Compare Xiaomi Redmi Watch 4 vs Garmin Enduro 3

The app ecosystem is weak because reviewers repeatedly pointed to no app storefront or downloadable app support.

The app ecosystem gets some credit for a large library of watch faces, but the broader smartwatch-app story is not the product’s main strength.

Band quality is the most common design complaint, with awkward clasp, cheap feel, and attachment issues offset by some quick-release praise.

Band quality was mostly praised for comfort and lightness, but sweat retention and wet fabric were recurring drawbacks.

Battery life is the strongest consensus strength, with reviewers repeatedly reporting week-plus, two-week, or excellent endurance.

Battery life was the strongest consensus point, with reviewers repeatedly describing weeks of use and endurance-event confidence.

Blood oxygen tracking drew negative accuracy evidence in one review, where readings did not match other trackers or a pulse oximeter.

Bluetooth connectivity received one positive connection comment, but there was limited broader evidence beyond that.

Brightness is consistently praised, with reviewers saying the screen is bright, visible, and sufficient outdoors.

Brightness was improved, especially versus older solar MIP designs, though AMOLED displays remained brighter in many conditions.

Build quality is improved by the aluminum frame and sturdy feel, although one review still felt it was cheap beside premium watches.

Build quality took a hit for one reviewer because replacing some metal with plastic made it feel less robust than the predecessor.

Button controls are mixed: the crown can be handy, but reviewers also mention no tactility and accidental presses.

Physical button controls were praised as reliable and satisfying, with the touchscreen-button blend described as the best of both worlds.

Call handling is mostly positive, with reviewers calling the Bluetooth calling clear, useful, or backed by a good speaker.

Call handling is limited because the Enduro 3 lacks mic and speaker hardware; one reviewer did not miss it, while another missed wrist-call support.

Calorie tracking usefulness is limited, with one reviewer saying the watch only gives rough ideas of calorie burn.

Charging convenience is mixed to negative due to the proprietary cable, despite one reviewer liking cable compatibility with other Xiaomi gear.

Charging convenience was criticized because the proprietary four-pin cable remains a hassle despite the long intervals between charges.

Charging speed is a weakness in the one scored review because a full charge takes well over an hour.

Charging speed was only directly judged in one long-term review, where the slow full charge was a minor nitpick because charging was rare.

Coaching features are useful for beginners, especially warm-up exercises, preloaded running workouts, and run-specific sessions.

Coaching and training-plan features were praised for actionable strength plans, readiness guidance, and useful endurance-focused training support.

Comfort is good for such a large watch because reviewers found it light and not too heavy to wear.

Comfort was better than expected for a 51mm watch thanks to low weight and nylon straps, though sleep comfort and bulk remained caveats.

The companion app is functional and sometimes improving, but reviewers also call it dated, unattractive, or unslick.

The companion app and Garmin Share workflow were praised for saving time when distributing routes and workouts.

Contactless payments are a major miss, with reviewers noting unavailable or effectively useless NFC payment support outside limited regions.

Contactless payments were strongly praised by reviewers who used Garmin Pay frequently and treated it as part of daily use.

Cross-platform compatibility was supported by one reviewer who used the watch with an iPhone and said it worked fine.

Cross-platform compatibility is mixed because Android users can reply with presets, while iPhone users lose reply functionality.

Customization options are mixed: one review found customization limited, while others liked the watch-face and card options.

Customization remains a Garmin strength, especially customizable data fields, stat widgets, and quick-access tools.

Display quality is one of the clearest strengths, though reviewers differ on color quality and bezel compromises.

Display quality improved over prior solar Garmins and is clear outdoors, but several reviewers still preferred AMOLED sharpness and color.

Durability is mixed: one reviewer found it durable, while another warned that sharp edges could scar or scratch.

Durability was strong in the reviewed evidence, with praise for the long-lasting body and a six-month report of no visible screen scratches.

Fit is a caveat: the watch suits bigger wrists better, and some reviewers found the size or crown placement problematic.

Fit was secure and wearable for some reviewers, but the large case still looked or felt oversized on smaller wrists.

Fitness tracking accuracy is mixed, with serious caveats from some reviewers and more positive reference-level impressions from others.

Fitness tracking was broadly viewed as accurate and dependable across real workouts, runs, hikes, and multisport use.

The flashlight was one of the most consistently loved extras, described as handy, underrated, and hard to live without.

GPS accuracy is uneven: one reviewer praised it as stellar, while others found it merely okay, wonky, or behind Huawei and Honor alternatives.

GPS accuracy drew strong agreement, with reviewers reporting precise tracks, solid distance totals, and reliable performance even in challenging terrain.

Health tracking accuracy is split: some reviewers found it only useful as a rough guide, while others considered the sensors good enough as a reference.

Reviewers found the Enduro 3’s health metrics credible and useful, with one noting it flagged underlying illness signs before the reviewer noticed them.

Heart rate accuracy is a recurring weak point, with reviewers reporting readings that were high, low, or wide of chest-strap and premium wearable references.

Heart-rate accuracy was usually strong, especially for steady running and baseline tests, but several reviewers saw misses during intervals, climbs, strength work, or fast intensity changes.

Mapping and navigation were a major strength, especially route following, off-course alerts, ClimbPro, and backcountry use, though some UI flow remains clunky.

Materials quality is a highlight, with reviewers praising the less-budget feel and metal construction.

Materials quality was mixed: reviewers liked the practical comfort and price effects of plastic, but one initially felt it seemed cheap.

Menu navigation is easy in the cited review, helped by large widgets and straightforward movement around the watch software.

Menu navigation improved overall, but added button presses and a learning curve kept it from feeling completely effortless.

Music controls are useful for phone playback, though reviewers still describe them as basic rather than a full onboard music experience.

Music controls were a weak spot: reviewers found the control page hard to avoid and phone music control clunky.

Onboard music storage is supported, but one reviewer had repeated Spotify download failures, hurting confidence in the feature.

The operating system experience is smooth but constrained, with reviewers describing HyperOS or the watch software as basic and not very expansive.

The updated software experience makes the Enduro 3 feel closer to a smartwatch while keeping its sports-watch focus.

Outdoor visibility is strong, with reviewers reporting clear or problem-free readability outside.

Outdoor visibility was mostly praised in sun and bright conditions, but one reviewer found the map hard to see in dim forest without backlight.

Pairing reliability was positive in one review, where pairing and syncing generally worked well.

Recovery insights are weak because reviewers said the underlying sensor accuracy casts doubt on recovery and training recommendations.

Recovery and training-readiness insights were repeatedly praised as useful for pacing training, race preparation, and deciding when to push or rest.

Reliability has limited but negative evidence, centered on a persistent DND sync bug.

Long-term reliability was praised in one six-month review, where the watch lived up to expectations through demanding use.

Safety features are useful but limited because emergency functions generally require a nearby paired phone.

Safety features received positive evidence through off-course alerts that prevented extra race mileage.

Size options are limited in practice, with one review noting the large case will not suit everyone.

Size options were the clearest weakness because the Enduro 3 only comes in one large 51mm case.

Sleep tracking is one of the better health areas for duration and wake times, though some reviewers still flagged false sleep detection or unreliable heart-rate-related sleep data.

Sleep tracking was described as solid, though comfort and size may limit how many users want to wear it overnight.

Notifications are readable on the large screen, but limitations around emoji display, replies, and message response keep the experience basic.

Notifications work, and Android replies are useful, but the evidence also points to platform limits rather than a rich messaging experience.

Smartwatch features are serviceable but basic, with multiple reviewers saying the Watch 4 stays closer to essential smartwatch functions than a full smart platform.

Smartwatch features are adequate for essentials but limited versus Apple, Samsung, or Garmin’s own Fenix 8 voice-enabled models.

Software smoothness is a strong point, with reviewers consistently praising snappy, fluid, or smooth interaction.

Software smoothness was mixed, with reviewers liking the direction but noting sluggishness, laggy post-run stats, and polish still needed.

Step counting accuracy is generally acceptable, with totals described as in line or not wildly far from comparison wearables.

Style and design are broadly praised, especially the nicer metal look and less-budget appearance.

Design reactions were mixed: some liked the sleek rugged look, while another found the changes polarizing and subjective.

Third-party app support is a positive surprise, especially for sharing data with platforms such as Suunto, Apple Health, and Strava.

Third-party app support was judged weak compared with Apple’s ecosystem, with reviewers saying the Connect IQ offering does not rival fuller smartwatches.

Touchscreen responsiveness is positive in the reviews that addressed it, with snappy and responsive interaction.

Touchscreen responsiveness was viewed positively, with reviewers praising touch unlock, responsiveness, and the touchscreen/buttons mix.

The user interface is generally praised as optimized, fluid, neat, and easy to understand on the larger square screen.

The revised interface was generally seen as easier and more coherent, though not perfectly polished across all reviewers.

Value for money is generally good for the display, battery, and design, but several reviewers still point to better-value or smarter alternatives.

Value for money was repeatedly praised because the Enduro 3 costs less than several Fenix alternatives while keeping key sports features.

Voice assistant quality is inconsistent: Alexa was seen as a useful addition in some contexts, but other reviews noted no assistant or China-only availability.

Watch face quality is mostly positive for variety and unique options, but one reviewer found the choices boring and insufficiently customizable.

Watch face quality was criticized by one reviewer as visually weak compared with Apple or Samsung options.

Water resistance performed well in cited use, with reviewers saying swimming, showering, or soaking was not a problem.

Water resistance is good for swimming and snorkeling, but reviewers noted it is not intended for diving.

Wellness insights sound ambitious but are undermined by reliance on questionable heart-rate and sensor data.

Wellness metrics such as Body Battery, Training Readiness, sleep, and health trends were seen as genuinely helpful rather than just decorative data.

Workout tracking variety is a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly noting the large sports-mode selection and broad exercise coverage.

Reviewers consistently praised the wide sport coverage, describing the Enduro 3 as capable across nearly every activity and especially strong for endurance athletes.