Compare Endgame Gear OP1we vs ASUS ROG Keris II Ace

Average score
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.0
Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3
2.4GHz connectivity
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.4

The supplied reviews describe 2.4GHz or receiver-based wireless as the main gaming connection, with praise for response time, stability, and simple receiver setup.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Reviews that discussed wireless modes consistently describe 2.4GHz connectivity as a core option alongside Bluetooth and wired use. The evidence supports strong coverage for 2.4GHz operation, including receiver storage, tri-mode connectivity, and pairing through the main wireless receiver.

acceleration control
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
2.8

Acceleration-control evidence is limited and mixed: one review says angle snapping can help straight-line movement but also made acceleration feel jarring.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

Sensor acceleration specs were consistently described as high-end, with reviewers citing 50G acceleration alongside 750 IPS speed. The evidence supports strong acceleration capability, though it is presented as sensor performance rather than a separate user-facing tuning feature.

Accuracy and tracking precision
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.4

Multiple reviews support strong aiming accuracy, citing accurate tracking, high precision sensors, and sharper tracking or flicking in games.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Tracking precision was repeatedly praised. Reviewers described near-perfect accuracy, high precision, accurate tracking, and jitter-free performance, with only one review noting high-DPI irregularity at extreme settings.

balance and weight distribution
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.6

Weight balance is consistently positive where discussed, with reviewers noting dexterity, stability, and very good front-to-back balance.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Most reviewers who discussed balance found the mouse light and well balanced. One teardown-style review noted a slightly forward balance point, but the broader evidence describes the mouse as comfortable to move without obvious front or rear weight bias.

battery life
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.0

Battery evidence is mostly positive for the wireless variants, ranging from seven-day claims to 70-hour figures, while 4K use is described as closer to 30 hours.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

Battery life is generally strong, with many reviews citing 107 hours at 2.4GHz with lighting off or strong real-world endurance. Higher polling rates and RGB reduce runtime, and one review measured lower Wi-Fi runtime with default lighting.

Bluetooth support
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
3.0

Bluetooth support is inconsistent across the supplied reviews: one says Bluetooth would have been nice, while another describes Bluetooth 5.1 support and broader device compatibility.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Bluetooth support is widely confirmed and treated as a useful convenience feature. Reviews describe Bluetooth pairing, multi-device Bluetooth use, and longer battery life in Bluetooth mode, while noting that it is not the low-latency competitive mode.

build quality
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.7

Build quality is one of the strongest repeated positives, with reviewers calling the mouse durable, solid, creak-free, and built to a very high standard.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

Build quality is mostly positive, with reviewers describing a sturdy, solid shell and little flex or creaking. A few reviewers found the build merely average or noted minor rattle, so the evidence is strong but not flawless.

button customization
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.3

Customization is a recurring strength, covering swappable switches, software settings, button assignment, DPI, polling, and hardware tinkering.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Button customization is well supported through Armoury Crate or onboard controls. Reviewers cite remapping inputs, assigning commands, programmable controls, and hardware-based adjustments for key settings.

button responsiveness
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.1

Button responsiveness is mostly praised for precision and responsive actuation, though one reviewer found the heavy click feel harder to spam.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Button responsiveness is consistently praised. Reviewers cite snappy registration, lightning-quick actuation, responsive clicks, and short-travel optical buttons that support fast inputs.

cable flexibility
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.5

Cable evidence applies to wired or charging use: reviewers praise the light, flexible, braided or drag-reducing cable design.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Cable flexibility is a strength overall. Several reviewers praised the paracord as flexible, tangle-free, or drag-reducing, though one reviewer found it long enough but somewhat stiff while charging.

charging convenience
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.3

Charging convenience is supported by references to USB-C, quick charging, and the cable serving both charging and receiver-converter use.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

Charging and setup convenience are mixed. One review says USB-C charging is quick and painless, while another liked the adapter/booster setup but noted the connection stack could feel loose.

claw grip comfort
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.4

Claw grip comfort is strongly supported, with several reviewers calling the shape claw-focused, suitable for relaxed or aggressive claw, or mostly a claw grip mouse.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Claw grip comfort is supported for many hand sizes. Reviews mention all-grip compatibility, relaxed claw comfort, and claw grip usefulness, though one detailed review cautions that fit depends on hand size.

click latency
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.6

Click latency evidence is strong on the wired/high-polling models and configurable on others, with reviewers citing very low latency or latency-related software modes.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Click latency is a clear strength. Reviews cite latency reduction from high polling, measured low click latency, no latency issues, and low wireless click latency measurements.

click noise
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.3

Click sound is described positively where mentioned, with thocky, satisfying, or pleasing button sound impressions.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Click noise is mixed but generally acceptable. Some reviews described the switches as quiet or quieter than competitors, while another found the optical clicks loud.

connection stability
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.5

Connection stability is generally praised, especially for 2.4GHz or receiver-based use, with reviewers describing stable, reliable, low-latency operation.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Connection stability is strong across the reviews that tested it. Reviewers mention tri-mode connectivity, no delays, no hiccups, no dropouts, and stable Bluetooth or wireless switching.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.2

Cross-platform compatibility has limited direct support, but one review explicitly links Bluetooth 5.1 to broader device compatibility.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Cross-device use is supported mainly through Bluetooth and multi-device pairing. Reviewers cite simultaneous pairing with multiple devices, multi-device setup versatility, and the ability to pair up to three devices.

debounce customization
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.1

Debounce and multiclick controls are well supported, with multiple reviews mentioning debounce time, multi-click filters, or related click filtering settings.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
2.3

Debounce customization is weak. The available evidence says debounce was 0ms and not adjustable, and another review states there was no debounce setting in the software.

DPI range
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.3

DPI coverage is strong, with reviews citing 19,000 DPI, 26,000 DPI, broad DPI ranges, and quick DPI settings.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.9

The DPI range is one of the clearest strengths. Reviewers repeatedly cite 42,000 DPI or CPI and describe it as unusually high, although some note that most users will not need the upper end.

durability over time
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.0

Durability evidence is positive for the shell and switches, though one wired-model review raises a concern about cable-fray durability.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Durability over time is supported mainly through switch behavior. One review specifically links optical switches to consistent long-term performance and reduced double-click risk.

ecosystem integration
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Ecosystem integration is present through Aura Sync and the ROG Omni receiver. Reviewers cite lighting sync with compatible devices and using one receiver for multiple ROG peripherals.

ergonomic design
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.5

Ergonomic design is supported by natural hand fit, flatter sides, and shape decisions intended to reduce strain and support control.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

The design is clearly ergonomic and right-handed. Reviews describe the curved or ergonomic shape, often tying it to right-handed comfort and ultra-light wireless use.

fingertip grip comfort
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.4

Fingertip grip support is repeatedly noted, especially because of the small size, flat sides, narrow profile, and flexible finger placement.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.4

Fingertip grip comfort is limited and hand-size dependent. One review says the light weight makes fingertip use possible with grip tape, while another does not recommend fingertip gripping the ergonomic shell.

firmware reliability
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.2

Firmware reliability has limited but positive support through comments about switch and firmware integration.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
No score yet
FPS gaming suitability
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.4

FPS suitability is strongly supported by competitive-gaming comments, fast aiming, high polling, low weight, and specific FPS testing.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

FPS and esports suitability are consistently strong. Reviewers repeatedly frame the mouse around hard-core gameplay, competitive esports, FPS use, high polling, and precision aiming.

glide smoothness
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.1

Glide is mostly praised for smooth skates and low-friction movement, though one review found the small stock skate area less smooth on hard surfaces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Glide smoothness is broadly praised. Reviewers cite PTFE feet, smooth glide, controlled movement, and good stock skates, including use on glass in some tests.

grip texture
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.4

Grip texture is a major positive, with reviewers praising grippy coating, non-slip feel, and secure hold; some also note fingerprints or grime.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.7

Grip texture is the most divisive physical trait. Some reviewers liked the non-slip or textured surface and grip tape, while others found the coating slippery or not secure enough without aftermarket grips.

handedness options
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
3.7

Handedness evidence is mixed but useful: reviews mention right-handed layouts, ambidextrous/symmetrical shapes, and a left-handed software mode.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.2

Handedness is limited. Evidence shows the mouse is comfortable for right-handers but not suited for lefties or users wanting an ambidextrous shape.

left and right click quality
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
3.8

Main click quality is polarizing: several reviews praise crisp, satisfying clicks, while others criticize heaviness, mushiness, rebound, or quick-fire suitability.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Left and right click quality is generally strong, with snappy, tactile, consistent, or solid click feedback across many reviews. Some detailed reviewers still criticized slipperiness or travel on the main buttons.

lift-off distance
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
3.9

Lift-off distance is configurable in the software where reviewed, with explicit mention of LOD adjustment and lift-off settings.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2

Lift-off distance support is present through software or onboard controls, but not universally flexible. Reviews mention lift-off adjustment, low/high LOD options, and 1mm/2mm LOD limits.

long-session comfort
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.3

Long-session comfort is generally positive because reviewers mention no cramping, extended-session comfort, stability, and low fatigue, although coating sweat appears in some reviews.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Long-session comfort is strong where discussed. Reviewers cite no hand pain, low fatigue, and zero strain over prolonged play, helped by the low weight.

macro support
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
1.3

Macro support is weak; the supplied reviews that discuss it explicitly say macro support is missing or limited.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Macro support is available through Armoury Crate. Reviews cite macro recording and saved macros in the software workflow.

materials quality
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.1

Materials are described as decent to premium, including matte shells, dry-grip plastic, and PBT plastic, with some cosmetic fingerprint concerns.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

Materials quality is generally positive, with evidence for PBT buttons, bio-based nylon, rigid shell feel, and textured surfaces. Some reviewers still found the shell feel less premium than rubberized coatings.

MMO gaming suitability
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
1.3

MMO suitability is weak because one review explicitly warns MMO players about the lack of buttons and omitted macro features.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

MMO suitability is only lightly supported. One review used the mouse in Final Fantasy XIV raids and inventory management, but the review evidence does not present it as a dedicated MMO mouse.

motion consistency
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.2

Motion consistency is supported by Motion Sync, sensor-data synchronization, real-world polling consistency, and consistent tracking impressions.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Motion consistency is strong in gameplay, with reviewers citing smooth tracking, granular accuracy, and micro-adjustment precision. MotionSync is present but not configurable in one technical review.

onboard memory
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.4

Onboard memory has limited support, but one review states switch settings are saved directly on the mouse’s onboard storage.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Onboard memory/profile support is present, with reviews citing hardware-based profiles, onboard controls, and profile switching without needing to keep the software open.

palm grip comfort
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
3.0

Palm grip comfort is mixed: the mouse can work for smaller hands or provide palm stability, but larger hands and full-palm users are often discouraged.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Palm grip comfort is positive but not universal. Reviews describe comfortable palm or relaxed palm use, while hand size and the smaller ergonomic shape affect fit.

polling rate
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.1

Polling-rate support is well documented across variants, with 1000Hz, 4000Hz, and 8000Hz configurations or claims appearing in the reviews.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Polling rate is a headline strength across nearly every review. Evidence repeatedly confirms 4,000Hz wireless polling and 8,000Hz wired polling through the included booster.

portability
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Portability is supported through bundled accessories, dongle storage, and multi-device use. Reviewers mention grip tape, extra feet, and using one mouse across multiple devices or on the go.

premium feel
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.5

Premium feel is repeatedly supported through comments about high-quality feel, premium construction, and strong overall finish.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Premium feel is present but not unanimous. Some reviewers found the chassis premium and the mouse solid, while others criticized coating and click feel as less premium for the price.

profile switching
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.0

Profile switching is supported through underside mode buttons, DPI or polling cycling, and multiple quick settings.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.1

Profile switching is supported but placement is sometimes criticized. Reviewers cite scenario profiles, saved profiles, and button-combination profile switching, while some dislike the underside DPI/profile control.

programmable buttons
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.2

Programmable buttons are supported by key mapping, button remapping, software reassignment, and keybinding assignment.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Programmable button coverage is solid for an esports mouse. Reviews cite five or six programmable buttons and programmable controls including scroll functions.

RGB features
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
2.3

RGB evidence is negative or neutral: multiple reviews state there is no RGB, framing the mouse as performance-focused rather than flashy.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

RGB features are modest but useful. Reviews focus on the single scroll-wheel RGB zone, customization, battery notifications, and keeping RGB without losing the low weight.

scroll wheel quality
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
3.7

Scroll wheel quality is mixed, with praise for tactile steps but criticism of light actuation, shallow grip, or notchy feel in some reviews.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.7

Scroll wheel quality is mixed. Some reviewers praised tactile, quiet, or excellent scrolling, while others wanted clearer steps, adjustable resistance, or a more controlled encoder.

sensor performance
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.4

Sensor performance is broadly positive, with PAW3370, PW3395, and PixArt references tied to accurate or reliable in-game performance.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

Sensor performance is excellent overall. Reviewers cite an accurate high-end sensor, no tracking issue, top-tier performance, glass tracking, and no spinouts or jitter in normal testing.

shape comfort
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.3

Shape comfort is a major strength but still preference-dependent; many reviewers praise the small, narrow, stable shape while one notes secure grip may vary.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Shape comfort is a major strength for many reviewers, especially for relaxed claw, palm, and small-to-medium ergonomic preferences. A few reviewers reported hand-size mismatch or cramps.

side button quality
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.3

Side button quality is mostly praised for tactile, crisp, premium-feeling actuation, though one review found the side buttons harsh.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.1

Side button quality is mixed. Some reviewers loved their placement and crispness, while others found them small, stiff, high, heavy, or less accessible for larger hands.

skate durability
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.1

Skate durability is only moderately supported. One review points to replaceable feet if they wear out, and another describes the stock skates as standard PTFE rather than emphasizing long-term durability.

software stability
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
2.0

Software stability has one clear negative data point: a review reports the configuration tool crashing and apply-button issues.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
2.9

Software stability is a weakness. Reviews describe Armoury Crate as bloated, resource-heavy, and unwieldy, even though some settings can be handled without keeping it open.

software usability
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.0

Software usability is mixed: reviewers like its simplicity and no-fuss customization, but several call it dated, basic, unexplained, or rough.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.6

Software usability is mixed. Some reviewers found configuration simple or the lighter Armoury Crate Gear easier, while others called the software slow, terrible, bloated, or in need of improvement.

surface compatibility
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
3.3

Surface compatibility is mixed: one review reports hard-surface grating, while another says the skates felt stable across multiple mouse pads.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Surface compatibility is very strong. Reviews describe calibration for surfaces, tracking on glass, and reliable tracking across many surfaces or mouse pads.

switch durability
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.5

Switch durability is positive where discussed, with 80-million-click ratings, optical double-click resistance, and durable switch implementation cited.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

Switch durability is a clear strength. Multiple reviews cite the ROG Optical Micro Switches and their 100-million-click rating.

switch feel
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.0

Switch feel is one of the most divisive attributes: reviewers praise crisp or satisfying clicks, but several find the stock clicks heavy, hollow, or hard to actuate.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

Switch feel is divisive. Some reviewers praised crisp, consistent, punchy switches, while others described dull, mushy, hollow, or travel-heavy click feel.

value for money
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.2

Value is generally positive, with reviewers praising pricing against premium mice, though one review says the wired 8K model does not justify its asking price.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.7

Value is mixed because the performance is high but the price is premium. Several reviewers called it expensive or pricey, while others still found the package justified or worth the money.

weight
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.6

Weight is widely praised as light, typically around 50.5g for wired variants and about 58g for OP1we/OP1w-style wireless units.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

Weight is a standout strength. Reviewers repeatedly cite 54g or about 1.9 ounces and praise the control and low fatigue that come from the ultra-light build.

weight tuning
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
3.7

Weight tuning has limited but real support through reviewer discussion of lowering weight by changing skates, cable, or modding.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
No score yet
wireless latency
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
3.9

Wireless latency evidence is mostly positive for stable low-latency 2.4GHz use, with one reviewer noting it may lag behind some newer 4K implementations.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Wireless latency is strong in the 2.4GHz mode. Reviewers cite low-latency wireless, low measured wireless click latency, high-polling responsiveness, and no obvious latency problems.

wireless performance
Product 1: Endgame Gear OP1we
4.5

Wireless performance is positive overall, with reviewers describing reliable wireless operation, simple receiver use, and good low-latency connectivity.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Wireless performance is consistently strong. Reviewers report good wireless connectivity, no drop in tracking, no hiccups, no stutters, and no dropouts during use.