Compare Cherry M64 Pro vs ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless

P1 Cherry M64 Pro
P2 ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless

Comparison Takeaways

Cherry M64 Pro

Where It Has the Edge

  • long-session comfort is 4.5 vs 3.7. Long-session comfort is mostly positive from Tom's Hardware, but the side charging cable and large-hand fit concerns limit...
  • weight is 4.7 vs 4.2. Weight is a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly measuring or citing roughly 54-55 grams for the Pro model.
  • balance and weight distribution is 4.5 vs 4.0. Weight balance was praised when mentioned, with reviewers calling the mouse solid, well-balanced, and free of obvious balance...
  • ergonomic design is 4.2 vs 3.8. The M64's right-handed ergonomic shape was a major draw for several reviewers, especially those who liked its low...

ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless

Where It Has the Edge

  • RGB features is 3.8 vs 1.3. RGB is modest: mostly scroll-wheel lighting, useful for DPI or battery indication rather than flashy lighting.
  • button customization is 4.5 vs 2.5. Button customization is well supported through Armoury Crate and onboard controls, including remapping, functions, and profiles.
  • fingertip grip comfort is 4.3 vs 2.6. Fingertip grip is one of the best-supported grips, with reviewers repeatedly calling it comfortable and well matched to...
  • software usability is 4.3 vs 2.8. Software usability is generally positive, with Armoury Crate offering clear controls for buttons, DPI, lighting, calibration, and power.
Average score
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.9
Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.3
2.4GHz connectivity
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6

Reviewers who discussed the radio link described the 2.4GHz connection as fast, reliable, and tied to the larger high-polling dongle experience.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.5

Reviewers consistently report working 2.4GHz wireless through the ROG Omni receiver, with SpeedNova called out as the performance-focused mode.

acceleration control
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.5

Acceleration support is strong on paper, with multiple reviews citing the 50g acceleration rating alongside the high-end sensor specs.

Accuracy and tracking precision
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6

Tracking precision was a consistent strength: reviewers reported smooth aiming, accurate snapping, and precise response on normal gaming surfaces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.7

Reviewers agree the mouse tracks accurately and translates movement precisely, especially for quick aiming and fast cursor control.

balance and weight distribution
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5

Weight balance was praised when mentioned, with reviewers calling the mouse solid, well-balanced, and free of obvious balance issues despite the low mass.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.0

Only one review directly discussed balance, finding the AA setup normal while noting balance depends on battery choice.

battery life
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.8

Battery life is mostly good in standard or mixed polling use, but IGN found peak 8K and Pro Gaming settings could drain it far faster than the rated 90 hours.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.6

Battery life is a major strength, with reviewers citing 450-hour 2.4GHz claims and real-world use showing little or no drain.

Bluetooth support
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.5

Bluetooth is consistently supported as the battery-saving wireless mode and a practical alternative to the 2.4GHz receiver.

build quality
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Build quality is generally solid for an ultralight shell, though one reviewer found M64 side-wall flex and IGN noted only minor flexing and a slightly cheap feel.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.7

Build quality is praised across reviews, with sturdy construction, tight fitment, and little wobble despite the removable shell.

button customization
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.5

Button customization is limited: reviewers found basic mapping or CPI presets, but no software-driven fine control or deeper customization.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.5

Button customization is well supported through Armoury Crate and onboard controls, including remapping, functions, and profiles.

button responsiveness
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Main-button responsiveness is strong overall, with reviewers describing snappy travel, good bounce-back, and reliable actuation during gameplay.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.5

Button response is described as crisp, accurate, and dependable, with reviewers highlighting clear actuation and reliable click registration.

cable flexibility
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.1

The included cable was usually described as flexible or pliant, helping offset the awkward side-port layout when charging or using wired mode.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
No score yet
charging convenience
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.8

Charging is fast enough and possible while playing, but several reviewers criticized the side USB-C port because the cable can feel awkward or drag against the hand.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.0

Power convenience is mixed: AA/AAA batteries are easy to replace, but some reviewers disliked the lack of a rechargeable internal battery.

claw grip comfort
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.6

Claw comfort depends on hand size: some reviewers liked the low front and relaxed-claw support, while IGN found the small right-handed shell cramped for large hands.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.2

Claw grip is generally a good fit, especially for smaller hands and users who prefer the mouse’s compact, low profile shape.

click latency
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Click latency is supported by adjustable debounce settings, giving users several response-time presets directly on the mouse.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.8

Click latency is considered excellent thanks to minimal pre-travel, tight button tensioning, and wireless responsiveness close to wired.

click noise
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.0

Click sound is moderate rather than silent: reviewers described the main clicks as mellow or balanced, though one found them fairly loud.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.1

Click noise is moderate to quiet depending on the reviewer; it is audible but not usually described as loud.

connection stability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6

Connection stability was consistently positive, with reviewers reporting no lag, stutter, hiccups, or wireless dropouts in normal use.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.7

Connection stability is a strong point, with reviewers reporting no signal breaks and reliable 2.4GHz radio communication.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.2

Cross-device use is supported by onboard memory, Bluetooth device switching, and replaceable or multi-device ROG receiver support.

debounce customization
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Debounce customization is broad on paper, but one reviewer had ghost clicks at the lowest setting while others praised the selectable 2/4/8/12 ms options.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
No score yet
DPI range
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.4

The DPI/CPI range is wide, reaching 26,000, but preset-only adjustment limits fine-grained sensitivity tuning.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.8

DPI range is a standout specification, with reviewers repeatedly citing the 100-to-36,000 DPI sensor range.

durability over time
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.0

Durability evidence is limited but positive around the finish, with Tom's Hardware noting the coating is designed for and withstood visible wear.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.4

Long-term durability is supported by hotswappable switches, durable click ratings, and reviewers valuing the ability to replace worn parts.

ecosystem integration
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.2

ASUS ecosystem integration is strong through Aura Sync, Armoury Crate, and ROG Omni receiver pairing with compatible peripherals.

ergonomic design
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

The M64's right-handed ergonomic shape was a major draw for several reviewers, especially those who liked its low front and thumb groove, though large hands may struggle.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
3.8

Ergonomics are good for smaller hands and lightweight use, but larger hands or extended sessions can expose limited support.

fingertip grip comfort
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.6

Fingertip grip drew weak support because reviewers found the M64's curvature awkward for fingertip users compared with palm or claw.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.3

Fingertip grip is one of the best-supported grips, with reviewers repeatedly calling it comfortable and well matched to the compact body.

FPS gaming suitability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3

FPS suitability is strong when tracking and responsiveness matter, though the shape may favor controlled play more than universal fast-flick comfort.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.6

FPS suitability is strong because reviewers connect the accurate sensor, low latency, light weight, and fast clicks to shooters.

glide smoothness
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6

Glide quality was praised, with reviewers citing smooth movement, strong PTFE feet, and good glide across multiple ordinary surfaces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.4

Glide is consistently smooth on pads and desks, with PTFE/Teflon feet getting positive comments.

grip texture
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.7

Grip texture is mixed: the white coating was seen as grippier and durable, while the black coating was criticized as a fingerprint magnet.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.2

Grip texture is useful despite no rubber panels, with textured sides and surfaces helping prevent slipping.

handedness options
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.5

Handedness is limited because the M64 Pro is explicitly a right-handed ergonomic mouse, not an ambidextrous option.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
3.7

The body shape is symmetrical, but side buttons on the left make it functionally better for right-handed users.

left and right click quality
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3

Left and right click quality was mostly praised for feel and reliability, with several reviewers calling the clicks snappy, satisfying, or trouble-free in gameplay.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.5

Left and right clicks are well regarded for PBT caps, crisp feel, minimal travel, and precise actuation.

lift-off distance
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Lift-off distance can be adjusted, typically between 1 mm and 2 mm, and one reviewer specifically needed the 2 mm option on hard surfaces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.5

Lift-off distance is adjustable in Armoury Crate or through shortcuts, and reviewers note it can be calibrated.

long-session comfort
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5

Long-session comfort is mostly positive from Tom's Hardware, but the side charging cable and large-hand fit concerns limit universal comfort.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
3.7

Long-session comfort is mixed: the mouse is easy for daily use and small hands, but larger hands may feel cramped.

macro support
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.4

Macro support is present through Armoury Crate, which reviewers specifically mention alongside button mapping and profiles.

materials quality
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.4

Materials feel mixed: the shell and UV coating are solid, but IGN felt the ultralight construction made the mouse feel somewhat cheap.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.5

Materials quality is praised, including PBT main buttons, practical matte plastic, textured sides, and sturdy lightweight construction.

MMO gaming suitability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.5

MMO suitability received only indirect support through a standard gaming sensor mode described for lower-precision MMO-style play.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
No score yet
motion consistency
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5

Motion consistency was a strong theme, with reviewers describing smooth, consistent movement and no obvious tracking irregularities.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.7

Motion consistency is excellent in the evidence, with reviewers reporting no jitter, no disruption, and no lag or stutter.

onboard memory
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3

On-device settings are a strength for plug-and-play users because key controls can be adjusted directly on the mouse without software.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.4

Onboard memory is supported and useful for saving calibrated settings and profiles directly to the mouse.

palm grip comfort
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.5

Palm grip comfort is decent for smaller to medium hands, but several reviewers warned the shape or size can be awkward for fingertip users or large hands.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
3.1

Palm grip support is limited, generally working only for very small hands because the shell is compact and flat.

polling rate
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5

The Pro model's 8K polling rate is widely documented and usually praised, though some reviewers said they could not always feel a meaningful difference.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.2

Polling rate is strong for the price, with 1000Hz 2.4GHz support noted, though Bluetooth can be lower in one reviewer’s testing.

portability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.3

Portability is strong thanks to the compact body, receiver storage, battery operation, and travel-friendly wireless design.

premium feel
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.0

Premium feel is mixed: some praised the non-hollow feel, while others felt the quality and finish were not quite top-tier for the price.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.4

Premium feel is present mainly in build and fit, though the product is still positioned as an affordable ROG model.

profile switching
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.0

Profile or sensor-mode switching is available directly on the mouse, with Pro Gaming, Standard, and Low Power modes mentioned.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.3

Profile switching is well supported through onboard memory, Armoury Crate, and mouse-button shortcuts.

programmable buttons
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.0

Programmable-button support is basic, mostly limited to standard game or Windows button mapping rather than rich software macros.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.2

Programmable buttons are present, especially the side buttons and configurable controls through software.

RGB features
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
1.3

RGB is essentially absent, with reviewers repeatedly noting no flashy lighting or special lighting beyond an indicator LED.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
3.8

RGB is modest: mostly scroll-wheel lighting, useful for DPI or battery indication rather than flashy lighting.

scroll wheel quality
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Scroll wheel quality is generally solid, with tactile notches, consistent scrolling, and easy movement, though one reviewer described the wheel feel as merely okay.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.4

Scroll wheel quality is positive overall, with clear notches, resistance, quiet operation, and precise control mentioned.

sensor performance
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6

Sensor performance is consistently strong thanks to the Pixart/Pixart 3395-class sensor, accurate tracking, and stable performance on common surfaces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.8

Sensor performance is one of the mouse’s strongest areas, with the ROG AimPoint sensor praised for accuracy and high specs.

shape comfort
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.9

Shape comfort is the most divisive area: some reviewers loved the locked-in ergonomic shape, while IGN found it cramped for large hands.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
3.6

Shape comfort is polarizing: compact and familiar for some, but too flat or sloped for others.

side button quality
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.9

Side-button quality is split: some reviewers praised their size and crispness, while others found the M64's side buttons mushy.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.1

Side buttons are usable and generally clear, but the left-only placement limits full ambidextrous use.

skate durability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
3.3

Skate durability is only moderately supported; glide is smooth, but reviews mention faster wear without a pad and no spare feet.

software usability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.8

Software usability is polarizing because there is no software; plug-and-play users may like it, but many reviewers found on-device controls tedious or limiting.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.3

Software usability is generally positive, with Armoury Crate offering clear controls for buttons, DPI, lighting, calibration, and power.

surface compatibility
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.6

Surface compatibility is acceptable on normal plastic and wood surfaces, but glass was reported unusable.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.1

Surface compatibility is good across pads and desk surfaces, though glass is a clear exception.

switch durability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.5

Switch durability is strong, with 50M to 70M click ratings and easy replacement through Push-Fit sockets.

switch feel
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Switch feel is generally good, with reviewers praising snappy, balanced main clicks, though one early impression found the implementation merely okay.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.4

Switch feel is praised as clear, tactile, crisp, and adjustable if users install compatible switches.

value for money
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.0

Value is mixed to weak: the $139 Pro version performs well, but reviewers questioned the 8K surcharge and compared it against strong software-supported competitors.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.4

Value is a recurring strength, with reviewers repeatedly describing the mouse as affordable or a great deal for its specs.

weight
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.7

Weight is a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly measuring or citing roughly 54-55 grams for the Pro model.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.2

Weight is light overall, though the 57g marketing figure excludes the required battery and real use is closer to 68-72g.

weight tuning
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.1

Weight tuning is a useful advantage because AA and AAA battery choices change the weight and battery-life tradeoff.

wireless latency
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3

Wireless latency was mostly praised as lag-free, though IGN questioned whether 8K gains are noticeable to average users.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.6

Wireless latency is consistently praised, with several reviewers finding it close to wired and suitable for gaming.

wireless performance
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5

Wireless performance was a strength, with reviewers reporting reliable 2.4GHz operation and no obvious wireless tracking issues.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Strix Impact III...
4.6

Wireless performance is a core strength, with stable signals, low-latency SpeedNova, and no delay issues reported.