Compare Cherry M68 Pro vs ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace

The 2.4GHz connection was praised directly as fast and reliable in competitive use.

2.4GHz connectivity received strong marks for gaming preference, lag-free behavior, and wireless 8K support without extra add-ons.

Acceleration control was specifically praised in testing where the reviewer found no jitter, skipping, or unwanted acceleration.

Reviewers consistently found tracking precise and confidence-inspiring, from accurate desktop movement to flawless aim adjustments in games.

Reviewers consistently described accurate, stable aiming and precise corrections, with especially strong praise in shooter and aim-control contexts.

The mouse was described as well-balanced by reviewers who focused on weight distribution and in-hand balance.

Balance and weight distribution received strong praise from reviewers who found the mouse well balanced and natural in hand.

Battery life was good in standard or lower polling modes, but 8K/Pro modes shortened runtime and battery warnings were a recurring weakness.

Battery life was good at standard polling but mixed at 8K, where reviewers reported notably shorter runtimes.

Bluetooth support was praised for stable productivity use and broader multi-device convenience, though competitive use favored 2.4GHz.

Build quality was consistently strong, with reviewers describing the shell as sturdy, solid, well-constructed, or tank-like.

Build quality was strongly praised, with repeated comments about rigidity, no flex, no creaks, and premium shell integrity.

Button customization was limited by the software-free design, especially for remapping and fine adjustments.

Button customization was rated well because Gear Link exposes broad assignment controls and reviewers found the interface comprehensive.

Button responsiveness was usually praised for quick actuation and reset, though one reviewer treated the buttons as merely fine in-game.

Button responsiveness was widely positive, with reviewers calling the clicks immediate, quick, consistent, and dependable in play.

Cable impressions were mixed: reviewers liked the flexible braided/EZcord cables, but side-cable movement could feel encumbered.

Cable flexibility had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer calling the included cable thin and flexible.

Charging convenience was sharply mixed: quick charging and flexible cables helped, but the side USB-C placement annoyed many reviewers.

Charging convenience was positive because reviewers could keep playing while charging or recover hours of play from short top-ups.

Claw grip support was a clear strength, with multiple reviewers saying the low-front shape suits relaxed or claw-style control.

Claw grip comfort was a major strength, with multiple reviewers calling the shape suitable, easy, or ideal for claw users.

Primary clicks were described as quick, responsive, and swift to reset, supporting low-latency-feeling inputs in the reviewed units.

Click latency evidence was limited but positive, with optical switches described as avoiding debounce delay.

Click noise was acceptable to positive for some reviewers, but another found the buttons pretty loud.

Click noise was acceptable to positive: one reviewer found clicks louder than the predecessor, while another found the optical sound mild.

Connection stability was strong, especially over 2.4GHz, with repeated reports of no hiccups, lag, or stuttering.

Connection stability was a strength across Bluetooth, dongle, and wireless sessions, with no dropouts, desyncs, or odd behavior reported.

Cross-platform compatibility was positive because web-based settings and easy PC/Mac switching made the mouse flexible across devices.

Debounce customization had enough increments for preferences in one review, but broader setup friction remained tied to no software.

DPI/CPI coverage was useful for preset users, but reviewers criticized the lack of granular software tuning for non-preset sensitivities.

The 42,000 DPI ceiling was seen as impressive but partly overkill, with reviewers noting most players will never use such a high range.

Durability-over-time evidence was mixed-negative, centered on coating residue and concern about click wobble rather than failures.

Durability over time evidence was positive but short-term, with click feel and button consistency holding up after intensive use.

The low-front ergonomic design was widely credited with improving control, grip security, and comfort.

Ergonomic design was praised for comfort and not fighting the user's grip, but reviewers stressed that shape fit remains personal.

Fingertip grip support was less certain, with one reviewer saying a G Pro X was probably the safer fingertip option.

Fingertip grip comfort was also strong, with praise for low-hump control and micro-adjustments, though size may affect smaller-hand users.

Firmware reliability had limited evidence, but one reviewer found the dongle and mouse firmware update easy.

FPS suitability was a major strength, with reviewers praising precise, responsive performance in shooters such as Counter-Strike, Valorant, and CS:GO.

FPS suitability was extremely strong, with repeated shooter-focused praise around instant reactions, precision, and competitive advantage.

Glide was usually smooth and easy, though reviewers noted skates, hard surfaces, or the missing center foot could affect feel.

Glide smoothness was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers praising smooth, low-friction movement across pads and stock feet.

Grip texture was mixed: several reviewers liked the traction or rubber grip, while the black coating drew fingerprint complaints.

Grip texture was mostly positive for grippy coatings and matte finishes, but some reviewers disliked slipperiness or fingerprints.

Handedness evidence was mixed: one left-handed reviewer liked it, while others noted the side-button layout favors right-handed users.

Left and right clicks were generally solid, easy, and satisfying, though one reviewer noted the M68 felt a little stiffer than the M64.

Left and right click quality was mostly strong, but one early unit had main-trigger rattle, creating a mild build-related caveat.

Lift-off options were adequate but not standout, and one reviewer had to raise LOD on hard surfaces.

Long-session comfort had limited but strong support, with one reviewer reporting no hand fatigue over extended gaming.

Long-session comfort was positive for low fatigue and wrist relief, though palm-grip marathon comfort favored larger ergonomic alternatives.

Materials quality was good but imperfect, combining useful traction and durable plastic with residue and fingerprint concerns.

Materials quality was praised for the bio-based nylon's feel, rigidity, and grippy surface, with minor smudge and slipperiness caveats.

MMO suitability was weak because one reviewer found the five-button layout limited for MMO gamers.

Motion consistency was a major strength, with reviewers reporting no inconsistencies, no hiccups, and flawless wireless tracking.

Motion consistency was rated strongly, with reviewers reporting stable cursors, reliable tracking, and no jitter under fast movement.

Onboard memory was the clearest functional drawback: one reviewer explicitly called its absence a downside for multi-PC use.

Palm grip comfort was limited for larger hands, with one reviewer specifically calling it cramped in palm grips.

Palm-grip comfort was mixed: one reviewer fit it well, while others preferred fuller right-handed shapes for long palm-heavy use.

The 8K polling rate impressed some reviewers with smooth responsiveness, while others found little detectable difference and noted battery tradeoffs.

8K polling was praised as a serious competitive feature, though several reviewers said gains can be subtle and battery cost rises at high rates.

Portability was good thanks to low weight and travel-friendly size, though one reviewer wanted a carrying bag.

Premium feel was mostly positive due to a solid, non-hollow shell, though one reviewer felt some details were not top-tier.

Premium feel was consistently strong, with reviewers describing high-quality impressions, sturdy construction, and a solid premium feel.

Profile and mode switching drew positive reactions for Zone Mode convenience, but underside DPI/profile controls created a usability caveat.

Programmable-button support was weak because reviewers noted that buttons could not be reprogrammed without software.

Programmable button evidence was positive but limited, centered on freely assignable buttons and full-feature button remapping.

RGB was treated as a small but useful extra, mainly around the illuminated scroll wheel and controllable logo lighting.

The scroll wheel was generally smooth, controlled, and pleasant, with a few reviewers describing it as merely okay or not ideal for repeated clicks.

Scroll wheel feedback was positive overall for precision, tactile notches, smoothness, and tension, with some productivity limitations noted.

The Pixart sensor drew broad praise for responsive, accurate tracking, with several reviewers calling it wonderful, snappy, or beautiful in use.

Sensor feedback was highly positive overall, with reviewers reporting precise or flawless tracking and only mild caveats that extreme DPI is mostly beyond normal use.

Shape comfort was the most polarizing area: several reviewers loved the low, controlled feel, while others found it cramped, wide, or odd.

Shape comfort was broadly positive for neutral, refined handling, though one reviewer found the mouse a little too big.

Side buttons received positive notes for feedback and positioning, but some criticism appeared around travel and feel.

Side buttons were broadly praised for placement, crispness, accessibility, and reduced accidental presses.

Software stability had a concern: moving settings to a web server raised worries about future access if the service goes down.

Software usability was the most repeated complaint: no software meant awkward manuals, color LEDs, and button-combo setup.

Software usability was a major win, with Gear Link described as clear, responsive, resource-saving, handy, full-featured, and better than Armoury Crate.

Surface compatibility was solid on pads and several non-glass surfaces, but reviewers still recommended a mouse pad or adjusted LOD on hard surfaces.

Surface compatibility was positive, including praise for tracking on varied surfaces and tempered glass, with one reviewer still recommending cloth pads.

Switch durability evidence came from short-to-medium use outcomes: reviewers said the click feel stayed consistent after intensive sessions.

Switch feel was mostly praised as excellent or snappy, with one early-look reviewer finding the implementation only okay.

Switch feel was generally crisp and clean, though one reviewer found the switches merely okay rather than best-in-class.

Value was mixed: reviewers liked the performance and shape, yet several thought the price was hard to justify against rivals.

Value was mixed-to-positive: reviewers called it competitive or easy to recommend, but several noted the high premium-mouse price.

Reviewers strongly agreed the mouse is impressively light and easy to move, with the 55g class weight repeatedly praised.

The ultralight weight was one of the strongest points across reviews, repeatedly described as excellent, headline-worthy, and easy to move.

Wireless latency impressions were excellent, with reviewers reporting instantaneous responsiveness, no lag, and no delays.

Wireless latency was rated very highly, with reviewers reporting no noticeable delay, little to no input lag, and instant 2.4GHz response.

Wireless performance was praised across reviews for smooth operation, reliable tracking, and no obvious hiccups.

Wireless performance was consistently excellent, with reviewers reporting standout wireless, low interference, lag-free use, and strong real-play results.