Compare Endgame Gear XM2we vs ASUS ROG Keris II Ace

P1 Endgame Gear XM2we
P2 ASUS ROG Keris II Ace

Comparison Takeaways

Endgame Gear XM2we

Where It Has the Edge

  • debounce customization is 4.5 vs 2.2. Debounce adjustment is repeatedly supported, including settings down to zero milliseconds in software.
  • software usability is 4.4 vs 3.0. Software usability is strong overall because the tool is simple, light, and focused on essentials rather than bloat.
  • firmware reliability is 4.1 vs 2.8. Firmware evidence is limited but positive to mixed: reviewers report adequate firmware performance and mention updates addressing reported...
  • side button quality is 4.6 vs 3.8. Side-button quality is one of the most consistent positives, with repeated praise for placement, tactility, and low travel.

ASUS ROG Keris II Ace

Where It Has the Edge

  • RGB features is 4.2 vs 1.1. RGB is limited to the scroll wheel but appreciated because many ultralight esports mice omit lighting entirely; some...
  • Bluetooth support is 4.5 vs 2.7. Bluetooth is a well-liked convenience feature, especially for multi-device and non-gaming use, while reviewers still favor 2.4GHz for...
  • click noise is 3.6 vs 2.0. Click noise is divisive: some reviewers found it quiet and pleasant, while others said the optical switches are...
  • portability is 4.3 vs 3.1. Portability is helped by Bluetooth, dongle storage, multi-device use, and travel-friendly wireless operation, even if the booster setup...
Average score
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.0
Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2
2.4GHz connectivity
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Reviewers confirm 2.4GHz wireless or dongle-based wireless, with no connection-drop complaints in supported reviews.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Reviewers consistently find the tri-mode setup useful, with 2.4GHz wireless treated as the main gaming connection and Bluetooth/USB adding flexibility.

acceleration control
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.1

Sensor specs and reviewer usage support strong acceleration handling for fast flicks, though it is discussed as capability rather than a separate tuning feature.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

The sensor's 50g acceleration rating is repeatedly cited as part of its top-tier performance spec, with no practical complaints about acceleration handling.

Accuracy and tracking precision
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6

Tracking is consistently described as accurate, with reviewers praising the PAW3370 implementation even during fast movement.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Tracking is one of the strongest consensus wins: reviewers describe precise, smooth, accurate movement across games and surfaces, though one noted very high DPI becomes impractical.

balance and weight distribution
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Most reviewers found the mouse well balanced or stable, with a few noting it can feel slightly rear- or side-heavy compared with lighter rivals.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Most reviewers praise the balance as centered and easy to control, but one detailed teardown-style review found a slight forward bias.

battery life
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Battery life is generally good, ranging from about 48 hours to more than a week, with several reviewers reporting week-plus use.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

Battery life is generally considered strong at normal wireless settings, though several reviewers note high polling rates and RGB reduce runtime.

Bluetooth support
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
2.7

Bluetooth evidence is mixed: one review says Bluetooth is present, while another explicitly says the mouse lacks Bluetooth support.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Bluetooth is a well-liked convenience feature, especially for multi-device and non-gaming use, while reviewers still favor 2.4GHz for competitive play.

build quality
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6

Build quality is one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly calling the chassis solid, tight, robust, or excellent.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Build quality is mostly praised as rigid and solid for a 54g mouse, with only a few unit-level notes about creaking, rattle, or average feel.

button customization
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Button reassignment is supported in software, and reviewers found basic remapping straightforward even if the software is minimal.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

Button remapping and control customization are well supported through Armoury Crate or onboard controls, including DPI, polling, and command assignment.

button responsiveness
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.7

Responsiveness is praised in use, especially in gaming, with no delays or misfires reported by the strongest positive reviews.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Button responsiveness is broadly positive, with reviewers calling clicks snappy, low-latency, precise, or consistent, even when switch feel is debated.

cable flexibility
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.2

The cable is generally flexible or thoughtfully angled for charging and wired use, though one reviewer found it stiff.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

The included cable is usually described as flexible, light, or low-drag, though one reviewer found it somewhat stiff and another called it only medium.

charging convenience
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Charging is easy and play-and-charge use is supported, with one review reporting a very fast full charge and others noting a two-hour estimate.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

Charging convenience is positive overall thanks to USB-C, an included cable, and a universally sized port, though charging was not a major focus of most reviews.

claw grip comfort
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.7

The XM2we is most consistently praised as a claw-grip mouse, especially for medium to large hands and aggressive claw styles.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2

Claw comfort is generally good for relaxed claw users and smaller-to-medium hands, but not every reviewer found the shape ideal for aggressive or large-hand claw use.

click latency
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Click latency evidence is positive overall, with adjustable debounce and several reviewers reporting no laggy click latency.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

Measured and reported click latency is very low, with reviewers citing roughly 1ms or sub-millisecond behavior depending on mode.

click noise
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
2.0

Click noise is a drawback in the one review that directly discusses it, describing the buttons as loud.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.6

Click noise is divisive: some reviewers found it quiet and pleasant, while others said the optical switches are louder, hollow, or not suited to silent-click preferences.

connection stability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5

Connection stability is strong in direct reports, with reviewers noting no drops, lags, hiccups, or similar wireless problems.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Connection stability is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly reporting no dropouts, no stutters, no hiccups, and stable high-polling wireless use.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Multi-device support is a meaningful advantage because Bluetooth can pair with several devices and the mouse is described as useful across PC, laptop, console, or travel setups.

debounce customization
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5

Debounce adjustment is repeatedly supported, including settings down to zero milliseconds in software.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
2.2

Debounce customization is weak because the available evidence says there is no debounce setting or that debounce is not adjustable.

DPI range
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

The PAW3370 sensor supports a high 19,000 CPI range, which reviewers present as enough for competitive shooter use.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
5.0

The 42,000 DPI ceiling is repeatedly highlighted as class-leading, though reviewers often note most players will never use the upper range.

drag click support
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.9

Drag-click support is directly praised in one review, which found the grippy coating and button travel unusually strong for high CPS.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
No score yet
durability over time
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5

Durability evidence comes mainly from optical-switch design, no double-click issues, and switch ratings rather than long-term ownership.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Durability evidence centers on optical switches, double-click resistance, consistent performance over time, and serviceability such as hot-swappable switches.

ecosystem integration
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Ecosystem integration is positive through Aura Sync, Windows Dynamic Lighting mentions, and the ROG Omni Receiver's ability to pair with other ROG peripherals.

ergonomic design
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5

Ergonomic evidence centers on the shape, thumb-access side buttons, low button height, and stability for claw-oriented grip styles.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

The right-handed ergonomic design is a core strength, frequently described as comfortable, esports-focused, and well-shaped for palm or relaxed claw use.

fingertip grip comfort
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
2.7

Fingertip comfort is mixed to weak, with reviewers saying the mouse is wide or not ideal for fingertip grip unless the hand size fits.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
2.8

Fingertip comfort is mixed: a few reviewers could use it or liked the control, but several said the ergonomic shell is awkward or not recommended for fingertip.

firmware reliability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.1

Firmware evidence is limited but positive to mixed: reviewers report adequate firmware performance and mention updates addressing reported issues.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
2.8

Firmware reliability is a minor concern because at least one review described updates as inconvenient and limiting software reconfiguration until completed.

FPS gaming suitability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6

FPS suitability is a clear strength, with multiple reviewers testing or recommending it for shooters and fast aim-heavy play.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

FPS suitability is excellent, with reviewers repeatedly tying the mouse to esports, Valorant, Counter-Strike, and high-speed competitive aim.

glide smoothness
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Glide is a major strength on suitable pads, repeatedly described as smooth, fluid, or excellent, though some hard or soft pad edge cases appear.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Glide is consistently praised thanks to smooth PTFE feet, spare feet, and strong performance on cloth, glass, and other surfaces.

grip texture
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.2

Grip texture is divisive: many praise the coating as grippy, while others find it slippery, dirty-looking, or lacking enough grip.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.6

Grip texture is the most disputed physical trait: some like the ridges or roughened surface, while others call the coating slippery and dependent on grip tape.

handedness options
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
2.0

The side-button layout and shape make this effectively a right-handed mouse, with no left-handed option discussed.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
2.3

Handedness is a clear limitation because the shape is right-handed, with left-handed and ambidextrous users directed elsewhere.

left and right click quality
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6

Left and right clicks are generally praised for crisp optical feel, though some reviewers found them heavy or uneven.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Left/right click quality is generally strong, with PBT or optical construction and consistent feel praised, though a few reviewers criticized travel or hollow feel.

lift-off distance
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Lift-off distance is adjustable, with reviewers citing 2mm stock behavior and a 1mm option through software.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.9

Lift-off distance is adjustable but not universally loved; reviewers liked having the control, while some found the low/high choices too limited.

long-session comfort
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Long-session evidence is positive but limited, with one review emphasizing low strain over extended use.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

Long-session comfort is mostly strong due to low weight and ergonomic support, though some hand sizes reported cramps or fit issues.

macro support
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.0

Macro support is present in the companion app according to PC Gamer, though only one review discusses it directly.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2

Macro support exists through Armoury Crate, but it is not a headline strength and onboard macro behavior is more limited.

materials quality
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Material evidence supports a thick plastic chassis and matte coating that reviewers generally describe as high quality.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

Materials quality is mixed-positive: the nylon/PBT construction supports low weight and rigidity, but coating feel and premium texture divide reviewers.

MMO gaming suitability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.2

Evidence for MMO use is limited but mildly positive where reviewers mention Final Fantasy XIV, Diablo IV, or mapping side buttons for raids; it is not an MMO-first mouse.

motion consistency
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5

Motion consistency is strong in direct testing, including stable polling-rate behavior and no noticeable latency comments.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.8

Motion consistency is strong in practice through smooth high-polling movement and stable tracking, but MotionSync and ripple controls are not fully configurable.

onboard memory
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Onboard profiles are directly supported in Tom’s Hardware, which says saved profiles can be used without installing software.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

Onboard memory and onboard controls are meaningful positives, with reviewers citing hardware profiles, on-device controls, and software-free settings changes.

palm grip comfort
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
3.9

Palm comfort is workable but not the main target; some reviewers liked it for palm grip, while others said the shape favors claw.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Palm grip comfort is a major strength for small-to-medium or relaxed palm users, though very large hands may prefer bigger ergonomic mice.

polling rate
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.2

Polling-rate support is repeatedly mentioned, with 1,000Hz behavior described as responsive or stable.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Polling rate support is one of the main selling points: 4,000Hz wireless and 8,000Hz wired are repeatedly highlighted, but 8,000Hz is not wireless.

portability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
3.1

Portability is mixed because it is wireless and light, but lack of dongle storage or Bluetooth limits travel/laptop convenience.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

Portability is helped by Bluetooth, dongle storage, multi-device use, and travel-friendly wireless operation, even if the booster setup can be bulky.

premium feel
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6

Premium feel is repeatedly tied to the coating, build, quality, and overall hand feel despite the no-frills feature set.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.1

Premium feel is mixed: many call the mouse solid or feature-rich, but coating, price, and button feel stop some reviewers from calling it universally premium.

profile switching
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.2

Profile switching is supported through onboard profiles or the bottom mode button, but its underside placement limits on-the-fly use.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.8

Profile switching is supported through profiles and button combinations, but the underside DPI/profile button placement is sometimes criticized.

programmable buttons
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
3.9

Programmable buttons are present in a simple five-button layout with an extra underside button in one review.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Programmable button coverage is solid for an FPS mouse, typically five or six physical buttons plus scroll directions through software.

RGB features
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
1.1

RGB features are intentionally absent; reviewers often treat the no-RGB design as a no-frills choice, but the feature score is low.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2

RGB is limited to the scroll wheel but appreciated because many ultralight esports mice omit lighting entirely; some reviewers dislike the execution.

scroll wheel quality
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.2

Scroll-wheel quality is mixed but mostly good, with praise for stiffness, tactility, and defined steps plus some complaints about rigidity.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.7

Scroll wheel quality is mixed: several reviewers praise tactile, quiet, or smooth behavior, while others report average tactility, light resistance, or overscrolling.

sensor performance
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Sensor performance is consistently solid to excellent, despite several reviewers noting the PAW3370 is older than newer 3395-based rivals.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Sensor performance is a standout strength, with the AimPoint Pro repeatedly described as accurate, high-spec, smooth, and reliable.

shape comfort
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Shape comfort is strong for XM1 fans and claw grip, but less safe for smaller hands or non-claw grip styles.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Shape comfort is broadly positive, especially for small-to-medium ergonomic users, but fit varies by hand size and grip preference.

side button quality
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6

Side-button quality is one of the most consistent positives, with repeated praise for placement, tactility, and low travel.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.8

Side button quality is one of the more mixed areas, with praise for crispness and placement offset by repeated complaints about small size, stiffness, or high placement.

skate durability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Skate durability evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer reporting the stock skates held up well and no dust or grinding on glass.

software stability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
3.1

Software stability is mixed: the app is simple and works for configuration, but battery reporting is criticized as unreliable.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

Software stability is acceptable in the lighter Armoury Crate Gear experience, but broader Armoury Crate concerns remain around bloat and background processes.

software usability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Software usability is strong overall because the tool is simple, light, and focused on essentials rather than bloat.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.0

Software usability is mixed-to-negative: it exposes deep settings, but many reviewers call Armoury Crate bloated, slow, heavy, or inconvenient.

surface compatibility
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.1

Surface compatibility is good overall, but reviewers note the glide behaves best on suitable soft pads and may feel rough on hard pads.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Surface compatibility is excellent, with reviewers citing glass tracking, surface calibration, and reliable behavior across mouse pads, tables, and other surfaces.

switch durability
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.5

Switch durability is supported by optical-switch advantages, rated click life, and lack of accidental double-clicking.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
5.0

Switch durability is excellent on paper and in reviewer discussion thanks to ROG optical switches rated for 100 million clicks and reduced double-click risk.

switch feel
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.1

Switch feel is broadly good but not universally loved because reviewers split between crisp, tactile praise and complaints about heaviness.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

Switch feel is mixed-positive: many like the crisp optical clicks, but some find them mushy, hollow, heavier, or less satisfying than mechanical alternatives.

tilt gesture controls
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
1.2

Tilt controls are essentially absent because the middle mouse button lacks left/right tilt switches.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
No score yet
value for money
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.4

Value is broadly positive around $79.99 or £80, though PC Gamer considered it less automatic against cheaper competitors.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.8

Value is context-dependent: reviewers agree it is expensive, but several justify the price for competitive FPS users while others recommend cheaper alternatives.

water and dust resistance
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
3.6

Water and dust resistance is only lightly supported by the hole-free shell comment, not by any formal IP rating or test.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
No score yet
weight
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.3

Weight is consistently light at roughly 62-65g, though some reviewers compare it unfavorably with 55g competitors.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
5.0

Weight is a clear strength, with nearly every review emphasizing the 54g or 1.9-ounce design as exceptionally light for an ergonomic wireless mouse.

wireless latency
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.8

Wireless latency evidence is strong, with reviewers reporting no noticeable latency or very low measured motion/click latency.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Wireless latency is treated as excellent over 2.4GHz with high polling, while Bluetooth is repeatedly framed as a convenience mode rather than a competitive mode.

wireless performance
Product 1: Endgame Gear XM2we
4.6

Wireless performance is consistently strong, with reviews reporting smooth play, no dropouts, and no meaningful wired/wireless difference.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

Wireless performance is excellent overall, with stable 4,000Hz operation, no dropouts, and strong sensor performance frequently reported.