Compare Kenmore Bagless Upright Vacuum Lift vs Dyson Ball Animal 2 Upright Vacuum Cleaner

Most reviews mention a useful kit including a 3-in-1 combo tool (crevice/dusting/upholstery) plus a powered or rotating pet handymate tool for stairs and furniture.

Included tools (combination/crevice, stair, turbine/pet tools, and variant-specific extras) are generally seen as useful, though at least one review finds the turbine tool underpowered.

Area rug handling can be challenging: several reviewers note the vacuum may stick, pull up mats, or feel overly aggressive on certain rugs due to strong suction and head design.

Assembly/setup is described as straightforward in an unboxing-style review, with quick connections for wand and hose and minimal fuss.

Assembly is consistently described as straightforward with a few click-in parts and minimal setup time.

The bin is described as adequately sized and easy to remove, with users noting it can capture surprising amounts even after a recent cleaning with another vacuum.

Bagless bin capacity is described as large (roughly 0.48–0.55 gal / about 2L), supporting longer sessions; sealing is generally good, with occasional minor leakage notes in lab testing.

Build quality impressions are mixed: several reviewers describe the unit as solid and well-built for the price, but at least one owner reports cracked hose components.

Build quality is often described as robust with durable plastics, but a minority of comments call out cheaper-feeling hose/handle plastics.

High-pile performance is described as good but more situational; at least one user notes using the brushroll on very high pile despite some carpet guidance against it.

High-pile carpet results are mixed: suction is strong, but several reviews report it can be difficult to push or it may struggle to capture larger debris sitting high in the pile.

Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently rated strong, with lab-style tests and user demos showing thorough debris removal.

Low-pile carpet performance is a consistent strength, with strong debris and hair pickup reported across both consumer and test-focused reviews.

Medium-pile pickup is a standout, including at least one report of a 100% deep-clean style test and other tests in the high-90% range.

No summary yet.

Debris flow is generally reliable, but a narrow wand/tube can clog if large items are picked up, and hair tangling around the brush can add periodic clearing.

In head-to-head comparisons, reviewers often rank Kenmore favorably versus similarly priced uprights for suction, usability, and pickup, while conceding competitors may offer longer warranties or different conveniences.

Comparative discussions often place it among the most powerful uprights tested, though some reviewers prefer newer or less expensive competitors depending on features and value.

Controls are generally simple and intuitive, including floor-type switching on some models and suction-control vents on the hose/wand in at least one review.

Controls are simple and functional, commonly including suction-level selection and brush control; most feedback is positive with few learning-curve complaints.

Cord length is repeatedly called out as generous (around 30 ft), improving room-to-room reach without frequent outlet changes.

Cord length and reach are strong for a corded upright (often cited around 30–35 ft cord and extended total reach), reducing outlet changes during cleaning.

Cord management is functional but not premium; wrapping is often manual, and retractable-cord convenience is referenced as a feature competitors may offer instead.

Cord wrap and basic cord management are mentioned as straightforward and adequate for storage.

Crevice/groove pickup is a reported weak spot on some versions, tied to design choices that reduce sealing at the floor for better large-debris intake.

Crevice and groove pickup is often called out as a strong point thanks to high suction, though fine powder in floor gaps can still require extra passes or tool use.

Cyclone system is repeatedly credited for strong, consistent pickup and maintaining performance room-to-room, with only occasional notes that floorhead design (not suction) limits large-debris pickup.

No summary yet.

Ease of use is repeatedly framed as a highlight due to swivel steering, lift-up/away versatility, and simple emptying, with only under-bed access and weight as recurring friction points.

Reviews mention this area with mixed to positive feedback overall (average score about 4.20), with performance varying by flooring, settings, and user expectations.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is repeatedly rated near the top, with strong edging tests and effective side channels at the floorhead.

Emptying is commonly described as quick and low-effort with push-button release, though routine upkeep (filters/brushroll) matters for maintaining performance.

Emptying is commonly described as quick and hygienic (one-button or point-and-shoot style), with minimal need to touch debris.

Multiple testers call out a sealed HEPA air path that keeps fine dust and allergens contained, and smoke/leakage style tests are reported as passing well for the price tier.

Whole-machine HEPA filtration and washable filters are praised for allergen control, though one lab-style review noted the system can be only partially sealed over years of use.

Self-adjusting floorhead design improves sealing and surface adaptation, but multiple reviewers say it can sit too close and push larger debris or reduce usability on some rugs.

On carpet, testers report very high pickup performance (often high-90% results) and strong pet hair removal, especially in medium/low pile situations.

Carpet hair pickup, especially pet hair, is repeatedly rated excellent and aligns with the product positioning for homes with shedding animals.

Hard-floor hair pickup is generally described as effective, helped by strong airflow and floorhead design; some versions emphasize better performance than similarly priced rivals.

Tangle resistance is mixed: some tests show hair wrapping on the brushroll (especially longer hair), while other variants include hair-eliminator features that reduce buildup.

Long-hair management is a weak spot on the main brush in some objective testing (notable tangling reported), even though pet-hair pickup is strong and some turbine tools resist tangles.

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is described as above average, supported by strong suction/airflow measurements and visible debris capture with headlights.

On hard floors, fine dust pickup is generally strong, but multiple tests note residue can remain in cracks/crevices (e.g., flour between boards) depending on technique and settings.

Large debris intake is noted as unusually capable on some variants due to wider front gates, improving chunky pickup versus many uprights at similar prices.

Large-debris pickup is inconsistent: some reviewers get solid results with the correct head setting, while others report the self-adjusting head can push cereal/large bits instead of ingesting them.

LED headlights are mentioned as genuinely helpful for spotting debris in darker areas and along typical cleaning paths.

Multiple sources note the floorhead lacks LED headlights, which can make it harder to see debris in darker spaces.

Hose durability is specifically criticized in one report that mentions cracking and snapping, suggesting the hose can be a weak point if stressed or used heavily.

Hose and wand reach are frequently praised for above-floor work (stairs, corners, behind furniture), though one reviewer notes the wand/tube can feel narrow for larger items.

A few comments suggest kid-friendliness via safety behavior when parked upright (rollers/brush not spinning), though overall usability still depends on handling the unit's weight.

Maintenance is emphasized for bagless performance: multiple reviews mention regular filter cleaning and occasional brushroll hair removal, with outcomes (tangles, suction consistency) improving when upkeep is done.

Maintenance is viewed as simple: wash filters on a schedule, empty the bin, and occasionally clear hair/debris from the brush or airway.

Handling is generally praised with responsive swivel steering and easy navigation around furniture, though the weight can still feel cumbersome for carries.

Noise is commonly described as loud for a corded upright, with test numbers around the high-70 dB range and user notes that it can be noticeable at higher power.

Noise impressions vary by test: some measurements place it in the high-60s/low-70s dB range while others find it louder; overall it is not silent, but generally within typical upright ranges.

Onboard storage for key tools and brackets is appreciated for keeping frequently used attachments accessible without a separate bag.

Ongoing costs come up mainly via filters, with one complaint that replacements feel expensive; multiple reviewers stress routine filter cleaning to preserve bagless performance.

Durability/longevity is the most polarized theme: some short-term impressions are positive, while a negative owner report describes early motor failure within months.

Overall sentiment skews positive in test-focused and owner demo reviews, but there is at least one strongly negative experience centered on early failure and repairability.

Overall sentiment trends positive on cleaning power and results, with the most common drawbacks being weight, high price, and occasional usability quirks on rugs/tight spaces.

Pet capability is repeatedly highlighted via the included pet tool and strong carpet pickup, though brushroll hair management varies by model and user cleaning habits.

Pet-focused performance is a highlight, with strong pet-hair pickup and useful pet tools, though tool effectiveness can vary by included kit and expectations.

Value is a consistent strength: reviews frame these Kenmore uprights as delivering near-premium pickup and sealed HEPA features at a notably lower price.

Price is a frequent criticism: many reviewers call it expensive, recommending it most when discounted or when maximum suction matters more than cost.

Stair cleaning is a strong use case when leveraging lift-up/away mode and the pet tool, making the weight less of a barrier than a traditional full-unit carry.

Stair cleaning is a standout: the long hose/wand reach lets users clean many steps from one position, reducing the need to carry the main body upstairs.

Bulky storage footprint and upright-stand behavior show tradeoffs: some users report an finicky click/lock into the upright position and overall size that can be harder to store.

Across reviews, Kenmore’s Lift bagless uprights are described as very strong for a corded upright, with suction readings around the low-20 kPa range in testing and noticeably aggressive pull on carpet in home use.

Reviews consistently describe class-leading suction that deep-cleans carpets and pulls embedded debris, but the strength can make the vacuum feel grabby on plush carpet and some rugs.

Reliability and warranty confidence is mixed, with comparisons noting shorter warranty terms than some competitors and at least one report of repeated shutdown/no-power issues.

Tool changes are described as easy, with combo tools that switch modes quickly and attachments that lock into place without much effort.

Tool swaps are typically described as quick click-on/click-off, making it easy to move between floor cleaning and above-floor attachments.

Under-furniture access is a common tradeoff: the main head may not fit under low beds, but lift-up/away plus hose/tools can partially compensate.

Under-furniture reach is limited for an upright; bulk and the ball housing prevent cleaning far under low-clearance furniture without moving items or switching to the wand.

Above-floor performance is supported by long reach wands and the included tools, with upholstery and ceiling reach called out as practical benefits.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning are frequently praised when using the turbine and combination tools, especially for furniture and blankets with hair.

Versatility is good for an upright via wand and tools, but it is not a true convertible handheld and can feel less flexible than lift-away or cordless designs.

Weight is consistently in the mid-teens (about 14–15 lb), which is manageable for a corded upright but noticeably heavier than cordless options.

Multiple reviewers flag the unit as heavy (roughly 16–17.5 lb), which can add arm strain during whole-home cleaning or when carrying it between floors.