Xiaomi Redmi Watch 4

Xiaomi Redmi Watch 4 Review

Brand: Xiaomi
Updated: 5 days ago
3.4
Consolidated expert score
266
Review insights
53
Scored features
10
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Redmi Watch 4 for a low-cost, good-looking watch with a big bright screen, long battery life and basic fitness tools. Skip it if you need accurate heart-rate data, rich apps, payments or premium smartwatch features.

Best for

Best for budget shoppers who want a large, bright smartwatch-style wearable for notifications, Bluetooth calls, long battery life, basic workouts, and casual health tracking. It also suits users who value design and battery more than advanced apps or training-grade accuracy.

Not for

Not for users who need reliable heart-rate training data, polished recovery metrics, contactless payments, LTE, onboard apps, or a premium smartwatch ecosystem. Smaller-wristed buyers may also find the large case less comfortable or visually balanced.

Verdict

The Redmi Watch 4 earns praise as a budget wearable with a large bright AMOLED screen, polished-looking metal frame, smooth software and battery life that can stretch well beyond a week. Its strongest case is visual and practical value: it feels nicer than older cheap smartwatches and covers calls, notifications, workouts, sleep, and basic wellness tools. The tradeoff is that it behaves more like a capable smart band than a full smartwatch. Reviewers repeatedly point to limited apps, no broad payment support, no cellular independence, and inconsistent health data, especially heart-rate accuracy. It works best as an affordable everyday watch, not as a serious training or advanced smartwatch platform.

Reviewer Consensus

Strong agreement: Reviewers most consistently agree that the Redmi Watch 4 delivers a big, bright display, attractive design, and long battery life for a low price.

Mixed opinions: Opinions split on tracking accuracy and software depth, with some reviewers praising casual fitness data while others found heart-rate, GPS, and advanced insights unreliable.

Common concern: The most repeated caveat is that the watch lacks richer smartwatch features such as a true app store, broad payments, message replies, and cellular independence.

Evidence coverage
  • 10 expert reviews
  • 37 of 53 scored features show reviewer agreement
  • 11 scored features have limited or less conclusive evidence
  • 5 scored features show reviewer disagreement or mixed evidence
  1. Limited review data
  2. Mixed evidence
  3. Moderate consensus
  4. Strong consensus

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Compared: budget smartwatch alternatives Wareable lists the Amazfit Bip 5 as one of the closest alternatives in the same class.
  • Compared: premium smartwatch positioning The reviewer frames Redmi as a budget watch not intended to displace Apple or Samsung flagships.
  • Worse: overall experience versus budget rivals The YouTube reviewer thinks the Redmi Watch 4 provides a better experience than the CMF Watch Pro and several other alternatives.

Feature Scorecards

Pros

  • 4.5
    based on 7 reviews
    workout tracking variety: 4.5, based on 7 reviews
    Workout variety is excellent for the price, with reviewers repeatedly citing more than 150 sports or workout modes.
  • 4.5
    based on 10 reviews
    battery life: 4.5, based on 10 reviews
    Battery life is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers commonly getting a week or more and quoting up to two or three weeks depending on settings.
  • 4.5
    based on 7 reviews
    water resistance: 4.5, based on 7 reviews
    Water resistance is consistently strong for the category, with 5ATM/50m claims and real swim or shower use noted.
  • 4.3
    based on 9 reviews
    software smoothness: 4.3, based on 9 reviews
    Software smoothness is a standout; reviewers repeatedly call the interface smooth, snappy, fluid, or minimally laggy.
  • 4.3
    based on 4 reviews
    build quality: 4.3, based on 4 reviews
    Build quality is a major upgrade over prior Redmi watches thanks to the aluminum/metal frame and generally sturdy feel.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    touchscreen responsiveness: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Touch and interaction responsiveness are positive where discussed, with reviewers calling the display responsive and the interface snappy.
  • 4.2
    based on 5 reviews
    outdoor visibility: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
    Outdoor visibility is strong, with repeated praise for the bright screen being readable outside or in sunlight.
  • 4.2
    based on 9 reviews
    brightness: 4.2, based on 9 reviews
    Brightness is consistently praised, with the 600-nit AMOLED panel considered strong for the price and usable in bright conditions.
  • 4.2
    based on 5 reviews
    style and design: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
    Reviewers generally like the design, especially the big square look and more premium metal frame at a budget price.
  • 4.1
    based on 6 reviews
    cross-platform compatibility: 4.1, based on 6 reviews
    The watch is broadly compatible with Android and iOS, and reviewers reported using or setting it up across both platforms.
  • 4.1
    based on 8 reviews
    display quality: 4.1, based on 8 reviews
    The large AMOLED display is one of the strongest features, though one reviewer found colors slightly washed out and bezels can be noticeable.
  • 4.1
    based on 7 reviews
    materials quality: 4.1, based on 7 reviews
    Materials quality is widely praised for the aluminum or metal frame, which makes the watch feel less budget than older plastic models.
  • 4.1
    based on 7 reviews
    user interface: 4.1, based on 7 reviews
    The UI is generally clear, colorful, and optimized for the large square screen.
  • 4.1
    based on 3 reviews
    menu navigation: 4.1, based on 3 reviews
    Menu navigation is generally easy thanks to swipes, widgets, and the crown, with the large screen helping readability.
  • 4.1
    based on 8 reviews
    call handling: 4.1, based on 8 reviews
    Bluetooth calling is consistently treated as a useful smartwatch feature, with positive comments about making, receiving, or hearing calls from the wrist.
  • 4.1
    based on 4 reviews
    comfort: 4.1, based on 4 reviews
    The large watch is still light enough for all-day wear and sleep tracking, though its size can affect smaller wrists.
  • 4.0
    based on 3 reviews
    activity auto-detection: 4.0, based on 3 reviews
    Workout auto-detection appears in several reviews and covers common modes, so it is a useful convenience rather than a standout training feature.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Bluetooth connectivity: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Bluetooth is adequate for pairing and calls, with reviewers treating it as a basic but functional connection layer.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    pairing reliability: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Pairing and syncing appear generally reliable in the main written review, though this is not heavily discussed across sources.
  • 4.0
    based on 4 reviews
    coaching features: 4.0, based on 4 reviews
    Coaching features are better than expected for the price, with running workouts, warm-ups, and training details, but they remain basic.
  • 3.9
    based on 6 reviews
    music controls: 3.9, based on 6 reviews
    Music controls are useful for phone playback, but reviewers do not describe true onboard music playback as a strength.
  • 3.9
    based on 7 reviews
    value for money: 3.9, based on 7 reviews
    Value is strong for shoppers prioritizing battery, display, and design, but several reviewers say rival budget watches can offer smarter features or better tracking.
  • 3.8
    based on 7 reviews
    customization options: 3.8, based on 7 reviews
    Customization is decent for watch faces, widgets, shortcuts, straps, and personal photos, though some reviewers want deeper software customization.
  • 3.8
    based on 6 reviews
    watch face quality: 3.8, based on 6 reviews
    Watch faces are polarizing, ranging from limited and boring to a large free selection depending on version, region, and reviewer expectations.
  • 3.7
    based on 7 reviews
    sleep tracking accuracy: 3.7, based on 7 reviews
    Sleep tracking is often good for bedtime and duration, but more advanced sleep or heart-rate details are less trustworthy.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    durability: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    Durability looks good from the aluminum body and water resistance, but sharp-edge scratch concerns appear in one review.
  • 3.6
    based on 4 reviews
    safety features: 3.6, based on 4 reviews
    Safety features center on emergency SOS through the crown, but reviewers note the phone must be nearby.
  • 3.6
    based on 8 reviews
    button controls: 3.6, based on 8 reviews
    The rotating crown is useful for navigation, though some reviewers dislike its lack of tactility or note accidental presses.
  • 3.5
    based on 3 reviews
    step counting accuracy: 3.5, based on 3 reviews
    Step tracking is good enough for casual use, with reviewers finding it generally in line or not wildly off.
  • 3.5
    based on 4 reviews
    stress tracking: 3.5, based on 4 reviews
    Stress tracking is included and can run with other wellness metrics, though reviews provide limited proof of its accuracy.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 8 reviews
    GPS accuracy: 3.4, based on 8 reviews
    GPS feedback ranges from stellar to merely okay, with multiple reviewers saying competitors or phones can track more accurately.
  • 3.4
    based on 6 reviews
    companion app quality: 3.4, based on 6 reviews
    Mi Fitness is functional and covers settings and stats, but reviewers describe it as plain, dated, or merely adequate rather than polished.
  • 3.3
    based on 10 reviews
    band quality: 3.3, based on 10 reviews
    Strap feedback is split: quick-release hardware is welcomed, but several reviewers criticize the clasp, feel, or friction of the stock band.
  • 3.3
    based on 7 reviews
    blood oxygen tracking: 3.3, based on 7 reviews
    Blood oxygen tracking is present and can run continuously, but reviewers disagree on whether the readings are dependable enough for deeper health insight.
  • 3.3
    based on 7 reviews
    smartphone notifications: 3.3, based on 7 reviews
    Notifications are useful and readable on the large screen, but reply support, emoji display, or notification limits are recurring caveats.
  • 3.2
    based on 3 reviews
    fitness tracking accuracy: 3.2, based on 3 reviews
    Fitness accuracy is mixed: some reviewers praise it for casual use, while others find it too rough for serious training.
  • 3.2
    based on 6 reviews
    operating system experience: 3.2, based on 6 reviews
    HyperOS is smooth but basic, and one Chinese-version review disputes whether it behaves like a real HyperOS smartwatch.
  • 3.1
    based on 5 reviews
    wellness insights: 3.1, based on 5 reviews
    Wellness insights are broad for the price, including sleep animals, Vitality, training load, and scores, but accuracy limits reduce trust.
  • 3.1
    based on 2 reviews
    reliability: 3.1, based on 2 reviews
    Reliability is mixed: one reviewer reports a recurring DND sync bug, while another praises good connection.
  • 3.0
    based on 5 reviews
    smartwatch features: 3.0, based on 5 reviews
    Smartwatch features cover basics like calls, notifications, weather, calendars, and controls, but reviewers repeatedly frame them as basic.
  • fit
    2.9
    based on 2 reviews
    fit: 2.9, based on 2 reviews
    Fit is context-dependent because the large case helps readability but may feel oversized on smaller wrists.
  • 2.9
    based on 8 reviews
    heart rate accuracy: 2.9, based on 8 reviews
    Heart-rate accuracy is the most disputed health metric, with several reviewers reporting poor or iffy readings and one positive reviewer seeing good reference data.
  • 2.8
    based on 4 reviews
    third-party app support: 2.8, based on 4 reviews
    Third-party support is mixed: there is no watch app store, but Mi Fitness can sync with services like Strava and Apple Health.
  • 2.6
    based on 4 reviews
    health tracking accuracy: 2.6, based on 4 reviews
    Overall health accuracy is mixed to weak because richer health metrics are undermined by questionable heart-rate and blood-oxygen data.
  • 2.6
    based on 4 reviews
    voice assistant quality: 2.6, based on 4 reviews
    Voice assistant support is inconsistent: Alexa or Mi AI appears in some versions, while other reviewers note no assistant or China-only limitations.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    calorie tracking usefulness: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Calorie tracking is only supported as a rough estimate, not a reliable training metric.
  • 2.3
    based on 3 reviews
    recovery insights: 2.3, based on 3 reviews
    Recovery insights exist, but reviewers question their usefulness because they rely on imperfect exercise and heart-rate data.
  • 2.0
    based on 2 reviews
    charging convenience: 2.0, based on 2 reviews
    Charging convenience is limited because reviewers identify the cable as proprietary, making it less travel-friendly than universal charging.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    charging speed: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Charging speed is not a strength; one review specifically notes there is no fast charging and a full charge takes well over an hour.
  • 1.5
    based on 4 reviews
    app ecosystem: 1.5, based on 4 reviews
    The watch handles built-in basics, but reviewers repeatedly note that there is no real app store or downloadable app ecosystem.
  • 1.4
    based on 5 reviews
    contactless payments: 1.4, based on 5 reviews
    Contactless payment support is a repeated limitation outside China, with several reviewers saying payment/NFC functionality is missing or region-bound.
  • 1.0
    based on 2 reviews
    LTE connectivity: 1.0, based on 2 reviews
    LTE or cellular independence is absent, so connected features like SOS and assistant use still depend on a nearby phone.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    onboard music storage: 1.0, based on 1 review
    Onboard music storage is effectively absent in the reviewed evidence; one review lists a music player among missing features.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Smart Watch, this product is below average in app ecosystem, charging speed, onboard music storage.

Attribute This product Category average Difference
app ecosystem 1.5 3.6 -2.1
charging speed 2.0 4.1 -2.1
onboard music storage 1.0 2.9 -1.9
recovery insights 2.3 3.9 -1.6
contactless payments 1.4 2.9 -1.5
charging convenience 2.0 3.5 -1.5
health tracking accuracy 2.6 3.9 -1.3
heart rate accuracy 2.9 3.9 -1.0

FAQ

Is the Redmi Watch 4 good for fitness tracking?

It offers a lot for the price, including built-in GPS and more than 150 workout modes. However, reviewer evidence is mixed on accuracy, especially for heart rate and advanced training insights.

How long does the Redmi Watch 4 battery last?

Battery life is one of its strongest areas. Reviewers commonly reported more than a week, with some reaching around two weeks depending on always-on display and health-monitoring settings.

Can the Redmi Watch 4 make calls?

Yes. Multiple reviewers confirm Bluetooth calling through the built-in microphone and speaker, though it depends on being connected to a nearby phone.

Does the Redmi Watch 4 support contactless payments?

Reviewers repeatedly treat payments as a limitation. Some note no NFC for payments, while others say NFC/payment features are useful only in China or not available internationally.

Is the Redmi Watch 4 a full smartwatch?

The reviews describe it as closer to a smart band or basic smartwatch than a full app-driven platform. It handles notifications, calls, widgets, music controls, and tracking, but lacks a broad app store and richer smartwatch features.

Is the screen easy to read outdoors?

Yes. Reviewers consistently praise the large AMOLED screen and 600-nit brightness, with several saying it remains visible outdoors or in bright daytime use.

Who should avoid the Redmi Watch 4?

Users who need accurate workout heart-rate data, deep app support, payment features, LTE, or a smaller case should look elsewhere. Several reviewers also note that rival budget watches can provide better tracking or smartwatch value.

Consider This Instead

If you want better onboard music storage

Choose Huawei Watch Fit 4. It scores 4.7 vs 1.0 for onboard music storage, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better contactless payments

Choose Apple Watch SE 3. It scores 4.8 vs 1.4 for contactless payments, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better app ecosystem

Choose Apple Watch Ultra 3. It scores 4.9 vs 1.5 for app ecosystem, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

Overall Top Smart Watch Alternatives

#1 Apple Watch Ultra 2
4.3
23 reviews

Good if you want the most rugged Apple Watch, brighter outdoor screen, better battery, LTE, and top apps. Skip it if you need Garmin-like mapping, recovery analytics, smaller sizing, or...

Pros: display quality, heart rate accuracy

Cons: cross-platform compatibility, recovery insights

#2 Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
4.3
20 reviews

Choose the Galaxy Watch 6 for a polished Android smartwatch with a bright screen, strong apps, and broad health tracking. Skip it if battery life, iPhone support, or full non-Samsung...

Pros: outdoor visibility, workout tracking variety

Cons: cross-platform compatibility, battery life

#3 Garmin Tactix 8
4.3
18 reviews

Good if you need a rugged Garmin with deep outdoor, tactical, GPS, training, and battery features. Skip it if you want a cheaper lifestyle watch or do not need the...

Pros: materials quality, durability

Cons: LTE connectivity, value for money

#4 Garmin Approach S70
4.3
14 reviews

Good if you want premium golf maps, virtual caddie tools, health metrics, music, notifications, and long battery life in one watch. Skip it if you only need basic yardages or...

Pros: pairing reliability, brightness

Cons: software smoothness, user interface