Compare Garmin Forerunner 255S vs Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)

P1 Garmin Forerunner 255S
P2 Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)

Comparison Takeaways

Garmin Forerunner 255S

Where It Has the Edge

  • comfort is 4.6 vs 3.4. Comfort is one of the strongest points, especially for sleep and long workouts, because the smaller case feels...
  • fit is 4.7 vs 3.5. Fit is excellent for smaller wrists, with the 41mm case repeatedly described as comfortable and well-sized.
  • watch face quality is 4.3 vs 3.3. Watch face support is good through built-in faces and Connect IQ, with reviewers noting customization and many free...
  • call handling is 3.5 vs 2.5. Call handling is basic: Android users can respond or reject calls through the watch, but it still relies...

Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)

Where It Has the Edge

  • touchscreen responsiveness is 4.6 vs 1.0. Touchscreen responsiveness is generally positive, especially for maps and daily use, with one reviewer praising it as responsive...
  • third-party app support is 4.0 vs 2.5. Third-party support appears through Connect IQ, letting users add watch faces, data fields, widgets, and apps.
  • pairing reliability is 4.8 vs 3.8. Pairing reliability is only lightly covered, but the AirPods report is positive, describing a simple Bluetooth connection that...
  • safety features is 4.4 vs 3.5. Safety features are centered on the LED flashlight, strobe modes, visibility options, and LiveTrack-style use, and reviewers found...
Average score
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.0
Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.1
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
3.9

Reviewers only touched on limited auto-detection behavior: Garmin Connect can automatically assign gear to activities, and strength mode detected exercises like squats, so support is useful but narrow.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.5

Connect IQ adds watch faces, data fields and apps, but reviewers describe the ecosystem as useful rather than Apple-level and sometimes limited.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.0

The Garmin ecosystem is described as expandable through a software marketplace and Connect IQ access, though the experience can feel more tool-like than slick.

band quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.4

Reviewers consistently liked the silicone strap, calling it comfortable, adjustable, exercise-ready and tough enough for regular training use.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.4

Bands are generally praised for quality and QuickFit swapping, with long-term evidence that the band holds up, though one white strap got dirty in use.

battery life
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.4

Battery life is a major strength, commonly landing around a week or more, though music, GPS and oxygen monitoring can reduce it.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.6

Battery life is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers reporting roughly 5-6 days with always-on use, around 10-16 days in many setups, and even multi-week use in lighter scenarios.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.0

Blood oxygen tracking is present for sleep or daytime monitoring, but reviews treat it as one metric among many rather than a standout feature.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.3

Blood oxygen tracking is present through wrist-based pulse oximetry, with one reviewer reporting readings stayed in the expected 95-100% range.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.9

Bluetooth headphone pairing is generally workable and music-friendly, though one long-term user found headphone pairing slow and frustrating.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.4

Bluetooth support is well documented for sensors and accessories, with reviewers noting Bluetooth/ANT+ connectivity and phone/accessory support.

brightness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.0

Brightness control is handled through physical buttons and fits the watch’s practical, low-key outdoor design.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.5

Display brightness and the flashlight brightness both score well, with reviewers describing the AMOLED screen as easy to see and the flashlight as adjustable.

build quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.1

Build quality is generally solid for a lightweight polymer watch, with durable long-term impressions but some concern about scratch-prone Gorilla Glass.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.8

Build quality is repeatedly strong, with reviewers describing the watch as price-worthy, rugged, and tank-like.

button controls
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.2

The five-button layout is repeatedly praised for workouts, water use and avoiding accidental touches, even if it requires adjustment.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.3

Button controls are a major practical advantage for workouts, with multiple reviewers praising tactile operation, though one long-term user found the many buttons confusing.

call handling
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.5

Call handling is basic: Android users can respond or reject calls through the watch, but it still relies heavily on the paired phone.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
2.5

Call handling is limited in the available evidence, especially on iPhone, where one reviewer said users cannot respond to texts or calls.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.0

Calorie tracking is useful mainly through Garmin Connect and MyFitnessPal integration, with total, base, and active calories visible.

charging convenience
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.2

Charging is functional but not premium; Garmin’s common cable is convenient for Garmin owners, while the proprietary setup feels dated to one reviewer.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
2.8

Charging convenience is a weakness in the review evidence because Garmin still relies on its proprietary plug-in charger and lacks solar charging on Epix Pro.

charging speed
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.8

Charging speed is a clear upgrade, with reviewers citing full charging in about an hour, under-an-hour charging, and meaningful battery gains from short top-ups.

coaching features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.4

Coaching features are a clear strength, with Garmin Coach, suggested workouts, race tools and personal-trainer-like prompts repeatedly highlighted.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.3

Coaching features are strong, spanning suggested workouts, customizable training plans, readiness-based guidance, and training tools, though one reviewer felt newer training features were not fully baked.

comfort
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.6

Comfort is one of the strongest points, especially for sleep and long workouts, because the smaller case feels light and unobtrusive.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
3.4

Comfort is mixed: some reviewers found the watch unobtrusive or surprisingly comfortable, while smaller-wrist users found it bulky or hard to wear overnight.

companion app quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.7

Garmin Connect is useful and reliable for setup, syncing, visualization and customization, though music setup and app separation can confuse newcomers.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.1

Garmin Connect is repeatedly valued for depth, training plans, and data, though watch customization from the companion app remains limited.

contactless payments
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.8

Garmin Pay and NFC are supported and useful, but reviewers note Garmin’s payment system lacks the polish or bank support of rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.1

Garmin Pay is useful when supported, with reviewers praising tap-to-pay convenience, but UK bank support was criticized as limited.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.5

The watch works across Android and iOS, with a consistent Garmin Connect experience, though Android gets better message response support.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
3.9

The watch works with both Android and Apple phones, but reviewers consistently note Android integration is better because iPhone replies and call responses are restricted.

customization options
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.4

Customization is strong, covering workout data screens, watch faces, colors, app settings and per-activity tracking options.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.1

Customization is broad across bands, apps, watch faces, data pages, and workouts, though some reviewers note it can take work to set up.

display quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.9

The MIP display is practical and readable rather than flashy, with reviewers trading away AMOLED vibrancy for battery life and outdoor usability.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.7

The AMOLED display is a highlight across reviews: vivid, crisp, readable, colorful, and a major reason to choose Epix over MIP-display alternatives.

durability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.4

Durability looks good in longer-term use, with reviewers reporting little wear, though the bezel and glass can still be scratch concerns.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.6

Durability is a strong theme, with sapphire glass, rugged construction, and long-term reports of no front-face scratches after heavy use.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
3.4

ECG evidence is mixed by review timing: one source notes a firmware update enabled ECG, while another earlier review says it was not yet available.

fit
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.7

Fit is excellent for smaller wrists, with the 41mm case repeatedly described as comfortable and well-sized.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
3.5

Fit depends heavily on size and wrist shape; smaller case options help, but a 47mm unit still felt ungainly on a very small wrist.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.5

Fitness tracking is broadly accurate and analysis-rich, especially for endurance training, with some caveats around live heart-rate smoothing.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.7

Fitness tracking accuracy is well regarded overall, with reviewers praising Garmin’s tracking package and repeatable distance measurements.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.2

GPS accuracy is a major strength thanks to multiband GNSS, though a few reviewers saw small variations or altitude inaccuracies in specific scenarios.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.8

GPS accuracy is one of the strongest consensus points, repeatedly described as reliable, fast, spot-on, and among the best available.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.8

Health tracking is useful but training-oriented; reviewers appreciated HRV and recovery metrics while noting it is not a full health wearable.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
3.8

Health tracking is generally useful but not uniformly trusted; reviewers praised HRV/body feedback while questioning wearable-derived metrics in some contexts.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.3

Heart-rate accuracy is generally strong for a wrist watch, often close to straps, but reviewers still recommend straps for the sharpest live accuracy.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.0

Heart rate accuracy is strong for many runs and workouts, especially with the newer sensor, but reviewers still saw latency or errors during cycling, intervals, or odd wrist-based readings.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.8

Mapping and navigation are standout strengths, with offline maps, routable navigation, course support, and wrist-based map use repeatedly praised.

materials quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.0

Materials are typical Garmin Forerunner fare: lightweight polymer, Gorilla Glass and silicone, chosen more for sport practicality than luxury.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.3

Materials quality is premium-leaning thanks to titanium, sapphire, and stainless options, though not every case component is luxury metal.

menu navigation
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
2.9

Menu navigation is the clearest weakness, with several reviewers calling it complex or confusing despite button-control advantages.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
2.8

Menu navigation is powerful but can be overwhelming, with one reviewer saying many options are not explained clearly.

music controls
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.0

Music controls are present for phone audio, and the watch exposes quick music controls from the button interface.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
3.8

Music controls and playback are useful, including offline Spotify and onboard playback, but one review reported patchy playback and headphone disconnects.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.7

Onboard music is a useful feature with storage for offline audio, but setup and loading can be slow or confusing for some users.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.6

Onboard storage is a strength, with 32GB available for maps, music, and workout data and enough room for phone-free listening.

operating system experience
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.9

The operating system is familiar and capable, with one reviewer praising its ease while others note Garmin’s learning curve.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.3

The operating system is deep and feature-rich, with strong built-in software and no required subscription, but it demands learning.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.7

Outdoor visibility is excellent because the MIP display remains readable in sunlight with very little glare.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.8

Outdoor visibility is excellent overall, with the AMOLED screen praised in sunlight, outdoors, and compared with other displays.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.8

Pairing and acquisition are mostly reliable, especially GPS and Bluetooth headphones, but headphone pairing frustrated one user.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.8

Pairing reliability is only lightly covered, but the AirPods report is positive, describing a simple Bluetooth connection that stayed connected.

recovery insights
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.3

Recovery insights are a strong training feature, including HRV, Body Battery, Training Load and Morning Report-style readiness context.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.4

Recovery insights are a major Garmin strength, including Training Readiness, Acute Load, HRV, Body Battery, Hill Score, and Endurance Score; usefulness varies by metric.

reliability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.8

Reliability is supported by long-term updates and GPS stability, with Garmin’s longevity praised in follow-up use.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.7

Reliability is strong in the available evidence, with one reviewer calling Garmin devices extremely reliable and another preferring Epix Pro stability over a newer model.

safety features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.5

Safety features exist through optional Garmin tools such as LiveTrack, though the reviews provide limited evaluation beyond availability.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.4

Safety features are centered on the LED flashlight, strobe modes, visibility options, and LiveTrack-style use, and reviewers found the flashlight more useful than expected.

size options
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.7

Size options are a standout benefit because the 255S gives smaller wrists a serious multisport watch without losing core training tools.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.7

Size options are a broad positive because Epix Pro comes in 42mm, 47mm, and 51mm, finally covering smaller and larger wrists.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.8

Sleep tracking is viewed as useful and reasonably aligned with other devices, though not as deep as dedicated sleep-focused wearables.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.0

Sleep tracking accuracy is mixed but improving: some reviewers trust it or find sleep timing accurate, while others still compare it unfavorably with Oura or report occasional misses.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.1

Smartphone notifications work well for basic alerts and quick replies, especially on Android, but remain constrained by the small non-touch screen.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.1

Smartphone notifications are readable and useful, but interaction depends on phone platform; iPhone users get more limited response options.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.0

Smartwatch features are useful but intentionally basic, prioritizing training over app-rich Apple, Google or Samsung-style smartwatch polish.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
3.9

Smartwatch features are adequate but secondary to sports use, with notifications, music, payments, and widgets present but less polished than Apple or Samsung.

software smoothness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
3.6

Software smoothness is mixed; one reviewer noticed slower post-workout chart loading, while another wanted faster software-side improvements.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.3

Step counting appears accurate in the reviewer evidence, including a near-spot-on manual step check.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.0

Step tracking is only lightly discussed, but one review says daily steps and sleep tracking serve users well.

stress tracking
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.0

Stress tracking is available as part of the broader health suite, with reviewers presenting it as a daily wellness metric.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.2

Stress tracking feeds Garmin’s Body Battery and readiness-style insights, with one reviewer noting stress clearly depletes the Body Battery estimate.

style and design
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.5

Style is utilitarian rather than flashy, but reviewers consider it acceptable for everyday wear if you choose muted colors.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.3

Style is rugged, serious, and tool-like rather than elegant, which some reviewers loved and others framed as a matter of taste.

third-party app support
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
2.5

Third-party app support exists through Connect IQ, Strava, Komoot and music apps, but reviewers describe it as limited versus mainstream smartwatches.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.0

Third-party support appears through Connect IQ, letting users add watch faces, data fields, widgets, and apps.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
1.0

Touchscreen responsiveness scores poorly because the watch has no touchscreen; reviewers mostly frame that as a deliberate sport-watch tradeoff.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.6

Touchscreen responsiveness is generally positive, especially for maps and daily use, with one reviewer praising it as responsive without being overly sensitive.

user interface
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.6

The interface is powerful but polarizing: some find it easy once learned, while newcomers can find it dense or confusing.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
3.2

The user interface is capable but polarizing: some reviewers call it slick, while long-term users still find it confusing.

value for money
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.4

Value is strong for runners and multisport users, especially given multiband GPS, battery life and training depth at a midrange price.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
3.9

Value is divisive: reviewers praise what the watch delivers for serious users, but repeatedly flag cheaper Garmin alternatives and the high price.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
1.9

Voice assistant quality is weak because reviewers note Garmin does not emphasize assistant features and Venu-style voice functionality is missing.

watch face quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.3

Watch face support is good through built-in faces and Connect IQ, with reviewers noting customization and many free options.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
3.3

Watch faces are customizable, but the experience is not flawless; one long-term user forgot how to switch faces.

water resistance
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.5

Water resistance is strong for swimming, rain and shower use, and physical buttons are an advantage around water.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.7

Water resistance is a clear strength, with 100m/10 ATM-style resistance repeatedly mentioned for swimming, wet rides, and even diving contexts.

wellness insights
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.2

Wellness insights such as Morning Report, Body Battery and general wellbeing metrics are useful companions to the training focus.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.5

Wellness insights are engaging and useful, especially Morning Report, HRV, Body Battery, stress, sleep, and health snapshots.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.2

Wi-Fi is useful for uploads, syncing, and map management, though big map downloads can be slower than USB.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.6

Workout variety is extensive, spanning running, cycling, swimming, hiking, yoga, triathlon and dozens of app-manageable workout types.

Product 2: Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2)
4.5

Workout variety is extensive, with many sport profiles, new activity modes, and broad coverage across running, cycling, swimming, gym, team sports, and more.