If you want better blood oxygen tracking
Choose OnePlus Watch 3. It scores 4.9 vs 2.0 for blood oxygen tracking, with a 4.0 overall score.
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 4 Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Redmi Watch 4 for a low-cost, good-looking watch with a big display and long battery life. Skip it if you need reliable fitness/health accuracy, deeper apps, payments, or richer smartwatch tools.
Best for
Best for budget buyers who want a stylish, lightweight smartwatch with a large bright screen, long battery life, basic health stats, calls, notifications, and plenty of workout modes.
Not for
Not for users who need precise heart-rate or recovery data, a deep app ecosystem, reliable contactless payments, LTE independence, or a smaller premium-feeling watch.
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 4 earns its strongest praise for looking and feeling better than a budget watch, with a large bright display, smooth software, and battery life that many reviewers found excellent. The tradeoff is that its smartwatch layer stays basic: app support is limited, payments are missing or region-bound, and notifications often stop short of replies. Fitness value depends heavily on expectations. Reviewers liked the broad workout modes, beginner run guidance, and step or sleep basics, but heart-rate accuracy, recovery insights, blood oxygen, and some GPS results drew clear criticism. It works best as a stylish, long-lasting budget wearable, not as a precision fitness watch or full app-driven smartwatch.
Current model
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
View current model
Feature Scorecards
Summary
50 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.01 (2%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.427 (54%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.414 (28%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.48 (16%)
Pros
-
Battery life is the strongest consensus strength, with reviewers repeatedly reporting week-plus, two-week, or excellent endurance.
-
Software smoothness is a strong point, with reviewers consistently praising snappy, fluid, or smooth interaction.
-
Outdoor visibility is strong, with reviewers reporting clear or problem-free readability outside.
-
Workout tracking variety is a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly noting the large sports-mode selection and broad exercise coverage.
-
Touchscreen responsiveness is positive in the reviews that addressed it, with snappy and responsive interaction.
-
Materials quality is a highlight, with reviewers praising the less-budget feel and metal construction.
-
Display quality is one of the clearest strengths, though reviewers differ on color quality and bezel compromises.
-
Style and design are broadly praised, especially the nicer metal look and less-budget appearance.
-
Brightness is consistently praised, with reviewers saying the screen is bright, visible, and sufficient outdoors.
-
Call handling is mostly positive, with reviewers calling the Bluetooth calling clear, useful, or backed by a good speaker.
-
The user interface is generally praised as optimized, fluid, neat, and easy to understand on the larger square screen.
-
Build quality is improved by the aluminum frame and sturdy feel, although one review still felt it was cheap beside premium watches.
-
Coaching features are useful for beginners, especially warm-up exercises, preloaded running workouts, and run-specific sessions.
-
Comfort is good for such a large watch because reviewers found it light and not too heavy to wear.
-
Third-party app support is a positive surprise, especially for sharing data with platforms such as Suunto, Apple Health, and Strava.
-
Water resistance performed well in cited use, with reviewers saying swimming, showering, or soaking was not a problem.
-
Bluetooth connectivity received one positive connection comment, but there was limited broader evidence beyond that.
-
Cross-platform compatibility was supported by one reviewer who used the watch with an iPhone and said it worked fine.
-
Menu navigation is easy in the cited review, helped by large widgets and straightforward movement around the watch software.
-
Pairing reliability was positive in one review, where pairing and syncing generally worked well.
-
Value for money is generally good for the display, battery, and design, but several reviewers still point to better-value or smarter alternatives.
-
Watch face quality is mostly positive for variety and unique options, but one reviewer found the choices boring and insufficiently customizable.
-
Step counting accuracy is generally acceptable, with totals described as in line or not wildly far from comparison wearables.
-
Customization options are mixed: one review found customization limited, while others liked the watch-face and card options.
-
Music controls are useful for phone playback, though reviewers still describe them as basic rather than a full onboard music experience.
-
Sleep tracking is one of the better health areas for duration and wake times, though some reviewers still flagged false sleep detection or unreliable heart-rate-related sleep data.
-
Health tracking accuracy is split: some reviewers found it only useful as a rough guide, while others considered the sensors good enough as a reference.
-
Durability is mixed: one reviewer found it durable, while another warned that sharp edges could scar or scratch.
Cons
-
Fitness tracking accuracy is mixed, with serious caveats from some reviewers and more positive reference-level impressions from others.
-
The companion app is functional and sometimes improving, but reviewers also call it dated, unattractive, or unslick.
-
GPS accuracy is uneven: one reviewer praised it as stellar, while others found it merely okay, wonky, or behind Huawei and Honor alternatives.
-
Notifications are readable on the large screen, but limitations around emoji display, replies, and message response keep the experience basic.
-
Button controls are mixed: the crown can be handy, but reviewers also mention no tactility and accidental presses.
-
Safety features are useful but limited because emergency functions generally require a nearby paired phone.
-
Size options are limited in practice, with one review noting the large case will not suit everyone.
-
Band quality is the most common design complaint, with awkward clasp, cheap feel, and attachment issues offset by some quick-release praise.
-
Smartwatch features are serviceable but basic, with multiple reviewers saying the Watch 4 stays closer to essential smartwatch functions than a full smart platform.
-
The operating system experience is smooth but constrained, with reviewers describing HyperOS or the watch software as basic and not very expansive.
-
Voice assistant quality is inconsistent: Alexa was seen as a useful addition in some contexts, but other reviews noted no assistant or China-only availability.
-
Charging convenience is mixed to negative due to the proprietary cable, despite one reviewer liking cable compatibility with other Xiaomi gear.
-
Fit is a caveat: the watch suits bigger wrists better, and some reviewers found the size or crown placement problematic.
-
Calorie tracking usefulness is limited, with one reviewer saying the watch only gives rough ideas of calorie burn.
-
Wellness insights sound ambitious but are undermined by reliance on questionable heart-rate and sensor data.
-
Heart rate accuracy is a recurring weak point, with reviewers reporting readings that were high, low, or wide of chest-strap and premium wearable references.
-
Blood oxygen tracking drew negative accuracy evidence in one review, where readings did not match other trackers or a pulse oximeter.
-
Charging speed is a weakness in the one scored review because a full charge takes well over an hour.
-
Reliability has limited but negative evidence, centered on a persistent DND sync bug.
-
The app ecosystem is weak because reviewers repeatedly pointed to no app storefront or downloadable app support.
-
Recovery insights are weak because reviewers said the underlying sensor accuracy casts doubt on recovery and training recommendations.
-
Contactless payments are a major miss, with reviewers noting unavailable or effectively useless NFC payment support outside limited regions.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in call handling, third-party app support, battery life, near average in display quality, build quality, below average in recovery insights, charging speed, heart rate accuracy.
Summary
50 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher5 (10%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts22 (44%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower23 (46%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| recovery insights | 1.8 | 3.9 | -2.2 |
| charging speed | 2.0 | 4.1 | -2.1 |
| heart rate accuracy | 2.0 | 3.8 | -1.8 |
| wellness insights | 2.2 | 4.0 | -1.9 |
| app ecosystem | 1.9 | 3.6 | -1.7 |
| reliability | 2.0 | 3.8 | -1.8 |
| blood oxygen tracking | 2.0 | 3.4 | -1.4 |
| contactless payments | 1.5 | 2.8 | -1.3 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better reliability
Choose Garmin Vivomove Sport. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for reliability, with a 3.7 overall score.
If you want better contactless payments
Choose Tag Heuer Connected Calibre E4. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for contactless payments, with a 4.3 overall score.
If you want better charging speed
Choose Google Pixel Watch 4. It scores 4.9 vs 2.0 for charging speed, with a 4.2 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Compared: budget alternatives The Amazfit Bip 5 is named as one of the most comparable budget watches.
- Compared: price alternatives The Amazfit Bip 5 is named as a direct budget-price alternative.
- Worse: overall experience The reviewer says the Redmi Watch 4 should offer a better experience than similar devices such as the cmf watch Pro.
- Compared: price alternatives The CMF Watch Pro is named among competing watches around the same price.
- Better: screen brightness The Redmi screen is said to be less bright than the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6.
- Compared: premium smartwatch positioning The reviewer frames the Redmi Watch 4 below Samsung’s premium smartwatch line.
FAQ
Is the Redmi Watch 4 good value for money?
Reviewers generally liked the price-to-design and battery mix, but several still said competing watches can offer better smartwatch value or accuracy.
How good is the battery life?
Battery life was the clearest strength. Reviewers reported more than a week, around two weeks in lighter use, and strong endurance even with some features enabled.
Is the fitness tracking accurate?
It is mixed. Workout variety and basic tracking were praised, but heart-rate accuracy, recovery insights, and some GPS results were criticized.
Can it handle calls and notifications?
Bluetooth calls were generally reviewed positively, with clear or useful call handling. Notifications are readable, but replies and richer message handling are limited.
Does it support apps and payments?
Reviewers repeatedly noted that it lacks a real app storefront or downloadable apps. Contactless payments were also treated as absent, limited, or not useful outside supported regions.
Is the display good outdoors?
Yes. Reviewers consistently praised the big AMOLED display for brightness, outdoor readability, and smooth 60Hz interaction, though a few noted color or bezel compromises.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - gizmochina
- Review score
- 3.8
YouTube - TechMishka
- Review score
- 3.9
Article Reviews
nasilemaktech.com
- Review score
- 3.2
Top Smartwatches to Consider
Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.
Pros: pairing reliability, brightness
Cons: Wi-Fi connectivity, Bluetooth connectivity
Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...
Pros: step counting accuracy, app ecosystem
Cons: Bluetooth connectivity, pairing reliability
Good if you want a compact, stylish Garmin with strong GPS, comfort, and week-plus battery life. Skip it if you need richer smartwatch apps, onboard music, bright always-on display, or...
Pros: health tracking accuracy, blood oxygen tracking
Cons: ECG functionality, onboard music storage
Best for luxury-watch styling, vivid TAG faces, solid build, and casual smartwatch use. Skip it if you need top fitness accuracy, call handling, LTE, or strong value.
Pros: contactless payments, pairing reliability
Cons: LTE connectivity, call handling