Average score
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.2
Bluetooth support
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.4
Bluetooth support is positive for everyday flexibility and long battery life, though one reviewer notes lower Bluetooth polling compared with 2.4GHz.
Endgame Gear XM2we
2.0
Bluetooth support was called out as a missing versatility feature, making the mouse more dependent on the included USB dongle.
profile switching
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.4
Profile switching is positively supported by the ability to switch saved profiles easily.
Endgame Gear XM2we
2.3
Profile switching drew criticism because the CPI/profile button sits on the underside, making on-the-fly adjustments inconvenient.
fingertip grip comfort
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.8
Fingertip grip comfort is one of the clearest comfort strengths, especially for users who hold the mouse with fingers rather than palm contact.
Endgame Gear XM2we
2.9
Fingertip comfort was mixed to negative: large hands may manage relaxed fingertip grip, but several reviewers found the width or scroll placement limiting.
handedness options
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
3.7
Handedness options are mixed because the symmetrical shell can work left-handed, but side buttons mainly favor right-handed use.
Endgame Gear XM2we
2.0
Handedness is limited: one reviewer explicitly noted the side-button placement and shape make it a right-handed mouse rather than truly ambidextrous.
long-session comfort
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
2.8
Long-session comfort is a recurring caveat, especially for larger hands or users needing more ergonomic support during long gaming sessions.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5
Long-session comfort had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer reporting no strain over long use.
cable flexibility
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
2.4
Cable flexibility scores poorly because reviewers point out that the wireless model cannot be used in wired mode.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.1
The cable received mostly positive feedback for flexibility and its angled connector, but one reviewer still found it seriously stiff.
click noise
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
3.9
Click noise is moderate rather than silent, with reviewers describing crisp audible clicks or minimal noise depending on the review.
Endgame Gear XM2we
2.5
Click noise was a downside in the one review that focused on it, with the reviewer saying the loud clicks would be obvious to others nearby.
portability
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.4
Portability is positive thanks to receiver storage, travel use, and a small travel bag, though evidence is not as broad as performance-related attributes.
Endgame Gear XM2we
3.0
Portability was only mildly criticized because there is no built-in dongle storage, which matters mainly for travel.
surface compatibility
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.1
Surface compatibility is mixed-positive: non-glass desks and pads worked well, but glass caused noticeable control loss.
Endgame Gear XM2we
3.0
Surface compatibility was mixed: sensor tracking worked well on varied surfaces, but glide could feel rough or terrible on some hard or ultra-soft pads.
palm grip comfort
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
2.6
Palm grip comfort is weak because reviewers say full palm grip only suits very small hands or is not suitable for large-hand full coverage.
Endgame Gear XM2we
3.6
Palm-grip comfort was adequate but not the main strength, with reviewers generally describing palm use as okay or fairly comfortable.
left and right click quality
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.6
Left and right click quality is a clear strength, with reviewers praising softness, precision, tactile response, and nice PBT click feel.
Endgame Gear XM2we
3.7
Main-click quality was mixed: reviewers liked the snappy optical feel and low pre-travel, but several found the buttons heavy, stiff, uneven, or easy to trigger accidentally.
ergonomic design
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
3.5
Ergonomic design is mixed: the size suits many grips, but reviewers also cite flatness, limited support, and right-click leverage issues for some users.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3
Ergonomic touches such as thumb-accessible side buttons and finger angling were praised, although the shape remains hand-size dependent.
macro support
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.3
Macro support is supported by the software evidence, where macro creation sits alongside profiles and other user-friendly customization tools.
Endgame Gear XM2we
3.5
Macro support was functional but not a highlight; the one review mentioning it said routine macro creation was easy enough in the companion app.
shape comfort
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
3.6
Shape comfort is mixed: several smaller-hand users found it comfortable, while others disliked the flat or stubby shape.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4
Shape comfort was strongly positive for the right hand size and grip, especially claw, but some reviewers found the shape subjective or difficult to adapt to.
button customization
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.5
Button customization is a strength, with reviewers highlighting unusually good customization for the price, gameplay versatility, and broad control in software.
Endgame Gear XM2we
3.8
Button remapping was considered functional and easy, but reviewers described the options as basic rather than deep.
claw grip comfort
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.4
Claw grip comfort is positive, with reviewers repeatedly identifying claw or partial claw as an ideal or suitable grip style.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.9
Claw-grip comfort was a major strength, with several reviewers describing the XM1-derived shape as excellent or near-perfect for claw users.
click latency
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.8
Click-latency comments are strongly positive, with reviewers pointing to near-zero latency and very little gap or travel before actuation.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.2
Click latency was mostly judged responsive or low, especially with debounce lowered, though one reviewer measured slightly more delay than usual.
side button quality
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.1
Side buttons are mostly liked for clear actuation and placement, but one reviewer found them mushier than the main clicks.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5
Side button quality was one of the most consistent strengths, with reviewers praising placement, tactility, crispness, and low travel.
charging convenience
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
3.6
Power and charging convenience is mixed: some reviewers like easy-to-buy batteries, while others dislike needing spares or missing an internal rechargeable battery.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.0
Charging was generally considered simple and convenient, with reviewers pointing to straightforward USB-C charging and about a two-hour charge estimate.
switch feel
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.5
Switch feel is described as clear, informative, tactile, crisp, and clicky, giving the main buttons a satisfying feel.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.1
Switch feel was generally liked for tactility and crispness, but reviewers frequently qualified that the optical clicks are heavy or not universally preferred.
sensor performance
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.7
The sensor receives broad praise as excellent, capable, and exceptionally accurate, with only glass surfaces called out as a weakness in one review.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4
Sensor performance was generally strong, with many reviewers saying the PAW3370 implementation felt flawless or very good despite not being the newest sensor.
grip texture
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.4
Grip texture is a strength, with reviewers saying textured or rough side surfaces improve grip and prevent slipping.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.0
Grip texture divided reviewers: many loved the grippy coating once warmed up, but others found it slippery, fingerprint-prone, or dirty-looking.
FPS gaming suitability
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.3
FPS gaming suitability is generally strong because reviewers praise fast shooters, fast FPS use, and flick-shot tracking, though one multi-user review was more cautious.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6
FPS suitability was a standout theme, with reviewers repeatedly recommending it for shooters, low-CPI flicks, CS:GO, and precise headshot-style play.
Accuracy and tracking precision
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.8
Reviewers consistently describe the mouse as precise and accurate, with fast shot alignment, responsive tracking, and no obvious tracking issues.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6
Reviewers generally found tracking accurate and dependable in games, with strong praise for fast flicks and precision; one reviewer preferred lighter smaller mice for raw aiming.
polling rate
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.3
Polling-rate evidence is positive overall: 1000Hz is praised as high performance, while Bluetooth polling is described as lower but still usable.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5
Polling-rate evidence was positive where mentioned, with reviewers calling the 1,000Hz rate responsive or stable.
switch durability
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.6
Switch durability is strong in reviewer evidence thanks to long-life switches and replaceable sockets that can extend usable life or fix dead clickers.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3
Switch durability evidence was positive but limited, focusing on optical durability claims and low double-click risk rather than long-term wear testing.
scroll wheel quality
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.5
The scroll wheel is generally praised for no wobble, clear cutoffs, precise resistance, and a nice feel.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.2
Scroll-wheel quality was mostly praised for sturdy, notchy, or tactile feel, although some reviewers found it rigid, stiff, or in need of tighter steps.
battery life
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.6
Battery life is one of the strongest repeated positives, with reviewers reporting held-up estimates, no dwindling after weeks, and extremely long runtime.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4
Battery life was consistently viewed as good to excellent, ranging from roughly two days to over a week depending on usage, with several reviewers calling it a strength.
motion consistency
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.9
Motion consistency is praised through comments about stability, no jitter, no disruption, and no noticeable lag or stuttering.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.7
Motion consistency was praised through stable polling, smooth movement, and top-tier-feeling performance in the reviewed units.
wireless performance
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.7
Wireless performance is a major strength, with reviewers saying the wireless signal is stable, smooth, responsive, and close to wired feel.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5
Wireless performance was a clear strength, with reviewers reporting no practical gap versus wired use, no lag, and strong in-game reliability.
software usability
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.4
Software usability is generally positive, with reviewers calling it user-friendly, easy to set up, and broad enough to control key settings.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.2
Software usability was mostly praised for being light, simple, and easy, though a couple of reviewers found it basic or slightly unpolished.
materials quality
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.5
Materials quality is strong, with reviewers praising practical plastics, PBT, pleasant matte texture, and high-quality material feel.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3
Materials quality was praised for the matte finish, clean shell, and robust hardware feel.
2.4GHz connectivity
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.7
2.4GHz connectivity is praised for stable SpeedNova/Omni performance, a strong signal, and responsive operation.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5
The dongle-based wireless connection drew positive feedback for avoiding connection drops, though the evidence is about stable 2.4GHz use rather than broader wireless flexibility.
balance and weight distribution
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.3
Weight distribution has limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer saying the AA setup felt normal and did not tilt when lifted.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5
Most reviewers praised the balance as stable or excellent, especially for wireless use, though one noted a slight rear or side-button heaviness.
DPI range
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.7
The DPI range is treated as more than enough for high-resolution and fast gaming use, though one reviewer’s praise ties the range mainly to precision.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5
The DPI/CPI ceiling was considered more than enough for competitive shooter play.
button responsiveness
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.7
Button responsiveness is repeatedly praised, especially for fast, accurate, light, crisp clicks that register reliably.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.8
Button response was praised for snappy actuation and little pre-travel, though one reviewer noted the light right click could trigger unexpectedly.
wireless latency
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.7
Wireless latency is praised as very low, with several reviewers reporting wired-like responsiveness or no delay issues.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6
Wireless latency was usually praised as unnoticeable or very low, with one reviewer saying any initial-click delay was not much of a problem.
lift-off distance
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.3
Lift-off distance is viewed positively where tested, with one reviewer pleased by surface performance without extra adjustment and another satisfied with the low setting.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.2
Lift-off distance was viewed positively by reviewers who liked the stock 2mm feel or valued the option to reduce it for minimal cursor movement.
connection stability
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.7
Connection stability is strong where tested, with reviewers reporting no signal loss, no connectivity issues, and a strong signal.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.8
Connection stability was praised, with reviewers reporting no dropouts, no hiccups, and no cutouts during wireless use.
programmable buttons
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.4
Programmable buttons are framed as useful because the configurable buttons add gameplay versatility through Armoury Crate.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5
Programmable buttons were praised in one review for being easily accessible in the standard layout.
value for money
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.6
Value for money is a major strength, with reviewers calling it excellent for the price, a great deal, and strong value despite some caveats.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5
Value for money was mostly praised because it competes in the premium lightweight wireless class at a lower price, though one review found it expensive against budget rivals.
build quality
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.7
Build quality is repeatedly praised as high, sturdy, well-fitted, reliable, and free of wobble or looseness.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.7
Build quality was one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly describing the shell as solid, tight, premium, and free of major creaks or flex.
premium feel
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.7
Premium feel is supported by reviewers describing it as top-tier, extremely reliable, accurate, and fantastic-feeling.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.7
Premium feel was a recurring strength, with reviewers praising the overall quality, chassis feel, and polished execution despite the no-frills package.
glide smoothness
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.5
Glide smoothness is consistently positive, with reviewers describing easy, smooth, uninterrupted movement on suitable surfaces.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4
Glide smoothness was broadly praised thanks to large PTFE feet, though a few reviewers noted slower or rougher behavior on certain hard or very soft pads.
weight
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.2
Weight is mostly praised as light or featherweight, though multiple reviewers caution that the advertised 57g excludes the battery and is somewhat misleading.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.2
Weight was widely praised as light or featherweight, though reviewers comparing it to 50g-class rivals sometimes considered it only moderately light.
onboard memory
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.5
Onboard memory is treated positively because reviewers connect it with saved presets, calibration, profile storage, and portability across devices.
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5
Onboard memory was praised because saved profiles let the mouse run well without keeping software installed.
cross-platform compatibility
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.5
Cross-platform compatibility has limited but positive evidence from stored settings that allow easier use across different PCs and devices.
Endgame Gear XM2weNo score yet
debounce customization
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III WirelessNo score yet
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4
Debounce customization was seen as useful because it can be lowered to zero, improving click latency or click registration for certain uses.
drag click support
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III WirelessNo score yet
Endgame Gear XM2we
5.0
Drag-click support received unusually strong praise from one reviewer, who said the grippy coating and button design made it outperform other mice for that use.
durability over time
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.6
Durability over time is positive, supported by long-life switch evidence, reliability comments, and one reviewer’s expectation that it will last a long time.
Endgame Gear XM2weNo score yet
ecosystem integration
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.6
Ecosystem integration is positive thanks to the ROG Omni Receiver and SpeedNova compatibility with other ROG peripherals.
Endgame Gear XM2weNo score yet
firmware reliability
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III WirelessNo score yet
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5
Firmware reliability was praised in one review that found the implementation up to the task during heated play.
RGB features
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
3.5
RGB feedback is mixed: reviewers like the subtle personalization, but several note that lighting is limited, not very bright, or only on the wheel.
Endgame Gear XM2weNo score yet
software stability
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III WirelessNo score yet
Endgame Gear XM2we
2.0
Software stability was the clearest weak point because battery reporting was described as unreliable in multiple reviews.
water and dust resistance
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III WirelessNo score yet
Endgame Gear XM2we
4.0
Water and dust resistance had limited indirect praise, with one reviewer liking that the closed shell avoids holes where dirt or water could enter.
weight tuning
ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.3
Weight tuning is positive where reviewers discuss AA/AAA battery flexibility, especially because they like being able to use either battery size.
Endgame Gear XM2weNo score yet