Compare Logitech G705 vs SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2

Average score
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.8
Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.3
2.4GHz connectivity
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.5

Reviews that discussed the 2.4GHz or Lightspeed connection generally described it as the gaming-focused wireless option, with several noting reliable or fast dongle performance.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.5

2.4 GHz connectivity is well supported through the bundled dongle or receiver, with reviewers tying it to full 4K polling and better gaming performance.

acceleration control
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

The only direct acceleration evidence came from a specifications-focused review that listed max acceleration above 30g.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.4

Acceleration control is supported mainly through software-level acceleration and precision settings plus the sensor specification of 40G acceleration.

Accuracy and tracking precision
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Precision feedback was mostly positive, with reviewers describing accurate tracking, smooth response, or strong practical performance, though some noted the lower DPI ceiling limits top-tier precision.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.6

Tracking precision is repeatedly described as accurate, one-to-one, and reliable, with several reviews tying that precision to flicks, aiming, and high-speed movement.

balance and weight distribution
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.1

Weight balance feedback was mixed: one reviewer praised its stopping power for aim, while others felt the balance or lightness reduced control.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
3.6

Balance feedback is mixed and limited: one reviewer found the balance spot-on, while another felt weight was biased toward the middle and rear.

battery life
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.7

Battery life was usually described as around 40 hours with RGB on; some reviewers considered that sufficient, while others saw it as a weakness next to longer-lasting alternatives.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.3

Battery life is generally strong at Bluetooth or 1,000 Hz 2.4 GHz settings, but several reviews note a sharp drop at 4,000 Hz and high RGB brightness.

Bluetooth support
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Bluetooth support was widely confirmed and generally treated as useful for flexibility, though a few reviewers reported setup friction or preferred the dongle for gaming.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.5

Bluetooth support is widely documented and valued for laptops, tablets, travel, and non-competitive use, though some advanced features require 2.4 GHz or wired mode.

build quality
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Build quality was generally viewed positively, with reviewers describing solid construction, premium assembly, robust workmanship, or no obvious quality issues.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.5

Build quality is mostly strong, with praise for fit, finish, shell integrity, lack of flex, and improved creaking or mushiness concerns.

button customization
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Button customization was well supported through G Hub, with reviews noting reprogrammable buttons, assignments, RGB adjustments, DPI tuning, and macro options.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.5

Button customization is supported through freely configurable side buttons, remapping, app controls, and profile-based settings changes.

button responsiveness
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Button responsiveness was praised in multiple reviews, with comments about responsive clicks, light actuation, easy reach, and satisfying click feel.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.5

Button responsiveness is generally strong, with reviewers describing clicky, snappy, responsive buttons and few complaints about missed inputs.

cable flexibility
Product 1: Logitech G705
2.3

Cable flexibility had limited evidence and was negative in the review that covered it, which called the included cable rigid for such a small mouse.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.4

Cable flexibility is supported by repeated praise for the included mesh, braided, or fabric USB-C cable and its smooth movement on a desk.

charging convenience
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Charging convenience was supported by USB-C charging, the ability to keep using the mouse while charging, and one report of a sub-two-hour full charge.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.4

Charging convenience is supported by USB-C charging, wired-while-charging use, quick charging comments, and included adapters or cables.

claw grip comfort
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Claw grip feedback was mostly positive for smaller hands, although several reviewers with larger or average hands found the mouse too small or awkward.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.5

Claw grip comfort is one of the clearest ergonomic strengths, with multiple reviewers saying the rear flare and compact shape suit claw grip users.

click latency
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

The only direct click-speed evidence described clicks as precise and fast, supporting good practical click latency.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.6

Click latency evidence is limited but positive, with two reviews citing the 1.2 ms response figure tied to the higher-performance internals.

click noise
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.4

Click noise evidence was limited but positive, with one review describing the scroll/click sound as quiet and not disruptive.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.0

Click noise is mixed: some reviewers liked the click sound or quieter scroll wheel, while others found the switches loud.

connection stability
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Connection stability was broadly positive for Lightspeed and general wireless use, but Bluetooth setup was a recurring point of friction in some reviews.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.5

Connection stability is mostly positive, with stable Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz experiences plus dongle placement or hub evidence for stronger signal.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Cross-platform evidence came from reviews mentioning device/app profiles, iPad use, and compatibility across Windows, macOS, iPadOS, and iOS.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.5

Cross-platform compatibility is supported by Bluetooth, multi-device use, smartphone or MacBook mentions, and settings saved for use across different systems.

DPI range
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.5

DPI range evidence consistently cited a roughly 100 to 8,200 DPI range; reviewers found it adequate for most users but below higher-end gaming mice.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.5

The 26,000 DPI ceiling is widely documented, with reviewers treating it as more range than most users need but useful for sensitivity flexibility.

durability over time
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.6

Durability-over-time evidence was mixed and limited: one review praised robust workmanship after prolonged use, while another raised concerns about dust and gaps.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.6

Durability evidence is strong, covering IP54 protection, tough shell behavior, drop or spill resistance, and general resistance to daily travel abuse.

ecosystem integration
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Ecosystem integration was a clear theme through Aurora pairing, G Hub sync, shared receivers, device profiles, and Logitech device coordination.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.3

Ecosystem integration is supported through SteelSeries GG, SteelSeries accessory integration, and coordinated setups with other SteelSeries gear.

ergonomic design
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.1

Ergonomic design was one of the strongest themes, especially for smaller hands, with praise for contours, curves, thumb rests, and compact comfort.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.1

Ergonomic design is praised by some for the flat symmetrical shape and small-hand fit, but one review criticizes the overall comfort compared with alternatives.

fingertip grip comfort
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Fingertip grip support was positive where tested, although some reviewers still found the shell unusually small.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
3.4

Fingertip grip comfort is mixed: some reviews include fingertip users in the target audience, while others found the flared rear awkward for fingertip control.

firmware reliability
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Firmware evidence was limited to G Hub support for checking or applying firmware updates.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
No score yet
FPS gaming suitability
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.8

FPS suitability was mixed: practical FPS performance often worked well, but some reviewers noted sensor, weight, or competitive limitations.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.5

FPS suitability is strongly supported, with repeated Counter-Strike, shooter, and competitive gaming evidence tied to low latency, tracking, and 4K polling.

glide smoothness
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Glide smoothness was consistently positive, with multiple reviews praising smooth movement, large skates, or easy gliding on mouse mats and surfaces.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.6

Glide smoothness is mostly positive, with PTFE feet described as smooth across mouse pads, desks, and cloth surfaces.

grip texture
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.1

Grip texture was supported by matte or pleasant-to-touch surface comments that helped grip and comfort.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.0

Grip texture is polarizing, with some reviewers finding the texture grippy and others saying the sides or plastic finish feel slippery.

handedness options
Product 1: Logitech G705
2.1

Handedness evidence was mostly negative, with reviews describing a right-handed shape and no left-handed version, despite one reviewer noting it could technically be used left-handed.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
3.3

Handedness evidence points to a right-handed practical layout despite the symmetrical shell, because the side buttons are only on one side.

left and right click quality
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Left and right click quality was consistently positive where mentioned, with tactile, light, or satisfying main clicks.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.5

Main click quality is mostly praised for satisfying, clicky feedback, with evidence focused on left/right click feel rather than unusual customization.

lift-off distance
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Lift-off distance had one direct positive mention alongside high polling rate as helping gaming and work performance.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.4

Lift-off distance is repeatedly supported as an adjustable software setting, usually mentioned alongside DPI, polling, and other advanced tuning controls.

long-session comfort
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.9

Long-session comfort depended strongly on hand size: smaller-hand-focused reviews praised longer-session comfort, while some larger-hand reviewers reported discomfort or fit limits.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.3

Long-session comfort is generally positive for smaller hands, light use, and fatigue reduction, though one reviewer reported hand cramps with the smaller shape.

macro support
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Macro support was repeatedly tied to G Hub assignments, macros, G-Shift, and system-command customization.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.5

Macro support appears in software-focused reviews, with explicit evidence that custom macros and game profile macros can be configured.

materials quality
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Materials quality was generally positive, with matte plastic, solid shells, and high-end feel noted, though some reviews still emphasized plastic construction.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.0

Materials quality trends positive for plastics and shell construction, though one review criticizes the finish for lacking grip.

MMO gaming suitability
Product 1: Logitech G705
2.4

MMO suitability was weak in the direct evidence because one review said the six-button layout was not best for MMOs.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
No score yet
MOBA gaming suitability
Product 1: Logitech G705
2.9

MOBA suitability was also limited by the six-button layout in some reviews, though one casual review reported no complaint in Dota 2.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
No score yet
motion consistency
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.4

Motion consistency evidence was mixed, ranging from smooth flicking and controlled movement to one review noting polling-rate variation.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.7

Motion consistency is described positively through smooth aiming, reliable tracking, fluid movement, and the lack of missed tracking during gameplay.

onboard memory
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.1

Onboard memory was confirmed in several reviews for saving settings or profiles on the mouse.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.4

Onboard memory is supported by references to storable profiles and settings saved directly to the mouse for use beyond one system.

palm grip comfort
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.3

Palm grip comfort was mixed: some found it usable or best-suited, while others said the mouse was too short or palm grip was not ideal.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
3.0

Palm grip comfort is mixed to weak overall, with smaller-hand praise offset by repeated comments that larger palm-grip users may prefer the Aerox 5 or another shape.

polling rate
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.9

Polling-rate coverage repeatedly identified 1000Hz wireless or dongle polling as the gaming-relevant mode, while Bluetooth was noted as lower.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.6

The move from 1,000 Hz to 4,000 Hz polling is a major upgrade across the reviews, improving responsiveness most clearly in competitive and high-refresh-rate play.

portability
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Portability was a clear strength because of the compact size, wireless use, travel suitability, and multi-device usefulness.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.3

Portability is mostly favorable because of durability, Bluetooth, compact size, and travel use, but one review criticizes the lack of onboard dongle storage.

premium feel
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Premium feel was usually positive, especially for the Aurora design, cohesive package, and high-end hand feel.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.4

Premium feel is supported by solid construction, low-weight feel that does not seem compromised, and descriptions of a more premium mouse experience.

profile switching
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Profile switching was supported through G Hub profiles, onboard settings, and program-specific switching, though one review wished for more Bluetooth profiles.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.4

Profile switching evidence is narrower but clear, with game-based saved settings and automatic profile switching described in the reviews.

programmable buttons
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Programmable-button evidence was broad and consistent, with the six-button layout repeatedly mentioned as reprogrammable or programmable.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.5

Programmable button support is well supported through evidence for remapping, six programmable buttons, and software-controlled button behavior.

RGB features
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.1

RGB features were widely discussed and usually praised for Aurora styling, but some reviewers felt the lighting was limited, covered by the hand, or battery-costly.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.4

RGB support is broad, with reviews mentioning three-zone lighting, Prism controls, presets, effects, and the battery impact of brighter lighting.

scroll wheel quality
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.0

Scroll wheel quality was generally positive but not perfect, with responsive scrolling and quiet operation offset by stiffer or firmer press comments.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.4

Scroll wheel quality is generally positive, with reviewers noting responsive scrolling, tactile feedback, and in some cases quieter or grippier revisions.

sensor performance
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.9

Sensor performance was adequate-to-good in most reviews, with accurate tracking in practice but repeated caveats about the lower-end Lightsync sensor and 8,200 DPI ceiling.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.6

The TrueMove 26K sensor is one of the most consistently supported strengths, with reviews describing smooth tracking, no missed beats, and strong gaming performance.

shape comfort
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.8

Shape comfort was highly hand-size-dependent: many praised the curves and smaller-hand fit, while others found it too small or hard to adapt to.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.2

Shape comfort is divisive: many reviewers liked the familiar Aerox shape, while others found the flared rear uncomfortable or polarizing.

side button quality
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Side button quality was positive where mentioned, with reviewers noting useful placement, a thumb ridge, and no obvious quality issues.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.0

Side button feedback is mixed: several reviewers found them easier to reach or improved, while others found the long shape easy to hit accidentally.

software stability
Product 1: Logitech G705
2.8

Software stability evidence was limited and mixed, with one review objecting to the burden of multiple Logitech software packages.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
No score yet
software usability
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.1

Software usability was generally positive for customization and G Hub controls, although some reviewers disliked needing G Hub or multiple Logitech apps.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.6

Software usability is one of the strongest repeated positives, especially SteelSeries GG, sensitivity tools, aim trainer features, live previews, and accessible customization.

surface compatibility
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.2

Surface compatibility was supported by reports of smooth movement across most surfaces or use on tabletops and mouse pads.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.3

Surface compatibility evidence is positive but narrower, with reviews noting smooth movement on pads and usable performance on desks or different surfaces.

switch durability
Product 1: Logitech G705
No score yet
Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.3

Switch durability is mostly supported by the 80 million click rating, with one review also noting consistent clicks after extended testing.

switch feel
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.3

Switch feel was consistently praised as tactile, sharp, light, satisfying, or clicky.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.4

Switch feel trends positive, with tactile, crisp, clicky feedback noted by several reviewers, though the feel remains more traditional mechanical than optical.

value for money
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.0

Value for money was one of the biggest tradeoffs: several reviewers saw the price as high for the performance, while a few considered sale pricing or compact features fair.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.1

Value is mixed-to-positive: reviewers often call the price competitive or reasonable, but several note strong competition around the same or lower price.

weight
Product 1: Logitech G705
3.6

Weight feedback was mixed because the mouse is light by general standards but sometimes felt heavy for its small shell or too light for control.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.3

The 68 g weight is often praised as light and agile, though a few reviewers note it is heavier or less competitive by current ultralight standards.

weight tuning
Product 1: Logitech G705
1.0

Weight tuning was explicitly poor in the one review that mentioned it, noting there is no adding or removing weights.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
No score yet
wireless latency
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.5

Wireless latency evidence was strong for Lightspeed or USB dongle use, with reviewers describing low latency, no lag, or faster response.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.7

Wireless latency is consistently favorable where tested, with low latency, no noticeable lag, and near-zero delay tied to 2.4 GHz or 4K operation.

wireless performance
Product 1: Logitech G705
4.4

Wireless performance was broadly positive, especially over Lightspeed, with reviews emphasizing reliable, snappy, or flexible wireless operation.

Product 2: SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen...
4.5

Wireless performance is a major strength, with reviews praising 4K wireless, reliable tracking, stable use, and no stutters or delays in several tests.