Compare Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 vs ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless

Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless

Quick verdict

What each product is best for

Choose Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 for software stability and fingertip grip comfort.

Choose ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless for skate durability and cable flexibility.

Comparison Takeaways

Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2

Where It Has the Edge

  • software stability is 4.5 vs 2.3. Software stability had limited but positive evidence from one review calling the G Hub interface stable.
  • fingertip grip comfort is 5.0 vs 3.4. Fingertip grip comfort was praised by reviewers who found the shape comfortable for fingertip use.
  • handedness options is 3.5 vs 2.0. Handedness support was mixed because the symmetrical shape helps lefties, but the side buttons remain left-side only.
  • durability over time is 4.5 vs 3.5. Durability over time had limited but positive evidence from a longer-use reviewer whose unit remained rock solid.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless

Where It Has the Edge

  • skate durability is 4.5 vs 2.0. Skate durability evidence was limited but positive, based on replaceable extra feet for wear.
  • cable flexibility is 4.2 vs 2.0. Cable flexibility was mostly positive for light, soft, flexible use, but one reviewer warned it kinked easily.
  • palm grip comfort is 4.6 vs 2.5. Palm grip comfort was consistently positive, with reviewers frequently calling it ideal, comfortable, or a natural fit.
  • side button quality is 4.6 vs 2.6. Side button quality was praised for tactile feedback, placement, and responsiveness, with only limited caveats around reach.
Average score
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.0
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.3
skate durability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.0

Skate durability was a repeated concern, with reviewers calling the PTFE feet thin, meh, or unlikely to last long.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5

Skate durability evidence was limited but positive, based on replaceable extra feet for wear.

software stability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Software stability had limited but positive evidence from one review calling the G Hub interface stable.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
2.3

Software stability was mixed-to-negative, with Bluetooth detection and Armoury Crate failures hurting confidence.

cable flexibility
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.0

Cable quality was a recurring complaint, with reviewers criticizing drag, resistance, and the dated rubber cable.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.2

Cable flexibility was mostly positive for light, soft, flexible use, but one reviewer warned it kinked easily.

palm grip comfort
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.5

Palm grip comfort was limited by one review saying palm-grip players may be better served elsewhere.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.6

Palm grip comfort was consistently positive, with reviewers frequently calling it ideal, comfortable, or a natural fit.

side button quality
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.6

Side button quality was the most contested control area, ranging from well-placed and improved to repeatedly described as mushy.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.6

Side button quality was praised for tactile feedback, placement, and responsiveness, with only limited caveats around reach.

MOBA gaming suitability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.5

MOBA suitability was weaker because one reviewer found the heavier clicks worse for spam-click games.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5

MOBA gaming suitability had limited positive evidence from one reviewer who found the buttons useful for skill-based games.

profile switching
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.0

Profile behavior was mixed: app-linked settings were useful, but onboard-profile handling was described as confusing in G Hub.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.7

Profile switching was praised as convenient, simple, and available directly from the mouse.

fingertip grip comfort
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Fingertip grip comfort was praised by reviewers who found the shape comfortable for fingertip use.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.4

Fingertip comfort was mixed, with some reviewers saying it worked and others doubting success or noting reach issues.

handedness options
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.5

Handedness support was mixed because the symmetrical shape helps lefties, but the side buttons remain left-side only.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
2.0

Handedness options were a consistent limitation because the mouse is clearly right-handed and not suited to left-handed users.

glide smoothness
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.5

Glide smoothness was highly mixed: some reviewers praised effortless glide, while others disliked stock-skate drag or control-heavy movement.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.7

Glide smoothness was one of the strongest positives, with many reviewers praising PTFE feet and smooth, effortless movement.

scroll wheel quality
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.0

Scroll wheel feedback was mixed, with some praise for tactility but repeated criticism that it felt stiff, mushy, vague, or less precise.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.2

Scroll wheel quality was mixed: several reviewers liked the feel and increments, while others criticized rattling, cheap sound, or limited resistance adjustment.

surface compatibility
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.8

Surface compatibility was mixed, with good results across many surfaces but complaints on softer pads and warnings to tune surface modes.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
5.0

Surface compatibility evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer getting consistent results across surfaces.

durability over time
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Durability over time had limited but positive evidence from a longer-use reviewer whose unit remained rock solid.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.5

Durability over time was mixed: swappable parts inspired longevity confidence, but one reviewer returned it over daily-use confidence concerns.

ecosystem integration
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Ecosystem integration was praised for Logitech presets, backward compatibility, and community/profile support.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.5

Ecosystem integration was mixed but present, with Armoury Crate centralizing ASUS devices while feeling overloaded for mouse-only use.

value for money
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.1

Value was mixed: reviewers praised the performance tier but often questioned the price and upgrade value from the original Superlight.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.9

Value for money was sharply mixed, with praise for feature value and bang-for-buck offset by high-price criticism.

weight
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.7

Reviewers strongly praised the low weight, calling it excellent, effortless, and well balanced for the mouse size.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.0

Weight split reviewers: many liked the 79g/89g feel, while others thought it was not ultralight or dated against newer esports mice.

click latency
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.2

Click latency was praised as very low by some reviewers, though one technical reviewer found it merely good rather than flagship-leading.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.9

Click latency was consistently praised, with reviewers citing quick switch response, instant actuation, and zero or very low wireless delay.

build quality
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.8

Build quality was repeatedly praised as solid, squeak-free, well put together, and elite despite the light shell.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.2

Build quality was divided: several reviewers found it sturdy or well manufactured, while others described cheap or fragile shell impressions.

2.4GHz connectivity
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

The 2.4GHz connection was praised through an instant, fast connection experience with the included dongle.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.4

2.4GHz connectivity was praised for gaming latency, stability, and being a major selling point.

long-session comfort
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Long-session comfort was strongly positive in one review that reported almost no hand fatigue after long sessions.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5

Long-session comfort was generally positive, with reviewers citing less fatigue and comfort over longer periods.

onboard memory
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.0

Onboard memory was supported by the ability to save multiple profiles, though evidence was more about usefulness than enthusiasm.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5

Onboard memory received limited but positive evidence as a useful feature for gamers using multiple systems.

polling rate
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.1

Polling-rate opinions were mixed: several reviewers felt clear responsiveness gains, while others saw 2,000Hz as fine but not industry-leading.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5

Polling rate evidence was positive overall, with one benchmark exceeding 1,000Hz and another reviewer saying 1,000Hz felt sufficient for quick response.

dock compatibility
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.3

PowerPlay compatibility was viewed positively, though one reviewer called the accessory expensive.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.7

Dock and dongle accessories were liked as useful or impressive quality-of-life additions.

battery life
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.7

Battery life was generally praised as long-lasting, though reviewers noted it drops with higher polling rates.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.3

Battery life was broadly praised, especially on 2.4GHz and Bluetooth, though a few reviewers found it merely decent or mixed with RGB.

materials quality
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Materials quality was praised for a cool, soft matte plastic feel.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.1

Materials quality was mixed, ranging from hollow-feeling plastic criticism to praise for premium look, good fit, and clean finish.

FPS gaming suitability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

FPS suitability was one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for speed, responsiveness, and competitive first-person shooter use.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.6

FPS gaming suitability was strong, with reviewers praising flicks, fast-paced shooters, and FPS accuracy.

ergonomic design
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.0

Ergonomics were generally positive for comfort and contouring, but one review noted large hands may find the shape less ergonomic.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.4

Ergonomics were mostly praised for comfort, though one reviewer treated the shape as neutral rather than standout.

left and right click quality
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.8

Left and right clicks were praised for satisfying tactility, light rapid tapping, and improved main-button feel.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.4

Left and right click quality was generally strong for low play and instant feel, but one reviewer noted post-travel.

premium feel
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Premium feel was positive overall, with reviewers saying the mouse feels sturdy, premium, and high quality.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.2

Premium feel was mixed, with some quality/aesthetic praise but also a view that the mouse is well-made yet basic.

lift-off distance
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.2

Lift-off distance control was viewed as useful and noticeably adjustable, especially for players who fine-tune mouse behavior.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5

Lift-off distance received limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer finding it very low in testing.

sensor performance
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.9

The HERO 2 sensor was widely praised as crisp, precise, fast, and close to flawless, though some reviewers framed the higher specs as incremental.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.6

Sensor performance was a standout strength, especially for the AimPoint sensor, which reviewers described as capable, problem-free, and among the best.

button responsiveness
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.0

Button responsiveness was mostly praised for tactile, responsive clicks, though one reviewer disliked the heavier actuation for spam clicking.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.8

Button responsiveness was mixed: one reviewer liked the key impression, while another found the main clicks firmer than expected.

motion consistency
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.8

Motion consistency was described positively, with reviewers calling motion smooth, sharp, and accurate.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
5.0

Motion consistency evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer reporting no jittering during use.

portability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Portability was supported by the dongle-storage cover, which one reviewer framed as essential for esports travel.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.3

Portability received positive but limited evidence from reviewers who liked multi-device flexibility and travel usefulness.

wireless latency
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Wireless latency was praised directly, with reviewers reporting no latency issues or seemingly no latency at all.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.8

Wireless latency was a strength, with reviewers reporting improved latency, no delays, and minimal input lag.

Accuracy and tracking precision
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.9

Reviewers consistently described the mouse as accurate in games, with especially strong praise for tracking, pointer accuracy, and shot control.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.8

Tracking precision was repeatedly praised, with reviewers calling the sensor precise and accurate; one reviewer found very high DPI settings messy.

button customization
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.7

Customization drew positive comments for granular controls and strong software-hardware integration, though it still depends heavily on G Hub.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5

Button customization was praised where reviewers discussed comprehensive software control and full configurability.

DPI range
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.7

DPI coverage was seen as technically strong and granular, but one reviewer felt the extreme ceiling is more marketing than everyday value.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.8

The DPI ceiling impressed reviewers, though several framed the highest settings as overkill or awkward rather than broadly useful.

wireless performance
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Wireless performance was praised as seamless and flawless, with no cable-related compromise in use.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.8

Wireless performance was praised in hands-on use, with reviewers reporting pleasing performance and no lag.

connection stability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Connection stability was praised in one review for not faltering even in a difficult RF environment.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.8

Connection stability was strong overall, with reviewers reporting stable wireless behavior and no lag or drops.

cross-platform compatibility
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Cross-platform compatibility was praised through G Hub support for both Windows and macOS.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.7

Cross-platform compatibility was positive, especially for Mac, iPad, and multi-device workflows.

software usability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.9

Software usability was split sharply: some reviewers found G Hub easy and powerful, while others called it unintuitive or frustrating.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.8

Software usability was the most mixed major area: some found Armoury Crate polished or comprehensive, while others called it bloated, overloaded, or unusable.

claw grip comfort
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.6

Claw grip comfort was broadly positive, with reviewers calling the mouse comfortable or easy to use for claw grip.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.4

Claw grip comfort was generally positive, with reviewers saying the ergonomics worked well for claw users.

switch durability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.7

Switch durability evidence centered on optical-switch reliability and reduced double-click concerns, with reviewers treating it as a meaningful benefit.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.8

Switch durability and replaceability were a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising hot-swappable switches, longevity, and repairability.

charging convenience
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.6

Charging convenience was praised for USB-C, faster charging, and fewer desk cables.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5

Charging convenience was praised because the mouse can be used while charging and has convenient USB-C behavior.

click noise
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.3

Click noise was mixed: some liked the satisfying click sound, while others found it loud or high-pitched.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.3

Click noise was mixed: some found it quiet or acceptable, while others called it noisy or cheap-sounding.

switch feel
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.2

Switch feel split reviewers: many loved the crisp, tactile Lightforce feel, while others found the clicks heavier or too tactile.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.2

Switch feel was mostly liked, especially the satisfying default switches, though one reviewer disliked the sound of the replaceable Omrons.

shape comfort
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.4

Shape comfort was broadly praised as safe, familiar, and very comfortable, though a few reviewers disliked the rounded shape personally.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.4

Shape comfort was a major positive for many reviewers, especially for larger or palm-oriented hands, but some found it too small or bulky.

RGB features
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.3

The lack of RGB was generally accepted as a worthwhile tradeoff for battery life, weight, and the mouse’s clean look.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.2

RGB features were generally liked for subtlety and placement, though reviewers also noted battery drain.

grip texture
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.4

Grip texture was well received, with reviewers praising the grippy surface, recessed sides, or usefulness for clammy hands.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.4

Grip texture was mostly praised for secure control, though one reviewer noted dirt buildup and another found one side slightly slippier.

balance and weight distribution
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Weight distribution received positive evidence from a reviewer who specifically praised the balance.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5

Balance evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer saying the mouse felt well balanced and lighter in hand.

programmable buttons
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Programmable side buttons were useful to one reviewer for DPI adjustment, especially because the mouse lacks a dedicated DPI button.

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5

Programmable-button evidence was limited but positive, tied to reviewers praising broad configuration options.

acceleration control
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Acceleration feel received direct praise in one review, where the reviewer enjoyed its smoothness in Diablo IV.

ASUS ROG Gladius III WirelessNo score yet
Bluetooth support
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2No score yet
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.1

Bluetooth support was useful for battery life and multi-device use, but lower polling or lighter-use caveats appeared.

drag click support
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.0

Drag click support had limited positive evidence from one reviewer who called drag clicking pretty awesome.

ASUS ROG Gladius III WirelessNo score yet
firmware reliability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2No score yet
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
2.3

Firmware reliability drew negative evidence around inconvenient update requirements and forced software behavior.

macro support
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Macro support was praised for an easy-to-use macro tool that guides users through setup.

ASUS ROG Gladius III WirelessNo score yet
MMO gaming suitability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2No score yet
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
2.5

MMO gaming suitability was weak, with one reviewer saying the button count was not enough for mapping.

weight tuning
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.0

Weight tuning was weakly received because the swappable cover options were seen as features most people would not find useful.

ASUS ROG Gladius III WirelessNo score yet