Compare Cherry M68 Pro vs Cherry M64 Pro

The 2.4GHz connection was praised directly as fast and reliable in competitive use.

The 2.4GHz connection was praised in one review as both fast and reliable.

Reviewers consistently found tracking precise and confidence-inspiring, from accurate desktop movement to flawless aim adjustments in games.

Reviewers praised tracking precision for smooth response, aim adjustments, and accurate shots, with one M64 user calling the experience very good.

The mouse was described as well-balanced by reviewers who focused on weight distribution and in-hand balance.

Balance and weight distribution drew positive comments, with reviewers describing the build as well balanced or having good weight balance.

Battery life was good in standard or lower polling modes, but 8K/Pro modes shortened runtime and battery warnings were a recurring weakness.

Battery life was mixed: several reviews found it strong or good, while IGN said peak-performance use drained it unpredictably.

Build quality was consistently strong, with reviewers describing the shell as sturdy, solid, well-constructed, or tank-like.

Build quality was generally solid, with many reviewers reporting sturdy shells and no creaking, though some found flexing or minor creaks.

Button customization was limited by the software-free design, especially for remapping and fine adjustments.

Button customization was limited in the one scored review, which said the mouse restricts customization.

Button responsiveness was usually praised for quick actuation and reset, though one reviewer treated the buttons as merely fine in-game.

Button responsiveness was mostly reliable, with reviewers saying buttons were fine in game, avoided misclicks, and never misbehaved.

Cable impressions were mixed: reviewers liked the flexible braided/EZcord cables, but side-cable movement could feel encumbered.

Cable flexibility itself was generally liked, but flexible cables did not fully solve the awkward side-charging experience.

Charging convenience was sharply mixed: quick charging and flexible cables helped, but the side USB-C placement annoyed many reviewers.

Charging convenience was the most common drawback, with quick charging and flexible cables offset by an awkward side port.

Claw grip support was a clear strength, with multiple reviewers saying the low-front shape suits relaxed or claw-style control.

Claw grip comfort was generally strong thanks to the low button height, but large-hand users may still feel cramped.

Primary clicks were described as quick, responsive, and swift to reset, supporting low-latency-feeling inputs in the reviewed units.

Click noise was acceptable to positive for some reviewers, but another found the buttons pretty loud.

Click noise was acceptable to mixed, ranging from loud in one review to balanced or mellow in others.

Connection stability was strong, especially over 2.4GHz, with repeated reports of no hiccups, lag, or stuttering.

Connection stability was strong in the scored reviews, with no hiccups, no stuttering, and no reliability problems called out.

Debounce customization had enough increments for preferences in one review, but broader setup friction remained tied to no software.

Debounce customization received negative evidence from one reviewer, who found the lowest debounce setting caused ghost or slam-click behavior.

DPI/CPI coverage was useful for preset users, but reviewers criticized the lack of granular software tuning for non-preset sensitivities.

DPI range was mixed: one reviewer found enough presets to settle in, while another criticized the lack of fine granularity.

Durability-over-time evidence was mixed-negative, centered on coating residue and concern about click wobble rather than failures.

Durability over time was mixed, with one review praising finish wear resistance and another treating click wobble as concerning.

The low-front ergonomic design was widely credited with improving control, grip security, and comfort.

The ergonomic design was usually praised for the thumb groove, low profile, and locked-in feel, but it was less successful for larger hands.

Fingertip grip support was less certain, with one reviewer saying a G Pro X was probably the safer fingertip option.

Fingertip grip comfort was weak in the available evidence because reviewers found the curvature or wider dimensions awkward for fingertip use.

Firmware reliability had limited evidence, but one reviewer found the dongle and mouse firmware update easy.

Firmware reliability had limited positive evidence, with one reviewer calling the dongle and mouse firmware update super easy.

FPS suitability was a major strength, with reviewers praising precise, responsive performance in shooters such as Counter-Strike, Valorant, and CS:GO.

FPS suitability was generally positive for responsiveness and precision, although one reviewer viewed the M64 shape as better for slower-paced play.

Glide was usually smooth and easy, though reviewers noted skates, hard surfaces, or the missing center foot could affect feel.

Glide smoothness was praised, with reviewers describing the M64 as butter smooth and noting excellent glide across surfaces.

Grip texture was mixed: several reviewers liked the traction or rubber grip, while the black coating drew fingerprint complaints.

Grip texture was mixed: reviewers liked the grippy or smooth finish, while one criticized the black coating as a fingerprint magnet.

Left and right clicks were generally solid, easy, and satisfying, though one reviewer noted the M68 felt a little stiffer than the M64.

Left and right click quality was mixed because reviewers noted wobble or a stiff right button despite otherwise usable performance.

Lift-off options were adequate but not standout, and one reviewer had to raise LOD on hard surfaces.

Lift-off distance had limited mixed evidence, with one reviewer needing to switch to 2 mm when using hard surfaces.

Long-session comfort had limited but strong support, with one reviewer reporting no hand fatigue over extended gaming.

Long-session comfort had limited but strong evidence, with one reviewer reporting no hand fatigue after long gaming sessions.

Materials quality was good but imperfect, combining useful traction and durable plastic with residue and fingerprint concerns.

Materials quality was mixed, balancing praise for a non-hollow shell and durable finish against complaints about cheap feel and fingerprint-prone coating.

Motion consistency was a major strength, with reviewers reporting no inconsistencies, no hiccups, and flawless wireless tracking.

Motion consistency was a strength, with reviewers describing smooth response, consistent tracking, and no wireless tracking problems.

Palm grip comfort was limited for larger hands, with one reviewer specifically calling it cramped in palm grips.

Palm grip comfort depended on hand size, with some reviewers able to palm it comfortably while IGN found it cramped for large hands.

The 8K polling rate impressed some reviewers with smooth responsiveness, while others found little detectable difference and noted battery tradeoffs.

The polling rate was generally seen as responsive and smooth, though IGN found the jump beyond 1000Hz hard to notice and tied it to battery drain.

Premium feel was mostly positive due to a solid, non-hollow shell, though one reviewer felt some details were not top-tier.

Premium feel was mixed: some impressions found it solid and distinctive, while IGN said the ultralight design felt a little cheap.

Profile and setting switching was divisive: on-device presets can be quick, but bottom controls and indicator-light workflows were tedious or problematic.

Programmable-button support was weak because reviewers noted that buttons could not be reprogrammed without software.

The scroll wheel was generally smooth, controlled, and pleasant, with a few reviewers describing it as merely okay or not ideal for repeated clicks.

Scroll wheel quality was well received for tactile steps, satisfying use, granular control, and easy movement.

The Pixart sensor drew broad praise for responsive, accurate tracking, with several reviewers calling it wonderful, snappy, or beautiful in use.

Sensor performance was consistently positive, with reviewers reporting good tracking, no hiccups, and reliable behavior even on less-than-ideal surfaces.

Shape comfort was the most polarizing area: several reviewers loved the low, controlled feel, while others found it cramped, wide, or odd.

Shape comfort was mostly praised for a natural, distinctive M64 feel, though reviewers also framed it as a less-safe shape for some users.

Side buttons received positive notes for feedback and positioning, but some criticism appeared around travel and feel.

Side button quality split reviewers: some complained about reach, mushiness, or pre-travel, while others praised the thumb buttons as dependable or exceptional.

Software usability was the most repeated complaint: no software meant awkward manuals, color LEDs, and button-combo setup.

Software usability was polarizing: no-software plug-and-play appealed to some, while others found manual button combinations annoying or tedious.

Surface compatibility was solid on pads and several non-glass surfaces, but reviewers still recommended a mouse pad or adjusted LOD on hard surfaces.

Surface compatibility was positive in the scored review, which found the sensor performed well on plastic and wood surfaces.

Switch feel was mostly praised as excellent or snappy, with one early-look reviewer finding the implementation only okay.

Switch feel was mostly praised as amazing, fast, snappy, and satisfying, though one early hands-on impression was more reserved.

Value was mixed: reviewers liked the performance and shape, yet several thought the price was hard to justify against rivals.

Value for money was highly mixed, with praise from some reviewers but repeated concerns about the 8K upcharge and $139 competition.

Reviewers strongly agreed the mouse is impressively light and easy to move, with the 55g class weight repeatedly praised.

Weight was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly calling the mouse very light, impressively lightweight, or easy to maneuver.

Wireless latency impressions were excellent, with reviewers reporting instantaneous responsiveness, no lag, and no delays.

Wireless latency was praised, with reviewers reporting no lag, no delays, and no wireless-experience issues.

Wireless performance was praised across reviews for smooth operation, reliable tracking, and no obvious hiccups.

Wireless performance was a major strength, with reviewers reporting top-notch, smooth, responsive, and issue-free wireless use.