If you want better value for money
Choose Suunto Race S. It scores 4.8 vs 3.7 for value for money, with a 3.9 overall score.
Coros Apex 2 Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Coros Apex 2 for long battery life, comfort, rugged materials, strong app support, and solid everyday workout tracking. Skip it if you need class-leading GPS, polished navigation, streaming music, contactless payments, or a full smartwatch.
Best for
Best for runners, hikers, backpackers, and outdoor users who want a light, durable watch with long battery life, strong app support, and enough training data without needing full smartwatch extras.
Not for
Not for buyers who prioritize streaming music, contactless payments, call handling, advanced smartwatch features, class-leading navigation, or the most consistently accurate GPS and heart-rate data.
Verdict
The Coros Apex 2 comes across as a comfortable, durable GPS watch with standout battery life, premium-feeling materials, and one of the better companion-app experiences in its class. Its core workout tracking is good enough for many runners and outdoor users, and the app, customization, buttons, and charging speed earn repeated praise. The tradeoff is that several higher-end promises feel unfinished: GPS accuracy is good but not consistently excellent, navigation is useful but limited by small-screen maps and weak guidance, and smartwatch features remain basic. Value depends heavily on price and priorities because reviewers liked the hardware but questioned it against stronger navigation, music, and accuracy rivals.
Current model
Coros Apex 4
View current model
Feature Scorecards
Summary
48 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.011 (23%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.428 (58%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.45 (10%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.44 (8%)
Pros
-
The resume-later feature was strongly praised by a backpacking reviewer who used it to pause overnight tracking.
-
Durability was strongly praised, with reviewers reporting no marks after hard knocks, no visible trail damage, and confidence in sapphire construction.
-
Pairing reliability was a strength, with reviewers reporting easy setup, quick syncing, and no sensor-pairing issues.
-
Customization was a strength, with one reviewer praising how easy it was to change numerous watch functions.
-
Fit was praised for adjustability, small-wrist suitability, glove clearance, and a generally secure comfortable feel.
-
Comfort was a major strength: reviewers repeatedly called the Apex 2 light, unobtrusive, less cumbersome, and comfortable enough for long wear or sleep.
-
Charging speed was consistently positive, with reviewers reporting fast full charges and measured times under two hours.
-
Battery life was one of the strongest consensus positives, repeatedly described as impressive, excellent, commendable, and better than some comparable watches.
-
Build quality was consistently praised, with reviewers calling the watch well-built, robust, solid, and durable.
-
The app ecosystem around the watch was praised for the amount of information and options available through the COROS app.
-
Outdoor or low-light visibility was praised in one review where the workout screen was easy to read in early-morning conditions.
-
The companion app was one of the strongest areas, often described as easy, elegant, informative, visually clear, or data-rich, though one review wanted more personalized insight.
-
Reviewers liked the broad sport coverage, with multiple activity modes and added sport-specific options making the watch versatile.
-
Materials were a strong point, especially sapphire glass and titanium, though one review described them simply as solid rather than exceptional.
-
Software smoothness was a strength where reviewed, with responsive interactions, little waiting, and smoother interface animations.
-
Reliability was generally positive, with reviewers calling it bug-free, solid, useful, or reliable despite scattered feature-specific caveats.
-
Wellness insights were useful for overall trends and day-to-day decisions, especially when combined in app views and biometrics.
-
The operating experience was described as fast and functional in positive reviews, especially once users adapted to the watch.
-
Button controls were generally strong, with praise for buttons, haptics, lockout, and the larger dial, though one reviewer found the crown fiddly during runs.
-
Training and coaching features were seen as increasingly comprehensive and data-rich, though insight depth sometimes depended on unlocking EvoLab or using the app.
-
Bluetooth connectivity worked well for phone and sensor pairing in some reviews, but the Bluetooth-only sensor approach was also criticized for dropping ANT+ support.
-
Step tracking was described as generally accurate or consistent with other devices in the two reviews that evaluated it.
-
Blood oxygen tracking was lightly praised as part of altitude mode, but only one review gave a clear positive judgment.
-
Wi-Fi was praised as a nice addition for direct updates, though evidence was limited.
-
The user interface divided reviewers: several found it easy or refreshingly simple, while one found it poor until habits formed.
-
Sleep timing was often praised as accurate, but sleep-stage confidence was weaker, creating a mixed accuracy picture overall.
-
Menu navigation was mostly intuitive but still took some exploration because of deeper submenu structure.
-
Value was highly context-dependent: some reviewers called it a bargain or better value, while others criticized pricing against better-featured competitors or the Pro model.
-
GPS accuracy was mixed: some reviewers found it great or close to measured routes, while others saw corner cutting, drift, weak open-water recovery, or merely good-not-great performance.
-
Style and design were mixed-to-positive: some reviewers liked the subtle, compact look, while others felt the watch lacked appealing daily-wear design.
-
Band quality was mixed: nylon comfort and durability earned praise, while the loop design, cheap feel, scratchiness, and aesthetics drew complaints.
-
Display quality was readable and clear for many users, but reviewers repeatedly noted dimness, muted colors, or AMOLED comparisons.
-
Water resistance was adequate for showers, rain, swimming, and shallow use, but reduced 5 ATM depth versus older models was a caveat.
-
Heart-rate accuracy was the most split sensor result: several reviewers saw good steady-state or workout responsiveness, while others saw lag, spikes, drops, or larger BPM differences.
-
Workout tracking was generally considered capable for runs and everyday training, but strength-training rep tracking and some accuracy fundamentals drew criticism.
-
Health metrics were broadly useful for trends, but reviewer confidence was mixed because some HRV-style readings appeared unreliable or needed more testing.
-
Recovery guidance was useful for one reviewer and felt body-aware, though another found COROS recovery metrics too runner- and flat-run-focused.
-
Music controls were usable once set up, but the experience was only described as pretty good rather than modern or seamless.
-
Notifications worked overall, but the alert strength was not especially noticeable during movement.
Cons
-
Brightness was mixed: the backlight worked well, but some reviewers found the screen naturally dark or merely functional.
-
Touchscreen usefulness was mixed: it worked well for maps in some cases, but other reviewers found it limited, less usable, or not especially impactful.
-
Charging convenience was mixed: one cable was secure, but several reviewers complained about loose, finicky, or non-USB-C charging hardware.
-
Mapping and navigation were the most common tradeoff: maps were useful and sometimes enhanced, but missing routable guidance, small-screen use, weak route planning, and lagging Garmin-like features limited it.
-
Smartwatch features were limited compared with true smartwatches, though reviewers still considered the watch a strong multisport or fitness-focused device.
-
Onboard music was repeatedly limited by MP3-only loading, no streaming, slow or old-school transfers, and competition for storage space.
-
Call handling was a clear smartwatch limitation because the reviewer noted the watch cannot answer calls or texts.
-
Contactless payments were a clear missing smartwatch feature in the review evidence.
-
Watch faces were criticized for bugs and poor visual design, making this one of the weaker software areas.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in Wi-Fi connectivity, resume later function, app ecosystem, near average in battery life, value for money, below average in watch face quality, call handling, mapping and navigation.
Summary
48 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher16 (33%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts15 (31%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower17 (35%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| watch face quality | 1.8 | 3.8 | -2.1 |
| call handling | 2.0 | 3.3 | -1.3 |
| Wi-Fi connectivity | 4.0 | 2.7 | +1.3 |
| resume later function | 5.0 | 3.9 | +1.1 |
| app ecosystem | 4.5 | 3.6 | +0.9 |
| fit | 4.7 | 3.9 | +0.8 |
| mapping and navigation | 2.9 | 3.4 | -0.6 |
| display quality | 3.6 | 4.3 | -0.7 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better display quality
Choose Suunto Run. It scores 4.6 vs 3.6 for display quality, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better watch face quality
Choose Garmin Forerunner 165. It scores 5.0 vs 1.8 for watch face quality, with a 4.3 overall score.
If you want better sleep tracking accuracy
Choose Polar Ignite 2. It scores 4.7 vs 3.8 for sleep tracking accuracy, with a 3.7 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Better: phone pairing and background sync The Apple Watch is said to do background phone connection and syncing better.
- Better: value, screen, battery, sensors and features The newer Coros Pace Pro is said to offer even better value for runners.
- Compared: feature overlap and price The Forerunner 255 is raised as a close comparison where the Apex 2 price stack is questioned.
FAQ
Is the Coros Apex 2 battery life good?
Yes. Battery life is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly calling it impressive, excellent, commendable, or strong enough for multi-day use.
How accurate is the GPS?
The GPS evidence is mixed. Some reviews found it great or close to measured routes, while others saw drift, corner cutting, open-water issues, or performance that was good but not class-leading.
Is heart-rate tracking reliable?
It can be good for steady efforts and some workouts, but several reviewers saw lag, spikes, or dropouts during harder or more variable sessions. A chest strap remains the safer choice for high-accuracy heart-rate training.
Are the maps and navigation good?
The maps are useful as a backup and are better than breadcrumb-only navigation, but reviewers criticized small-screen use, weak route guidance, missing routable maps, and limited turn prompts.
Is it comfortable for daily wear?
Yes. Reviewers repeatedly praised the light, compact feel and comfortable fit, including during sleep, though band quality and aesthetics were more divisive.
Does it work well as a smartwatch?
Only in a limited way. Notifications and MP3 storage exist, but reviewers noted no contactless payments, no call or text answering, and no music streaming.
Is the COROS app good?
The companion app is a major positive. Reviewers described it as easy, elegant, informative, visually clear, and useful for settings, training data, and workout analysis.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - The Run Testers
- Review score
- 3.3
YouTube - UltraTrailSteven
- Review score
- 4.2
YouTube - DesFit
- Review score
- 3.8
YouTube - DC Rainmaker
- Review score
- 3.2
Article Reviews
advnture.com
- Review score
- 4.3
Top Smartwatches to Consider
Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.
Pros: pairing reliability, brightness
Cons: Wi-Fi connectivity, Bluetooth connectivity
Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...
Pros: step counting accuracy, app ecosystem
Cons: Bluetooth connectivity, pairing reliability
Good if you want a compact, stylish Garmin with strong GPS, comfort, and week-plus battery life. Skip it if you need richer smartwatch apps, onboard music, bright always-on display, or...
Pros: health tracking accuracy, blood oxygen tracking
Cons: ECG functionality, onboard music storage
Best for luxury-watch styling, vivid TAG faces, solid build, and casual smartwatch use. Skip it if you need top fitness accuracy, call handling, LTE, or strong value.
Pros: contactless payments, pairing reliability
Cons: LTE connectivity, call handling