Compare Logitech G705 vs ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini

Average score
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.8
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3
2.4GHz connectivity
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.5

Reviews that discussed the 2.4GHz or Lightspeed connection generally described it as the gaming-focused wireless option, with several noting reliable or fast dongle performance.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

2.4GHz support is consistently described as a core connection mode, usually through the included receiver or dongle. Several reviewers also tied the 2.4GHz mode to low-latency or higher-performance use, with only the optional high-polling booster adding a caveat.

acceleration control
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

The only direct acceleration evidence came from a specifications-focused review that listed max acceleration above 30g.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Acceleration-related evidence is positive where tested or specified: reviewers noted mouse acceleration being off in testing, a 50G acceleration spec, and zero acceleration or jitter in use.

Accuracy and tracking precision
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Precision feedback was mostly positive, with reviewers describing accurate tracking, smooth response, or strong practical performance, though some noted the lower DPI ceiling limits top-tier precision.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Accuracy is one of the strongest areas. Reviewers repeatedly described the mouse as fast, precise, pixel-perfect, or smooth-tracking, though one test noted rattling at very high DPI.

balance and weight distribution
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.1

Weight balance feedback was mixed: one reviewer praised its stopping power for aim, while others felt the balance or lightness reduced control.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Balance evidence is mixed but mostly positive. One reviewer found it a little weighted at the back, while another said the balance felt spot on.

battery life
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.7

Battery life was usually described as around 40 hours with RGB on; some reviewers considered that sufficient, while others saw it as a weakness next to longer-lasting alternatives.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Battery life is a major strength across reviews, with quoted runtimes up to 105-139 hours depending on mode and repeated real-use praise for lasting days or weeks.

Bluetooth support
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Bluetooth support was widely confirmed and generally treated as useful for flexibility, though a few reviewers reported setup friction or preferred the dongle for gaming.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Bluetooth is well supported as part of the mouse's tri-mode connectivity. Reviewers described pairing, Bluetooth use, and switching as convenient, simple, or painless.

build quality
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Build quality was generally viewed positively, with reviewers describing solid construction, premium assembly, robust workmanship, or no obvious quality issues.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Build quality is generally praised as solid, sturdy, and well built. A few durability/material caveats appear elsewhere, but the shell and structural feel are usually rated positively.

button customization
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Button customization was well supported through G Hub, with reviews noting reprogrammable buttons, assignments, RGB adjustments, DPI tuning, and macro options.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Button and control customization is broadly supported through Armoury Crate or Armoury Crate Gear, with reviewers citing remapping, DPI controls, RGB settings, profiles, and other tuning options.

button responsiveness
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Button responsiveness was praised in multiple reviews, with comments about responsive clicks, light actuation, easy reach, and satisfying click feel.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Button responsiveness is praised in the reviews that discuss it, with descriptions such as satisfying, tactile, responsive, bouncy, and precise.

cable flexibility
Product 1: Logitech G705
2.3

Cable flexibility had limited evidence and was negative in the review that covered it, which called the included cable rigid for such a small mouse.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Cable evidence is limited but positive. Reviewers described the included paracord or braided cable as flexible, thin, high quality, and minimally intrusive.

charging convenience
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Charging convenience was supported by USB-C charging, the ability to keep using the mouse while charging, and one report of a sub-two-hour full charge.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Charging convenience is supported by USB-C charging and fast charging mentions. Reviewers liked the front USB-C port and quick top-up language where discussed.

claw grip comfort
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Claw grip feedback was mostly positive for smaller hands, although several reviewers with larger or average hands found the mouse too small or awkward.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Claw grip comfort is a consistent strength. Multiple reviewers identify the mouse as built or optimized for claw grip, especially for small-hand and esports users.

click latency
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

The only direct click-speed evidence described clicks as precise and fast, supporting good practical click latency.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Click latency is supported by NVIDIA Reflex mention, optical switch comments, and reviewer statements about low or lowest possible latency. The evidence is strongest for click speed rather than formal latency testing.

click noise
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.4

Click noise evidence was limited but positive, with one review describing the scroll/click sound as quiet and not disruptive.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
No score yet
connection stability
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Connection stability was broadly positive for Lightspeed and general wireless use, but Bluetooth setup was a recurring point of friction in some reviews.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Connection stability is praised across wireless modes. Reviewers described easy mode switching, lag-free connectivity, no issues across modes, and extender/receiver placement that can reduce signal dropouts.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Cross-platform evidence came from reviews mentioning device/app profiles, iPad use, and compatibility across Windows, macOS, iPadOS, and iOS.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Cross-platform evidence is narrower but positive. Reviewers used or positioned the mouse across Windows, MacBook, work, gaming, and mobile setups, mainly through Bluetooth and tri-mode connectivity.

debounce customization
Product 1: Logitech G705
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
2.5

Debounce customization is a weakness where directly discussed. One reviewer said the software does not allow adjusting debounce settings because of the optical switches.

DPI range
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.5

DPI range evidence consistently cited a roughly 100 to 8,200 DPI range; reviewers found it adequate for most users but below higher-end gaming mice.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

DPI range is a standout specification. Reviewers repeatedly cite the 42,000 DPI/CPI ceiling and app or onboard controls for preset or fine-tuned DPI settings.

durability over time
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.6

Durability-over-time evidence was mixed and limited: one review praised robust workmanship after prolonged use, while another raised concerns about dust and gaps.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

Durability evidence is mixed. Optical switches are rated for very high click counts, but one travel-use review reported exterior scuffing after repeated bag use.

ecosystem integration
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Ecosystem integration was a clear theme through Aurora pairing, G Hub sync, shared receivers, device profiles, and Logitech device coordination.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Ecosystem integration is a clear ASUS advantage. Reviewers mention the ROG Omni receiver, multi-device ROG support, Aura Sync, and compatibility with other ROG peripherals.

ergonomic design
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.1

Ergonomic design was one of the strongest themes, especially for smaller hands, with praise for contours, curves, thumb rests, and compact comfort.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

Ergonomics are strong for small and medium hands, but not universal. Reviewers praised comfort and contouring while cautioning that larger hands may struggle or need a different grip.

fingertip grip comfort
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Fingertip grip support was positive where tested, although some reviewers still found the shell unusually small.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Fingertip grip support is explicitly positive in reviews that mention it, with the small low-profile shape described as accommodating fingertip users.

firmware reliability
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Firmware evidence was limited to G Hub support for checking or applying firmware updates.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
No score yet
FPS gaming suitability
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.8

FPS suitability was mixed: practical FPS performance often worked well, but some reviewers noted sensor, weight, or competitive limitations.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

FPS and esports suitability is a major theme. Reviewers cite competitive play, Counter Strike 2, pro-FPS positioning, and fast accurate control as key strengths.

glide smoothness
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Glide smoothness was consistently positive, with multiple reviews praising smooth movement, large skates, or easy gliding on mouse mats and surfaces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Glide smoothness is highly praised. Reviewers cite PTFE feet, smooth glide, easy mousepad movement, and slick slide pads.

grip texture
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.1

Grip texture was supported by matte or pleasant-to-touch surface comments that helped grip and comfort.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Grip texture is a strength. Reviewers mention ridged sides, grippy coating, matte texture, rubber grips, and anti-slip treatment.

handedness options
Product 1: Logitech G705
2.1

Handedness evidence was mostly negative, with reviews describing a right-handed shape and no left-handed version, despite one reviewer noting it could technically be used left-handed.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
2.7

Handedness options are limited. Although the shell is sometimes described as symmetrical or ambidextrous, the side buttons favor right-handed use and left-handed users are repeatedly warned away.

left and right click quality
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Left and right click quality was consistently positive where mentioned, with tactile, light, or satisfying main clicks.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Main click quality is strong. Reviewers describe the left and right clicks as satisfying, tactile, clear, precise, comfortable, and well implemented.

lift-off distance
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Lift-off distance had one direct positive mention alongside high polling rate as helping gaming and work performance.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Lift-off distance is configurable in the sources that discuss it, with High/Low options and software customization noted.

long-session comfort
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.9

Long-session comfort depended strongly on hand size: smaller-hand-focused reviews praised longer-session comfort, while some larger-hand reviewers reported discomfort or fit limits.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Long-session comfort is supported mainly for smaller-hand users and claw/fingertip grips, including explicit extended-session comfort language.

macro support
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Macro support was repeatedly tied to G Hub assignments, macros, G-Shift, and system-command customization.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

Macro support exists, but one reviewer said full macro options require the heavier Armoury Crate suite rather than only the lighter Gear version.

materials quality
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Materials quality was generally positive, with matte plastic, solid shells, and high-end feel noted, though some reviews still emphasized plastic construction.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

Materials quality is mostly positive but not spotless. Reviewers mention bio-based nylon, a grippy coating, and premium feel, while some note smudging, scuffs, or skepticism about the material.

MMO gaming suitability
Product 1: Logitech G705
2.4

MMO suitability was weak in the direct evidence because one review said the six-button layout was not best for MMOs.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

MMO suitability is only lightly supported. One review says the sensor and responsiveness make the mouse ideal for MMORPG play, but the limited button count keeps this from being a major strength.

MOBA gaming suitability
Product 1: Logitech G705
2.9

MOBA suitability was also limited by the six-button layout in some reviews, though one casual review reported no complaint in Dota 2.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.2

MOBA suitability is lightly but directly supported by one review, which links the mouse's accuracy and responsiveness to MOBA use.

motion consistency
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.4

Motion consistency evidence was mixed, ranging from smooth flicking and controlled movement to one review noting polling-rate variation.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Motion consistency is strong in several tests, with crisp, consistent responsiveness and little wavering, but one review saw rattling at 6400 DPI.

onboard memory
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.1

Onboard memory was confirmed in several reviews for saving settings or profiles on the mouse.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Onboard memory/control support is positive where mentioned, with reviewers citing onboard controls, ready-on-the-go memory profiles, and direct setting adjustment.

palm grip comfort
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.3

Palm grip comfort was mixed: some found it usable or best-suited, while others said the mouse was too short or palm grip was not ideal.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

Palm grip comfort is usable for some smaller-hand users, but larger-hand palm users receive repeated cautions. Scores therefore vary by hand size.

polling rate
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.9

Polling-rate coverage repeatedly identified 1000Hz wireless or dongle polling as the gaming-relevant mode, while Bluetooth was noted as lower.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.1

Polling rate support is capable but caveated. Reviews cite 1000Hz out of the box and up to 8000Hz with the optional booster, which several consider a downside at the price.

portability
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Portability was a clear strength because of the compact size, wireless use, travel suitability, and multi-device usefulness.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Portability is a recurring strength because of the compact shape, light weight, dongle storage, and travel-friendly use cases.

premium feel
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Premium feel was usually positive, especially for the Aurora design, cohesive package, and high-end hand feel.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Premium feel is praised in several reviews through comments about premium impression, masterful feel, and solid execution, despite material caveats elsewhere.

profile switching
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Profile switching was supported through G Hub profiles, onboard settings, and program-specific switching, though one review wished for more Bluetooth profiles.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Profile switching is supported through up to five profiles and onboard/software switching. The evidence also includes criticism that some profile switching controls are clunky.

programmable buttons
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Programmable-button evidence was broad and consistent, with the six-button layout repeatedly mentioned as reprogrammable or programmable.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Programmable buttons are supported by multiple reviews citing side buttons, six programmable buttons, remapping, and five programmable buttons.

RGB features
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.1

RGB features were widely discussed and usually praised for Aurora styling, but some reviewers felt the lighting was limited, covered by the hand, or battery-costly.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.8

RGB is intentionally minimal. Reviewers repeatedly note the scroll-wheel-only lighting and customization options, which suits subdued setups but not buyers wanting major flair.

scroll wheel quality
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Scroll wheel quality was generally positive but not perfect, with responsive scrolling and quiet operation offset by stiffer or firmer press comments.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.9

Scroll wheel quality is mixed. Some reviewers liked its resistance or light actuation, while others found it stiff, soft, or tighter than prior models.

sensor performance
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.9

Sensor performance was adequate-to-good in most reviews, with accurate tracking in practice but repeated caveats about the lower-end Lightsync sensor and 8,200 DPI ceiling.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Sensor performance is a major strength. Reviews repeatedly cite the AimPoint Pro sensor, high DPI ceiling, precision, reliability, and rock-solid tracking.

shape comfort
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.8

Shape comfort was highly hand-size-dependent: many praised the curves and smaller-hand fit, while others found it too small or hard to adapt to.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Shape comfort is one of the strongest areas for smaller hands. Reviewers praised the fit, compact shape, and mini proportions, while noting limits for larger hands.

side button quality
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Side button quality was positive where mentioned, with reviewers noting useful placement, a thumb ridge, and no obvious quality issues.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Side button quality is generally positive, with praise for placement, feel, and responsiveness, though the right-handed placement limits left-handed use.

skate durability
Product 1: Logitech G705
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Skate durability/coverage is supported by PTFE feet, replacement feet, and extra skates in the box. Direct long-term wear evidence is limited, so scores lean positive but not absolute.

software stability
Product 1: Logitech G705
2.8

Software stability evidence was limited and mixed, with one review objecting to the burden of multiple Logitech software packages.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
2.5

Software stability is a weakness where directly discussed. One reviewer reported connection and setting-change errors and restarts needed to get the software working.

software usability
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.1

Software usability was generally positive for customization and G Hub controls, although some reviewers disliked needing G Hub or multiple Logitech apps.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.6

Software usability is mixed. Some reviewers found Armoury Crate Gear clean, intuitive, or lightweight, while others found Armoury Crate clunky, hard to locate, large, outdated, or difficult to navigate.

surface compatibility
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Surface compatibility was supported by reports of smooth movement across most surfaces or use on tabletops and mouse pads.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Surface compatibility is strong. Reviewers cite surface calibration, almost-all-surface tracking, glass use, and different mousepad/material support.

switch durability
Product 1: Logitech G705
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Switch durability is a clear strength due to repeated 100-million-click optical switch claims and comments about double-click avoidance.

switch feel
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Switch feel was consistently praised as tactile, sharp, light, satisfying, or clicky.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Switch feel is positive overall, with reviewers describing tactile, responsive, snappy, precise, and comfortable switch behavior.

value for money
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.0

Value for money was one of the biggest tradeoffs: several reviewers saw the price as high for the performance, while a few considered sale pricing or compact features fair.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.9

Value is mixed. Several reviewers think the price is reasonable versus competitors or sales, while others call it high or note cheaper accurate wireless mice exist.

weight
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.6

Weight feedback was mixed because the mouse is light by general standards but sometimes felt heavy for its small shell or too light for control.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.8

Weight is a major strength, with almost every review emphasizing the roughly 49g ultralight design.

weight tuning
Product 1: Logitech G705
1.0

Weight tuning was explicitly poor in the one review that mentioned it, noting there is no adding or removing weights.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
No score yet
wireless latency
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.5

Wireless latency evidence was strong for Lightspeed or USB dongle use, with reviewers describing low latency, no lag, or faster response.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Wireless latency evidence is very positive for low-latency 2.4GHz and SpeedNova use, though the highest polling/latency-reduction path may need an extra booster.

wireless performance
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.4

Wireless performance was broadly positive, especially over Lightspeed, with reviews emphasizing reliable, snappy, or flexible wireless operation.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Wireless performance is broadly praised through reliable 2.4GHz operation, lag-free connectivity, SpeedNova precision, and long wireless battery life.