Average score
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.0
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.1
AI Room Calibration
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.1
Trueplay room calibration was usually praised for improving room fit and sound, though reviewers noted the effect can be modest and iOS-only.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
3.5
Room calibration drew divided reactions: some reviewers said SpaceFit worked well or optimized bass, while others noticed little or no audible change.
AirPlay compatibility
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.1
AirPlay 2 was treated as a useful flexibility feature for Apple users, although one reviewer still found it less convenient than Bluetooth.
P2Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
No score yetApp reliability
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
3.8
App reliability and usability were mixed: several reviewers called the app intuitive or fluid, while others hit setup retries, configuration friction, or frustrating system changes.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.5
The SmartThings app was usually praised for easier setup and deeper control, despite remote/display limitations pushing users toward it.
Audio format support
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
2.9
Audio format support was a recurring limitation because reviews criticized missing DTS or Atmos support, despite one included review praising Atmos content.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.3
Audio format support was praised for covering key formats such as Dolby Atmos and DTS variants, though some mentions were primarily factual.
Bluetooth connection stability
P1Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.0
Bluetooth connection evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer saying it worked as advertised despite feeling awkward on a premium system.
Bluetooth connectivity
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
2.5
Bluetooth connectivity was a repeated weakness, with reviewers missing Bluetooth as a quick fallback despite Sonos' Wi-Fi and AirPlay alternatives.
P2Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
No score yetCabinet construction / bracing
P1Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.5
Cabinet construction evidence was positive, with the bar described as a serious, solid piece of gear.
Chromecast compatibility
P1Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
2.0
Chromecast compatibility was a weak point in one review because Chromecast was not supported in the US version tested.
Cohesive presentation
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.6
Cohesive presentation was one of the Beam's strongest areas, with reviewers describing rich, balanced, impressive sound that dramatically improves TV audio.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.8
Cohesion was praised through seamless surround handoffs, integrated bass, refined delivery, and a warm detailed presentation.
Control button responsiveness
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.0
Touch controls were considered useful and straightforward, with reviewers noting practical top-panel volume and playback actions.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.5
Physical buttons were praised as clicky rather than touch-sensitive, which one reviewer explicitly preferred.
Design and aesthetics
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.6
Design and aesthetics were highly praised: reviewers repeatedly called the Beam stylish, understated, minimal, sleek, or easy to blend into a room.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
3.8
Design aesthetics were mostly positive for understated, sleek, high-end looks, though some found the angular design dated or severe.
Design and build quality
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.3
Build quality was generally strong, with reviewers calling the Beam well made, robust, and high quality, while fabric durability concerns appeared in one review.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.5
Build quality was consistently described as premium, solid, robust, and well constructed.
Detail retrieval
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.3
Detail retrieval was mostly strong, with repeated praise for clarity, effects, and precision; the main caveat was some complex sounds being glossed over.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.6
Detail retrieval was praised for fine effects, instrument separation, and precision, though one reviewer said it lacked the highest premium detail.
Dialogue clarity (for TV/soundbar use)
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.7
Dialogue clarity was a major consensus strength, with reviewers praising crisp, clear speech and the usefulness of speech enhancement for TV and movie viewing.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.9
Dialogue clarity drew strong agreement, with reviewers repeatedly saying voices stayed clear through dense movie mixes, sports, and dialogue-heavy content.
Distortion at high volume
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.0
Most high-volume comments were positive, with reviewers hearing little or no distortion, but one review reported crackle/distortion when pushed to maximum volume.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.3
Most reviewers reported clean output or very low compression at high volume, though a few heard subwoofer crackle, chuffing, or stress on extreme bass passages.
Dolby Atmos height effects
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
2.6
Dolby Atmos evidence was mostly a limitation for Gen 1, with several reviews pointing to missing height/3D support; one included review praised Atmos handling more positively.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.8
Dolby Atmos height effects were repeatedly praised as immersive, overhead, and convincing, though one reviewer wanted more true above-you sensation.
Dynamic headroom
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
5.0
Dynamic headroom had limited but very positive evidence, with one review praising the Beam's scale, dynamics, detail, and punch.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.7
Dynamic headroom was praised for big volume shifts, impact differences, and enough dynamic range for cinematic material.
EQ customization
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.0
EQ and sound modes were useful for bass, treble, speech, and night listening, but one reviewer wanted more granular control.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.2
EQ and sound customization were praised through the app, especially channel levels, EQ tools, and near-total control.
Frequency response balance
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.1
The tonal balance was usually described as clear and well balanced, with caveats around slightly murky bass, brightness, or low-bass limits in some testing.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.5
Reviewers consistently described a balanced profile with clear mids and treble, controlled bass, and only occasional low-end muddiness or content-dependent tuning caveats.
Gaming HDMI passthrough
P1Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
3.7
Gaming HDMI passthrough was mostly praised as a major upgrade, though one reviewer reported a faulty HDMI port on the tested unit.
Google
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.3
Google Assistant support was praised where tested, mainly because it broadened assistant choice and worked well for basic commands or music control.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
2.0
Google-related support was marked down because one reviewer specifically found the lack of US Chromecast support irksome.
HDMI 2.1 gaming
P1Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.6
HDMI 2.1 gaming support was a major strength, with repeated praise for 4K/120Hz, VRR, low latency, and console usefulness.
HDMI ARC
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.2
HDMI ARC was a major usability win because it simplified setup, TV remote control, and voice TV control, though it depends on compatible TVs.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.5
HDMI eARC was recommended as the best wired route for reliability and sound quality.
Home theater integration
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.1
Home theater integration was good for compact rooms and expandable Sonos setups, but reviewers warned it is not a full cinematic system without additions.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.6
Home theater integration was strong, especially with compatible Samsung TVs through Q-Symphony, though benefits depend on TV ownership.
Inter-speaker connectivity
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.0
Inter-speaker connectivity was praised as easy within the Sonos ecosystem, though surround results could depend on source format and setup.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.6
Inter-speaker connectivity was reliable in review use, with no dropouts, flawless connection, easy power-only satellite use, and automatic sync comments.
Latency with TV (lip sync)
P1Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.8
Latency evidence was positive, with reviewers reporting synced audio/video and no added delay from HDMI pass-through.
Loudness / maximum volume
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.0
Reviewers generally found the Beam loud enough for living rooms and action scenes, though several noted it does not have the punch or room-filling power of larger soundbars.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.8
Reviewers found the system loud enough for large rooms and cinematic impact, with only contextual concerns about using that power in smaller spaces.
Low-volume performance
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
3.8
Low-volume tools such as Night Sound and speech enhancement were useful, but one reviewer did not find very quiet listening a meaningful TV-speaker upgrade.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.0
Low-volume features were useful for late-night listening, though they involved compromises such as reduced dynamics or rear-only playback.
Microphone
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.3
The microphone array was generally praised for hearing commands across the room and over playback, with one reviewer offering only a light, unextended test.
P2Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
No score yetMulti-speaker pairing reliability
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
3.5
Multi-speaker expansion was viewed as a key Sonos advantage, but one reviewer found moving/removing surround speakers in the app slow and frustrating.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.5
Pairing reliability was positive where tested, with speakers pairing immediately or expected to sync automatically during setup.
On-device controls
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
5.0
On-device controls received limited but strong praise, with one review calling the top touch controls a joy to use.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.5
On-device controls received positive but limited evidence as useful when the remote is unavailable.
optical
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
3.0
Optical support was treated as a useful fallback, but one reviewer clearly disliked optical setup and called the connector fragile.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
2.0
Optical input was treated as a fallback because it lacks Dolby Atmos and was framed as a compromised connection compared with eARC.
Privacy and data
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
3.5
Privacy evidence was limited to one reviewer who raised Alexa privacy concerns while noting microphone muting in the surrounding discussion.
P2Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
No score yetRear speaker cable length
P1Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
3.5
Rear speaker cable feedback was mixed: one review praised extra-long power cables, while others wanted longer cables or noted shorter rear-speaker runs.
Remote control usability
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.3
Remote usability was positive overall because TV remotes could pair or work automatically, despite the absence of a dedicated Sonos remote.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
3.3
Remote usability was mixed: some found it simple or well-designed, while others criticized cumbersome adjustments and missing shortcuts.
Setup simplicity
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.1
Setup was usually easy and fast, especially over HDMI ARC, but non-ARC TVs and app connection attempts caused notable friction for some reviewers.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.7
Setup simplicity was strongly praised across reviews, with several calling it effortless, intuitive, or complete in minutes.
Smart assistant integration (Alexa
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.2
Voice-assistant integration was broadly useful and flexible, especially for music, TV volume, and smart-home control, but reviewers also described limits and occasional awkwardness.
P2Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
No score yetSmart features
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.5
Smart features were a consistent strength, with reviewers praising the large service ecosystem, assistant flexibility, and smart-home hub role.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.4
Smart features were generally praised, especially Q-Symphony, Private Rear Sound, useful modes, and Samsung ecosystem extras.
Soundstage height
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.5
Soundstage height had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer noting a surprisingly tall delivery for the Beam's size.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
5.0
Soundstage height was a clear strength, with reviewers describing height, overhead scale, and dome-like placement.
Spotify Connect reliability
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.0
Spotify-related control was supported by one positive review that described the handoff into the Sonos app as mostly seamless.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
3.3
Spotify Connect evidence was mixed: one reviewer had a maddening volume-step issue, while another called Spotify Connect a favorite feature.
Status indicators
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.5
Status indicator design received one positive note for keeping lights hidden and unobtrusive during viewing.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
2.0
Status indicators were a common complaint because the small front display was hard to read, limited, or nearly useless for settings.
Stereo imaging accuracy
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.4
Stereo width was one of the most consistent strengths: reviewers repeatedly described a surprisingly wide, spacious stage for such a compact bar.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.4
Stereo imaging was generally praised, especially with music and front/rear speaker modes, though it remains a soundbar-based presentation.
Subwoofer
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
3.4
Bass impressed some reviewers for the Beam's size, but the most repeated caveat was limited low-end rumble unless a separate Sonos Sub is added.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.4
The subwoofer was widely praised for power, punch, and integration, though reviewers disagreed on whether it was earth-shaking enough or fully refined.
Surround sound simulation
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
3.6
Surround impressions were mixed: the Beam can sound spacious and becomes stronger with rear speakers, but reviewers stressed it is not a true surround replacement on its own.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
5.0
Surround performance was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers describing immersive, room-filling effects and convincing movement around the listening position.
TV connection stability
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
3.5
TV connection stability was mixed: one reviewer was pleased by automatic Roku remote behavior, while another reported a Roku mute/unmute problem.
P2Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
No score yetValue for money
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.5
Value sentiment was strong: reviewers often called the Beam affordable or excellent for the price, while noting that adding a Sub or surrounds raises total cost.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
3.9
Value opinions were mixed but generally positive: reviewers saw strong performance for the money, while often noting the cheaper Q990C as better value for non-gamers.
Video passthrough support
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
2.5
Video passthrough support was weak, with one comparison noting disappointment that HDMI passthrough was still absent.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.4
Video passthrough support was praised for Dolby Vision/HDR formats and 4K/120Hz support, with one reviewer preferring TV ports for best image quality.
Voice assistant responsiveness
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
3.9
Voice responsiveness was useful for music and TV control, but reviewers noted limits such as lag, reduced feature parity, or incomplete hands-free control.
P2Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
No score yetVoice clarity
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.4
Music vocals and voice-forward content were generally praised as warm, clear, or natural, though voice presence was not the main strength in every mix.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.3
Voice clarity was a strength overall, especially with dialogue aids, though one reviewer found voice processing hit-and-miss and another chose to leave it off.
Voice recognition accuracy
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.3
Voice recognition was generally strong, with far-field microphones often hearing commands across rooms or over playback, though not every command was caught perfectly.
P2Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
No score yetWeight convenience
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.3
The Beam's compact, lightweight body was widely praised for easy placement, although one reviewer felt it looked odd under a very large TV.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
2.9
Weight and size convenience was a mild drawback: reviewers noted the bar is large, heavy, and best matched with bigger TVs.
Wi-Fi streaming reliability
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
4.3
Wi-Fi streaming was mostly praised as seamless and dropout-free, though one review disliked the extra app setup required compared with a quick Bluetooth handoff.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
4.0
Wi-Fi connection was described as surprisingly seamless with only a few blips, though HDMI was still recommended for maximum reliability.
Wired input
P1
Product 1: Sonos Beam (Gen 1)
2.8
Wired inputs were repeatedly described as minimal, with reviewers noting the lack of extra analog inputs and the reliance on HDMI/optical paths.
P2
Product 2: Samsung HW-Q990D Soundbar
3.8
Wired input evidence was mixed: reviewers praised eARC and wired reliability but criticized the absence of analog inputs.