Compare Xiaomi Watch 2 vs Apple Watch SE 3

P1 Xiaomi Watch 2
P2 Apple Watch SE 3

Comparison Takeaways

Xiaomi Watch 2

Where It Has the Edge

  • blood oxygen tracking is 4.1 vs 1.0. Blood oxygen tracking is widely present and generally useful, with several reviewers noting all-day or nighttime SpO2 support...
  • outdoor visibility is 4.5 vs 3.6. Outdoor visibility is consistently praised, with reviewers saying the display remains bright or visible outdoors and in direct...
  • brightness is 4.3 vs 3.5. Brightness is a consistent strength, with reviewers praising the AMOLED screen as bright enough for normal use and...
  • charging speed is 4.7 vs 4.3. Charging speed is one of the strongest battery-related positives, with reviewers reporting full charges in roughly 35 to...

Apple Watch SE 3

Where It Has the Edge

  • LTE connectivity is 4.3 vs 1.2. LTE and cellular connectivity are improved by 5G, with reviewers noting better coverage, calls, texts, messages, and downloads...
  • recovery insights is 4.1 vs 2.0. Recovery insights are present through training load, Vitals, sleep score, and workout feedback, but they are not as...
  • calorie tracking usefulness is 4.0 vs 2.0. Calorie tracking is treated as part of the reliable core fitness feature set, with one reviewer noting workout...
  • size options is 4.0 vs 2.0. Size options are adequate and familiar at 40mm and 44mm, with the smaller size appealing to smaller wrists,...
Average score
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.7
Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
2.3

Automatic workout detection is not a strength: one reviewer found no automatic workout tracking, while another said the feature could be trigger-happy, though one YouTube reviewer enabled it successfully.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.2

Reviewers found automatic workout or walk detection useful and generally dependable, though one noted occasional slower workout-end recognition.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.5

Reviewers consistently liked the Wear OS app ecosystem, highlighting Google apps, Play Store access, and major third-party apps as a major value advantage.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

The app ecosystem is a major strength, with reviewers praising the Apple Watch App Store and broad app availability compared with rival budget watches.

band quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.5

Band feedback is mixed: reviewers appreciated standard or workout-friendly straps, but the included TPU band was also called cheap, okay, or less premium than alternatives.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.5

Band support is a strength because the SE 3 uses Apple’s familiar strap system and has many Apple and third-party options.

battery life
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.3

Battery life varies by setup, ranging from one day with richer tracking to two days or more with conservative settings, so it is useful but not class-leading.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Battery life is the clearest mixed area: some reviewers saw all-day or better results, while others still treated it as a daily-charge watch.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.1

Blood oxygen tracking is widely present and generally useful, with several reviewers noting all-day or nighttime SpO2 support and one comparison showing close readings.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
1.0

Blood oxygen tracking is consistently described as missing from the SE 3, making it a clear limitation versus Series and Ultra models.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.0

Bluetooth support is generally reliable for phone connection and calls, though one reviewer emphasized the watch is Bluetooth-only because it lacks cellular service.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Bluetooth support is present and useful for headphones and audio, though reviewers mostly mention it as part of the connectivity package rather than a standout feature.

brightness
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.3

Brightness is a consistent strength, with reviewers praising the AMOLED screen as bright enough for normal use and direct sunlight.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Brightness is adequate for many reviewers, but the 1,000-nit display is repeatedly framed as weaker than the Series 11 in direct sunlight.

build quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.0

Build quality is generally good for the price, with premium-feeling or solid construction noted, though some reviewers still felt it lacked ultra-premium materials.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Build quality is generally praised as light, well made, and attractive, with tougher glass helping the SE 3 feel less like a budget device.

button controls
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.0

The two-button setup is easy to use and customizable, but reviewers also noted the lack of a rotating crown limits navigation compared with the Pro model.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Button and gesture controls are strongly received, especially the Digital Crown, side button, Double Tap, and Wrist Flick gestures.

call handling
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.4

Call handling is a clear positive, with multiple reviewers saying the microphone and speaker support calls well and allow direct wrist calling.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Call handling is solid for a wrist device, with useful speaker, microphone, cellular, and voice isolation notes, though it is not ideal as a primary phone substitute.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
2.0

Calorie tracking usefulness is weakly supported because one reviewer found Mi Fitness workouts sometimes contained glitched calorie figures or mismatched information.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Calorie tracking is treated as part of the reliable core fitness feature set, with one reviewer noting workout calorie metrics matched comparison data.

charging convenience
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
2.7

Charging convenience is a recurring concern because the proprietary magnetic puck needs careful alignment and is less flexible than universal wireless charging.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.9

Charging convenience improves with USB-C magnetic charging and fast top-ups, but sleep tracking still requires a daily charging routine for many users.

charging speed
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.7

Charging speed is one of the strongest battery-related positives, with reviewers reporting full charges in roughly 35 to 60 minutes.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Charging speed is a repeated upgrade, with reviewers citing useful fast-charge top-ups and roughly 80 percent in around 45 minutes to an hour.

coaching features
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.9

Coaching features are present through running courses, sports modes, and coaching tips, but evidence is limited and less central than the basic tracking features.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Coaching features are useful but not deeply advanced; Workout Buddy is described as beginner-friendly, motivational, or basic depending on the reviewer.

comfort
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.4

Comfort is strongly positive: reviewers repeatedly described the watch as light, comfortable, unobtrusive, and wearable during daily use, sleep, and workouts.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Comfort is a strength, with reviewers calling the watch lightweight, unobtrusive, and well suited to sleep or smaller wrists.

companion app quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.3

The companion app is mixed: it enables setup, reports, watch faces, and health views, but one reviewer found Mi Fitness a chore for analysis.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Companion app quality is functional but split across Watch, Health, and Fitness apps, which can be useful yet occasionally tedious.

contactless payments
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.3

Contactless payment support is a major Wear OS benefit through Google Wallet or Google Pay, though one reviewer disliked the required screen lock.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Contactless payments are a strong Apple Watch staple, with Apple Pay repeatedly included among the SE 3’s core smartwatch strengths.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
2.3

Cross-platform compatibility is limited because several reviewers said the watch is Android-only or loses potential on iPhone despite the Mi Fitness app existing there.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
2.0

Cross-platform compatibility is weak because reviewers frame the SE 3 as an iPhone smartwatch and note it only works with iPhone.

customization options
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.4

Customization is strong, with reviewers praising watch face choices, complications, tile rearranging, strap options, and Play Store watch face expansion.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Customization is strong across watch faces, metrics, widgets, bands, and gesture-driven controls.

display quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.4

Display quality is one of the most praised attributes, with multiple reviewers calling the 1.43-inch AMOLED screen sharp, bright, detailed, and excellent for the price.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Display quality is much improved by the always-on OLED screen, though thicker bezels and lower brightness keep it below Series and Ultra displays.

durability
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.5

Durability impressions are mixed: the watch survived normal testing and felt durable, but reviewers noted no military standard and uncertainty about protection materials.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.9

Durability is improved through tougher Ion-X glass and water resistance, but some reviewers still point to weaker scratch or dust protection than pricier models.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
1.0

ECG functionality is absent; reviewers explicitly noted there is no ECG or related advanced health hardware at this price.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
1.0

ECG functionality is absent, and reviewers repeatedly call this one of the main health-feature tradeoffs.

fit
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.7

Fit is acceptable but size-sensitive, with one reviewer praising snug fit potential and others noting the larger case or specified wrist-size range.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Fit is favorable for smaller wrists and sleep tracking, though one reviewer found the older chassis less flush than newer models.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.4

Fitness tracking accuracy is mixed: indoor heart-rate workouts and swim data looked promising, but reviewers warned some workout data and GPS could vary.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Fitness tracking accuracy is a strong point, with reviewers reporting accurate workouts and close agreement with comparison devices.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.0

GPS evidence is mostly positive, especially from reviewers praising dual-band or accurate outdoor tracking, though one reviewer found the GPS lacked exactness.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

GPS accuracy is generally strong for a single-band Apple Watch, with caveats in tall-building or canyon-like conditions.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.5

Health tracking accuracy is adequate for general trends but not medical-grade, with reviewers split between encouraging raw data and warnings about trust or heart-rate dependence.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.2

Health tracking accuracy is solid for the essentials, especially heart rate, sleep, and workouts, while advanced sensors are omitted.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.4

Heart-rate accuracy is mixed: some reviewers saw close readings versus Garmin or an oximeter, while others reported jumps and inconsistent values.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Heart-rate accuracy is repeatedly praised, with reviewers finding close agreement against straps or other watches.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
1.2

LTE connectivity is not available on the Watch 2, and several reviewers treated the missing eSIM or cellular option as a clear compromise.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

LTE and cellular connectivity are improved by 5G, with reviewers noting better coverage, calls, texts, messages, and downloads away from the phone.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
No score yet
Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Mapping and navigation are useful thanks to Apple Maps, offline maps, Find My basics, and Compass Backtrack, though precision finding is limited.

materials quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.7

Materials quality is acceptable for the price, with an aluminum frame and light body, but reviewers contrasted it with stainless steel or sapphire-equipped rivals.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Materials quality is good for the price, with aluminum and Ion-X glass, but premium titanium, sapphire, and some rugged ratings remain reserved for higher models.

menu navigation
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.2

Menu navigation is generally intuitive through swipes, buttons, tiles, and quick toggles, though the lack of crown means more touch navigation.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.5

Menu navigation is easy and fast, helped by watchOS, the Digital Crown, touch controls, and one-handed gestures.

music controls
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.9

Music controls are supported through YouTube Music, Spotify, and playback controls, but the evidence focuses more on availability than depth of control.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Music controls are a strength, including Apple Music pairing, media controls, and playback improvements.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.2

Onboard music storage is a strength because the 32GB storage was repeatedly described as enough for apps, playlists, podcasts, or offline music.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Onboard storage and offline playback are improved, with 64GB storage and support for music or media without the phone nearby.

operating system experience
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.7

The operating system experience is a major selling point because it runs Wear OS with Google services, though being on Wear OS 3.5 drew update concerns.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

The operating system experience is a major strength; reviewers praise watchOS 26 as polished, cohesive, and rich in Apple Watch features.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.5

Outdoor visibility is consistently praised, with reviewers saying the display remains bright or visible outdoors and in direct sunlight.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.6

Outdoor visibility is usable but not class-leading, with the 1,000-nit screen and direct sunlight repeatedly cited as limits.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.4

Pairing reliability appears good in the limited evidence, with reviewers citing automatic syncing and an easy setup process.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Pairing and iPhone integration are strong, with reviewers praising how well the watch syncs, routes notifications, and pairs with Apple services.

recovery insights
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
2.0

Recovery insights are weak because Mi Fitness recovery suggestions were criticized, despite the watch offering some post-workout analysis.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Recovery insights are present through training load, Vitals, sleep score, and workout feedback, but they are not as deep or prescriptive as some rivals.

reliability
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.0

Reliability evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer saying the screen had not scuffed or scratched after several days of use.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Reliability appears strong in everyday use, with reviewers emphasizing smooth performance and lack of issues in ordinary tasks.

safety features
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.0

Safety features are modest: reviewers mentioned find-my-phone and heart-rate alerts, but safety was not a major focus.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Safety features are a major strength, including fall detection, crash detection, emergency SOS, heart-rate alerts, and Compass Backtrack.

size options
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
2.0

Size options are a clear weakness because reviewers noted the watch is offered in a single large case size, which may frustrate smaller wrists.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Size options are adequate and familiar at 40mm and 44mm, with the smaller size appealing to smaller wrists, though color choices are limited.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.1

Sleep tracking is generally positive, with reviewers reporting useful sleep stages, wake-up detection, and close-enough results versus other devices.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Sleep tracking is useful and generally accurate for time and stages, but sleep score is sometimes described as simple or limited.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.9

Smartphone notifications are mixed: many reviewers found replies and alerts useful, while one reported Wear OS notification delays from frequent apps.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Notifications are a core strength, especially with always-on viewing, wrist vibration routing, and gestures for dismissal or management.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.6

Smartwatch features are strong for the price, including Google Maps, Wallet, Assistant, calls, messages, Play Store apps, and broad Wear OS functionality.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Smartwatch features are excellent for the price, with reviewers emphasizing that it feels like a full Apple Watch rather than a stripped-down tracker.

software smoothness
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.9

Software smoothness is mostly good, with reviewers praising fluidity or improved slickness, but some still noticed sluggishness, stutters, or older Wear OS.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Software smoothness is one of the clearest strengths because the S10 chip keeps watchOS, apps, and gestures fast and responsive.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.0

Step counting evidence is limited but positive, coming from one reviewer who grouped basic step tracking with daily metrics that worked well for him.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.0

Step counting appears as part of the core activity toolkit, though reviewers discuss the feature more than rigorous step-count accuracy.

stress tracking
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.0

Stress tracking is widely supported as a built-in health feature, with some reviewers noting all-day tracking options.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
No score yet
style and design
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.7

Style and design divide reviewers: many found the minimalist round design clean or suitable, while others called it plain or lacking character.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.3

Style and design are mixed: reviewers like the familiar Apple Watch look but often criticize the older body, thicker bezels, and limited colors.

third-party app support
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.5

Third-party app support is strong because Wear OS and Google Play bring apps such as Spotify, WhatsApp, Audible, Amazon Music, and more.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Third-party app support is strong because the SE 3 retains Apple’s large app store and broad developer support.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.1

Touchscreen responsiveness is generally positive, with reviewers describing responsive scrolling, usable touch controls, and smooth interaction, despite occasional UI polish issues.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.7

Touchscreen responsiveness is strong, with reviewers saying touch, buttons, gestures, and everyday controls work promptly and fluidly.

user interface
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.8

The user interface is broadly intuitive, with easy defaults and simple swipes, but one reviewer saw overlapping or disappearing graphical elements.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

The user interface is easy, clean, and cohesive, especially with watchOS 26 and the familiar watch face/home structure.

value for money
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.6

Value for money is the strongest consensus point: reviewers repeatedly framed the Watch 2 as unusually affordable for a capable Wear OS smartwatch.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.8

Value for money is the strongest consensus attribute, with reviewers repeatedly saying the SE 3 offers near-Series functionality at a much lower price.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.2

Voice assistant quality is generally good through Google Assistant, with reviewers praising accuracy, smart-device control, and easy voice access despite occasional recognition delay.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.4

Voice assistant quality improves with on-device Siri and the S10 chip, making requests faster and more useful than earlier SE models.

watch face quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.3

Watch face quality is strong thanks to attractive AMOLED rendering, built-in faces, customization, and access to many additional faces through the Play Store.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Watch face quality is praised through attractive, high-quality options and watchOS 26 face support.

water resistance
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.9

Water resistance is adequate for swimming and daily water exposure at 5ATM, though reviewers noted no extra IP rating or rugged certification.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.3

Water resistance is solid for typical use, with reviewers noting 50-meter or 164-foot resistance and swim tracking, but not advanced dive sensors.

wellness insights
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.1

Wellness insights are present but basic, with sleep advice and health summaries seen as useful yet generic or bare-minimum compared with premium platforms.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.1

Wellness insights are useful for mainstream users through sleep score, sleep apnea alerts, wrist temperature, Vitals, and heart-rate notifications.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
3.8

Wi-Fi support is present and useful, including 5GHz Wi-Fi, but one reviewer noted calls and notifications still depend on phone connectivity without cellular.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
3.5

Wi-Fi is adequate but not premium, with reviewers noting 2.4GHz-only or Wi-Fi 4 support rather than dual-band.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Xiaomi Watch 2
4.6

Workout variety is very strong, with reviewers repeatedly citing roughly 150 to 160-plus sport modes across running, swimming, cycling, gym, yoga, and more.

Product 2: Apple Watch SE 3
4.6

Workout tracking variety is strong, covering many sports, workouts, running metrics, swimming, and common gym activities.