Compare Glorious Model O3 vs Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX

P1 Glorious Model O3
P2 Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX

Comparison Takeaways

Glorious Model O3

Where It Has the Edge

  • Bluetooth support is 4.2 vs 1.1. Bluetooth support is well documented, with several reviews citing Bluetooth mode and higher Bluetooth battery estimates.
  • RGB features is 3.5 vs 1.1. RGB is prominent and configurable, but reactions vary from quick and painless customization to tacky or blotchy lighting.
  • handedness options is 3.5 vs 1.6. Handedness evidence is limited: PCGamesN says left-handed users can use it and swap main buttons, but side buttons...
  • programmable buttons is 4.3 vs 2.6. Programmable-button support is strong, with software, dock controls, and freely assignable buttons cited across reviews.

Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX

Where It Has the Edge

  • portability is 5.0 vs 3.0. Portability is helped by dongle storage and the small receiver, which reviewers appreciated for travel and avoiding lost...
  • FPS gaming suitability is 4.8 vs 3.4. FPS gaming suitability is strong, with reviewers specifically testing shooters and praising responsiveness, control, and competitive-grade sensor performance.
  • motion consistency is 5.0 vs 3.8. Motion consistency is strong, with reviewers reporting clean tracking, no jitter, no dropped tracking, and reliable fast sweeps.
  • balance and weight distribution is 4.5 vs 3.4. Weight balance is mostly praised, with several reviewers saying the mouse feels evenly distributed or well balanced, though...
Average score
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.9
Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.7
2.4GHz connectivity
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.3

2.4GHz connectivity is well supported, with reviews citing 2.4 GHz receiver use, runtime, and dongle-based wireless operation.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.6

Reviewers describe the DEX as a LIGHTSPEED/2.4GHz dongle mouse, with the high-polling wireless link treated as central to its gaming performance.

acceleration control
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.0

Acceleration evidence is limited but positive, with PCGamesN citing a 50G acceleration rating as part of the sensor package.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
5.0

Acceleration control is praised where reviewers mention no acceleration, smoothing, or filtering, supporting consistent raw-feeling tracking.

Accuracy and tracking precision
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.2

Reviewers generally found tracking precise and fast in practice, though PC Gamer and Basic Tutorials noted wireless consistency caveats.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.7

Tracking precision is consistently strong, with reviewers calling out pixel-level accuracy, clean fast-motion tracking, and precise in-game aiming.

balance and weight distribution
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.4

Balance is context-dependent: some reviewers felt weight distribution was handled well, while others noticed rear heaviness from the battery.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.5

Weight balance is mostly praised, with several reviewers saying the mouse feels evenly distributed or well balanced, though one found rear weight concentration awkward.

battery life
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.5

Battery life is the strongest consensus point, with hot-swappable batteries and long runtimes cited in every review.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.3

Battery life is a major strength, usually framed around 90 to 105 hours at normal polling, with some caveats that high polling drains it faster.

Bluetooth support
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.2

Bluetooth support is well documented, with several reviews citing Bluetooth mode and higher Bluetooth battery estimates.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
1.1

Bluetooth support is a limitation: reviewers explicitly say the mouse lacks Bluetooth and relies on Logitech's dongle-based wireless connection.

build quality
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.3

Build quality is generally good to strong, though GamesRadar felt the total build package could not match premium rivals.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.7

Build quality is broadly positive, with repeated comments about solid construction, no creaks, no flex, and sturdy lightweight materials.

button customization
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.3

Button customization is strong, with reviewers confirming reprogrammable buttons, configurable clickers, and software assignment options.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.0

Button customization is solid through G Hub remapping, G-Shift, and profile controls, though the small five-button layout limits what can be assigned.

button responsiveness
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.2

Button responsiveness is mostly positive, with reviewers calling inputs precise, responsive, and good in game.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.4

Button responsiveness is generally strong, especially for the main clicks, which reviewers describe as tactile, fast, and immediate.

cable flexibility
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
No score yet
Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
1.8

Cable flexibility is a weakness: reviewers criticize the included cable as rubbery, bad, or not ultralight for wired use while charging.

charging convenience
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.5

Charging convenience is a major strength for most reviewers, though one reviewer questioned whether the system is necessary.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.4

Charging convenience is strong thanks to front USB-C charging, continued use while plugged in, and PowerPlay wireless charging support.

claw grip comfort
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.3

Claw grip comfort is mostly positive where tested, with hybrid palm-claw and claw/fingertip users reporting comfort.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.9

Claw grip comfort is mixed but generally usable, with stronger results for relaxed claw and larger hands than aggressive claw on smaller hands.

click latency
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.4

Click latency evidence is positive, with speed-focused clickers, ultra-low-latency wireless language, and responsive optical clicks mentioned.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.4

Click latency evidence is positive overall, including an extremely low response-time claim and independent wireless latency testing in the low millisecond range.

click noise
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.4

Click noise is mixed, with PC Gamer and GamesRadar hearing hollow or pinging sounds while PCGamesN praised the switch sound.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
2.8

Click noise is a tradeoff: main clicks are often crisp and satisfying, but several reviewers note they are loud or high-pitched.

connection stability
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.7

Connection stability is a standout for battery swapping, with reviewers repeatedly noting no disconnects and uninterrupted use.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.5

Connection stability is strong where discussed, with reviewers reporting easy dongle setup and reliable wireless operation.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
2.9

Cross-platform compatibility is limited, with left-hand button swapping mentioned but Windows-only software called out by Basic Tutorials.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
No score yet
debounce customization
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.2

Debounce customization is clearly supported through Glorious Core settings across multiple reviews.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
No score yet
dock compatibility
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.2

Dock compatibility and usefulness are mostly positive, but the dock can take desk or bag space and was criticized by one reviewer.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
No score yet
DPI range
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.3

DPI support is broad, with 30K sensitivity, multiple DPI levels, software controls, and dock-based DPI adjustment mentioned.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.9

The DPI range is consistently presented as elite, with the HERO 2 platform described at 32,000 DPI initially and 44,000 DPI after updates.

durability over time
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.3

Durability over time is supported mainly by switch ratings and build impressions, while one reviewer reserved judgment on battery mechanism longevity.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.0

Durability over time has limited but positive evidence, mainly from month-long use showing the coating did not decay.

ecosystem integration
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
No score yet
Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.6

Ecosystem integration is strong through G Hub, LIGHTSPEED, onboard profiles, and PowerPlay support, even if the mouse itself stays feature-light.

ergonomic design
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.3

Ergonomic design is polarized, with some reviews praising comfort and control while others criticized the shape as awkward.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.3

Ergonomic design is one of the product's defining traits, praised by many reviewers as a right-handed shape that improves comfort and control.

fingertip grip comfort
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.3

Fingertip grip evidence is positive but limited, with PCGamesN and Basic Tutorials describing fingertip compatibility favorably.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
2.8

Fingertip grip comfort is mixed to weak, with some reviewers saying the larger hump and rear mass make fingertip grip less suitable.

firmware reliability
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
2.8

Firmware reliability evidence is limited and negative, with GamesRadar reporting a receiver issue after a firmware update.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
No score yet
FPS gaming suitability
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.4

FPS suitability is highly split, with some reviewers praising fast FPS use and others saying the shape is not competitive FPS friendly.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.8

FPS gaming suitability is strong, with reviewers specifically testing shooters and praising responsiveness, control, and competitive-grade sensor performance.

glide smoothness
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.6

Glide smoothness is positive where discussed, with PTFE feet described as effortless or super-smooth across mouse pads.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.4

Glide smoothness is mixed: some reviewers praise the PTFE feet and effortless movement, while enthusiast reviewers often recommend replacing the stock skates.

grip texture
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.6

Grip texture is mixed, with PC Gamer praising the matte surface while PCGamesN found it not very grippy.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.6

Grip texture is divisive, with some reviewers liking the dry matte coating and others finding it too smooth or slippery without grip tape.

handedness options
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.5

Handedness evidence is limited: PCGamesN says left-handed users can use it and swap main buttons, but side buttons remain a caveat.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
1.6

Handedness options are limited because the DEX is designed for right-handed users and is repeatedly described as uncomfortable for left-handed players.

left and right click quality
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.1

Left and right click quality is mostly positive, with normal clicks, robust main buttons, and responsive optical clicks noted.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.5

Left and right click quality is a standout, with reviewers repeatedly praising the Lightforce main clicks as crisp, tactile, snappy, or satisfying.

lift-off distance
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.2

Lift-off distance is supported through Glorious Core customization rather than deep testing, but several reviews confirm the setting is available.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.2

Lift-off distance evidence is conflicting: one review found no adjustment, while others described lift-off settings or calibration options in G Hub.

long-session comfort
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.2

Long-session comfort is generally good in positive shape reviews, but this depends heavily on grip and tolerance for the shell.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.5

Long-session comfort is a strength for right-handed ergonomic users, with several reviewers mentioning hours of use, long gaming sessions, or extended comfort.

macro support
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.6

Macro support is mixed: PCGamesN and Basic Tutorials mention macro or function assignment, while GamesRadar could not record custom mouse macros.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.6

Macro support exists through G Hub, with several reviews mentioning macro creation or shortcut assignment, but the limited button count reduces practical scope.

materials quality
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.9

Materials quality is mixed: the finish and matte shell earned praise, but surface finish and standard plastic feel drew criticism.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.5

Materials quality is supported by comments about solid lightweight plastic, premium materials, and sturdy construction, though some noted the low weight can initially feel less premium.

MMO gaming suitability
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
2.7

MMO suitability is weak, as reviewers noted the larger body lacks the extra buttons expected for MMO-style use.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
2.0

MMO gaming suitability is weak because the mouse has only a simple five-button layout despite some software presets.

MOBA gaming suitability
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
2.5

MOBA suitability is weakly supported and negative, with one reviewer questioning the mouse for MMO/MOBA-like gaming needs.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.0

MOBA gaming suitability is adequate but not a headline strength; one reviewer used DOTA2 and found little dramatic difference.

motion consistency
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.8

Motion consistency is mixed: Motion Sync controls are present, yet PC Gamer and Basic Tutorials observed wireless tracking inconsistency.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
5.0

Motion consistency is strong, with reviewers reporting clean tracking, no jitter, no dropped tracking, and reliable fast sweeps.

onboard memory
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.4

Onboard memory evidence is positive but limited, with profiles/customizations described as saveable to the mouse.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.1

Onboard memory is well supported, with multiple reviews describing onboard profiles or settings saved directly to the device.

palm grip comfort
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.9

Palm grip comfort is mixed: some reviewers could rest the palm comfortably, while others found the shape only partly suited or awkward.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.1

Palm grip comfort is generally positive for right-handed users and larger hands, though some reviewers with smaller or specific aim grips preferred other shapes.

polling rate
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.6

Polling support is a clear strength, with multiple reviews citing up to 8,000 Hz wireless polling and easy polling controls.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.8

Polling rate is a major selling point, repeatedly cited at 8,000Hz wireless after updates, with some reviews noting lower wired limits.

portability
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.0

Portability is mixed: Bluetooth travel use was suggested, but another reviewer disliked carrying the dock and batteries.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
5.0

Portability is helped by dongle storage and the small receiver, which reviewers appreciated for travel and avoiding lost dongles.

premium feel
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.7

Premium feel is mixed: PC Gamer found it solid and premium, while GamesRadar said it lacked premium polish.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
2.7

Premium feel is mixed: several reviewers praise the build, but at least one said the very low weight first felt less premium or budget-like.

profile switching
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.8

Profile support exists, but automatic game-based profile switching was criticized as missing by PCGamesN.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.0

Profile switching is mixed: software profiles and presets are useful, but the lack of a dedicated DPI/profile button frustrated several reviewers.

programmable buttons
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.3

Programmable-button support is strong, with software, dock controls, and freely assignable buttons cited across reviews.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
2.6

Programmable buttons are limited by the five-button layout; remapping exists, but reviewers wanting extra inputs or MMO-style controls will find it sparse.

RGB features
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.5

RGB is prominent and configurable, but reactions vary from quick and painless customization to tacky or blotchy lighting.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
1.1

RGB features are minimal to absent, which helps battery life but makes the mouse poor for users who want lighting effects.

scroll wheel quality
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.4

Scroll wheel feedback is divided, with some reviewers calling it nice or sturdy while others criticized weak notches, stiffness, or poor feel.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.7

Scroll wheel quality is mixed, ranging from smooth, quiet, and controlled to mushy, loose, or less satisfying than the main clicks.

sensor performance
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.3

Sensor performance was described as strong overall, with 30K DPI, 750 IPS, and precise BAMF 3.0 performance cited across reviews.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
5.0

Sensor performance is one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for the HERO 2 sensor, 44K DPI capability, high IPS, and flawless tracking.

shape comfort
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.5

Shape comfort is highly mixed, ranging from very comfy and ergonomic to awkward, too long, or poor in hand.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.1

Shape comfort is the most polarizing core attribute: many reviewers loved the right-handed ergonomic shape, while others found it too large, high, or awkward.

side button quality
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.7

Side button quality is mixed: some reviewers liked or accepted them, while GamesRadar found them underwhelming.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
2.4

Side button quality is the most repeated hardware complaint, with reviewers citing mushiness, high placement, pre-travel, post-travel, or hard-to-hit buttons.

skate durability
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
No score yet
Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.2

Skate durability and skate feel are mixed: reviewers note durable skates, but also thinness, long break-in, or eventual wear concerns.

software stability
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.3

Software stability is mixed: GamesRadar and PCGamesN reported issues, while another reviewer praised the updated software experience.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
1.6

Software stability is a weakness where discussed, with one reviewer reporting G Hub freezing, loading problems, crashes, and reinstall trouble.

software usability
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.2

Software usability is mostly positive after updates, with several reviewers calling Core easy, intuitive, or lightweight, despite one rougher-edge critique.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.0

Software usability is mixed to positive: G Hub offers useful tuning and remapping, but some reviewers complain about resource use, speed, or interface complexity.

surface compatibility
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.5

Surface compatibility evidence is limited but positive, with Basic Tutorials citing smooth movement on a variety of mouse pads.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
3.3

Surface compatibility is generally decent, though reviewers note best results on padded or textured surfaces and some glass-pad concerns.

switch durability
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.9

Switch durability is a strong specification point, with reviews repeatedly citing 130-million-click optical switches.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.6

Switch durability is positively supported by reports of reliable optical/mechanical clicks and no double-click issues.

switch feel
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.1

Switch feel is mostly strong, with optical clicks praised in several reviews, though GamesRadar found the landing harsh.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.4

Switch feel is a key strength for the main buttons, with reviewers praising Lightforce clicks as crisp, tactile, fast, and satisfying, though not universally premium.

tilt gesture controls
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
No score yet
Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
1.0

Tilt gesture controls are effectively absent; the wheel may move sideways in one review, but the reviewer clarified it is not tilt functionality.

value for money
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.2

Value is one of the most contested areas, with reviewers divided between appreciating the extras and questioning the high price.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
2.7

Value for money is mixed to weak: reviewers like the performance but repeatedly call out the high price versus cheaper ergonomic or high-end alternatives.

weight
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.7

Weight is moderate for a wireless gaming mouse: reviewers cite roughly 66 to 68 grams, while some felt it was not ultralight.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.7

Weight is a major strength, with the DEX repeatedly measured around 58 to 60 grams and praised as feather-light for a larger ergonomic mouse.

weight tuning
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
3.8

Weight tuning is limited to using the mouse without the swappable battery, which PCGamesN preferred but noted undercuts the concept.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
No score yet
wireless latency
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.4

Wireless latency is generally strong in practical reports, with low-latency language and no-hiccup experiences cited.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.9

Wireless latency is strong, with reviewers linking LIGHTSPEED, high polling, and optical switches to low-latency responsiveness.

wireless performance
Product 1: Glorious Model O3
4.2

Wireless performance is mostly good in real use, but PC Gamer reported underwhelming wireless tracking consistency.

Product 2: Logitech G PRO X Superlight...
4.7

Wireless performance is strong overall, with reviewers reporting stable, smooth, lag-free operation and confidence moving away from wired mice.