Compare Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5 vs Garmin Enduro 3

Auto-detection is useful but basic: one reviewer saw workout prompts work well, while another liked the feature but wanted more control.

Reviewers found the app ecosystem limited, citing missing major apps and only a small number of add-on apps.

The app ecosystem gets some credit for a large library of watch faces, but the broader smartwatch-app story is not the product’s main strength.

Band feedback is mostly positive for comfort, swapping, and optional materials, though some reviewers disliked proprietary straps or unremarkable fit.

Band quality was mostly praised for comfort and lightness, but sweat retention and wet fabric were recurring drawbacks.

Battery life is the strongest consensus point, with most reviewers reporting unusually long endurance for a budget smartwatch despite one heavier-use outlier.

Battery life was the strongest consensus point, with reviewers repeatedly describing weeks of use and endurance-event confidence.

Blood oxygen tracking received limited but positive accuracy evidence, with one reviewer saying readings were close in testing.

Bluetooth connectivity was praised in limited evidence for stable, lower-latency calling and audio support.

Body temperature tracking is effectively absent; the reviewer grouped the missing temperature sensor with features that would have been nice to have.

Brightness is widely praised, with reviewers repeatedly calling the AMOLED panel bright enough for outdoor use and high peak brightness.

Brightness was improved, especially versus older solar MIP designs, though AMOLED displays remained brighter in many conditions.

Build quality is mixed-positive: several reviewers praised the aluminum feel, while one felt the casing was plasticky.

Build quality took a hit for one reviewer because replacing some metal with plastic made it feel less robust than the predecessor.

The rotating crown and button controls are generally liked for tactile feedback and navigation, though one reviewer wished for more button functionality.

Physical button controls were praised as reliable and satisfying, with the touchscreen-button blend described as the best of both worlds.

Call handling is mostly good for quick wrist calls, but reviewers noted limits such as modest loudness, occasional lag, or uneven clarity.

Call handling is limited because the Enduro 3 lacks mic and speaker hardware; one reviewer did not miss it, while another missed wrist-call support.

Charging convenience is mixed: the magnetic connection can be secure and cable-sharing helps, but several reviewers disliked the proprietary pogo-pin cable.

Charging convenience was criticized because the proprietary four-pin cable remains a hassle despite the long intervals between charges.

Charging speed is generally acceptable to strong, with reviewers noting quick top-ups, one-hour charging, or reasonable full-charge times.

Charging speed was only directly judged in one long-term review, where the slow full charge was a minor nitpick because charging was rare.

Coaching features are useful for budget fitness guidance, including running courses, guided workouts, breathing exercises, and export options.

Coaching and training-plan features were praised for actionable strength plans, readiness guidance, and useful endurance-focused training support.

Comfort is broadly praised because the watch is light and wearable day and night, though its size can still matter for smaller wrists.

Comfort was better than expected for a 51mm watch thanks to low weight and nylon straps, though sleep comfort and bulk remained caveats.

The Mi Fitness companion app is generally viewed as clean, visual, and easy to use, but some reviewers found it basic or behind stronger rivals.

The companion app and Garmin Share workflow were praised for saving time when distributing routes and workouts.

Contactless payments are a clear limitation because global reviewers repeatedly noted the lack of NFC payment support.

Contactless payments were strongly praised by reviewers who used Garmin Pay frequently and treated it as part of daily use.

Cross-platform compatibility is useful but compromised, with reviewers noting broader phone support alongside reduced functionality on some platforms.

Cross-platform compatibility is mixed because Android users can reply with presets, while iPhone users lose reply functionality.

Customization is mixed: photo faces, watch faces, and UI options are praised, but some reviewers wanted deeper watch-face customization.

Customization remains a Garmin strength, especially customizable data fields, stat widgets, and quick-access tools.

Display quality is one of the most praised areas, with reviewers consistently highlighting the large, vibrant, sharp AMOLED screen.

Display quality improved over prior solar Garmins and is clear outdoors, but several reviewers still preferred AMOLED sharpness and color.

Durability evidence is positive but limited, with reviewers reporting no scratches or scuffs after use.

Durability was strong in the reviewed evidence, with praise for the long-lasting body and a six-month report of no visible screen scratches.

ECG functionality is missing, and one reviewer treated the absent advanced sensors as nice-to-have but not expected at the price.

Fit is split: one reviewer found alternative straps did not fit well, while another found the watch balanced on the wrist.

Fit was secure and wearable for some reviewers, but the large case still looked or felt oversized on smaller wrists.

Fitness tracking accuracy is mixed: some casual and heart-rate workout results impressed reviewers, while others found it basic or not ideal for serious tracking.

Fitness tracking was broadly viewed as accurate and dependable across real workouts, runs, hikes, and multisport use.

The flashlight received a brief positive usefulness mention as a handy quick setting.

The flashlight was one of the most consistently loved extras, described as handy, underrated, and hard to live without.

GPS accuracy is mixed-positive: many reviewers found it accurate or reliable for casual runs, but some saw overreporting or slight inaccuracies.

GPS accuracy drew strong agreement, with reviewers reporting precise tracks, solid distance totals, and reliable performance even in challenging terrain.

Health tracking accuracy is adequate for general use but not advanced, with reviewers warning against medical-grade expectations while noting some improvements.

Reviewers found the Enduro 3’s health metrics credible and useful, with one noting it flagged underlying illness signs before the reviewer noticed them.

Heart rate accuracy is mixed: some tests were close to chest straps, while other reviewers found lag, high readings, or odd spikes.

Heart-rate accuracy was usually strong, especially for steady running and baseline tests, but several reviewers saw misses during intervals, climbs, strength work, or fast intensity changes.

LTE connectivity is a drawback on the global model, with reviewers noting the lack of global LTE/eSIM support.

Mapping and navigation are weak because reviewers noted no native map apps, offline maps, or GPX-style navigation.

Mapping and navigation were a major strength, especially route following, off-course alerts, ClimbPro, and backcountry use, though some UI flow remains clunky.

Materials quality is budget-appropriate: reviewers noted aluminum alloy and better materials, but not a fancy feel.

Materials quality was mixed: reviewers liked the practical comfort and price effects of plastic, but one initially felt it seemed cheap.

Menu navigation is generally easy, with praise for app finding, crown scrolling, and text-labeled icon layouts.

Menu navigation improved overall, but added button presses and a learning curve kept it from feeling completely effortless.

Music controls are basic but useful for quickly pausing, resuming, skipping tracks, and changing volume.

Music controls were a weak spot: reviewers found the control page hard to avoid and phone music control clunky.

Onboard music storage is useful for phone-free workouts but inconsistent across phones and hurt by slow Bluetooth transfers.

Onboard music storage is supported, but one reviewer had repeated Spotify download failures, hurting confidence in the feature.

The operating system is smooth and functional for basics, but reviewers criticized HyperOS limitations and missing richer smartwatch integrations.

The updated software experience makes the Enduro 3 feel closer to a smartwatch while keeping its sports-watch focus.

Outdoor visibility is strongly praised thanks to the bright AMOLED panel and readable screen in direct sunlight.

Outdoor visibility was mostly praised in sun and bright conditions, but one reviewer found the map hard to see in dim forest without backlight.

Pairing reliability has limited but positive evidence, with no issues reported for pairing and syncing.

Recovery insights received limited positive evidence through beneficial breathing and running features tied to training and recovery.

Recovery and training-readiness insights were repeatedly praised as useful for pacing training, race preparation, and deciding when to push or rest.

Reliability evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer reporting no stutters or hiccups in use.

Long-term reliability was praised in one six-month review, where the watch lived up to expectations through demanding use.

Safety features received limited positive evidence from the SOS function, which the reviewer considered useful for emergencies.

Safety features received positive evidence through off-course alerts that prevented extra race mileage.

Size options are a weakness because the large one-size design can feel overwhelming or bulky on smaller wrists.

Size options were the clearest weakness because the Enduro 3 only comes in one large 51mm case.

Sleep tracking accuracy is mixed: some reviewers found it close for sleep duration, while others saw inconsistent sleep stages and overestimated deep sleep.

Sleep tracking was described as solid, though comfort and size may limit how many users want to wear it overnight.

Smartphone notifications are a common weakness because messages can be viewed but usually cannot be acted on or replied to.

Notifications work, and Android replies are useful, but the evidence also points to platform limits rather than a rich messaging experience.

Smartwatch features cover the basics well for the price, but reviewers repeatedly frame them as limited compared with richer smartwatch platforms.

Smartwatch features are adequate for essentials but limited versus Apple, Samsung, or Garmin’s own Fenix 8 voice-enabled models.

Software smoothness is mostly good, with smooth navigation in several reviews, but some reported stutters, lag, or touch delays.

Software smoothness was mixed, with reviewers liking the direction but noting sluggishness, laggy post-run stats, and polish still needed.

Step counting accuracy received limited but very positive evidence, with one reviewer finding exercise-mode counts nearly exact.

Stress tracking was criticized in one review as slow and sensitive to movement, making continuous tracking less reliable.

Style and design are mostly praised for looking modern, smart, and not cheap, although several reviewers criticized the Apple-like originality.

Design reactions were mixed: some liked the sleek rugged look, while another found the changes polarizing and subjective.

Third-party app support is weak because reviewers noted no native major music/map apps, no third-party apps, and limited accessory support.

Third-party app support was judged weak compared with Apple’s ecosystem, with reviewers saying the Connect IQ offering does not rival fuller smartwatches.

Touchscreen responsiveness is positive, with reviewers praising swipes, taps, and even wet-screen responsiveness.

Touchscreen responsiveness was viewed positively, with reviewers praising touch unlock, responsiveness, and the touchscreen/buttons mix.

The user interface is generally easy and smooth, with straightforward layouts and good navigation for a budget watch.

The revised interface was generally seen as easier and more coherent, though not perfectly polished across all reviewers.

Value for money is a major strength, but not universal: most reviewers call it excellent value, while one felt it was overpriced against cheaper alternatives.

Value for money was repeatedly praised because the Enduro 3 costs less than several Fenix alternatives while keeping key sports features.

Voice assistant quality is poor because the reviewer noted effectively no voice assistant support.

Voice notes are useful but mixed: reviewers liked recording and audio notes, while others noted loudness, access, or sharing limitations.

Watch face quality is strong, with reviewers praising the large, stylish, free, and varied watch-face library.

Watch face quality was criticized by one reviewer as visually weak compared with Apple or Samsung options.

Water resistance is reassuring for swimming and showers, with reviewers noting 5ATM support and successful pool/shower use.

Water resistance is good for swimming and snorkeling, but reviewers noted it is not intended for diving.

Wellness insights are mixed: Vitality and sleep routine suggestions are appreciated, but deeper personalized advice is scarce.

Wellness metrics such as Body Battery, Training Readiness, sleep, and health trends were seen as genuinely helpful rather than just decorative data.

Wi-Fi connectivity is absent and criticized because file transfers depend on slower Bluetooth methods.

Workout tracking variety is strong, with reviewers praising broad activity coverage, many sports, and useful running/workout modes.

Reviewers consistently praised the wide sport coverage, describing the Enduro 3 as capable across nearly every activity and especially strong for endurance athletes.