Compare Glorious GMMK 2 vs Corsair K100 RGB

Acoustics were generally praised as satisfying, full-bodied, or surprisingly good, though one reviewer heard some hollow sound.

Acoustics are mixed: several reviewers like the smoother or more satisfying sound, while ProSettings complains about hollow, resonating, loud keys.

Actuation consistency was mixed: reviewers liked the switches after use, but several noted they needed break-in time before feeling consistent.

Actuation consistency is supported by IGN's report that there were no response or press issues during fast gaming use.

Backlight brightness was mostly praised as bright and vivid, though one reviewer found the ABS caps slightly subdued the effect.

Backlight brightness is strongly praised where mentioned, especially by reviewers who call the lighting impressively bright.

Build quality was widely praised; reviewers repeatedly described the board as solid, sturdy, weighty, well-built, or premium for the price.

Build quality is usually described as premium, sturdy, solid, or excellent, but one Tom's Hardware sample left concerns because of magnet and key issues.

Cable quality was mixed, with praise for decent or compatible cables but criticism of stiffness and packaging kinks.

Cable quality is mixed: reviewers call the cable sturdy, thick, and braided, but fixed and non-detachable design hurts convenience.

Compatibility evidence was positive but limited, with one reviewer reporting smooth use across Windows, Mac, consoles, and Android.

Compatibility receives positive evidence from iCue recognizing another Corsair device, suggesting useful ecosystem integration.

Connectivity was mixed: wired USB connections worked reliably, but one reviewer treated wired-only operation as a downside.

Connectivity gets positive marks for USB passthrough as a handy extra, though the wired-only setup and thick cable remain contextual limitations.

Customization options were one of the broadest strengths, spanning switches, keycaps, software, RGB, firmware, and modding.

Customization options are extremely broad across lighting, keys, macros, and wheel functions, but reviewers often warn that configuring them takes effort.

Design aesthetics were usually praised for attractive colors, clean styling, and strong RGB presentation, though some disliked exposed switches or specific colors.

Design aesthetics are widely praised as premium, sleek, gorgeous, luxurious, or visually impressive, with the RGB-heavy look occasionally framed as busy.

Desk space efficiency was a clear strength for the compact 96% and 65% layouts, especially for users who need mouse room.

Desk space efficiency is weak because multiple reviewers mention a massive footprint or the need to sacrifice room for the keyboard and wrist rest.

Durability evidence was positive, including drop survival, expected long life, and ease of long-term repair.

Durability evidence focuses mainly on PBT keycaps and materials that reviewers say resist wear or hold up better over time.

Ease of switch replacement was praised as simple, quick, and accessible with included tools and hot-swap support.

Ergonomics were mixed: some liked the angle and long-use comfort, while others found the height, legs, or lack of wrist support uncomfortable.

Ergonomics are generally good due to comfort and wrist support, though some reviewers want a better wrist angle or note the large full-size layout.

Extra gaming features were present but described as standard rather than exceptional in the tested review evidence.

Extra gaming features are polarizing: reviewers praise the G keys and control wheel potential, but several call the wheel limited, janky, or not very useful in games.

Frame rigidity scored strongly because reviewers found little to no flex, sturdy aluminum framing, and a case that resisted twisting.

Frame rigidity receives excellent marks from reviewers who report no frame flex or only minimal flex.

Gaming performance was broadly positive, with reviewers reporting responsive, enjoyable, and reliable play across casual and competitive use.

Gaming performance is widely praised as fast, smooth, and confidence-inspiring, with some reviewers reporting better responsiveness or a noticeable improvement in games.

Hot-swappable switches were a standout feature, letting users swap switches without soldering and making the board beginner-friendly.

Hot-swappable switches score poorly because the one opinionated mention treats the lack of hot-swap support as a drawback.

Keycaps drew mixed reactions: reviewers liked the feel, legends, and higher-than-usual ABS quality, but many wanted thicker or PBT caps.

The double-shot PBT keycaps are praised for feel, texture, clean looks, durability, and bright/crisp legends, though one review criticizes the included replacement caps as less durable.

Reviewers who discussed responsiveness found the keys fast and dependable in gaming and typing, with no missed inputs in tested use.

The keyboard is repeatedly praised for very fast, sensitive, and responsive inputs, with several reviewers describing immediate or lightning-fast key response.

Key spacing was mixed because the compact layouts were usable for some reviewers but caused accidental presses or adjustment for others.

Key spacing is mixed, with praise for standard bottom-row spacing but complaints that the left G keys can cause reaches or accidental presses.

Key stability was generally strong, with comments about stable keys, reduced wobble, and a smoother switch feel.

Key stability receives strong praise from reviewers who note almost no tilt, no rattle, and no flex or wobble in the keys.

Latency control was viewed positively, especially when reviewers lowered input latency for more responsive or more competitive gaming.

Latency impressions are mostly positive in real use, including reports of no lag or instant action, but some reviewers question whether the sub-millisecond gains are perceptible.

Layout options were mostly appreciated for 65% and 96% choices, although some reviewers wanted a tenkeyless option or noted compressed layouts.

Layout options improve because reviewers appreciate the standard bottom row and easier compatibility with aftermarket keycap sets.

Legend visibility was praised because shine-through legends and side/front markings made the keyboard easier to use in dim settings.

Legends are praised as sharp, clean, bright, and well illuminated, with reviewers appreciating the less gamer-heavy font and full legend visibility.

Macro customization was a useful strength, with reviewers praising macro creation, layers, shortcuts, and programmable keybinds.

Macro customization is a major strength, with reviewers praising G keys, Stream Deck integration, on-the-fly macro recording, and broad remapping possibilities.

Materials quality was generally strong, with praise for aluminum, weight, and sturdiness, while some reviewers noted the plastic lower case as a tradeoff.

Materials quality is praised for aluminum, premium feel, strong construction, and top-quality components.

Media controls were functional but somewhat limited because control relies on function shortcuts rather than a physical knob or roller.

Media controls are mostly praised for dedicated keys, a metal scroll wheel, and usable feedback, although some buttons feel odd or less satisfying.

Noise level was usually considered quiet or controlled, though one reviewer found the board a bit louder than a HyperX board.

Noise level is divided: some reviewers call the board loud or drastically louder than quieter keyboards, while others find the sound pleasant or less distracting.

Onboard memory was positively mentioned for saving profiles and settings, but evidence was limited to a few reviews.

Onboard memory is praised as unusually large or impressive, especially the ability to store many profiles and lighting layers on the keyboard.

Passthrough features are generally appreciated as a useful luxury or handy extra, though cable routing is not universally ideal.

Per-key lighting control was viewed as a strong customization advantage, especially through software and individual-key lighting options.

Per-key lighting control is positively noted in reviews that appreciate the individual key lighting and access to the keyboard's 44 lighting zones.

Polling-rate adjustment was treated as a useful performance-tuning feature, though most praise came as part of the broader software/performance controls.

The 4,000Hz polling rate is seen as technically impressive and future-facing, yet many reviewers say the practical difference from 1,000Hz is subtle or hard to notice.

Portability was positive for the 65% model and compact weight, although it was not presented as an ultra-light travel board.

Portability is poor because reviewers emphasize the K100's size, weight, full-size layout, and non-detachable cable as desk-bound traits.

Profile management was praised where tested, especially saving multiple profiles for different uses through software or onboard memory.

Profile management is capable but can be overwhelming; reviewers praise large onboard profile capacity while noting the profile system can become complex.

Reliability evidence was positive but limited, with reviewers noting perfect macOS operation and a reliable, enjoyable overall experience.

Reliability is mixed: optical switches are praised for avoiding chatter and missed inputs, but one reviewer experienced keyboard freezing and shutoff.

RGB customization was praised for software effects, presets, layers, and per-key or individual color control, with some platform limitations noted separately.

RGB customization is considered extensive, with praise for per-key control, many lighting zones, and deep reworking options, though software complexity can slow the process.

RGB lighting quality was a major highlight, often described as vivid, bright, attractive, or unusually impressive for the class.

RGB lighting quality is one of the most consistently praised areas, with reviewers calling it vibrant, bright, clear, excellent, and visually premium.

Size and form factor were generally praised for compactness and retained functionality, but reviewers mentioned learning curves or compressed key clusters.

Size and form factor are a limitation for reviewers who describe the K100 as large, full-size, and demanding of desk space.

Software quality was split: reviewers liked Core's ease and flexibility, but criticized Windows-only support, bugs, and cheap-feeling polish.

Software quality is the most divisive area, combining deep iCue functionality with repeated complaints about clunkiness, confusing workflows, and tedious setup.

Sound dampening was praised because the foam reduced noise, improved sound, and helped avoid hollow or high-pitched acoustics.

Sound dampening is praised most strongly by KitGuru, which finds the K100 noticeably more muted and less resonant than its predecessor.

Stabilizer quality was mixed: some reviewers praised lubed or rattle-free stabilizers, while others complained about scratchiness, mushiness, or spacebar issues.

Stabilizer quality is viewed as improved, with praise for better sound and less rattle, though one reviewer still found some wobble and rattling.

Reviewers consistently liked the Fox linear switches for smooth, soft, quiet, or satisfying feel, though a few noted break-in time or wanted other switch types.

Reviewers consistently describe the OPX or Speed linear switches as fast, smooth, and satisfying, though a few note the sensitivity takes adjustment and the feel is not for everyone.

Switch choice was praised through barebones and hot-swap flexibility, but several reviewers criticized the limited prebuilt factory option.

Switch choice is viewed as limited because reviewers mention OPX and Cherry MX Speed variants, while one reviewer explicitly disliked the lack of a tactile option.

Typing comfort was strong, with reviewers citing low fatigue, smoothness, and easy adjustment during long writing or daily use.

Typing comfort is mixed: some find the K100 comfortable after adjustment, while others call the sensitive switches unforgiving or not for all typists.

Typing feel was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers calling it sublime, smooth, excellent, or otherwise pleasing.

Typing feel is generally strong once acclimated, with praise for fewer typos and satisfying keys, though PCMag initially found the keys uncomfortable.

Value for money was strongly positive, with many reviewers calling the GMMK 2 compelling, budget-friendly, or excellent for its price.

Value for money is highly conditional: reviewers like the premium feature set but repeatedly warn that the high price only makes sense if the extras are used.

Volume control was usable through function-key commands, though the same review noted no physical volume roller or knob.

The volume wheel is a highlight, repeatedly praised for smoothness, premium feel, strong resistance, and better feel than some competitors.

Wrist support drew mixed evidence: one reviewer wanted a wrist rest included, while another liked the separate wrist-rest accessory.

The wrist rest is broadly praised as comfortable, cushioned, magnetic, and much improved over earlier Corsair rests, with only minor firmness or branding complaints.