Compare Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 vs ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini

P1 Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
P2 ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini

Comparison Takeaways

Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2

Where It Has the Edge

  • software stability is 4.5 vs 2.7. Software stability has limited but positive evidence, with one review specifically calling G Hub's interface stable.
  • macro support is 4.7 vs 3.2. Macro support is confirmed through G Hub, including an easy-to-use macro creation tool.
  • handedness options is 3.1 vs 2.6. Handedness is limited: the shape is symmetrical or ambidextrous in form, but left-side thumb buttons make it effectively...
  • materials quality is 4.3 vs 3.9. Materials are described as matte, grippy, durable-feeling plastic that stays solid despite the ultralight construction.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini

Where It Has the Edge

  • Bluetooth support is 4.7 vs 1.0. Bluetooth support was widely confirmed as part of the tri-mode design and was repeatedly described as easy, convenient,...
  • cable flexibility is 4.8 vs 2.7. Cable flexibility was strongly praised where mentioned, with reviewers calling the included paracord highly flexible or thin and...
  • RGB features is 4.0 vs 2.0. RGB features were intentionally minimal, with nearly all evidence pointing to a single scroll-wheel lighting zone and software-controlled...
  • skate durability is 4.5 vs 2.6. Skate durability evidence centered on slick slide pads and included larger or replacement skates, with generally positive comments...
Average score
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.0
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4
2.4GHz connectivity
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.3

Reviews describe the mouse as relying on low-latency 2.4GHz wireless via a USB receiver or dongle, rather than Bluetooth.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Reviewers consistently documented 2.4GHz wireless as a core mode, usually tied to the included receiver, SpeedNova/RF language, or quoted battery figures.

acceleration control
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.3

Acceleration specs are presented as high-end and stable, with 40G to 88G figures and smooth acceleration noted in game use.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Acceleration-related evidence was positive overall: reviewers cited zero acceleration or jitter, 50G acceleration capability, and software angle-snapping or tuning options.

Accuracy and tracking precision
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.7

Tracking accuracy is one of the strongest consensus areas, with reviewers repeatedly calling aim, sensor response, and high-DPI control precise.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Accuracy was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers describing the mouse as fast, precise, pixel-perfect, and reliable in shooting-game or tracking tests.

balance and weight distribution
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.4

Weight balance is described favorably where reviewers mention it, with the light body still feeling controlled rather than hollow or unstable.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.2

Balance evidence was limited but split: one reviewer found it slightly back-weighted, while another said the balance felt spot on.

battery life
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.4

Battery life is consistently praised, commonly around 95 hours at default/lower polling, with high polling modes reducing runtime.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Battery life drew broad praise, with reviewers citing 105-139 hour claims, weekslong practical impressions, and strong endurance for such a light mouse.

Bluetooth support
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
1.0

Bluetooth support is explicitly absent; reviewers frame the mouse as a performance-focused 2.4GHz wireless device instead.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Bluetooth support was widely confirmed as part of the tri-mode design and was repeatedly described as easy, convenient, or useful for non-gaming devices.

build quality
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.6

Build quality earns strong marks for a rigid, creak-free shell that keeps weight low without honeycomb cutouts or obvious flex.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Build quality was generally praised as sturdy, solid, and well put together despite the very low weight and compact shell.

button customization
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.3

Button customization is available through G Hub, including remapping, G-Shift, DPI functions, app-linked settings, and other assignments.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Button customization was supported by Armoury Crate or Armoury Crate Gear, with reviewers noting button remapping and assignment controls, though some disliked the software.

button responsiveness
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.6

Button responsiveness is generally strong thanks to Lightforce switches and low-latency input, though click weight is not universally loved.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Button responsiveness was praised across reviews, especially for tactile clicks, bouncy buttons, spam-click ease, and solid click implementation.

cable flexibility
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
2.7

Cable feedback is mixed to negative: USB-C is welcomed, but reviewers criticize the rubber cable and wish it were softer or braided.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.8

Cable flexibility was strongly praised where mentioned, with reviewers calling the included paracord highly flexible or thin and high quality.

charging convenience
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.5

Charging convenience improves over the original with USB-C, fast charging mentions, and PowerPlay-related accessory options in several reviews.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Charging convenience was supported by USB-C charging, fast charging, and the included braided cable or extender accessories.

claw grip comfort
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.3

Claw grip comfort is broadly positive because the familiar symmetrical shape works well for claw users across many hand sizes.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Claw grip comfort was one of the best-supported fit attributes, with multiple reviewers saying the small shape suits claw grip users and pro-FPS play.

click latency
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.1

Click latency is mostly praised, especially in optical mode, though one measurement-focused reviewer found it less impressive than some competitors.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Click latency evidence was positive, with reviewers citing NVIDIA Reflex measurement, optical-switch speed, latency reduction, and low click-latency behavior.

click noise
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.0

Click noise is mixed: some like the bassier or clicky sound, while others call the clicks loud or high-pitched.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
No score yet
connection stability
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.7

Connection stability is positive in the reviews that discuss it, with no connectivity issues and perfect tracking reported.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Connection stability was generally positive, with evidence around secure dongle fit, reduced signal-dropout risk, easy pairing, lag-free connectivity, and problem-free modes.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.1

Cross-platform compatibility is mainly Windows and macOS, with G Hub support on both and Windows 10/11 explicitly mentioned.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Cross-platform or multi-device flexibility was supported by wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4GHz modes, plus evidence of use across Windows, MacBook, work, gaming, and mobile setups.

debounce customization
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
2.0

Debounce customization was weak: one reviewer specifically noted the software did not allow bounce-setting adjustment.

dock compatibility
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.2

PowerPlay and charging-mat compatibility are repeatedly mentioned, though accessory costs and compatibility caveats keep it from being universal praise.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
No score yet
DPI range
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.6

The DPI ceiling is very high, ranging from 32,000 DPI in many reviews to 44,000 CPI/DPI in updated-firmware coverage.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

DPI range was repeatedly supported by the 42,000 DPI/CPI ceiling and, in some cases, preset or adjustable DPI controls.

drag click support
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.2

Drag clicking is only directly mentioned once, where the reviewer says the coating and click setup can support it.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
No score yet
durability over time
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.5

Durability evidence centers on optical-mechanical switches, reduced double-click risk, and rated actuation durability rather than long multi-year testing.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.2

Durability over time was mostly positive because of optical-switch lifespan and sturdy build, but one travel-use review reported visible finish scuffing.

ecosystem integration
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.4

Logitech ecosystem integration appears through G Hub, older Logitech device compatibility, community profiles, PowerPlay, and cross-device programming.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Ecosystem integration was supported through the ROG Omni receiver, single-dongle multi-device pairing, Aura Sync, and compatibility with other ROG peripherals.

ergonomic design
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.4

Ergonomics are generally praised for a safe symmetrical body, light contouring, and broad hand-size compatibility, with some hand-size caveats.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.2

Ergonomic design was mixed: smaller-handed users found the frame comfortable, while one review said the semi-symmetrical shape gives up some ergonomic specificity.

fingertip grip comfort
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.3

Fingertip grip comfort is mostly positive, though a few reviewers prefer flatter or smaller shapes for purer fingertip use.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Fingertip grip comfort was consistently positive where discussed, with reviewers saying the shape supports fingertip use and keeps fingers naturally placed.

FPS gaming suitability
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.6

FPS suitability is one of the clearest strengths, with many reviewers calling it ideal for competitive shooters and quick aim correction.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

FPS gaming suitability was strongly supported through esports positioning, Counter-Strike, Valorant, Apex, pro-FPS references, and emphasis on precision.

glide smoothness
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.8

Glide is mixed: PTFE feet and light weight help smooth movement, but several reviewers dislike the stock skates or find them slow.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Glide smoothness was praised through pure PTFE feet, smooth pad movement, slick slide pads, and positive comments on the included skates.

grip texture
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.2

Grip texture is generally favorable, with reviewers noting a grippy matte coating and included tape for users who want more traction.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Grip texture was broadly praised, with reviewers citing ridged sides, grip tape, grippy coating, rubber grips, and textured matte surfaces.

handedness options
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.1

Handedness is limited: the shape is symmetrical or ambidextrous in form, but left-side thumb buttons make it effectively right-hand focused.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
2.6

Handedness was a clear limitation: reviewers repeatedly noted side buttons on the left and right-hand-favoring design despite some symmetrical or ambidextrous shaping.

left and right click quality
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.7

Left and right click quality is praised in several reviews for crisp, tactile Lightforce clicks, though feel depends on click-weight preference.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Left and right click quality was positive, with tactile, comfortable, and well-implemented main clicks noted in several reviews.

lift-off distance
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.4

Lift-off distance control is a strong customization point, with multiple reviews noting low, medium, high, or per-DPI adjustment options.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Lift-off distance was configurable where mentioned, with onboard or software options for LOD adjustment.

long-session comfort
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.5

Long-session comfort is positive where discussed, helped by low weight, low fatigue, and a comfortable speed-focused shape.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Long-session comfort was supported by one review that explicitly connected the shape to extended gaming-session comfort.

macro support
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.7

Macro support is confirmed through G Hub, including an easy-to-use macro creation tool.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.2

Macro support was limited because one review said macro settings required the fuller Armoury Crate and Aura Sync software rather than just the lighter utility.

materials quality
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.3

Materials are described as matte, grippy, durable-feeling plastic that stays solid despite the ultralight construction.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.9

Materials quality was mixed: reviewers cited bio-based nylon and premium-feeling coatings, but also noted a finish that scuffed or held fingerprints.

MMO gaming suitability
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
2.7

MMO suitability is weak because reviewers note the mouse has only a handful of buttons and lacks the button count MMO players may expect.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

MMO gaming suitability was lightly supported by one review that included MMORPG games among use cases, but evidence was much thinner than for FPS.

MOBA gaming suitability
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
2.8

MOBA suitability is mixed to weak in the one direct mention, because stiffer clicks can be worse for spam-clicking games.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

MOBA gaming suitability was lightly supported by one review that explicitly listed MOBA games among suitable genres.

motion consistency
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.7

Motion consistency is strong overall, with reviewers noting no smoothing/filtering, smooth implementation, consistent aiming, and flawless 2K polling.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Motion consistency was strong in most testing, with several reviewers citing smooth or consistent tracking, though one saw high-DPI rattling and severe jitter at unrealistic settings.

onboard memory
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.6

Onboard memory is a clear strength, with multiple reviews noting saved settings or up to five onboard profiles.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Onboard memory and controls were supported by profile controls, memory profiles, and on-the-go settings access.

palm grip comfort
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.3

Palm grip comfort is positive for many reviewers, especially with the safe hump and familiar shape, though one review says palm players may prefer elsewhere.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

Palm grip comfort was context-dependent: small-handed reviewers could palm it comfortably, while larger-hand or palm-first users were cautioned.

polling rate
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.3

Polling rate is heavily covered and generally strong, from 2,000Hz in many reviews to 4,000Hz or 8,000Hz in updated coverage.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.2

Polling-rate evidence was mixed: reviewers noted standard 1,000Hz operation and optional 8,000Hz support, but repeatedly criticized the separate booster requirement.

portability
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.4

Portability is helped by the very low weight and built-in USB receiver storage, making it more travel-friendly than many esports mice.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Portability was a strength because reviewers called it compact, travel-friendly, small, lightweight, and easy to take on the go.

premium feel
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.5

Premium feel is generally positive, with reviewers describing a sturdy matte build and refined feel despite the minimalist look.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Premium feel was generally positive, with reviewers describing the mouse as impressive, masterful, premium-feeling, and solid despite its simple design.

profile switching
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.3

Profile switching is handled through G Hub and onboard/profile presets rather than dedicated physical profile buttons.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Profile switching was supported by five-profile configuration and onboard profile-switching controls, though Pokde found the control method clunky.

programmable buttons
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.0

Programmable buttons are present but limited in count, with five programmable buttons cited and remapping available in software.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Programmable buttons were supported by evidence of programmable side buttons, remappable buttons, and five programmable buttons.

RGB features
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
2.0

RGB features are intentionally absent; reviewers usually treat this as a battery and weight tradeoff rather than a surprise.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

RGB features were intentionally minimal, with nearly all evidence pointing to a single scroll-wheel lighting zone and software-controlled effects.

scroll wheel quality
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.4

Scroll wheel quality is mixed, ranging from precise and workable to stiff, mushy, smoother than before, or less tactile.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

Scroll wheel quality was mixed: some liked the resistance or steps, while others found it stiff, soft, or tighter than the larger model.

sensor performance
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.7

Sensor performance is a major strength, with HERO 2 repeatedly praised for speed, accuracy, DPI range, and smooth implementation.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Sensor performance was a major strength, repeatedly tied to the AimPoint Pro sensor, high DPI ceiling, precise tracking, and reliable gaming performance.

shape comfort
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.3

Shape comfort is broadly strong because the familiar Superlight shape is safe and comfortable, though some reviewers find it boring or not ideal.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Shape comfort was strong for smaller hands and compact-grip preferences, but reviewers cautioned that the small, less curved shape may not suit everyone.

side button quality
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.3

Side button quality is the most repeated control weakness, often described as mushy, unchanged, or less tactile than the main clicks.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Side button quality was positive overall, with reviewers praising placement, programmable side buttons, satisfying side clicks, and easy thumb activation.

skate durability
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
2.6

Skate durability and stock skate quality draw repeated criticism, including thin feet, compatibility changes, and recommendations for aftermarket skates.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Skate durability evidence centered on slick slide pads and included larger or replacement skates, with generally positive comments but little direct wear testing.

software stability
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.5

Software stability has limited but positive evidence, with one review specifically calling G Hub's interface stable.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
2.7

Software stability was a weakness where directly tested, especially with reported connection and setting-change errors.

software usability
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.2

Software usability is mixed: several reviewers praise G Hub customization and navigation, while others find it convoluted or frustrating.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

Software usability was divided: reviewers valued Armoury Crate Gear and tuning options but often criticized Armoury Crate as clunky, difficult, large, or outdated.

surface compatibility
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.7

Surface compatibility is positive overall but not flawless, with good performance across surfaces and surface modes, yet rough or soft pads can expose skate issues.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Surface compatibility was strong, with reviewers citing mousepad calibration, different-surface configuration, glass/nylon pad use, and tracking on almost any surface.

switch durability
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.6

Switch durability is a strength because optical-mechanical switches are tied to reduced double-click risk, durability, and long actuation ratings.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.8

Switch durability was well supported by the 100-million-click optical-switch rating and reduced double-click-risk commentary.

switch feel
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.2

Switch feel is polarizing: many love the tactile, crisp Lightforce clicks, while others find them heavier or worse for spam clicking.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Switch feel was positive overall, with tactile and responsive optical switches, crisp button feel, and safer optical switch implementation noted.

tilt gesture controls
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
1.0

Tilt gesture controls are not supported in the evidence; the only direct mention says tilt support is missing.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
No score yet
value for money
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.6

Value for money is mixed: reviewers praise top-tier performance but repeatedly question the premium price and upgrade value from the original.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.1

Value was mixed-to-positive: several reviewers liked its price relative to rivals or sales, while others still called $130 expensive or not cheap.

weight
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.5

Weight is a clear strength, with most reviews placing the mouse around 58g to 60g or roughly 2.1 ounces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.8

Weight was one of the strongest positives, with nearly every review emphasizing the sub-50g or 49g class and its easy, fast movement.

weight tuning
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.7

Weight tuning is limited to small puck-related changes rather than true adjustable weights.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
No score yet
wireless latency
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.7

Wireless latency is strongly praised, with reviewers reporting no lag, 0.5ms latency claims, and responsive wireless play.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Wireless latency evidence was generally positive through low-latency 2.4GHz RF, SpeedNova precision, booster latency reduction, and lag-free connectivity.

wireless performance
Product 1: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.7

Wireless performance is consistently strong, with LIGHTSPEED, 2.4GHz, and no-falter wireless behavior earning praise.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Wireless performance was praised for reliability, top-level responsiveness, SpeedNova 2.4GHz behavior, and consistently great performance.