Compare Endgame Gear XM2we vs Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K

P1 Endgame Gear XM2we
P2 Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K

Comparison Takeaways

Endgame Gear XM2we

Where It Has the Edge

  • FPS gaming suitability is 4.6 vs 3.5. FPS suitability is a clear strength, with multiple reviewers testing or recommending it for shooters and fast aim-heavy...
  • weight is 4.3 vs 3.1. Weight is consistently light at roughly 62-65g, though some reviewers compare it unfavorably with 55g competitors.
  • firmware reliability is 4.1 vs 3.0. Firmware evidence is limited but positive to mixed: reviewers report adequate firmware performance and mention updates addressing reported...
  • value for money is 4.4 vs 3.5. Value is broadly positive around $79.99 or £80, though PC Gamer considered it less automatic against cheaper competitors.

Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K

Where It Has the Edge

  • RGB features is 4.7 vs 1.1. RGB features are widely praised for Chroma lighting, multiple zones, logo/wheel lighting, and underglow effects.
  • tilt gesture controls is 4.8 vs 1.2. Tilt controls are strongly supported by the four-way wheel and left/right horizontal inputs, which reviewers found useful for...
  • Bluetooth support is 5.0 vs 2.7. Bluetooth support is repeatedly confirmed and adds versatility for work, travel, and multi-device use.
  • click noise is 3.9 vs 2.0. Click noise is mixed: main clicks can be louder, while some reviewers praise quiet wheel or click behavior.
Average score
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.0
Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.5
2.4GHz connectivity
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Reviewers confirm 2.4GHz wireless or dongle-based wireless, with no connection-drop complaints in supported reviews.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.9

2.4GHz connectivity is broadly supported through HyperSpeed and included dongles, often paired with Bluetooth and wired modes.

acceleration control
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.1

Sensor specs and reviewer usage support strong acceleration handling for fast flicks, though it is discussed as capability rather than a separate tuning feature.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.9

Acceleration control evidence is positive, with reviewers noting high acceleration limits and no acceleration or malfunction issues.

Accuracy and tracking precision
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6

Tracking is consistently described as accurate, with reviewers praising the PAW3370 implementation even during fast movement.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7

Reviewers consistently found the mouse accurate and precise in play, with only one high-DPI jitter caveat.

balance and weight distribution
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Most reviewers found the mouse well balanced or stable, with a few noting it can feel slightly rear- or side-heavy compared with lighter rivals.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.4

Balance is generally favorable, with reviewers citing centered balance, good distribution, and stability despite weight.

battery life
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Battery life is generally good, ranging from about 48 hours to more than a week, with several reviewers reporting week-plus use.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.5

Battery life is mostly a strength, with many 140-150 hour claims and good real-world endurance, though RGB and high polling reduce it.

Bluetooth support
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
2.7

Bluetooth evidence is mixed: one review says Bluetooth is present, while another explicitly says the mouse lacks Bluetooth support.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
5.0

Bluetooth support is repeatedly confirmed and adds versatility for work, travel, and multi-device use.

build quality
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6

Build quality is one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly calling the chassis solid, tight, robust, or excellent.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.8

Build quality is strong, with reviewers citing great workmanship, solid construction, and no creaking or rattling.

button customization
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Button reassignment is supported in software, and reviewers found basic remapping straightforward even if the software is minimal.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.9

Button customization is extensive, including remapping, Hypershift, secondary functions, and user-defined actions.

button responsiveness
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.7

Responsiveness is praised in use, especially in gaming, with no delays or misfires reported by the strongest positive reviews.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7

Button responsiveness is strong overall, with fast, clean, snappy, or minimal-travel clicks reported across many reviews.

cable flexibility
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.2

The cable is generally flexible or thoughtfully angled for charging and wired use, though one reviewer found it stiff.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
3.6

Cable flexibility is mixed: some reviews praise the lightweight SpeedFlex-style cable, while others call the included cable stiff or not lightweight.

charging convenience
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Charging is easy and play-and-charge use is supported, with one review reporting a very fast full charge and others noting a two-hour estimate.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.6

Charging convenience is strong when using the optional dock or wireless charging puck, but the best experience usually costs extra.

claw grip comfort
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.7

The XM2we is most consistently praised as a claw-grip mouse, especially for medium to large hands and aggressive claw styles.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.0

Claw grip comfort is mixed; some reviewers found it usable or comfortable, while others said claw grip was awkward or less ideal.

click latency
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Click latency evidence is positive overall, with adjustable debounce and several reviewers reporting no laggy click latency.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.8

Click latency evidence is positive, with low-latency claims, optical-switch responsiveness, and no debounce-related play issues.

click noise
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
2.0

Click noise is a drawback in the one review that directly discusses it, describing the buttons as loud.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
3.9

Click noise is mixed: main clicks can be louder, while some reviewers praise quiet wheel or click behavior.

connection stability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5

Connection stability is strong in direct reports, with reviewers noting no drops, lags, hiccups, or similar wireless problems.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.5

Connection stability is mostly positive, but not perfect; reviewers cite reliable operation while a few mention drops, scroll-wheel freezes, or power-cycling.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
No score yet
Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.2

Cross-platform compatibility is context-dependent: multi-device use is supported, but Linux support relies on community tools.

debounce customization
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5

Debounce adjustment is repeatedly supported, including settings down to zero milliseconds in software.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
No score yet
dock compatibility
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
No score yet
Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7

Dock compatibility is well supported, with repeated mentions of Mouse Dock Pro and related charging or high-polling features.

DPI range
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

The PAW3370 sensor supports a high 19,000 CPI range, which reviewers present as enough for competitive shooter use.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.9

The DPI range is extremely high, with repeated 35K references and fine DPI-step control, but reviewers often described such high settings as overkill.

drag click support
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.9

Drag-click support is directly praised in one review, which found the grippy coating and button travel unusually strong for high CPS.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
No score yet
durability over time
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5

Durability evidence comes mainly from optical-switch design, no double-click issues, and switch ratings rather than long-term ownership.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.2

Durability over time has limited but positive evidence from long-term use comments.

ecosystem integration
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
No score yet
Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.5

Ecosystem integration is strong through Chroma, Razer multi-device dongles, and synchronized Razer hardware setups.

ergonomic design
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5

Ergonomic evidence centers on the shape, thumb-access side buttons, low button height, and stability for claw-oriented grip styles.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7

Ergonomic design is one of the most consistently praised traits, especially the contoured right-handed shape and thumb rest.

fingertip grip comfort
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
2.7

Fingertip comfort is mixed to weak, with reviewers saying the mouse is wide or not ideal for fingertip grip unless the hand size fits.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
3.5

Fingertip comfort is weaker and more hand-size dependent, with several reviewers saying the weight or shape makes fingertip use less comfortable.

firmware reliability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.1

Firmware evidence is limited but positive to mixed: reviewers report adequate firmware performance and mention updates addressing reported issues.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
3.0

Firmware reliability evidence is limited and negative-leaning, focused on a convoluted dock pairing and update process.

FPS gaming suitability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6

FPS suitability is a clear strength, with multiple reviewers testing or recommending it for shooters and fast aim-heavy play.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
3.5

FPS suitability is mixed: the sensor is capable, but the weight makes it less ideal for competitive shooters and fast flicks.

glide smoothness
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Glide is a major strength on suitable pads, repeatedly described as smooth, fluid, or excellent, though some hard or soft pad edge cases appear.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.6

Glide smoothness is generally good on mouse pads, with buttery or smooth glide praise, though hard surfaces can be less ideal.

grip texture
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.2

Grip texture is divisive: many praise the coating as grippy, while others find it slippery, dirty-looking, or lacking enough grip.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7

Grip texture is a strength, with rubberized sides, textured surfaces, and secure thumb support frequently praised.

handedness options
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
2.0

The side-button layout and shape make this effectively a right-handed mouse, with no left-handed option discussed.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
2.7

Handedness options are limited because the mouse is repeatedly described as right-handed or unsuitable for left-handed users.

left and right click quality
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6

Left and right clicks are generally praised for crisp optical feel, though some reviewers found them heavy or uneven.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.2

Left and right click quality is mostly positive for speed and actuation, with one review calling the clicks somewhat squishy.

lift-off distance
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Lift-off distance is adjustable, with reviewers citing 2mm stock behavior and a 1mm option through software.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.8

Lift-off distance control is a strength, with adjustable or consistent lift-off behavior mentioned across software and sensor testing.

long-session comfort
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Long-session evidence is positive but limited, with one review emphasizing low strain over extended use.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7

Long-session comfort is strong, with reviewers praising reduced fatigue, easy long sessions, and wrist comfort.

macro support
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.0

Macro support is present in the companion app according to PC Gamer, though only one review discusses it directly.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.9

Macro support is strong through Synapse, Hypershift, and software macro recording or full macro functionality.

materials quality
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Material evidence supports a thick plastic chassis and matte coating that reviewers generally describe as high quality.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7

Materials quality is positive, especially the matte/textured plastics, rubber surfaces, and premium-feeling finishes.

MMO gaming suitability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
No score yet
Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.3

MMO suitability is fairly good because extra buttons, Hypershift, and scroll-wheel inputs help, though it is not a dedicated MMO mouse.

MOBA gaming suitability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
No score yet
Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.3

MOBA suitability is positive where mentioned, mainly because of extra programmable inputs and customization.

motion consistency
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5

Motion consistency is strong in direct testing, including stable polling-rate behavior and no noticeable latency comments.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.8

Motion consistency is praised through perfect consistency, Motion Sync, and stable sensor behavior in fast and slow movements.

onboard memory
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Onboard profiles are directly supported in Tom’s Hardware, which says saved profiles can be used without installing software.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7

Onboard memory/profile evidence is solid, with several reviews citing up to five stored profiles or onboard profile storage.

palm grip comfort
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
3.9

Palm comfort is workable but not the main target; some reviewers liked it for palm grip, while others said the shape favors claw.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.6

Palm grip comfort is a major strength, with multiple reviewers calling it exceptionally comfortable or clearly palm-oriented.

polling rate
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.2

Polling-rate support is repeatedly mentioned, with 1,000Hz behavior described as responsive or stable.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.5

Polling-rate support is strong, reaching high rates with optional accessories, while out-of-box rates are still considered sufficient by many reviewers.

portability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
3.1

Portability is mixed because it is wireless and light, but lack of dongle storage or Bluetooth limits travel/laptop convenience.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.6

Portability evidence is limited but positive, centered on Bluetooth and usefulness for laptop or multi-PC setups.

premium feel
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6

Premium feel is repeatedly tied to the coating, build, quality, and overall hand feel despite the no-frills feature set.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7

Premium feel is strong, with reviewers describing it as high-end, luxurious, and a top-pick style product.

profile switching
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.2

Profile switching is supported through onboard profiles or the bottom mode button, but its underside placement limits on-the-fly use.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.6

Profile switching is supported by bottom buttons, DPI/profile controls, and stored profiles on the mouse.

programmable buttons
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
3.9

Programmable buttons are present in a simple five-button layout with an extra underside button in one review.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
5.0

Programmable-button coverage is very strong, with reviews repeatedly citing 11 to 13 programmable controls.

RGB features
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
1.1

RGB features are intentionally absent; reviewers often treat the no-RGB design as a no-frills choice, but the feature score is low.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7

RGB features are widely praised for Chroma lighting, multiple zones, logo/wheel lighting, and underglow effects.

scroll wheel quality
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.2

Scroll-wheel quality is mixed but mostly good, with praise for stiffness, tactility, and defined steps plus some complaints about rigidity.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.8

The HyperScroll wheel is one of the clearest strengths, praised for tactile/free-spin modes, Smart-Reel, 4-way behavior, and productivity value.

sensor performance
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Sensor performance is consistently solid to excellent, despite several reviewers noting the PAW3370 is older than newer 3395-based rivals.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7

Sensor performance was broadly praised as top-tier, flawless, or effectively faultless, though several reviewers said the upgrade is not always noticeable.

shape comfort
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Shape comfort is strong for XM1 fans and claw grip, but less safe for smaller hands or non-claw grip styles.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.5

Shape comfort is broadly positive, especially for users who fit the Basilisk form, though some reviewers found the slimmer or grip-specific shape limiting.

side button quality
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6

Side-button quality is one of the most consistent positives, with repeated praise for placement, tactility, and low travel.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7

Side buttons are usually described as easy to reach, tactile, crisp, and not overly easy to hit accidentally.

software stability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
3.1

Software stability is mixed: the app is simple and works for configuration, but battery reporting is criticized as unreliable.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7

Software stability evidence is favorable where cited, with stable Synapse behavior and no software connectivity issues in two reviews.

software usability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Software usability is strong overall because the tool is simple, light, and focused on essentials rather than bloat.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.4

Software usability is feature-rich and powerful, but reviewers vary on whether Synapse feels intuitive or annoying.

surface compatibility
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.1

Surface compatibility is good overall, but reviewers note the glide behaves best on suitable soft pads and may feel rough on hard pads.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.6

Surface compatibility is strong, including soft, hard, hybrid, and glass-surface mentions, with some caveats about shiny or hard surfaces.

switch durability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5

Switch durability is supported by optical-switch advantages, rated click life, and lack of accidental double-clicking.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.9

Switch durability is well supported by repeated 90-million-click and optical-switch longevity mentions.

switch feel
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.1

Switch feel is broadly good but not universally loved because reviewers split between crisp, tactile praise and complaints about heaviness.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.6

Switch feel is generally tactile, clicky, and snappy, although one reviewer preferred the firmness of other Razer mice.

tilt gesture controls
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
1.2

Tilt controls are essentially absent because the middle mouse button lacks left/right tilt switches.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.8

Tilt controls are strongly supported by the four-way wheel and left/right horizontal inputs, which reviewers found useful for extra functions.

value for money
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Value is broadly positive around $79.99 or £80, though PC Gamer considered it less automatic against cheaper competitors.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
3.5

Value for money is mixed to weak: the mouse is feature-rich, but many reviewers question its price or upgrade value versus older Basilisk models.

water and dust resistance
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
3.6

Water and dust resistance is only lightly supported by the hole-free shell comment, not by any formal IP rating or test.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
No score yet
weight
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Weight is consistently light at roughly 62-65g, though some reviewers compare it unfavorably with 55g competitors.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
3.1

Weight is the main tradeoff: reviewers repeatedly call it heavy or not ultralight, though some find it controlled rather than burdensome.

wireless latency
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.8

Wireless latency evidence is strong, with reviewers reporting no noticeable latency or very low measured motion/click latency.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.8

Wireless latency is praised as low or unnoticeable, especially over 2.4GHz HyperSpeed and optical-switch setups.

wireless performance
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6

Wireless performance is consistently strong, with reviews reporting smooth play, no dropouts, and no meaningful wired/wireless difference.

Product 2: Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.6

Wireless performance is generally strong, with HyperSpeed, reliable 2.4GHz behavior, and smooth multi-device use; one review reported interference until relocating the dongle.