Compare Coros Apex 2 vs Garmin Forerunner 255

P1 Coros Apex 2
P2 Garmin Forerunner 255

Comparison Takeaways

Coros Apex 2

Where It Has the Edge

  • touchscreen responsiveness is 3.0 vs 1.7. Touchscreen support is useful mainly for maps and simple scrolling, but several reviewers describe it as limited, finicky,...
  • materials quality is 4.4 vs 3.5. Materials quality is repeatedly praised for sapphire crystal, titanium, and lightweight construction that feels premium for the class.
  • step counting accuracy is 4.0 vs 3.3. Step counting is treated as generally accurate in the two reviews that discuss it directly.
  • build quality is 4.4 vs 3.9. Build quality is a consistent strength, with reviewers highlighting solid construction, ruggedness, sapphire glass, titanium parts, and reliable...

Garmin Forerunner 255

Where It Has the Edge

  • contactless payments is 3.9 vs 1.0. Contactless payments are consistently supported through Garmin Pay/NFC, although bank participation limits usefulness for some reviewers.
  • watch face quality is 3.9 vs 2.0. Watch-face quality is solid, with customizable stock faces and Connect IQ options, though one reviewer notes limits around...
  • size options is 4.4 vs 3.0. Size options are a strength, with reviewers repeatedly highlighting 41/42mm and 46mm options that serve different wrist sizes.
  • music controls is 3.9 vs 2.5. Music controls are useful, with reviewers noting phone playback control and on-watch controls such as changing, pausing, and...
Average score
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.6
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.3

Auto-detection evidence is positive but limited, with reviewers noting automatic run/walk/rest or effort detection rather than broad automatic workout recognition.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.8

The app ecosystem supports route/course transfer and some third-party integrations, but reviewers still see limits compared with bigger ecosystems.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.9

The app ecosystem is supported through Connect IQ and Garmin's watch-face/app store, but the evidence emphasizes fitness tools more than a broad app marketplace.

band quality
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.7

Band quality is mixed: many like the comfort and adjustability of nylon, while others dislike the loop style, scratchiness, or styling.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.4

Band quality is strong, with reviewers praising the silicone quick-release band, stretch, comfort, notches, and easy swapping.

battery life
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.4

Battery life is the strongest consensus positive, with reviewers repeatedly reporting multi-day to two-week use and long GPS runtime.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.6

Battery life is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly reporting week-plus use, two-week smartwatch estimates, and strong GPS endurance.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.5

Blood oxygen tracking is consistently identified as present through SpO2 or pulse-ox sensors, mainly as an added outdoor or altitude-oriented health metric.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.4

Blood oxygen/Pulse Ox support is present and mentioned often, but reviewers treat it as secondary because continuous use can hurt battery life and accuracy depends on conditions.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.4

Bluetooth connectivity works for phones, headphones, and sensors, though some reviewers criticize the removal of ANT+ and Bluetooth-only accessory support.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.3

Bluetooth connectivity is strong for headphones and external sensors, with reviewers noting Bluetooth audio and ANT+/Bluetooth sensor pairing.

brightness
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.2

Brightness is functional but not flashy; reviewers note readable backlighting and subtle MIP brightness while also calling it dimmer than AMOLED.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.4

Brightness is mixed: the display is readable, but multiple reviewers prefer brighter AMOLED screens or say brightness could be better.

build quality
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.4

Build quality is a consistent strength, with reviewers highlighting solid construction, ruggedness, sapphire glass, titanium parts, and reliable fundamentals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.9

Build quality is generally good for a lightweight sports watch, but reviewers note the plastic/resin construction feels cheaper than metal premium models.

button controls
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.9

Button controls are generally strong, with reviewers praising the three-button layout, lockout behavior, and tactile controls, though the crown takes adjustment.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.1

Button controls are broadly positive, with reviewers liking reliable physical buttons for sports, though a few mention learning curves or squishy buttons.

call handling
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
1.5

Call handling is limited because the watch can show incoming call notifications but cannot answer calls or texts.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
1.5

Call handling is weak because one review directly says the watch cannot make calls and lacks the hardware for calling.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.8

Calorie tracking is mentioned as part of the workout data set, but reviewers do not deeply evaluate its independent usefulness.

charging convenience
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
2.6

Charging convenience is mixed: some reviewers found the cable secure or easy, while others criticized USB-A or a loose/finicky magnetic cable.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.2

Charging convenience is mixed: the cable fits and replacement cables are available, but proprietary charging and battery drain with GPS/music are recurring caveats.

charging speed
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.3

Charging speed is solid, with reviewers reporting full charges in roughly one to under two hours.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.5

Charging speed is positive, with reviewers noting full charging in a couple of hours and 50 percent charge in under half an hour.

coaching features
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.0

Coaching features center on EvoLab, effort pace, training insights, and coach-oriented workout tools, and are viewed as increasingly useful for runners.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.5

Coaching features are a standout, with race widgets, Garmin Coach, adaptive suggested workouts, race-based plans, and workout guidance appearing across many reviews.

comfort
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.7

Comfort is a strong point: reviewers describe the Apex 2 as light, unobtrusive, and comfortable during workouts, sleep, and daily use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.6

Comfort is a consistent strength, with many reviewers describing the watch as light, comfortable for 24/7 wear, and easy to sleep in.

companion app quality
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.2

The Coros companion app is one of the strongest recurring positives, praised for clarity, data visualization, ease of use, and a polished experience.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.5

The companion app is a major strength, with Garmin Connect described as detailed, polished, powerful, and helpful for syncing, workouts, and long-term stats.

contactless payments
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
1.0

Contactless payments are absent, which one reviewer explicitly calls out as a missing everyday smartwatch convenience.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.9

Contactless payments are consistently supported through Garmin Pay/NFC, although bank participation limits usefulness for some reviewers.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.3

Cross-platform compatibility is positive, with reviewers noting iOS and Android support through Garmin Connect and Bluetooth.

customization options
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.0

Customization is a strength, with reviewers citing adjustable watch functions, data fields, watch faces, bands, and settings through the watch or app.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.7

Customization is a strong point, with reviewers praising data fields, watch-face changes, activity settings, and phone-based configuration.

display quality
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.6

Display quality is readable and practical, but the smaller MIP screen can feel cramped, faint, or less vivid than AMOLED alternatives.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.0

Display quality is practical and readable, especially for sport use, but reviewers contrast the MIP screen with brighter AMOLED displays.

durability
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.8

Durability is strongly supported by long-use testing, hard knocks, premium materials, and reports of little visible wear.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.4

Durability evidence is positive but limited, with reviewers mentioning Gorilla Glass, solid daily durability, and few scratches or cracks over months.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.3

The watch includes ECG-related hardware mainly used for HRV-style readings, but evidence frames it more as wellness data than full medical ECG functionality.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
No score yet
fit
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.5

Fit is helped by the smaller case, adjustable nylon strap, and micro-adjustable Velcro, especially for smaller wrists.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.3

Fit is positive, supported by closely spaced strap holes, multiple sizes, and reviewers reporting secure wrist adjustment.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.5

General fitness tracking is useful for workouts and running metrics, but strength-training rep detection and some activity-specific accuracy are weaker.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.6

Fitness tracking is described as accurate and detailed across workouts, with reviewers highlighting strong sport data, reliable modes, and post-workout analysis.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.5

GPS accuracy is the clearest mixed area: some tests were strong, but multiple reviewers found it good-not-great in cities, woods, off-road riding, or open-water scenarios.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.7

GPS accuracy is one of the strongest consensus points, with reviewers praising multi-band GNSS and reporting excellent or near spot-on tracking in varied conditions.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.2

Health data is useful for broad trends, but reviewers warn that some measurements, especially floors and heart-rate-derived health metrics, are not precise enough to treat as definitive.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.5

One review says the watch helps build an accurate picture of day-to-day health, based on heart rate, SpO2, sleep, stress, and related health stats.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.5

Heart-rate accuracy is improved and sometimes strong, especially indoors or steady workouts, but several reviewers saw lag, spikes, dropouts, or larger deviations versus chest straps.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.5

Reviewers repeatedly report strong wrist heart-rate accuracy, often comparing it favorably with chest straps, though one notes chest straps remain preferable for maximum precision.

materials quality
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.4

Materials quality is repeatedly praised for sapphire crystal, titanium, and lightweight construction that feels premium for the class.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.5

Materials quality evidence is limited and mixed, with one review identifying the resin case and silicone band rather than premium materials.

menu navigation
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
2.8

Menu navigation is mixed: some reviewers found it easy, while others criticized map/navigation workflows, turn prompts, route planning, or the digital-crown/menu structure.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.6

Menu navigation is mixed: Garmin's button/menu system works and can be quick, but reviewers note a learning curve and limited mapping/navigation depth.

music controls
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
2.5

Music features are limited: reviewers repeatedly note MP3/local playback and controls but no streaming service support.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.9

Music controls are useful, with reviewers noting phone playback control and on-watch controls such as changing, pausing, and playing tracks.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
2.9

Onboard storage supports MP3 files and maps, but reviewers note the base model has only 8GB and relies on manual file transfer.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.1

Onboard music storage is a clear optional strength on Music models, with Spotify/offline playlist support and roughly 500-song storage noted, though storage is limited versus higher models.

operating system experience
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.3

The operating experience is mostly simple and easy to learn, though one reviewer found it better as a workout tool than a polished daily smartwatch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.1

Operating system experience is functional and familiar, with Garmin's watch software described as consistent and usable rather than lifestyle-watch rich.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.5

Outdoor visibility is generally good in sunlight, but map/data readability while moving can still be hard on the small screen.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.6

Outdoor visibility is strong, with reviewers repeatedly praising MIP visibility in direct sunlight or bright outdoor conditions.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.8

Pairing and syncing are praised when directly tested, especially setup with the Coros app and reliable background syncing.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.3

Pairing reliability evidence is limited, but one cycling review successfully paired power-meter pedals and used the data without complaint.

recovery insights
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.9

Recovery and training-load feedback are a meaningful strength for runners and outdoor users, though at least one reviewer found suggested recovery times somewhat long.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.2

Recovery insights are a major upgrade, with HRV, Body Battery, recovery time, and training-load tools giving useful context, though Training Readiness is missing.

reliability
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.0

Reliability is generally positive in the limited direct evidence, with reviewers calling it a reliable companion or a strong all-around watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.8

Reliability evidence is limited but positive, with one long-term reviewer calling the watch fantastic after six months.

safety features
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.8

Safety features are practical but basic, including off-course alerts and storm alerts rather than full smartwatch safety suites.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.2

Safety features are present through emergency assistance, live tracking, and personal safety features, but evidence assumes phone-linked or outdoor use cases.

size options
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.0

Size options are mixed because the compact case suits smaller wrists, but the Apex 2 itself comes in one main size and may need longer bands for larger wrists.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.4

Size options are a strength, with reviewers repeatedly highlighting 41/42mm and 46mm options that serve different wrist sizes.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.3

Sleep start and wake times are repeatedly described as accurate, though reviewers are more skeptical of deeper sleep-stage interpretation.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.1

Sleep tracking is widely covered and generally positive, with several reviewers finding it useful or close to external sleep tools, while some still note overestimation or limits.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.5

Notifications work for basic phone alerts, but reviewers present them as a simple convenience rather than a smartwatch standout.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.7

Smartphone notifications are consistently available and useful for viewing messages, calls, texts, and app alerts, though controls vary by phone platform.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.1

Smartwatch features are present but secondary; reviewers frame the Apex 2 as a sports watch first, with limited calls, payments, streaming, and daily smartwatch polish.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.2

Smartwatch features are adequate for Garmin Pay, music, notifications, and Connect IQ, but reviewers repeatedly say they fall short of Apple or Samsung-style smartwatches.

software smoothness
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.3

Software smoothness is generally positive, with quick syncing or responsive interaction noted, though not every reviewer loved the overall interface structure.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.3

Software smoothness gets limited but positive evidence, with one review calling menuing smooth and lag-free.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.0

Step counting is treated as generally accurate in the two reviews that discuss it directly.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.3

Step counting evidence is limited and mixed: one reviewer reports an inaccurate stair count, while another calls the step counter very accurate.

stress tracking
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.5

Stress appears as part of the wellness/training-data layer rather than a deeply evaluated standalone feature.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.6

Stress tracking appears through HRV, Body Battery, and stress metrics, but evidence is mixed because at least one reviewer finds Garmin's stress data not very useful.

style and design
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.0

Style and design are mostly positive for a subtle rugged watch, though opinions differ on the strap aesthetics and overall visual polish.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.6

Style and design are functional rather than stylish, with reviewers calling it clearly sporty, utilitarian, or not a luxury-looking watch.

third-party app support
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.8

Third-party app support is helpful for syncing routes and fitness data to services such as Strava, Komoot, Apple Health, Nike Run Club, and adidas Running.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.8

Third-party app support exists through Connect IQ and downloadable faces/apps, but reviewers describe it as useful rather than Apple Watch-level broad.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.0

Touchscreen support is useful mainly for maps and simple scrolling, but several reviewers describe it as limited, finicky, or not fully impactful.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
1.7

Touchscreen responsiveness scores low because the watch does not have a touchscreen; reviewers often frame this as acceptable for workouts.

user interface
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.0

The user interface is generally usable and sometimes praised as intuitive, though it can feel less refined than leading smartwatch ecosystems.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.8

The user interface is practical, especially through glances and widgets, but some recovery/health metrics require interpretation.

value for money
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.4

Value is contested: reviewers praise the materials and battery at the price, but several say competitors offer stronger accuracy, navigation, or smartwatch features.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.4

Value for money is strongly positive for sports-focused buyers, though reviewers also mention price concerns and cheaper rivals.

watch face quality
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
2.0

Watch face quality is weak in the limited evidence: reviewers note few options or unattractive designs.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
3.9

Watch-face quality is solid, with customizable stock faces and Connect IQ options, though one reviewer notes limits around custom Face It storage.

water resistance
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.9

Water resistance is adequate for swimming, showers, rain, and shallow water use, though some reviewers note the 5 ATM rating is lower than the original Apex.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.3

Water resistance is positive, with reviewers noting 5ATM/waterproofing and suitability for swimming, pool use, showers, and open water.

wellness insights
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.5

Wellness insights combine HRV, SpO2, stress, sleep, training load, and related metrics, with value for trend awareness but limited personalization in some app views.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.2

Wellness insights are well represented through Morning Report, Body Battery, Health Snapshot, and sleep/recovery context, and several reviewers call these features useful.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
3.8

Wi-Fi is included and can support setup, updates, or connectivity, but it is not presented as a major mature feature across the reviews.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.0

Wi-Fi evidence is limited to Music models and syncing/downloading use cases, but reviewers confirm Wi-Fi support for those versions.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Coros Apex 2
4.3

Workout variety is broad, with running, cycling, swimming, hiking, watersports, gym, and other sport profiles repeatedly mentioned across reviews.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 255
4.7

Workout variety is a major strength, with reviewers emphasizing triathlon, multisport, running, cycling, swimming, open-water swimming, and many built-in activity profiles.