrist-based sensor, with several reviewers calling it excellent or near chest-strap performance, though interval lag can still appear.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

LTE connectivity is absent. Reviews explicitly note that the watch lacks LTE or mobile internet support.

materials quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.7

Titanium or steel construction and sapphire materials are repeatedly highlighted as premium touches.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Materials quality is solid, with repeated mentions of titanium, Gorilla Glass, and generally premium-feeling hardware choices.

menu navigation
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

Menus are easy to navigate, with key items accessible rather than buried.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Menu navigation is generally good once learned, with reviewers highlighting customizable widgets and easy menu flow, though Garmin’s depth can still feel dense at first.

music controls
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.0

The watch can control music playing from a connected phone.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Music controls are well covered for a sports watch, with reviewers noting onboard player controls and convenient workout use.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
1.0

Reviews clearly state that there is no onboard music storage or playback.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Onboard music storage is a strength thanks to offline music support and ample storage for playlists, maps, and media.

operating system experience
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.8

The operating system is seen as usable and reasonably intuitive, though not especially impressive.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

The operating system experience is capable but not always elegant. Reviewers appreciate the depth and button-first control options, yet some still describe Garmin’s interface conventions as archaic or complex.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.8

Outdoor readability is strong, with reviewers calling the screen or maps easy to read in bright sunlight.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Outdoor visibility is a clear positive. Reviewers say the AMOLED screen remains readable outdoors and in direct sun, even if some still prefer MIP’s look.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Pairing reliability is strong, with quick phone pairing and dependable syncing or headphone use in the selected reviews.

recovery insights
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.2

Recovery insights are present through recovery/energy features, and reviewers generally found that guidance useful.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.8

Recovery insights are a major strength, especially through Training Readiness, recovery time, and related load metrics that help guide training decisions.

reliability
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Reliability is broadly strong. Reviewers describe stable tracking, dependable uploads, and few serious failures in day-to-day use.

safety features
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.1

Safety-relevant tools such as storm alerts, sunset or weather alerts, and ETA are positively mentioned.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Safety features are meaningful, with reviewers highlighting LiveTrack and fall detection as useful extras for training and outdoor use.

size options
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
1.8

Size choice is limited; reviewers note the lineup is essentially one-size.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.8

Size options are limited because the Forerunner 965 is effectively a one-size model, which can be restrictive for smaller-wrist users.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

Sleep tracking is usually described as accurate or close to real sleep and wake timing.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Sleep tracking accuracy is one of the most mixed areas. Some reviewers call it excellent or improved versus older Garmins, while others say the results can feel off or inconsistent.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.0

Smartphone notifications are present and generally work well, though one review notes limited emoji handling.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Smartphone notifications work well enough for viewing alerts, but several reviews point out limitations around interaction and reply behavior, especially on iPhone.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.2

Smartwatch features are present, but reviewers do not see them as especially complete versus more smartwatch-oriented rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Smartwatch features are good for a training watch, including notifications, music, and payments, but they still trail more full-fledged smartwatches in polish and breadth.

software smoothness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.0

Software smoothness has improved, but lag remains a recurring complaint.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Software smoothness is a strong point, with reviewers describing the interface as fluid and largely free of lag or stutter.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Step counting accuracy is strong in the selected evidence, including one low-error test result and praise for the visible real-time counter.

stress tracking
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.0

Stress is tracked through the resources system, which estimates energy levels using stress and recovery inputs.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Stress tracking is well integrated into Garmin’s broader readiness and wellness stack, with reviewers frequently citing it as one of the useful day-to-day metrics.

style and design
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.7

Reviewers consistently like the styling, describing it as minimal, rugged, or well-designed.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Style and design are widely praised, with the AMOLED display, slimmer body, and premium bezel helping the 965 look more modern and upscale than earlier Forerunners.

third-party app support
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

Third-party syncing and integration support is strong, especially with Strava, TrainingPeaks, and broader partner apps.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Third-party app support is good, with Connect IQ apps plus integrations like Strava and TrainingPeaks adding flexibility for training and data workflows.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.2

Touch interaction is usable but commonly described as laggy or slightly delayed.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Touchscreen responsiveness is generally praised, with reviewers saying touch makes navigation easy and smooth when they choose to use it.

user interface
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.4

The user interface is generally intuitive and easy to learn, even if performance is not always snappy.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

The user interface is improved and easier on the eyes than earlier Forerunners, with smoother visuals and a more modern presentation.

value for money
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.7

Value is mixed: some reviewers call it a sound investment or relatively cheaper than rivals, while others question the price.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.8

Value for money is mixed. Several reviewers think the feature set can justify the price, but others say many buyers would be better served by cheaper Garmin alternatives.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

Voice assistant functionality is absent. Reviews explicitly note there is no voice assistant, microphone-based response system, or similar wrist voice feature.

watch face quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.4

Watch-face options exist, but at least one reviewer still wanted better designs.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Watch face quality is good overall, especially visually on the AMOLED display, but some reviewers also note fewer face options than previous Garmin experiences.

water resistance
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.0

Water resistance is solid for swimming and snorkelling use, though not pitched as a full diving watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Water resistance is strong, with repeated confirmation of 5ATM or 50-meter suitability for swimming and everyday water exposure.

wellness insights
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.1

The watch offers wellness-oriented feedback such as VO2 max, fitness age, and training or recovery guidance.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Wellness insights are a major selling point, with Body Battery, sleep scores, readiness-style guidance, and rest cues making daily health data more actionable.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.1

Wi‑Fi enables map downloads, but it depends on network availability and can be slow or situational.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

Wi-Fi connectivity is useful for tasks like map or music downloads, though it is not framed as especially fast or notable compared with other core features.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
5.0

Workout variety is excellent, with 90-plus to 95 sport modes and specialty options mentioned.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Workout tracking variety is excellent, with broad multisport coverage, triathlon support, and many workout modes ranging from yoga to golf and hiking.