Compare Turtle Beach Burst II Pro vs Cherry M64 Pro

2.4GHz connectivity was praised as a fast, stable wireless option.

The 2.4GHz connection was praised in one review as both fast and reliable.

Reviewers consistently found tracking accurate, with no major precision complaints across standard and unusual surfaces.

Reviewers praised tracking precision for smooth response, aim adjustments, and accurate shots, with one M64 user calling the experience very good.

Balance and weight distribution were praised in reviews that found the mouse well-balanced and drag-free.

Balance and weight distribution drew positive comments, with reviewers describing the build as well balanced or having good weight balance.

Battery life was broadly praised, especially at 1K and even with several days of 8K use, though one review noted the high-polling compromise.

Battery life was mixed: several reviews found it strong or good, while IGN said peak-performance use drained it unpredictably.

Bluetooth support was considered useful and convenient, especially for device switching or alternate connection modes.

Build quality was split: some reviewers found it solid and creak-free, while others reported creaking or fragility worries.

Build quality was generally solid, with many reviewers reporting sturdy shells and no creaking, though some found flexing or minor creaks.

Button customization was a clear strength, with several reviewers noting easy remapping and broad control options.

Button customization was limited in the one scored review, which said the mouse restricts customization.

Button responsiveness was generally strong, with fast clicks and accessible side controls, though main-click tactility split reviewers.

Button responsiveness was mostly reliable, with reviewers saying buttons were fine in game, avoided misclicks, and never misbehaved.

Cable flexibility was a weak spot, with reviewers noting stiffness or tugging even while acknowledging acceptable quality.

Cable flexibility itself was generally liked, but flexible cables did not fully solve the awkward side-charging experience.

Charging convenience was positive overall thanks to USB-C quick charging and the ability to use the mouse while plugged in.

Charging convenience was the most common drawback, with quick charging and flexible cables offset by an awkward side port.

Claw grip comfort was mostly positive for medium hands, but duplicate reviews found the shape awkward for a claw-palm hybrid.

Claw grip comfort was generally strong thanks to the low button height, but large-hand users may still feel cramped.

Click latency evidence was strongly positive, with optical-switch and debounce comments pointing to fast, responsive inputs.

Click noise was mixed to negative overall, with loud-switch complaints offset by quieter or controlled sound in one review.

Click noise was acceptable to mixed, ranging from loud in one review to balanced or mellow in others.

Connection stability was strong, with no-disconnect, stable-connection, and locked-in comments.

Connection stability was strong in the scored reviews, with no hiccups, no stuttering, and no reliability problems called out.

Cross-platform compatibility was supported by onboard memory comments about settings carrying across systems.

Debounce customization was viewed positively as a useful control for click behavior.

Debounce customization received negative evidence from one reviewer, who found the lowest debounce setting caused ghost or slam-click behavior.

The high DPI range was treated as fast and capable, with reviewers tying it to broad sensitivity coverage rather than everyday necessity.

DPI range was mixed: one reviewer found enough presets to settle in, while another criticized the lack of fine granularity.

Durability over time was mixed, with one review praising finish wear resistance and another treating click wobble as concerning.

Ecosystem integration was praised for Swarm II acting as one hub for multiple Turtle Beach devices.

Ergonomic design was praised for a natural thumb rest and comfortable feel.

The ergonomic design was usually praised for the thumb groove, low profile, and locked-in feel, but it was less successful for larger hands.

Fingertip comfort was split, with some suitability claims but one reviewer saying the shape strains fingertips.

Fingertip grip comfort was weak in the available evidence because reviewers found the curvature or wider dimensions awkward for fingertip use.

Firmware/update reliability was a weak point in the duplicate reviews because setup around the required update was confusing.

Firmware reliability had limited positive evidence, with one reviewer calling the dongle and mouse firmware update super easy.

FPS gaming suitability was generally positive because of speed, tracking, and control, though duplicate reviews disliked it for Fortnite due to shape.

FPS suitability was generally positive for responsiveness and precision, although one reviewer viewed the M64 shape as better for slower-paced play.

Glide smoothness was a consistent strength, helped by PTFE feet and a low-friction feel.

Glide smoothness was praised, with reviewers describing the M64 as butter smooth and noting excellent glide across surfaces.

Grip texture and included grip tape were repeatedly praised for control, especially during long or sweaty sessions.

Grip texture was mixed: reviewers liked the grippy or smooth finish, while one criticized the black coating as a fingerprint magnet.

Main left and right clicks were mixed, ranging from solid and tactile to too padded or unsatisfying for some testers.

Left and right click quality was mixed because reviewers noted wobble or a stiff right button despite otherwise usable performance.

Lift-off distance tuning was viewed positively as part of the deeper sensor customization set.

Lift-off distance had limited mixed evidence, with one reviewer needing to switch to 2 mm when using hard surfaces.

Long-session comfort was strongly positive, with reviewers praising marathon comfort, long gaming sessions, and reduced hand fatigue.

Long-session comfort had limited but strong evidence, with one reviewer reporting no hand fatigue after long gaming sessions.

Macro support was useful overall, but one reviewer found the included game macro list outdated for the latest Battlefield.

Materials quality was generally positive, with praise for solid construction and non-plasticky feel, offset by fingerprint-prone finish.

Materials quality was mixed, balancing praise for a non-hollow shell and durable finish against complaints about cheap feel and fingerprint-prone coating.

Motion consistency was praised for smooth flicks, stable micro-adjustments, and little to no stuttering in faster movement.

Motion consistency was a strength, with reviewers describing smooth response, consistent tracking, and no wireless tracking problems.

Onboard memory was valued because settings appeared to persist on the device and could carry across systems.

Palm grip comfort was praised by one reviewer who found the wider body supportive for relaxed palm use.

Palm grip comfort depended on hand size, with some reviewers able to palm it comfortably while IGN found it cramped for large hands.

Polling-rate impressions were mixed: the 8K headline impressed some reviewers, while others called the benefit subtle or mostly box-ticking.

The polling rate was generally seen as responsive and smooth, though IGN found the jump beyond 1000Hz hard to notice and tied it to battery drain.

Portability was supported by the mouse’s light, convenient, hand-disappearing feel and endurance-focused design.

Premium feel was strong where discussed, with reviewers praising the premium look, solidity, and quality feedback.

Premium feel was mixed: some impressions found it solid and distinctive, while IGN said the ultralight design felt a little cheap.

Profile and setting switching was divisive: on-device presets can be quick, but bottom controls and indicator-light workflows were tedious or problematic.

Programmable controls were viewed as useful, with reviewers praising the breadth of remapping and per-control customization.

RGB features were limited; one reviewer said users looking for flashy gamer lighting would be underwhelmed.

The scroll wheel earned positive comments for quiet operation, tension, and responsiveness, despite one reviewer noting softer notches.

Scroll wheel quality was well received for tactile steps, satisfying use, granular control, and easy movement.

Sensor performance was a major strength, with praise for smooth, stable, accurate tracking and only minor caveats in one review at low battery.

Sensor performance was consistently positive, with reviewers reporting good tracking, no hiccups, and reliable behavior even on less-than-ideal surfaces.

Shape comfort was the most polarizing comfort attribute: some found it controlled and neutral, while duplicate reviews found the rear flare awkward.

Shape comfort was mostly praised for a natural, distinctive M64 feel, though reviewers also framed it as a less-safe shape for some users.

Side buttons were mostly well received for access and precision, with some notes that they were louder or more traditional than the mains.

Side button quality split reviewers: some complained about reach, mushiness, or pre-travel, while others praised the thumb buttons as dependable or exceptional.

Software stability was mixed: one reviewer said it never failed, while another found Easy Shift flaky.

Software usability was mostly positive for clear controls and depth, but duplicate reviews found one update/setup flow confusing.

Software usability was polarizing: no-software plug-and-play appealed to some, while others found manual button combinations annoying or tedious.

Surface compatibility was excellent in the evidence, with reviewers reporting strong performance on cloth, hard pads, glass, wood, and other surfaces.

Surface compatibility was positive in the scored review, which found the sensor performed well on plastic and wood surfaces.

Switch feel was divisive: some reviewers praised crisp, stable, satisfying clicks, while others disliked the padded or deep feel.

Switch feel was mostly praised as amazing, fast, snappy, and satisfying, though one early hands-on impression was more reserved.

Value for money was mixed: reviewers liked the feature set versus some flagships, but several still considered it pricey or not the cheapest.

Value for money was highly mixed, with praise from some reviewers but repeated concerns about the 8K upcharge and $139 competition.

Low weight was one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly praised for speed, control, and easy movement.

Weight was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly calling the mouse very light, impressively lightweight, or easy to maneuver.

Wireless latency was one of the strongest attributes, with reviewers praising extremely responsive 8K wireless behavior and low-latency test results.

Wireless latency was praised, with reviewers reporting no lag, no delays, and no wireless-experience issues.

Wireless performance was praised for responsiveness and reliability across several reviews.

Wireless performance was a major strength, with reviewers reporting top-notch, smooth, responsive, and issue-free wireless use.