Compare Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX vs Logitech G305 Lightspeed

Acceleration control was positively judged where tested, with movement described as consistent and free of acceleration or smoothing.

Advanced acceleration-related tuning was a weak point because the G305 lacks the kind of sensor adjustment features some competitors offer.

Balance was mostly praised as well distributed and fatigue-free, though one reviewer felt the rear-heavy balance hurt lift-offs.

Balance was one of the more consistent physical complaints, with reviewers calling the mouse back-heavy or unusually weighted because of the rear AA battery.

Ergonomic design was a major positive overall, with reviewers praising the hand support, contoured right-handed form, and FPS-friendly ergonomic balance.

Ergonomics were mixed to weak, with reviewers praising the simple shape for some hands but criticizing the lack of palm or ergonomic support.

Charging convenience was strong when using USB-C or Powerplay, though one reviewer criticized the full recharge time.

Charging convenience was weak because the mouse relies on replaceable AA batteries and lacks USB charging, wired use, or rechargeable convenience.

Durability over time had limited evidence but one month of use showed the coating had not decayed.

Durability over time was mixed: one long-term review found only minor cosmetic wear, while another reported click failure after a little over two years.

Software stability was mixed to poor, led by a PC Gamer report of freezes, crashes, and reinstall trouble despite another reviewer finding basics usable.

Software stability had limited positive evidence from a reviewer who said Logitech had improved the once-buggy G Hub experience.

Switch durability evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer reporting no double clicks or related issues during testing.

Switch durability was mixed: rated switch life impressed one reviewer, another saw downgraded switch endurance, and one reported failure.

Value for money was the most common strategic concern because reviewers liked the performance but repeatedly called the price high or premium.

Value for money was one of the strongest consensus points, with most reviewers calling it affordable, competitive, or unusually good for wireless performance.

Profile switching was a recurring weakness because reviewers missed a physical DPI/profile button and disliked leaving games to change settings.

Profile switching was generally useful through G Hub and onboard memory, though limited onboard profile storage drew one complaint.

Cross-platform compatibility was limited by the lack of Bluetooth and multi-device switching, making it less flexible than generalist mice.

Cross-platform compatibility was mixed: reviewers liked PC/Mac or broad device support, but software and Linux limitations reduced flexibility.

Weight was one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as feather-light, ultra-light, or impressively low for its size.

Weight was divisive: many liked it for a wireless mouse, but others found it heavy for its size or too rear-loaded with the AA battery.

Palm grip comfort was usually strong, with reviewers praising the larger ergonomic rear and palm support; one source still advised some palm users toward a rival.

Palm grip comfort was highly hand-size dependent, with some reviewers comfortable but others finding palm support poor or awkward.

Fingertip comfort was generally weak because the larger hump and body interfered with finger micro-adjustments, with only one reviewer finding it workable.

Fingertip grip comfort was usually favorable, especially for small or medium hands, but stock weight and balance hurt some fingertip users.

Skate durability was mixed: one reviewer valued long-lasting skates, while others recommended replacement or noted wear concerns.

Skate durability was positive in limited evidence, with reviewers describing durable PTFE and little concern about wear.

Weight tuning evidence was limited to modding; removing components lowered weight but hurt the reviewer’s sense of balance.

Weight tuning was mostly discussed through battery swaps or mods, which helped reduce weight but also highlighted the lack of built-in tuning.

Long-session comfort was generally positive thanks to low weight and ergonomics, though awkward grip demands caused fatigue for one reviewer.

Long-session comfort was mixed: light clicks reduced fatigue, but the small, flat body and side grip could become uncomfortable for some users.

Programmable button evidence was mixed: G Hub assignment was useful, but the five-button layout and lack of extra controls limited flexibility.

Programmable button feedback was mixed: remapping was useful, but the small six-button layout left some reviewers wanting more controls.

Claw grip comfort was mixed, working for relaxed claw or some users while feeling too large or high for others.

Claw grip comfort was usually positive, especially for small to medium hands, though some large-hand users still found the mouse small.

The DPI ceiling was treated as extremely high and impressive, with fine adjustment praised by reviewers who used G Hub.

The 12,000 DPI range was mostly considered enough for mainstream users, though reviewers noted it trails newer or higher-end gaming mice.

Main click quality was usually strong, with repeated praise for tactile, crisp, snappy clicks, though a few reviewers wanted a sharper or more premium feel.

Primary click quality was mostly strong, with praise for crisp, springy, satisfying clicks, offset by one long-term left-click failure report.

Surface compatibility was adequate but not universal, with one reviewer preferring padded surfaces and another reporting no glass-pad tracking issues.

Surface compatibility was generally good across pads, desks, and varied surfaces, but several reviewers noted weakness on glass.

Portability was excellent because the compact receiver and onboard storage make the high-polling setup easy to pack.

Portability was consistently strong thanks to the compact body, wireless use, dongle storage, and laptop-bag friendliness.

2.4GHz connectivity was praised for stable, speedy Lightspeed/2.4GHz operation and high polling without a bulky receiver.

Reviewers found the 2.4GHz Lightspeed dongle dependable over normal use distances, with strong gaming performance despite one note about the crowded band.

Side buttons were the most divisive control: some found them easy and great in game, while many criticized mushiness, high placement, or extra travel.

Side button quality was mixed, with praise for placement but criticism for non-swappability, extra resistance, or mushy feel.

Handedness options were a drawback because the DEX is strongly right-handed and several reviewers warned left-handers away.

Handedness was mixed because the shell is symmetrical, but left-side thumb buttons make it less useful for left-handed users.

Switch feel was mostly praised for crisp, tactile Lightforce clicks, though some reviewers found them inconsistent, loud, or merely satisfactory.

Switch feel was generally positive for tactile, clicky, light switches, though some reviewers found them dull or overhyped.

The 8K wireless polling rate impressed reviewers for speed and smoothness, though several called it overkill or battery-hungry outside competitive play.

Polling-rate opinions were mostly positive for 500-1000Hz use, though reviewers saw higher modern rates as mostly unnecessary for average players.

Ecosystem integration was strong where mentioned, especially G Hub plus Logitech hardware features that set the mouse apart.

Ecosystem integration was a plus for users in Logitech’s software and keyboard ecosystem, including G-Shift and app integrations.

MOBA gaming suitability had limited, mixed evidence, with one reviewer saying DOTA2 did not reveal much difference.

MOBA suitability was positive in limited evidence because reviewers connected the light mechanical clicks to repeated click-heavy games.

Bluetooth support was a weakness because it is absent, though some reviewers accepted the tradeoff for weight and responsiveness.

Bluetooth support was a recurring limitation because reviewers liked the dongle performance but disliked being unable to use Bluetooth or non-USB devices.

Onboard memory was valued for saving profiles and reducing dependence on G Hub, with reviewers noting multiple memory slots or dongle/profile convenience.

Onboard memory was useful for travel and multi-PC use because settings can be stored on the mouse rather than only in software.

Glide smoothness was mixed: some praised effortless movement and PTFE feet, while many enthusiasts disliked the stock skates and wanted replacements.

Glide smoothness was mostly praised for PTFE feet and easy movement, though several reviewers disliked the stock skates or felt extra drag.

Shape comfort split reviewers: many loved the ergonomic, right-handed shape, while several found it too bulky, awkward, or hand-size dependent.

Shape comfort was highly subjective: some reviewers loved the egg-like compact shape, while others found it too flat, narrow, short, or awkward.

Build quality was consistently strong, with reviewers reporting sturdy construction, no flex, no rattle, and solid fit despite the low weight.

Build quality was usually praised as sturdy, tight, and well assembled, with only isolated caveats about batches or long-term issues.

Click noise was a caveat: main clicks were often loud or high-pitched, though some found the noise acceptable or preference-based.

Click noise was mixed to negative, ranging from average to noticeably loud or distracting depending on the reviewer and environment.

Scroll wheel feedback was generally usable and often quiet or tactile, but several reviewers noted rattle, mushiness, or weaker click feel.

Scroll wheel quality was mostly positive for tactile, crisp, or smooth scrolling, though one review found it merely average and another noted noise.

Macro support was useful through G Hub, but the limited button count reduced how far reviewers could take macro-heavy setups.

Macro support was viewed as a useful part of Logitech’s customization package, with reviewers noting it was available and easy enough to use.

Materials quality was praised as premium and well assembled in the few reviews that explicitly judged the materials.

Materials quality was praised for solid plastics and high-quality plastic components that feel smooth and well fitted.

Premium feel was mixed: one reviewer initially found it budget-like due to lightness, while another praised the in-hand quality.

Premium feel was positive for the price, with reviewers highlighting solid construction and a more substantive plastic case than expected.

Button responsiveness was one of the stronger areas, with many reviewers calling clicks tactile, immediate, snappy, or super responsive.

Button responsiveness was generally strong, with reviewers praising light, crisp, reactive clicks, though several warned that very light clicks can cause accidental presses.

FPS gaming suitability was strong overall, with praise for shooters, responsiveness, and control; negative reports centered on hand-size/shape fit rather than sensor performance.

FPS suitability was a major strength thanks to low latency, strong tracking, quick movement, and repeated positive shooter-game impressions.

Grip texture was mixed: some liked the dry or grippy coating, while others found it too smooth, sticky over time, or in need of tape.

Grip texture was mixed: some liked the smooth or lightly textured finish, while others disliked the lack of side texture or sweat resistance.

Software usability was generally good when G Hub worked, with useful profiles, remapping, macros, and calibration; memory use and interface speed drew criticism.

Software usability was mostly positive, with reviewers calling G Hub or Logitech software easy, simple, and useful for remapping and profiles.

RGB absence was mostly framed as acceptable or even beneficial for battery and subtle looks, though it makes the mouse less flashy.

RGB features were mixed but often acceptable; many reviewers did not mind the lack of RGB because colors, simplicity, and battery life helped compensate.

Wireless performance was consistently excellent, with reviewers reporting fast, stable, lag-free, high-performance wireless use.

Wireless performance was consistently praised as reliable, fast, and suitable for gaming, often described as the mouse’s main appeal.

Connection stability was positive where tested, with no issues on Windows, reliable wireless impressions, and supportive receiver setup comments.

Connection stability was a standout strength, with reviewers reporting no dropouts, lag, freezes, or range problems in normal setups.

The Hero 2 sensor was repeatedly described as top-tier, flawless, or working perfectly, with only isolated uncertainty around real-world need for the highest specs.

Sensor performance was one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for the HERO sensor’s precision, smoothness, and gaming readiness.

Button customization was strong in software, especially drag-and-drop remapping, but constrained by the DEX's simplified button layout.

Button customization was widely liked because the six buttons and DPI controls can be remapped easily in Logitech software.

Reviewers generally found tracking and aiming precise, with praise for pinpoint pixel work, fast shooters, and smooth control; one reviewer struggled mainly because the shape hurt aim.

Tracking accuracy drew broad praise, with reviewers repeatedly calling the HERO sensor responsive, precise, smooth, and reliable, though one noted balance could affect precision.

Click/input latency was mostly praised as immediate, responsive, or low, with one measured latency result landing only mid-pack despite still being usable.

Click latency was consistently praised as low or effectively wired-like across reviews that tested responsiveness.

Wireless latency was praised as low or highly responsive, helping several reviewers feel comfortable using it wirelessly for serious gaming.

Wireless latency was consistently excellent, with reviewers repeatedly describing lag-free or wired-like responsiveness.

Battery life was widely praised as long-lasting, often exceeding expectations, though high polling rates were noted to drain it faster.

Battery life was one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly validating or praising long AA runtime, even when they disliked disposable batteries.

Motion stayed consistent in fast movements, with reviewers reporting no acceleration, smoothing, or loss of tracking while sliding quickly.

Motion consistency was praised, especially for smooth tracking, accurate stops, and the absence of smoothing or filtering.

Cable flexibility was a repeated complaint, with reviewers calling the cable bad, not ultralight, or unsuitable for wired use.

Debounce customization was a weakness because reviewers noted competing budget mice offer adjustable debounce while the G305 does not.

Dock compatibility was valued through Powerplay support, with reviewers praising continuous charging or easy mat integration despite cost caveats.

Firmware-like reliability was supported by the mouse waking immediately from power-saving behavior without frustrating delay.

Lift-off options were inconsistent across reviews: one reviewer could set LOD, another disliked the lack of millimeter values, and another found no adjustment.

MMO suitability had limited but positive evidence, with World of Warcraft reported as working great.