Compare Logitech G705 vs ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace

Average score
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.8
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.4
2.4GHz connectivity
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.5

Reviews that discussed the 2.4GHz or Lightspeed connection generally described it as the gaming-focused wireless option, with several noting reliable or fast dongle performance.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.8

Reviews repeatedly support the 2.4GHz path as the mouse's primary high-performance connection, including wireless 8K polling through the dongle and tri-mode switching with wired and Bluetooth options.

acceleration control
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

The only direct acceleration evidence came from a specifications-focused review that listed max acceleration above 30g.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.5

Acceleration behavior is supported mainly through tracking tests: reviewers reported no odd acceleration or cited the high 50G acceleration capability, which supports reliable fast-swipe control rather than adjustable acceleration tuning.

Accuracy and tracking precision
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Precision feedback was mostly positive, with reviewers describing accurate tracking, smooth response, or strong practical performance, though some noted the lower DPI ceiling limits top-tier precision.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.8

Aiming precision is one of the clearest strengths. Reviewers describe fine corrections, minimal movements, and real-game reticle control as stable, precise, and natural.

balance and weight distribution
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.1

Weight balance feedback was mixed: one reviewer praised its stopping power for aim, while others felt the balance or lightness reduced control.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.8

Balance is praised in the reviews that discuss it directly, with one noting better hand balance from the shell geometry and another calling the weight and balance spot-on.

battery life
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.7

Battery life was usually described as around 40 hours with RGB on; some reviewers considered that sufficient, while others saw it as a weakness next to longer-lasting alternatives.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.3

Battery life is strong at standard polling, with multiple reviews citing roughly 98-101 hours or several long sessions, but several also warn that 8K mode drains it much faster.

Bluetooth support
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Bluetooth support was widely confirmed and generally treated as useful for flexibility, though a few reviewers reported setup friction or preferred the dongle for gaming.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.7

Bluetooth is consistently supported as part of the tri-mode setup and is described as stable enough for productivity or multi-device use, though competitive use generally favors 2.4GHz.

build quality
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Build quality was generally viewed positively, with reviewers describing solid construction, premium assembly, robust workmanship, or no obvious quality issues.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.7

Build quality is broadly praised. Reviewers describe a solid shell, rigid nylon construction, no creaking or flexing in most samples, and a premium-feeling chassis despite the very low weight.

button customization
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Button customization was well supported through G Hub, with reviews noting reprogrammable buttons, assignments, RGB adjustments, DPI tuning, and macro options.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.5

Customization is well supported through Gear Link, with reviewers citing browser-based changes to DPI, button assignments, lighting, lift-off distance, debounce, and Zone Mode.

button responsiveness
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Button responsiveness was praised in multiple reviews, with comments about responsive clicks, light actuation, easy reach, and satisfying click feel.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.6

Button responsiveness is rated highly where tested, with immediate main-key response, consistent clicks, and fast actuation noted across multiple reviews.

cable flexibility
Product 1: Logitech G705
2.3

Cable flexibility had limited evidence and was negative in the review that covered it, which called the included cable rigid for such a small mouse.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.4

Cable flexibility is supported in the reviews that mention the included USB-C cable, which is described as flexible or thin enough for wired play.

charging convenience
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Charging convenience was supported by USB-C charging, the ability to keep using the mouse while charging, and one report of a sub-two-hour full charge.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.8

Charging convenience is a strength where discussed: USB-C charging, quick cable top-ups, and play-while-charging reduce downtime.

claw grip comfort
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Claw grip feedback was mostly positive for smaller hands, although several reviewers with larger or average hands found the mouse too small or awkward.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.6

Claw grip comfort is a recurring strength. Reviewers repeatedly describe the shape as well suited to claw grip, helped by the low hump, tapering sides, and light shell.

click latency
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

The only direct click-speed evidence described clicks as precise and fast, supporting good practical click latency.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.8

Click latency is supported by optical switch and movement-delay evidence, with reviewers noting immediate response, no noticeable delay, and very quick optical actuation.

click noise
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.4

Click noise evidence was limited but positive, with one review describing the scroll/click sound as quiet and not disruptive.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.2

Noise evidence is limited but mixed-positive: one review says the primary clicks are slightly louder than the predecessor, while another praises the scroll wheel as smooth and quiet.

connection stability
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Connection stability was broadly positive for Lightspeed and general wireless use, but Bluetooth setup was a recurring point of friction in some reviews.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.9

Connection stability is consistently strong in the reviews that tested it, with stable Bluetooth, no dropouts, no ghost inputs, and no desyncs over longer sessions.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Cross-platform evidence came from reviews mentioning device/app profiles, iPad use, and compatibility across Windows, macOS, iPadOS, and iOS.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.7

Cross-platform and multi-device use is supported by Gear Link's browser approach and one reviewer switching between a gaming PC and MacBook over different connection modes.

debounce customization
Product 1: Logitech G705
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.2

Debounce customization is directly supported by Gear Link evidence in one review, which mentions adjusting debounce along with DPI, lift-off distance, and Zone Mode.

DPI range
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.5

DPI range evidence consistently cited a roughly 100 to 8,200 DPI range; reviewers found it adequate for most users but below higher-end gaming mice.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
5.0

DPI range is strongly supported by repeated references to the AimPoint Pro sensor's 42K or 42,000 DPI/CPI ceiling and per-step DPI adjustment.

durability over time
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.6

Durability-over-time evidence was mixed and limited: one review praised robust workmanship after prolonged use, while another raised concerns about dust and gaps.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.4

Durability over time is supported by durable switch ratings and short-term testing where clicks and chassis feel stayed consistent, though long-term multi-year evidence is not present.

ecosystem integration
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Ecosystem integration was a clear theme through Aurora pairing, G Hub sync, shared receivers, device profiles, and Logitech device coordination.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.0

Ecosystem integration is supported modestly through ROG Gear Link, Armoury Crate references, RGB/Bluetooth additions, and the broader Ace collection context, but it is not a dominant review theme.

ergonomic design
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.1

Ergonomic design was one of the strongest themes, especially for smaller hands, with praise for contours, curves, thumb rests, and compact comfort.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.5

Ergonomic design is supported by reviewers describing neutral shaping, tapering sides, contoured buttons, and a shape that gets out of the way rather than forcing one grip style.

fingertip grip comfort
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Fingertip grip support was positive where tested, although some reviewers still found the shell unusually small.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.6

Fingertip grip comfort is a recurring strength. Several reviewers mention fingertip suitability, lower hump control, and easier micro-adjustments.

firmware reliability
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Firmware evidence was limited to G Hub support for checking or applying firmware updates.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
No score yet
FPS gaming suitability
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.8

FPS suitability was mixed: practical FPS performance often worked well, but some reviewers noted sensor, weight, or competitive limitations.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.8

FPS suitability is strong. Reviews repeatedly frame the mouse around esports and shooters, citing fast tracking, low delay, smooth flicks, and competitive play benefits.

glide smoothness
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Glide smoothness was consistently positive, with multiple reviews praising smooth movement, large skates, or easy gliding on mouse mats and surfaces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.7

Glide smoothness is heavily supported. Reviewers praise the PTFE feet, rounded edges, low-friction glide, and smooth movement across pads or desks.

grip texture
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.1

Grip texture was supported by matte or pleasant-to-touch surface comments that helped grip and comfort.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.3

Grip texture is mostly positive but not universal. Reviewers praise grippy matte or rubberized coatings, while some note slipperiness, fingerprints, or smudging.

handedness options
Product 1: Logitech G705
2.1

Handedness evidence was mostly negative, with reviews describing a right-handed shape and no left-handed version, despite one reviewer noting it could technically be used left-handed.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
3.8

Handedness is mixed. Some reviews call the shell ambidextrous or usable by left-handers, while others emphasize left-side buttons that make it better suited to right-handed users.

left and right click quality
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Left and right click quality was consistently positive where mentioned, with tactile, light, or satisfying main clicks.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.6

Left and right click quality is mostly strong, with crisp, sharp, consistent clicks and precise feedback, though one early sample had trigger rattle.

lift-off distance
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Lift-off distance had one direct positive mention alongside high polling rate as helping gaming and work performance.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.2

Lift-off distance is directly supported by settings and test references, including Gear Link LOD adjustment and measured loss of tracking at low card-thickness ranges.

long-session comfort
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.9

Long-session comfort depended strongly on hand size: smaller-hand-focused reviews praised longer-session comfort, while some larger-hand reviewers reported discomfort or fit limits.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.5

Long-session comfort is generally positive because of low fatigue, low mass, and reliable shape, though palm-grip users with larger hands may prefer a fuller mouse.

macro support
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Macro support was repeatedly tied to G Hub assignments, macros, G-Shift, and system-command customization.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.0

Macro support is only lightly supported through the reviewer’s description of button remapping with a secondary function layer, so the score is conservative rather than a broad macro claim.

materials quality
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Materials quality was generally positive, with matte plastic, solid shells, and high-end feel noted, though some reviews still emphasized plastic construction.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.6

Materials quality is strong: reviewers repeatedly cite bio-based nylon, rigid construction, and a premium shell that keeps weight low without obvious fragility.

MMO gaming suitability
Product 1: Logitech G705
2.4

MMO suitability was weak in the direct evidence because one review said the six-button layout was not best for MMOs.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
2.8

MMO suitability is weak because the mouse offers limited buttons; one review explicitly says the button layout is limited for MMO gamers.

MOBA gaming suitability
Product 1: Logitech G705
2.9

MOBA suitability was also limited by the six-button layout in some reviews, though one casual review reported no complaint in Dota 2.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
No score yet
motion consistency
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.4

Motion consistency evidence was mixed, ranging from smooth flicking and controlled movement to one review noting polling-rate variation.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.9

Motion consistency is excellent in the reviews, with stable cursor behavior, no jitter, tracking steadiness, motion sync, and no weird wireless or sensor behavior.

onboard memory
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.1

Onboard memory was confirmed in several reviews for saving settings or profiles on the mouse.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
2.0

Onboard memory is a clear weakness in the review that discusses it directly, noting that profiles are not stored permanently on the mouse.

palm grip comfort
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.3

Palm grip comfort was mixed: some found it usable or best-suited, while others said the mouse was too short or palm grip was not ideal.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
3.6

Palm grip comfort is mixed. Some reviews say the shape can work for palm grip, but others say larger-handed palm users may prefer fuller support from alternatives.

polling rate
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.9

Polling-rate coverage repeatedly identified 1000Hz wireless or dongle polling as the gaming-relevant mode, while Bluetooth was noted as lower.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
5.0

Polling rate is one of the strongest supported specs, with many reviews highlighting native 8,000Hz/8K polling, including wireless operation without an extra booster.

portability
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Portability was a clear strength because of the compact size, wireless use, travel suitability, and multi-device usefulness.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.3

Portability is good thanks to low weight, compact travel friendliness, and dongle storage, but one review notes that a carrying bag would have improved the package.

premium feel
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Premium feel was usually positive, especially for the Aurora design, cohesive package, and high-end hand feel.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.3

Premium feel is supported by high-quality impressions, solid premium shell comments, and a rigid finish, although one lightweight chassis was described as initially hollow by one reviewer.

profile switching
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Profile switching was supported through G Hub profiles, onboard settings, and program-specific switching, though one review wished for more Bluetooth profiles.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
3.4

Profile switching has mixed support. Gear Link supports multiple profiles, but one review says profiles are not stored permanently, making multi-PC use less seamless.

programmable buttons
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Programmable-button evidence was broad and consistent, with the six-button layout repeatedly mentioned as reprogrammable or programmable.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.5

Programmable buttons are supported by key assignment and freely assignable button evidence, though the number of buttons remains focused on shooter use rather than shortcut-heavy games.

RGB features
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.1

RGB features were widely discussed and usually praised for Aurora styling, but some reviewers felt the lighting was limited, covered by the hand, or battery-costly.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.0

RGB features are present but secondary. Reviews mention RGB lighting, scroll wheel lighting, adjustable lighting, and Zone Mode disabling lighting to save power.

scroll wheel quality
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Scroll wheel quality was generally positive but not perfect, with responsive scrolling and quiet operation offset by stiffer or firmer press comments.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.5

Scroll wheel quality is positive overall, with reviewers citing precise clicks, defined tactile notches, good tensioning, and smooth quiet scrolling.

sensor performance
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.9

Sensor performance was adequate-to-good in most reviews, with accurate tracking in practice but repeated caveats about the lower-end Lightsync sensor and 8,200 DPI ceiling.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.9

Sensor performance is consistently excellent, with reviewers praising the AimPoint Pro sensor, flawless tracking, high DPI capability, and strong practical gaming performance.

shape comfort
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.8

Shape comfort was highly hand-size-dependent: many praised the curves and smaller-hand fit, while others found it too small or hard to adapt to.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.5

Shape comfort is generally strong for claw and fingertip users and medium-to-large symmetrical-mouse fans, but reviewers note that shape fit still depends on hand size and grip style.

side button quality
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Side button quality was positive where mentioned, with reviewers noting useful placement, a thumb ridge, and no obvious quality issues.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.6

Side button quality is generally strong. Reviewers praise crisp feel, placement, accidental-press prevention, and solid implementation, with one long-finger caveat.

software stability
Product 1: Logitech G705
2.8

Software stability evidence was limited and mixed, with one review objecting to the burden of multiple Logitech software packages.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
3.2

Software stability is mixed. Gear Link is described as responsive and better than Armoury Crate, but one reviewer worries about web dependency and server availability.

software usability
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.1

Software usability was generally positive for customization and G Hub controls, although some reviewers disliked needing G Hub or multiple Logitech apps.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.5

Software usability is one of the product's clearest strengths. Reviewers repeatedly praise Gear Link as browser-based, clear, responsive, intuitive, and easier than installing heavier software.

surface compatibility
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Surface compatibility was supported by reports of smooth movement across most surfaces or use on tabletops and mouse pads.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.9

Surface compatibility is strong. Reviewers cite track-on-glass, surface calibration, varied-surface tracking, and successful use across glass, wood, hard surfaces, and mouse pads.

switch durability
Product 1: Logitech G705
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.9

Switch durability is strongly supported by repeated 100-million-click ratings for the optical switches and durable microswitch language.

switch feel
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Switch feel was consistently praised as tactile, sharp, light, satisfying, or clicky.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.6

Switch feel is mostly positive, with repeated praise for crisp, decisive, clicky, and consistent optical switches, though one reviewer found them only okay.

value for money
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.0

Value for money was one of the biggest tradeoffs: several reviewers saw the price as high for the performance, while a few considered sale pricing or compact features fair.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
3.9

Value for money is mixed. Reviewers call the price premium or not cheap, but several also describe it as competitive or smartly priced against other flagship mice.

weight
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.6

Weight feedback was mixed because the mouse is light by general standards but sometimes felt heavy for its small shell or too light for control.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
5.0

Weight is one of the strongest attributes, with almost every review emphasizing the 46-48g range and praising the mouse as ultralight or extremely easy to move.

weight tuning
Product 1: Logitech G705
1.0

Weight tuning was explicitly poor in the one review that mentioned it, noting there is no adding or removing weights.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
No score yet
wireless latency
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.5

Wireless latency evidence was strong for Lightspeed or USB dongle use, with reviewers describing low latency, no lag, or faster response.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.9

Wireless latency is excellent where discussed, with reviewers noting no delay, instant 2.4GHz response, low latency, and minimal interference.

wireless performance
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.4

Wireless performance was broadly positive, especially over Lightspeed, with reviews emphasizing reliable, snappy, or flexible wireless operation.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
5.0

Wireless performance is excellent overall, with native 8K wireless, strong SpeedNova performance, low interference, and wired-like feel appearing across several reviews.