Compare Cherry M64 Pro vs ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini

P1 Cherry M64 Pro
P2 ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini

Comparison Takeaways

Cherry M64 Pro

Where It Has the Edge

  • debounce customization is 4.2 vs 2.5. Debounce customization is broad on paper, but one reviewer had ghost clicks at the lowest setting while others...
  • polling rate is 4.5 vs 4.1. The Pro model's 8K polling rate is widely documented and usually praised, though some reviewers said they could...
  • click noise is rated 4.0 while the other product has no score yet. Click sound is moderate rather than silent: reviewers described the main clicks as mellow or balanced, though one...
  • scroll wheel quality is 4.2 vs 3.9. Scroll wheel quality is generally solid, with tactile notches, consistent scrolling, and easy movement, though one reviewer described...

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini

Where It Has the Edge

  • RGB features is 3.8 vs 1.3. RGB is intentionally minimal. Reviewers repeatedly note the scroll-wheel-only lighting and customization options, which suits subdued setups but...
  • fingertip grip comfort is 4.5 vs 2.6. Fingertip grip support is explicitly positive in reviews that mention it, with the small low-profile shape described as...
  • button customization is 4.3 vs 2.5. Button and control customization is broadly supported through Armoury Crate or Armoury Crate Gear, with reviewers citing remapping,...
  • premium feel is 4.6 vs 3.0. Premium feel is praised in several reviews through comments about premium impression, masterful feel, and solid execution, despite...
Average score
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.9
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3
2.4GHz connectivity
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6

Reviewers who discussed the radio link described the 2.4GHz connection as fast, reliable, and tied to the larger high-polling dongle experience.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

2.4GHz support is consistently described as a core connection mode, usually through the included receiver or dongle. Several reviewers also tied the 2.4GHz mode to low-latency or higher-performance use, with only the optional high-polling booster adding a caveat.

acceleration control
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Acceleration-related evidence is positive where tested or specified: reviewers noted mouse acceleration being off in testing, a 50G acceleration spec, and zero acceleration or jitter in use.

Accuracy and tracking precision
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6

Tracking precision was a consistent strength: reviewers reported smooth aiming, accurate snapping, and precise response on normal gaming surfaces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Accuracy is one of the strongest areas. Reviewers repeatedly described the mouse as fast, precise, pixel-perfect, or smooth-tracking, though one test noted rattling at very high DPI.

balance and weight distribution
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5

Weight balance was praised when mentioned, with reviewers calling the mouse solid, well-balanced, and free of obvious balance issues despite the low mass.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Balance evidence is mixed but mostly positive. One reviewer found it a little weighted at the back, while another said the balance felt spot on.

battery life
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.8

Battery life is mostly good in standard or mixed polling use, but IGN found peak 8K and Pro Gaming settings could drain it far faster than the rated 90 hours.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Battery life is a major strength across reviews, with quoted runtimes up to 105-139 hours depending on mode and repeated real-use praise for lasting days or weeks.

Bluetooth support
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Bluetooth is well supported as part of the mouse's tri-mode connectivity. Reviewers described pairing, Bluetooth use, and switching as convenient, simple, or painless.

build quality
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Build quality is generally solid for an ultralight shell, though one reviewer found M64 side-wall flex and IGN noted only minor flexing and a slightly cheap feel.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Build quality is generally praised as solid, sturdy, and well built. A few durability/material caveats appear elsewhere, but the shell and structural feel are usually rated positively.

button customization
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.5

Button customization is limited: reviewers found basic mapping or CPI presets, but no software-driven fine control or deeper customization.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Button and control customization is broadly supported through Armoury Crate or Armoury Crate Gear, with reviewers citing remapping, DPI controls, RGB settings, profiles, and other tuning options.

button responsiveness
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Main-button responsiveness is strong overall, with reviewers describing snappy travel, good bounce-back, and reliable actuation during gameplay.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Button responsiveness is praised in the reviews that discuss it, with descriptions such as satisfying, tactile, responsive, bouncy, and precise.

cable flexibility
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.1

The included cable was usually described as flexible or pliant, helping offset the awkward side-port layout when charging or using wired mode.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Cable evidence is limited but positive. Reviewers described the included paracord or braided cable as flexible, thin, high quality, and minimally intrusive.

charging convenience
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.8

Charging is fast enough and possible while playing, but several reviewers criticized the side USB-C port because the cable can feel awkward or drag against the hand.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Charging convenience is supported by USB-C charging and fast charging mentions. Reviewers liked the front USB-C port and quick top-up language where discussed.

claw grip comfort
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.6

Claw comfort depends on hand size: some reviewers liked the low front and relaxed-claw support, while IGN found the small right-handed shell cramped for large hands.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Claw grip comfort is a consistent strength. Multiple reviewers identify the mouse as built or optimized for claw grip, especially for small-hand and esports users.

click latency
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Click latency is supported by adjustable debounce settings, giving users several response-time presets directly on the mouse.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Click latency is supported by NVIDIA Reflex mention, optical switch comments, and reviewer statements about low or lowest possible latency. The evidence is strongest for click speed rather than formal latency testing.

click noise
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.0

Click sound is moderate rather than silent: reviewers described the main clicks as mellow or balanced, though one found them fairly loud.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
No score yet
connection stability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6

Connection stability was consistently positive, with reviewers reporting no lag, stutter, hiccups, or wireless dropouts in normal use.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Connection stability is praised across wireless modes. Reviewers described easy mode switching, lag-free connectivity, no issues across modes, and extender/receiver placement that can reduce signal dropouts.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Cross-platform evidence is narrower but positive. Reviewers used or positioned the mouse across Windows, MacBook, work, gaming, and mobile setups, mainly through Bluetooth and tri-mode connectivity.

debounce customization
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Debounce customization is broad on paper, but one reviewer had ghost clicks at the lowest setting while others praised the selectable 2/4/8/12 ms options.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
2.5

Debounce customization is a weakness where directly discussed. One reviewer said the software does not allow adjusting debounce settings because of the optical switches.

DPI range
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.4

The DPI/CPI range is wide, reaching 26,000, but preset-only adjustment limits fine-grained sensitivity tuning.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

DPI range is a standout specification. Reviewers repeatedly cite the 42,000 DPI/CPI ceiling and app or onboard controls for preset or fine-tuned DPI settings.

durability over time
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.0

Durability evidence is limited but positive around the finish, with Tom's Hardware noting the coating is designed for and withstood visible wear.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

Durability evidence is mixed. Optical switches are rated for very high click counts, but one travel-use review reported exterior scuffing after repeated bag use.

ecosystem integration
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Ecosystem integration is a clear ASUS advantage. Reviewers mention the ROG Omni receiver, multi-device ROG support, Aura Sync, and compatibility with other ROG peripherals.

ergonomic design
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

The M64's right-handed ergonomic shape was a major draw for several reviewers, especially those who liked its low front and thumb groove, though large hands may struggle.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

Ergonomics are strong for small and medium hands, but not universal. Reviewers praised comfort and contouring while cautioning that larger hands may struggle or need a different grip.

fingertip grip comfort
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.6

Fingertip grip drew weak support because reviewers found the M64's curvature awkward for fingertip users compared with palm or claw.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Fingertip grip support is explicitly positive in reviews that mention it, with the small low-profile shape described as accommodating fingertip users.

FPS gaming suitability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3

FPS suitability is strong when tracking and responsiveness matter, though the shape may favor controlled play more than universal fast-flick comfort.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

FPS and esports suitability is a major theme. Reviewers cite competitive play, Counter Strike 2, pro-FPS positioning, and fast accurate control as key strengths.

glide smoothness
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6

Glide quality was praised, with reviewers citing smooth movement, strong PTFE feet, and good glide across multiple ordinary surfaces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Glide smoothness is highly praised. Reviewers cite PTFE feet, smooth glide, easy mousepad movement, and slick slide pads.

grip texture
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.7

Grip texture is mixed: the white coating was seen as grippier and durable, while the black coating was criticized as a fingerprint magnet.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Grip texture is a strength. Reviewers mention ridged sides, grippy coating, matte texture, rubber grips, and anti-slip treatment.

handedness options
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.5

Handedness is limited because the M64 Pro is explicitly a right-handed ergonomic mouse, not an ambidextrous option.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
2.7

Handedness options are limited. Although the shell is sometimes described as symmetrical or ambidextrous, the side buttons favor right-handed use and left-handed users are repeatedly warned away.

left and right click quality
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3

Left and right click quality was mostly praised for feel and reliability, with several reviewers calling the clicks snappy, satisfying, or trouble-free in gameplay.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Main click quality is strong. Reviewers describe the left and right clicks as satisfying, tactile, clear, precise, comfortable, and well implemented.

lift-off distance
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Lift-off distance can be adjusted, typically between 1 mm and 2 mm, and one reviewer specifically needed the 2 mm option on hard surfaces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Lift-off distance is configurable in the sources that discuss it, with High/Low options and software customization noted.

long-session comfort
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5

Long-session comfort is mostly positive from Tom's Hardware, but the side charging cable and large-hand fit concerns limit universal comfort.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Long-session comfort is supported mainly for smaller-hand users and claw/fingertip grips, including explicit extended-session comfort language.

macro support
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

Macro support exists, but one reviewer said full macro options require the heavier Armoury Crate suite rather than only the lighter Gear version.

materials quality
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.4

Materials feel mixed: the shell and UV coating are solid, but IGN felt the ultralight construction made the mouse feel somewhat cheap.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

Materials quality is mostly positive but not spotless. Reviewers mention bio-based nylon, a grippy coating, and premium feel, while some note smudging, scuffs, or skepticism about the material.

MMO gaming suitability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.5

MMO suitability received only indirect support through a standard gaming sensor mode described for lower-precision MMO-style play.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

MMO suitability is only lightly supported. One review says the sensor and responsiveness make the mouse ideal for MMORPG play, but the limited button count keeps this from being a major strength.

MOBA gaming suitability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.2

MOBA suitability is lightly but directly supported by one review, which links the mouse's accuracy and responsiveness to MOBA use.

motion consistency
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5

Motion consistency was a strong theme, with reviewers describing smooth, consistent movement and no obvious tracking irregularities.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Motion consistency is strong in several tests, with crisp, consistent responsiveness and little wavering, but one review saw rattling at 6400 DPI.

onboard memory
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3

On-device settings are a strength for plug-and-play users because key controls can be adjusted directly on the mouse without software.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Onboard memory/control support is positive where mentioned, with reviewers citing onboard controls, ready-on-the-go memory profiles, and direct setting adjustment.

palm grip comfort
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.5

Palm grip comfort is decent for smaller to medium hands, but several reviewers warned the shape or size can be awkward for fingertip users or large hands.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

Palm grip comfort is usable for some smaller-hand users, but larger-hand palm users receive repeated cautions. Scores therefore vary by hand size.

polling rate
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5

The Pro model's 8K polling rate is widely documented and usually praised, though some reviewers said they could not always feel a meaningful difference.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.1

Polling rate support is capable but caveated. Reviews cite 1000Hz out of the box and up to 8000Hz with the optional booster, which several consider a downside at the price.

portability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Portability is a recurring strength because of the compact shape, light weight, dongle storage, and travel-friendly use cases.

premium feel
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.0

Premium feel is mixed: some praised the non-hollow feel, while others felt the quality and finish were not quite top-tier for the price.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Premium feel is praised in several reviews through comments about premium impression, masterful feel, and solid execution, despite material caveats elsewhere.

profile switching
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.0

Profile or sensor-mode switching is available directly on the mouse, with Pro Gaming, Standard, and Low Power modes mentioned.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Profile switching is supported through up to five profiles and onboard/software switching. The evidence also includes criticism that some profile switching controls are clunky.

programmable buttons
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.0

Programmable-button support is basic, mostly limited to standard game or Windows button mapping rather than rich software macros.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Programmable buttons are supported by multiple reviews citing side buttons, six programmable buttons, remapping, and five programmable buttons.

RGB features
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
1.3

RGB is essentially absent, with reviewers repeatedly noting no flashy lighting or special lighting beyond an indicator LED.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.8

RGB is intentionally minimal. Reviewers repeatedly note the scroll-wheel-only lighting and customization options, which suits subdued setups but not buyers wanting major flair.

scroll wheel quality
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Scroll wheel quality is generally solid, with tactile notches, consistent scrolling, and easy movement, though one reviewer described the wheel feel as merely okay.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.9

Scroll wheel quality is mixed. Some reviewers liked its resistance or light actuation, while others found it stiff, soft, or tighter than prior models.

sensor performance
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6

Sensor performance is consistently strong thanks to the Pixart/Pixart 3395-class sensor, accurate tracking, and stable performance on common surfaces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Sensor performance is a major strength. Reviews repeatedly cite the AimPoint Pro sensor, high DPI ceiling, precision, reliability, and rock-solid tracking.

shape comfort
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.9

Shape comfort is the most divisive area: some reviewers loved the locked-in ergonomic shape, while IGN found it cramped for large hands.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Shape comfort is one of the strongest areas for smaller hands. Reviewers praised the fit, compact shape, and mini proportions, while noting limits for larger hands.

side button quality
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.9

Side-button quality is split: some reviewers praised their size and crispness, while others found the M64's side buttons mushy.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Side button quality is generally positive, with praise for placement, feel, and responsiveness, though the right-handed placement limits left-handed use.

skate durability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Skate durability/coverage is supported by PTFE feet, replacement feet, and extra skates in the box. Direct long-term wear evidence is limited, so scores lean positive but not absolute.

software stability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
2.5

Software stability is a weakness where directly discussed. One reviewer reported connection and setting-change errors and restarts needed to get the software working.

software usability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.8

Software usability is polarizing because there is no software; plug-and-play users may like it, but many reviewers found on-device controls tedious or limiting.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.6

Software usability is mixed. Some reviewers found Armoury Crate Gear clean, intuitive, or lightweight, while others found Armoury Crate clunky, hard to locate, large, outdated, or difficult to navigate.

surface compatibility
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.6

Surface compatibility is acceptable on normal plastic and wood surfaces, but glass was reported unusable.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Surface compatibility is strong. Reviewers cite surface calibration, almost-all-surface tracking, glass use, and different mousepad/material support.

switch durability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Switch durability is a clear strength due to repeated 100-million-click optical switch claims and comments about double-click avoidance.

switch feel
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Switch feel is generally good, with reviewers praising snappy, balanced main clicks, though one early impression found the implementation merely okay.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Switch feel is positive overall, with reviewers describing tactile, responsive, snappy, precise, and comfortable switch behavior.

value for money
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.0

Value is mixed to weak: the $139 Pro version performs well, but reviewers questioned the 8K surcharge and compared it against strong software-supported competitors.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.9

Value is mixed. Several reviewers think the price is reasonable versus competitors or sales, while others call it high or note cheaper accurate wireless mice exist.

weight
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.7

Weight is a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly measuring or citing roughly 54-55 grams for the Pro model.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.8

Weight is a major strength, with almost every review emphasizing the roughly 49g ultralight design.

wireless latency
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3

Wireless latency was mostly praised as lag-free, though IGN questioned whether 8K gains are noticeable to average users.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Wireless latency evidence is very positive for low-latency 2.4GHz and SpeedNova use, though the highest polling/latency-reduction path may need an extra booster.

wireless performance
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5

Wireless performance was a strength, with reviewers reporting reliable 2.4GHz operation and no obvious wireless tracking issues.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Wireless performance is broadly praised through reliable 2.4GHz operation, lag-free connectivity, SpeedNova precision, and long wireless battery life.