Cherry M68 Pro

Cherry M68 Pro Gaming Mouse Review

Brand: Cherry
Released: August 2, 2024
Updated: 2 months ago
4.0
Overall review score
162
Review evidence points
42
Scored features
9
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Cherry M68 Pro if you want a very light, precise, comfortable esports mouse with strong wireless performance. Skip it if you need software tuning, easy wired use, or better value.

Best for

Best for competitive FPS players who want a very light, low-front wireless mouse with strong tracking, stable 2.4GHz performance, and a shape that favors claw or relaxed claw control.

Not for

Not ideal for buyers who need software remapping, exact CPI tuning, visible battery management, comfortable wired play, or a safer palm/fingertip shape.

Verdict

The Cherry M68 Pro lands as a performance-first wireless gaming mouse with broad praise for its sensor, low weight, stable 2.4GHz connection, and low-front shape that many reviewers said improved control. It is especially convincing for FPS and claw-style players who value fast, precise movement over feature depth. The tradeoff is convenience: reviewers repeatedly criticized the software-free setup, manual-dependent button combinations, limited CPI granularity, weak battery visibility, and side-mounted USB-C port. Battery life is good in standard modes but falls quickly at high polling rates, so its esports focus comes with practical compromises.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

42 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    14 (33%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    18 (43%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    7 (17%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    3 (7%)

Pros

  • 4.7
    6 reviews strong consensus
    sensor performance: 4.7, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The Pixart sensor drew broad praise for responsive, accurate tracking, with several reviewers calling it wonderful, snappy, or beautiful in use.
  • 4.6
    6 reviews strong consensus
    weight: 4.6, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers strongly agreed the mouse is impressively light and easy to move, with the 55g class weight repeatedly praised.
  • 4.3
    9 reviews strong consensus
    build quality: 4.3, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Build quality was consistently strong, with reviewers describing the shell as sturdy, solid, well-constructed, or tank-like.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    ergonomic design: 4.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The low-front ergonomic design was widely credited with improving control, grip security, and comfort.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Accuracy and tracking precision: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers consistently found tracking precise and confidence-inspiring, from accurate desktop movement to flawless aim adjustments in games.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    wireless performance: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Wireless performance was praised across reviews for smooth operation, reliable tracking, and no obvious hiccups.

Cons

  • 2.4
    6 reviews strong consensus
    software usability: 2.4, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Software usability was the most repeated complaint: no software meant awkward manuals, color LEDs, and button-combo setup.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    button customization: 2.0, 1 review
    Button customization was limited by the software-free design, especially for remapping and fine adjustments.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    programmable buttons: 2.0, 1 review
    Programmable-button support was weak because reviewers noted that buttons could not be reprogrammed without software.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    palm grip comfort: 2.5, 1 review
    Palm grip comfort was limited for larger hands, with one reviewer specifically calling it cramped in palm grips.
  • 2.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    durability over time: 2.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Durability-over-time evidence was mixed-negative, centered on coating residue and concern about click wobble rather than failures.
  • 2.9
    7 reviews low consensus
    charging convenience: 2.9, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Charging convenience was sharply mixed: quick charging and flexible cables helped, but the side USB-C placement annoyed many reviewers.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Gaming Mice, this product is above average in firmware reliability, balance and weight distribution, 2.4GHz connectivity, near average in glide smoothness, cable flexibility, below average in button customization, programmable buttons, software usability.

Comparison summary

42 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    7 (17%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    22 (52%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    13 (31%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
button customization 2.0 4.3 -2.3
programmable buttons 2.0 4.1 -2.1
firmware reliability 4.5 2.7 +1.8
software usability 2.4 3.9 -1.5
palm grip comfort 2.5 3.9 -1.4
durability over time 2.8 4.0 -1.2
charging convenience 2.9 4.0 -1.1
DPI range 3.5 4.2 -0.7

Consider This Instead

If you want better durability over time

Choose Endgame Gear OP1we. It scores 5.0 vs 2.8 for durability over time, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better button customization

Choose Glorious Model D3. It scores 4.7 vs 2.0 for button customization, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Compared: ultralight gaming mouse competition IGN places the M68 Pro against premium ultralight rivals including the Asus ROG Keris II Ace.
  • More expensive: price and 8K wireless specs TechRadar says the M68 Pro costs less than the Razer DeathAdder V3 Pro while competing spec-for-spec.

FAQ

Is the Cherry M68 Pro good for FPS gaming?

Yes. Reviewers repeatedly praised its precise sensor, stable wireless performance, low weight, and control-focused shape for FPS play.

Does the 8K polling rate make a difference?

Opinions were mixed. Some reviewers noticed smoother, more responsive movement, while others could not detect much difference versus lower polling rates.

How is the battery life?

Battery life is strong in standard or lower polling modes, but it can drop to only a few days at 8K or Pro Gaming settings.

Is the side charging port a problem?

Often, yes. Several reviewers found the side USB-C port awkward for wired use, although quick charging and flexible cables helped in some cases.

Does it have software customization?

No. Reviewers described the software-free design as convenient for plug-and-play use but frustrating for remapping, CPI precision, battery visibility, and settings changes.

What grip style fits it best?

Claw and relaxed claw grips received the most praise. Palm grip can feel cramped for larger hands, and fingertip grip drew more cautious feedback.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Gaming Mice to Consider

#1 ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.6

Choose the ROG Harpe II Ace for ultralight FPS play, precise tracking, smooth glide, and web-based tuning. Skip it if you need palm-grip support, MMO buttons, onboard profiles, or long...

Pros: acceleration control, wireless latency

Cons: onboard memory, MMO gaming suitability

#2 Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.4

Choose it if you want a premium MMO/productivity mouse with 12 adjustable side buttons, strong battery life, and Stream Deck integration. Skip it if you need an ultralight FPS mouse,...

Pros: click latency, macro support

Cons: firmware reliability, tilt gesture controls

#3 Razer Viper V4 Pro
4.4

Best for ultra-light, competition-focused speed, precise tracking, stable wireless, and long battery life. Skip it if you need quieter clicks, left-handed support, Bluetooth, more buttons, or better value for casual...

Pros: balance and weight distribution, build quality

Cons: dock compatibility, Bluetooth support

#4 MSI Versa 300 Wireless 8K
4.4

Best for precise wireless tracking, smooth glide, strong battery life, and unusually good 8K value. Skip it if you need polished software, quiet snappy clicks, true left-handed controls, or gentle...

Pros: Accuracy and tracking precision, click latency

Cons: software stability, profile switching