Compare OneOdio Studio Max 2 vs Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones

Analog input flexibility was a standout advantage, with repeated praise for built-in 3.5mm/6.35mm support and wired performance.

ANC is effectively a missing feature in the review evidence, and multiple reviewers treated its absence as a travel or lifestyle limitation.

Software feature depth was better than expected for some reviewers, but one volume limiter failure and some mode limitations kept the score from being uniformly high.

Discreetness was a weakness: multiple reviewers emphasized that the headphones are bulky, large or awkward-looking for public/general use.

One review directly praised the product as visually appealing and authentic.

The app was useful for EQ and settings, but reviewers varied from easy and responsive to barebones, unattractive or unstable.

Latency and sync were the product's strongest consensus point, with repeated praise for no noticeable delay or verified 9ms performance, except for one Bluetooth-mode caveat.

Bass was often described as punchy, controlled, forceful or engaging, but some reviewers found it ill-defined, lighter than classic DJ cans, or lacking low-end level.

Bass was generally praised for control, texture, punch, and warmth, with repeated caveats that sub-bass slam is limited or the low end can feel bloomy.

Battery life was the strongest overall point, repeatedly described as remarkable, absurd, massive or something users rarely need to think about.

Bluetooth was generally reliable, with stable pairing and few dropouts, though some reviewers distinguished it clearly from the superior low-latency transmitter mode.

Build quality was mixed: many reviewers found it sturdy or good for the price, while others criticized plastic, creaks or budget-looking molding.

Build quality was consistently praised as robust, premium, refined, and carefully assembled.

Hi-res playback evidence was positive, especially where reviewers heard good quality or near-wired LDAC playback.

The included USB-C DAC adapter was praised for convenience, but the evidence supports an external adapter rather than a fully built-in headphone DAC.

Physical controls were mostly praised as reachable, tactile and easy, though one reviewer disliked the time needed for track navigation.

Cable quality was positively described where reviewers discussed it, especially the included coiled or stretchy cables.

Cable feedback was mixed: some liked the sturdiness or low microphonics, while others criticized ergonomics, microphonics, or the lack of a balanced option.

The hard case was widely praised as protective, sturdy, premium or a major upgrade, though one review still noted its bulk.

The included case was consistently praised as robust, well-made, useful, and attractive.

Charging evidence was positive, especially fast charging that gives several hours of playback in minutes.

Clamp comfort was viewed positively, with secure or excellent clamping that helped fit without becoming the main discomfort source.

Clamp was mostly comfortable and well distributed, though one review found it a bit tight at first.

Codec support was useful thanks to LDAC and related options, but it came with tradeoffs around dual-device connectivity and mode limitations.

Comfort was highly mixed: some reviewers wore the headphones for hours comfortably, while others found the size, weight, heat or padding fatiguing.

Comfort was one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly praising long-session wearability and Meze’s ergonomics.

Connectivity was one of the most consistent strengths, with praise for wired 3.5mm/6.35mm, Bluetooth and low-latency wireless flexibility.

Connectivity was mixed because USB-C/3.5mm convenience was offset by narrow connectors and the absence of a balanced stock cable.

Design reactions were mostly positive where reviewers focused on looks, with praise for the vinyl-style cups, practical layout and premium-looking details.

Design was a major strength, with reviewers praising the walnut-accented look, vintage-modern styling, and overall visual execution.

The wired fallback and detachable cable setup were consistently useful, especially for passive operation when the battery dies or for secure DJ/studio use.

Detachable cable use was mixed, with secure connection praised but aftermarket cable fit called harder due to the recessed/narrow connectors.

The M2 transmitter and dongle system were central to the praise, with reviewers repeatedly calling the low-latency mode useful, fast and close to wired, despite one stutter complaint.

The USB-C dongle/DAC was received positively as a convenient and classy included accessory.

Durability expectations were positive due to flexibility and a design intended for long-term ownership.

Ear cup padding was generally praised as soft, spacious, memory-foam-like and comfortable, even in reviews that criticized the headband or weight.

Earpads were widely praised as soft, plush, comfortable, and well made.

Swivel and rotation range were a clear strength, repeatedly praised for 180-degree movement, DJ monitoring and flexible folding.

Cup articulation was praised for helping fit and seal, with one review noting broad pivoting movement.

Custom EQ was valuable for taming the tuning, especially brightness, but one review found its EQ modes made music crunchier.

Find My was positively received where tested, especially by reviewers who liked being able to locate the headphones.

Frequency response was one of the biggest tradeoffs: reviewers noted useful DJ impact and detail but also emphasized non-flat tuning, low-end gaps, bright boosts and poor reference accuracy.

Tuning was described as smooth, balanced, and coherent by many, but not neutral; several reviewers noted colorations and divisive response traits.

Headband adjustment was judged practical, with enough room for larger heads and stepped adjustments that help repeat fit.

The self-adjusting headband was repeatedly praised for fit, convenience, and comfort.

Headband padding was a repeated weakness, with several reviewers describing thin padding, digging, hot spots or a need for better cushioning.

One review praised the headband’s pressure distribution across the top of the head.

Only one review raised hinge durability as a concern, specifically around long-term plastic hinge wear despite no short-term failures.

Gaming-style immersion received limited but positive evidence from one reviewer who found the reproduced environment spacious and clear.

Immersive audio was a repeated strength, with reviewers describing lifelike, emotional, three-dimensional, or enveloping presentation.

Included accessories were well received, with reviewers saying the box includes the needed cables, case and enough extras for most uses.

Included accessories were positively viewed, especially when tied to the case, adapters, cable, and overall value.

Separation was a strength in the more positive reviews, with praise for clarity and micro-detail, though one reviewer noted separation can suffer in dense bass-heavy tracks.

Instrument separation and imaging were consistently praised, with reviewers highlighting precise placement, strong layering, and easy focus on individual sounds.

Integrated microphone usefulness was limited in one review because headset use was not possible in the low-latency transmitter mode.

LDAC drew qualified praise for added detail and near-wired playback in some reviews, while another noted connection stability can vary.

Maximum-volume behavior was praised where tested, with reviewers saying the headphones stayed punchy or comfortable without becoming harsh.

One review specifically said the headphones kept dynamics intact at louder volumes.

Midrange comments leaned positive when reviewers discussed tracking or vocals, though one review found vocals overcrowded and another described the midrange as not the main focus.

Midrange was often treated as a strength, especially for clarity, timbre, and vocals, but a few reviewers noted forwardness, hollowness, or harshness with some voices.

Platform compatibility was praised for covering mixers, gaming PCs, smartphones, iPhones, Android devices and studio equipment.

Source and platform compatibility was strong overall, with reviewers saying it works well from phones, laptops, DAPs, and varied sources.

Multipoint was appreciated for convenience, but reviewers noted tradeoffs: LDAC can disable it, and some app-supported features only work in Bluetooth mode.

Passive isolation was inconsistent: some found it good or decent, while DJ-focused reviewers said it was only moderate or not strong enough for loud environments.

Passive isolation was considered weak or reduced, which reviewers framed as expected for an open-back design.

Overall recommendations were context-dependent: most reviewers endorsed them for DJs, creators or low-latency users, while several warned against everyday, travel or pro-mixing use.

Overall recommendation was positive across most reviews, though not unanimous; one reviewer found it not fully competitive on sound alone.

Foldability helped portability, but the large headphones and case still limited everyday bag friendliness.

One review framed the headphones as relatively portable-friendly for an open-back design.

Premium feel was praised by reviewers who focused on first impressions, price-relative presentation and the in-hand feel.

Premium feel was a clear strength, with reviewers emphasizing luxury materials, refined styling, and ownership experience.

Preset EQ quality was uneven: some reviewers found Monitoring useful, but others criticized Music or Bass presets as static-filled or muffled.

One review confirmed removable pads as part of the serviceable construction.

Repair-related replaceability was poor in the only scored review, which noted there were no replaceable parts compared with some competitors.

Replaceable pads/headband were praised as part of the long-term serviceable design.

Smart features were seen as useful in one review, but a wear reminder was personally unwanted in another.

Setup was generally simple and quick, particularly for transmitter pairing, though one app download path caused a security-block issue.

One review found leakage lower than expected for an open-back headphone.

Reviewers were sharply divided: some heard detailed, enjoyable or faithful sound, while several others criticized muddy, muffled, static-heavy or non-professional tuning.

Most reviewers praised the 105 Silva’s sound as musical, engaging, and refined, though one measurement-focused review found it less competitive acoustically.

Soundstage impressions were mixed, ranging from average or closed-in to reasonably wide and useful for gaming or general listening.

Soundstage impressions were mixed: several heard expansive or organized staging, while others found the stage narrower, modest, or not especially deep.

One review praised the front-to-back and left-to-right spatial definition.

Wear stability received one negative review, where the headphones moved around while walking.

Fit stability was praised in the reviews that addressed it, with no slippage and secure head fit noted.

Repairability and sustainability were strong positives, with reviewers emphasizing disassembly, serviceability, and replaceable parts.

Transparency mode evidence was weak to negative: one reviewer found conversation hard to hear, and another said the feature was absent altogether.

Travel friendliness was mixed: the hard case and battery help, but bulk and lack of ANC made several reviewers reject them for travel.

Travel friendliness was mixed: reviewers liked the case and some outdoor practicality, but open-back leakage and size limited true portable use.

Treble was commonly energetic and crisp, but several reviewers found the top end bright, fuzzy, sharp, tinny or fatiguing depending on music and volume.

Treble drew strong praise for clarity, air, and refinement, while several reviewers warned about spice, sizzle, or timbral issues on brighter recordings.

USB-C received limited but positive evidence as a welcome modern connection.

USB-C support through the included adapter was positively received for convenience and pleasant out-of-box use.

Value was strong for the intended low-latency niche, though reviewers warned the price is less compelling for ordinary Bluetooth listening or upgrading from the first model.

Value was mostly positive, especially for build, sound, accessories, and price, though competition at $500 was noted.

Voice prompts were useful for connection feedback, but one reviewer found their default volume too loud.

Volume output was a concern in two different directions: one reviewer found minimum volume too loud, while another said the headset was not as loud as a comparison OneOdio model.

Reviewers repeatedly found the headphones easy to drive and capable of high volume from modest devices.

Weight comfort split reviewers: some called the headset heavy, while others still found it light enough or manageable for long use.

Weight comfort was praised because the headphone feels lighter than expected and distributes weight well.

Xbox compatibility had one positive test, with lip-sync and game audio landing correctly through an Xbox controller.