Compare Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 Headphones vs Sennheiser MOMENTUM 4 Wireless Headphones

3.5mm analog support was positive overall because reviewers valued wired flexibility, though one reviewer noted the port requires the supplied USB-C adapter.

Analog input practicality was mixed to negative because wired listening without power degraded significantly in one review.

ANC was seen as good to very good for the price, especially for low-frequency noise, but reviewers repeatedly said Bose, Sony or AirPods Max still do better.

ANC opinions were split: several reviewers found it solid, effective, or excellent, while others called it middling, dated, subpar, or behind Sony and Bose.

Advanced software features were adequate rather than class-leading, with useful app functions but fewer modern extras than some rivals.

Advanced software features were a major strength, with reviewers praising app-based personalization, Sound Zones, and feature execution.

Discreet aesthetics were mostly positive, with praise for subtle branding and finishes, though one reviewer disliked the headband silhouette.

The discreet profile was a plus for one reviewer who preferred the understated, normal-looking design.

ANC background noise was a concern in quieter use, with static or clicking mentioned by multiple reviewers.

ANC background noise handling was mid-pack: the review said it held up but trailed the best competitors.

ANC’s effect on the sound signature was mostly positive, with no tonal shift in one review and a bass boost in another.

ANC effect on sound signature was mildly negative because one review reported a small performance loss with ANC on.

ANC’s audio impact was mixed: some heard no tonal shift or a useful bass boost, while others heard crackle or distracting movement artifacts.

ANC's sound impact was mildly negative because one review heard a small soundstage/imaging loss when ANC was activated.

Android compatibility was positive, with Android USB recognition and Google Fast Pair both described favorably.

Android compatibility was positive because aptX and aptX HD were described as more consistent on Android devices.

The app was generally viewed as useful, simple or feature-rich, though some reviewers saw it mainly as a firmware and EQ utility.

The app was broadly praised as intuitive, useful, and clean, with strong access to EQ, ANC, device management, and other settings.

aptX support was repeatedly treated as a premium strength, especially aptX Lossless and Adaptive for higher-quality Bluetooth playback.

aptX support was evaluated positively, especially for Android consistency and codec flexibility.

Audio-video sync was generally strong thanks to gaming or low-latency modes, though PCMag said latency was reduced rather than eliminated.

Audio-video sync was praised in the video review that found audio and video perfectly aligned.

Auto-play/wear detection was mixed in PCMag because it resumed playback even when the user had paused manually.

Auto-play and wear detection was praised as an important feature that the reviewer felt was implemented well.

Auto power-off was praised as useful for forgetful users and battery conservation.

Auto on/off reliability was mixed, with one reviewer disabling it due to misfires while another found auto-off consistent.

Award recognition was strong because PCMag awarded the P100 an Editors’ Choice.

Award recognition was strong in TechRadar's evidence, which noted the headphones became its headphones of the year for 2022.

Bass was usually described as punchy, controlled and substantial without overwhelming other frequencies, with only one What Hi-Fi comparison finding it short on kick.

Bass was generally praised for punch, warmth, and control, though several reviewers found the stock low end a little heavy, boomy, or occasionally flabby.

Battery life was the strongest consensus feature, repeatedly described as epic, class-leading, insane, benchmark-setting or outstanding.

Battery life was the product's clearest consensus strength, with reviewers repeatedly describing 49-60 hour results as exceptional, class-leading, or nearly worry-free.

Bluetooth performance was generally reliable, with reviewers citing stable pairing, good range, basement roaming and compatibility across devices.

Bluetooth was marked down in one 2025 review because the hardware was described as older compared with newer Bluetooth developments.

Bluetooth 5.3 was treated positively where evaluated, especially as newer, stronger and more reliable.

Bluetooth version was criticized as feeling older in the context of newer wireless standards.

Build quality was consistently strong, with reviewers calling the headphones premium, robust, top-notch or substantial.

Build quality was positive in the supporting review, especially the smoother, sturdier-feeling ear cup mechanism.

Hi-res wired and DAC-related playback were viewed positively, especially USB-C lossless playback and direct wired listening quality.

Built-in DAC and wired playback were praised because wired mode tightened and improved bass compared with wireless.

Physical button controls were mostly praised as simple, tactile and preferable to touch, despite Tom’s Guide finding the control layout imperfect.

Button usability was criticized because the power/Bluetooth button made powering on feel finicky.

Cable quality was praised in Tom’s Guide, which described the bundled audio cables as durable woven fabric.

Cable quality was criticized because the supplied analog cable was viewed as thin and underbuilt for expensive travel headphones.

The case was usually praised for protection, storage and fit, but several reviewers still noted its larger or chunkier footprint.

Case quality was usually praised for protection, structure, compartments, and compactness compared with certain rivals, despite one note that it is large.

Fast charging was praised across reviews, with five-minute top-ups repeatedly described as useful, powerful or impressive.

Charging was viewed positively because a short charge can deliver several hours of playback.

Clamping force was divisive, with some calling it well judged or Goldilocks-approved and others finding the fit tight or pressure-inducing.

Clamping force was consistently positive, with reviewers saying it was gentle, balanced, or just right rather than overly tight.

Codec support was praised as broad and high-end, centered on aptX Lossless and aptX Adaptive, though PCMag still preferred LDAC availability.

Codec support was praised as a strong, price-appropriate list, despite separate criticism elsewhere about missing LDAC and newer lossless Bluetooth options.

Long-use comfort was mixed: many found the P100 comfortable for hours, but Tom’s Guide and PCMag reported discomfort, weight or pressure points.

Comfort was one of the strongest areas, with many reviewers praising long-wear comfort, soft padding, lighter feel, glasses compatibility, and all-day listening.

Connectivity options were a strength, with reviewers valuing Bluetooth, USB-C digital audio, 3.5mm support and included cables.

Connectivity options were strongly praised, especially the mix of Bluetooth, analog, USB-C, and practical fallback listening modes.

Design was generally praised as attractive, stylish and well put together, though a few reviewers found the headband shape or bulk less flattering.

Design reactions were mixed: reviewers liked the functional, understated approach but also called it plain or less original than prior Momentum models.

Detachable cable convenience was positive because the wired option kept the headphones usable across different work and casual listening situations.

Head-tracked 3D audio was a weak area because Stereo Guide recommended Sony, Apple or Bose for that feature set.

Durability evidence was very positive, with reviewers noting no creaks, groans or visible wear after handling and travel.

Durability evidence was mixed: one review called the plastic build not especially rugged, while another long-use video said the headphones still looked pristine.

Ear cup padding was widely praised as soft, plush, well-cushioned or snug without suffocating the ears.

Ear cup padding was praised for being soft, comfortable, and accommodating without making the headphones feel insecure.

Ear cup swivel and rotation were generally useful, though PCMag felt the rotation would matter more if the case supported flat storage.

Ear cup rotation was viewed positively because the rotation felt smoother and contributed to a sturdier fit.

Ecosystem integration evidence was limited but positive, with Google Fast Pair enabling one-tap pairing.

Ecosystem integration was limited for Apple-centric users because one review noted the lack of iOS-only features.

EQ customization was one of the clearest software strengths, with reviewers praising the seven-band EQ and how well the sound responds to tuning.

EQ customization was a strength, with reviewers praising useful app EQ, many options, and accurate frequency adjustment.

Launch features were viewed as adequate to good, but reviewers wanted more modern extras such as spatial audio or more polished software features.

Firmware support was viewed positively where discussed, with the app framed as a path to future features and tweaks.

Frequency balance was generally praised as natural, flat or properly balanced, though PCMag and What Hi-Fi wanted more default liveliness.

Frequency response accuracy was strongly praised by the lab-style review that found the measured response close to its preference curve.

Headband adjustment was positively described as stable, seamless or cleanly integrated into the design.

Headband adjustability was praised for fitting comfortably and adjusting easily.

Headband padding was mixed: one review wanted it softer, while others praised the soft lining or found pressure points after long wear.

Headband padding was a comfort caveat, with reviewers noting pressure concentration or possible digging during careless fit or very long sessions.

What Hi-Fi praised the smoothly rotating hinges as part of the headphones’ assured style and construction.

Immersive audio quality was praised through spatiality, cohesive presentation and a sense of being pulled into the music.

Immersive audio was praised in the supporting review for intimate, holographic vocal presentation.

Included accessories were well received, especially the case, storage pouch and USB-C or 3.5mm cabling.

Included accessories were praised for adding a hard case, cable, and airplane adapter convenience.

Instrument separation was a recurring strength, with reviewers noting clear detail retrieval, distinct vocals and instruments, and strong layering.

Instrument separation was a recurring strength, with reviewers noting resolving performance, spatial separation, and distinct instruments, though one comparison found stronger separation elsewhere.

The integrated microphones were praised by Tom’s Guide for superb speech recognition and accurate vocal capture.

The integrated microphone array was positively described in one test as clearly picking up the speaker's voice.

LDAC was a weakness in the one review that discussed it, because the reviewer preferred LDAC over aptX Lossless for Android hi-res listening.

LDAC was a clear omission for reviewers who wanted higher-bitrate or lossless-style wireless options.

One reviewer praised high-volume clarity by noting zero distortion while highs remained retained clearly.

Maximum-volume clarity was positive in the one supporting review, which said the headphones still sounded great even at max volume.

Microphone noise handling was split: some reviewers heard reduced echo and clear calls, while PCMag found background noise still came through.

Microphone noise reduction was mixed: one reviewer noted issues rejecting noise, while another test found the microphones clearly picked up speech through traffic noise.

Call quality was mixed but mostly favorable, with strong speech intelligibility in some reviews and weaker, distant mic capture in PCMag.

Call quality was inconsistent, ranging from usable in some cases to disappointing when background noise interfered or when walking and biking were considered.

Most reviewers found vocals and mids clear, expressive and well placed, although What Hi-Fi and one YouTube reviewer heard a thinner or less forward midrange.

Midrange reactions were mixed: some reviewers heard clean vocals and exceptional reproduction, while others found the mids less rich, blunted, or not the main strength.

Multi-platform support was generally positive across Android, iOS, macOS and Windows, though Apple wired behavior was less smooth in one review.

Multi-platform compatibility was positive because the wired and wireless options helped across work and casual listening.

Multipoint was a consistent strength, with reviewers reporting smooth dual-device pairing, hitch-free operation or fast switching.

Multipoint was useful when working well, but reliability was mixed because one review reported seamless switching while another saw glitches near previously paired devices.

Passive isolation was viewed positively, with reviewers saying the fit and earcups blocked or reduced outside sound effectively even before ANC.

Passive isolation was a weakness, with reviewers saying the Momentum 4 let in more ambient sound than competitors or had weaker isolation than the prior model.

Overall recommendations were strongly positive, with most reviewers calling the P100 high-value, competitive or easy to recommend, despite some caveats.

Overall recommendation was positive across many reviews, especially for sound, comfort, features, battery, and value, with caveats around ANC, calls, and newer tech.

Portability was a limitation, with reviewers noting the P100 does not fold small and is not among the sleekest or most compact over-ears.

Portability was mixed because the case and non-folding design were criticized despite some travel-friendly organization.

Premium feel was generally strong, with praise for materials, style and finish, though What Hi-Fi noted cheap-feeling earcups.

Premium feel was mixed: one reviewer missed the more premium older build, while another found the textured case and fabric experience high-end.

Preset EQ reactions were mixed: some liked Flat or broader presets, while PCMag said presets did not restore enough energy.

Preset EQ quality was positive where discussed, especially the podcast preset's ability to improve midrange balance.

Replaceable earpads were a recurring repairability strength, with reviewers praising easy replacement and longer-term ownership.

Replaceable pads and battery support were a strong repairability advantage and helped reviewers view the headphones as longer-lasting.

Sensors were praised in one review as a cool wear-detection feature, though other wear-detection attributes show reliability caveats.

Sidetone was praised by one reviewer who liked hearing some of their own voice during calls.

Sidetone was praised by TechRadar for improving call handling and making conversations feel more natural.

Smart listening features were praised in one review as part of a broad feature set intended to elevate the listening experience.

Smart listening features were praised through Sound Zones, which one reviewer found useful and effective in real testing.

Smart Pause performance was weak to mixed, with reviewers reporting delayed, context-insensitive or inconsistent auto-pause behavior.

Smart Pause performance was positive in the review that said the app-enabled features worked as advertised.

Setup and software simplicity were generally strong, with reviewers calling setup child’s play, the interface simple, and controls straightforward.

Setup simplicity was criticized in one video because the app onboarding had too many pop-ups and needed streamlining.

Sound leakage was praised by one reviewer, who found the closed-back design useful for recording because it did not leak externally.

Sound leakage was positive in the one supporting review, which said the closed-back design and pads minimized leakage.

Reviewers broadly praised the P100’s sound as detailed, clean, spacious and high-value, though What Hi-Fi and PCMag wanted more energy or EQ help.

Reviewers overwhelmingly liked the sound, describing it as excellent, detailed, crisp, engaging, or exceptional; criticism focused more on tuning taste than basic audio quality.

Soundstage evidence was positive overall, with reviewers describing wide, expansive, spacious or plausible imaging for a closed-back ANC headphone.

Soundstage was usually considered good for wireless closed-back ANC headphones, with some reviewers praising width while others found it intimate or not as expansive as software-enhanced rivals.

Spatial audio was a clear limitation, with reviewers noting no spatial audio and steering head-tracking seekers toward other brands.

Spatial audio was a weakness in the 2025 video review, which described the feature as weak compared with newer headphone tech.

Stability was weak for active use: reviewers reported looseness, popping with movement, slipping, or suitability mainly for stationary listening.

Stability was limited because the headphones stayed usable for walking but not more active movement.

Repairability and sustainability were major strengths, especially user-replaceable batteries and earpads plus longevity-focused design.

Sustainability and repairability evidence was limited and mixed, with praise for paper/cardboard-forward packaging but a call for better retail hangers.

Sustainable materials were praised, especially recycled content, plastic-free packaging and an eco-conscious design approach.

Sustainability materials were mixed, with paper/cardboard-forward packaging praised but retail packaging improvements suggested.

Touch controls were not implemented, and Tom’s Guide treated that absence as a missed opportunity for the earcup design.

Touch controls were divisive: several reviewers found them intuitive and dependable, while others reported sensitivity, accidental inputs, or startup glitches.

Transparency mode drew mixed-to-positive reactions: several found it useful or natural, while others said clarity and ambient audibility needed work.

Transparency mode was usable but not a standout, with reviewers calling it serviceable while criticizing it as less natural or less crisp than leading alternatives.

Travel friendliness was strong because of battery life and isolation, but softened by the relatively bulky case and non-folding design.

Travel friendliness was mixed because battery and case helped, but weak noise cancellation limited travel and commuting recommendations.

Treble was generally praised for bite, sparkle and articulation without harshness, while PCMag noted some upper-register energy was missing by default.

Treble was mostly viewed as clear and energetic, with praise for shimmer and accuracy tempered by notes about forwardness, sizzle, or slight harshness for sensitive listeners.

USB-C was a strength, especially for charging and wired digital playback, with reviewers praising hi-res wired output and easy computer connection.

USB-C was praised as a meaningful listening option that gives users another practical way to use the headphones.

Value for money was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly saying the P100 competes above its price.

Value for money was a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly describing the Momentum 4 as a bargain, steal, or high-value alternative to pricier rivals.

Voice assistant integration was rated adequate, with Tom’s Guide calling hands-free commands fine and speech capture accurate.

Voice prompts were a standout novelty, especially the Matt Berry/Southwark option that reviewers found unusually enjoyable.

Voice prompts and feedback were criticized for inconsistent verbal and musical cues that made status feedback less clear.

Volume and dynamic output were rated highly, with reviewers describing strong headroom, loud maximum levels and excellent dynamic range.

Volume output drew caution because reviewers said the headphones were quieter than some competitors even though usable listening remained possible.

Water resistance was a weakness in the one review that discussed it, noting there was no water-resistant rating.

Water and sweat resistance was a weakness because the review advised against wearing them in the rain.

Wear detection auto-pause was criticized by Tom’s Guide for not always initiating and sometimes delaying.

Wear detection auto-pause was praised because music paused and resumed automatically in a way the reviewer liked.

Wear detection performance was mixed-to-weak, with reviewers noting delays, context issues or oversensitivity before firmware updates.

Wear detection performance was praised because playback resumed automatically and was described as fantastic.

Weight comfort was mixed: some reviewers felt the weight was distributed well, while others called the headphones heavy, bulky or heavier than rivals.

Weight comfort was positive in one review, which found the headphones relatively light despite being near 293 grams.

Wind and movement noise handling was a recurring concern, with several reviewers hearing wind, popping, footstep or left/right ANC artifacts.

Wind noise handling was praised in one video review, which said the wind reduction worked effectively.