Average score
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.3
software stability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0
Software stability had limited evidence, with Armoury Crate Gear praised for not affecting system performance.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
2.3
Software stability was mixed-to-negative, with Bluetooth detection and Armoury Crate failures hurting confidence.
MMO gaming suitability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0
MMO suitability had limited but positive evidence from FFXIV/raid use and button mapping comments.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
2.5
MMO gaming suitability was weak, with one reviewer saying the button count was not enough for mapping.
profile switching
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.3
Profile switching was mixed, with praise for onboard switching but criticism of the underside DPI/profile button placement.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.7
Profile switching was praised as convenient, simple, and available directly from the mouse.
button responsiveness
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8
Button responsiveness was praised for snappy, reliable, and fast actuation in several reviews.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.8
Button responsiveness was mixed: one reviewer liked the key impression, while another found the main clicks firmer than expected.
ecosystem integration
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5
Ecosystem integration was praised where reviewers used the Omni receiver or Aura Sync-style setup without delays.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.5
Ecosystem integration was mixed but present, with Armoury Crate centralizing ASUS devices while feeling overloaded for mouse-only use.
grip texture
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.4
Grip texture was the most divided attribute, ranging from non-slip praise to strong complaints about slippery coating.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.4
Grip texture was mostly praised for secure control, though one reviewer noted dirt buildup and another found one side slightly slippier.
weight
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.9
Weight was consistently praised as very light, impressive, and control-friendly.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.0
Weight split reviewers: many liked the 79g/89g feel, while others thought it was not ultralight or dated against newer esports mice.
click noise
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2
Click noise impressions were mixed, from quiet and pleasant to fairly loud, depending on reviewer and switch comparison.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.3
Click noise was mixed: some found it quiet or acceptable, while others called it noisy or cheap-sounding.
software usability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
2.9
Software usability was the clearest weakness, with repeated complaints about Armoury Crate being bloated, slow, or needing improvement.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.8
Software usability was the most mixed major area: some found Armoury Crate polished or comprehensive, while others called it bloated, overloaded, or unusable.
side button quality
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.8
Side button quality was mixed: several reviewers praised crisp placement, while others found them small, high, or stiff.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.6
Side button quality was praised for tactile feedback, placement, and responsiveness, with only limited caveats around reach.
charging convenience
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.8
Charging and dongle convenience were mixed: USB-C and cable placement helped, but the booster/dongle setup could feel chunky.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5
Charging convenience was praised because the mouse can be used while charging and has convenient USB-C behavior.
wireless latency
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.1
Wireless latency was praised in 2.4GHz mode but Bluetooth was criticized as too latent for competitive gaming.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.8
Wireless latency was a strength, with reviewers reporting improved latency, no delays, and minimal input lag.
premium feel
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.5
Premium feel was mixed: some found the mouse premium, while others felt the coating or hollow shell hurt the premium impression.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.2
Premium feel was mixed, with some quality/aesthetic praise but also a view that the mouse is well-made yet basic.
lift-off distance
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.8
Lift-off distance was mixed: one reviewer liked the low setting, while another found low too low and high too high.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5
Lift-off distance received limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer finding it very low in testing.
scroll wheel quality
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.6
Scroll wheel quality was mixed, ranging from excellent and distinct to average, light, or prone to overscrolling.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.2
Scroll wheel quality was mixed: several reviewers liked the feel and increments, while others criticized rattling, cheap sound, or limited resistance adjustment.
button customization
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0
Customization was considered adequate to strong where reviewers described remapping, DPI, and profile tools as straightforward or sufficient.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5
Button customization was praised where reviewers discussed comprehensive software control and full configurability.
durability over time
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0
Long-term durability was not directly tested, but switch durability and repairability evidence supported limited durability scoring.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.5
Durability over time was mixed: swappable parts inspired longevity confidence, but one reviewer returned it over daily-use confidence concerns.
motion consistency
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5
Motion consistency was praised through comments about precise recognition, consistent tracking, and polling stability.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
5.0
Motion consistency evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer reporting no jittering during use.
programmable buttons
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0
Programmable buttons were considered competitive and sufficient for this class, though not extensive like MMO mice.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5
Programmable-button evidence was limited but positive, tied to reviewers praising broad configuration options.
skate durability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0
Skate durability had limited evidence, but one reviewer said the skates held up well on glass.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5
Skate durability evidence was limited but positive, based on replaceable extra feet for wear.
Bluetooth support
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5
Bluetooth was viewed as a useful convenience for work, travel, and multi-device use, not as the preferred competitive mode.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.1
Bluetooth support was useful for battery life and multi-device use, but lower polling or lighter-use caveats appeared.
click latency
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5
Click latency was praised as very low or competitive, including measured or perceived fast response.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.9
Click latency was consistently praised, with reviewers citing quick switch response, instant actuation, and zero or very low wireless delay.
materials quality
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5
Materials quality was scored through reviewer judgments about the nylon/PBT shell, coating, and perceived premium or slippery feel.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.1
Materials quality was mixed, ranging from hollow-feeling plastic criticism to praise for premium look, good fit, and clean finish.
palm grip comfort
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2
Palm grip comfort was positive for average or compatible hands, though not universal for larger hands.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.6
Palm grip comfort was consistently positive, with reviewers frequently calling it ideal, comfortable, or a natural fit.
value for money
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.6
Value was mixed: reviewers praised the feature set but often called the price expensive or hard to justify.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.9
Value for money was sharply mixed, with praise for feature value and bang-for-buck offset by high-price criticism.
long-session comfort
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8
Long-session comfort was strongly positive where reviewers mentioned low strain, no hand pain, or reduced fatigue.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5
Long-session comfort was generally positive, with reviewers citing less fatigue and comfort over longer periods.
cable flexibility
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5
The cable was usually praised as flexible, free-flowing, and low-friction, with one reviewer calling it a bit stiff.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.2
Cable flexibility was mostly positive for light, soft, flexible use, but one reviewer warned it kinked easily.
switch durability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5
Switch durability was scored where reviewers linked optical switches to double-click prevention, hot-swapping, or durability.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.8
Switch durability and replaceability were a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising hot-swappable switches, longevity, and repairability.
build quality
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5
Build quality was mostly strong, with repeated praise for rigidity and lack of flex, though one reviewer reported average build with creaking.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.2
Build quality was divided: several reviewers found it sturdy or well manufactured, while others described cheap or fragile shell impressions.
Accuracy and tracking precision
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5
Reviewers consistently praised tracking accuracy and precision, with only one reviewer warning that extreme DPI values became irregular.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.8
Tracking precision was repeatedly praised, with reviewers calling the sensor precise and accurate; one reviewer found very high DPI settings messy.
onboard memory
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8
Onboard control and memory features were praised when reviewers could change settings or avoid software.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5
Onboard memory received limited but positive evidence as a useful feature for gamers using multiple systems.
portability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5
Portability was supported by dongle storage, Bluetooth, and multi-device/travel use.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.3
Portability received positive but limited evidence from reviewers who liked multi-device flexibility and travel usefulness.
left and right click quality
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2
Left and right click quality was mostly positive, with praise for consistency and similar actuation between sides.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.4
Left and right click quality was generally strong for low play and instant feel, but one reviewer noted post-travel.
sensor performance
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.9
Sensor performance was one of the best-reviewed areas, repeatedly described as accurate, top-tier, or flawless.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.6
Sensor performance was a standout strength, especially for the AimPoint sensor, which reviewers described as capable, problem-free, and among the best.
FPS gaming suitability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8
FPS suitability was one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for competitive aiming, speed, and esports performance.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.6
FPS gaming suitability was strong, with reviewers praising flicks, fast-paced shooters, and FPS accuracy.
balance and weight distribution
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7
Weight distribution was usually praised as well balanced, though one reviewer found the mouse slightly forward-balanced.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5
Balance evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer saying the mouse felt well balanced and lighter in hand.
shape comfort
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2
Shape comfort was generally praised, especially for right-handed ergonomic users, but hand size and finger length created caveats.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.4
Shape comfort was a major positive for many reviewers, especially for larger or palm-oriented hands, but some found it too small or bulky.
RGB features
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4
RGB was generally appreciated as a rare lightweight-mouse touch, though a few reviewers disliked the implementation.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.2
RGB features were generally liked for subtlety and placement, though reviewers also noted battery drain.
connection stability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
5.0
Connection stability was strongly praised, with reviewers reporting no dropouts, hiccups, or interference.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.8
Connection stability was strong overall, with reviewers reporting stable wireless behavior and no lag or drops.
DPI range
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0
The DPI ceiling was seen as technically impressive, but one reviewer found very high DPI practically unusable.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.8
The DPI ceiling impressed reviewers, though several framed the highest settings as overkill or awkward rather than broadly useful.
glide smoothness
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6
Glide smoothness was consistently praised across stock PTFE feet and multiple surfaces.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.7
Glide smoothness was one of the strongest positives, with many reviewers praising PTFE feet and smooth, effortless movement.
polling rate
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4
Polling rate support was widely praised, especially 4K wireless and included booster access, with some debate over 8K usefulness.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5
Polling rate evidence was positive overall, with one benchmark exceeding 1,000Hz and another reviewer saying 1,000Hz felt sufficient for quick response.
switch feel
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.1
Switch feel was mixed but often positive, with some crisp/punchy praise and some dull or mushy complaints.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.2
Switch feel was mostly liked, especially the satisfying default switches, though one reviewer disliked the sound of the replaceable Omrons.
ergonomic design
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5
The ergonomic design was broadly praised for right-handed comfort, while left-handed users were consistently excluded.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.4
Ergonomics were mostly praised for comfort, though one reviewer treated the shape as neutral rather than standout.
battery life
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2
Battery life was generally praised as good to excellent, with caveats that high polling rates and active use drain it faster.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.3
Battery life was broadly praised, especially on 2.4GHz and Bluetooth, though a few reviewers found it merely decent or mixed with RGB.
surface compatibility
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.9
Surface compatibility was strongly praised, including glass, mouse pads, tables, and varied surfaces.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
5.0
Surface compatibility evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer getting consistent results across surfaces.
cross-platform compatibility
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8
Cross-platform use was praised through Bluetooth multi-device pairing and easy movement between PCs, laptops, tablets, and handhelds.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.7
Cross-platform compatibility was positive, especially for Mac, iPad, and multi-device workflows.
claw grip comfort
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4
Claw-grip comfort was generally positive, especially relaxed claw, though hand size affected comfort.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.4
Claw grip comfort was generally positive, with reviewers saying the ergonomics worked well for claw users.
2.4GHz connectivity
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5
Reviewers discussed the 2.4GHz receiver mainly as part of the broader wireless setup, with praise for low-latency use when paired with the booster.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.4
2.4GHz connectivity was praised for gaming latency, stability, and being a major selling point.
fingertip grip comfort
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.3
Fingertip grip comfort was mixed; some found it possible, while others found the ergonomic shell awkward for fingertip use.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
3.4
Fingertip comfort was mixed, with some reviewers saying it worked and others doubting success or noting reach issues.
wireless performance
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8
Wireless performance was repeatedly praised as low-latency, stable, and responsive.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.8
Wireless performance was praised in hands-on use, with reviewers reporting pleasing performance and no lag.
handedness options
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
2.0
Handedness scored low because reviewers repeatedly noted the right-handed ergonomic shape and lack of a left-handed option.
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
2.0
Handedness options were a consistent limitation because the mouse is clearly right-handed and not suited to left-handed users.
acceleration control
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5
The acceleration spec was only scored where a reviewer connected the 50g capability to confident fast maneuvers in FPS play.
ASUS ROG Gladius III WirelessNo score yet
dock compatibility
ASUS ROG Keris II AceNo score yet
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.7
Dock and dongle accessories were liked as useful or impressive quality-of-life additions.
firmware reliability
ASUS ROG Keris II AceNo score yet
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
2.3
Firmware reliability drew negative evidence around inconvenient update requirements and forced software behavior.
MOBA gaming suitability
ASUS ROG Keris II AceNo score yet
ASUS ROG Gladius III Wireless
4.5
MOBA gaming suitability had limited positive evidence from one reviewer who found the buttons useful for skill-based games.